John R. Houk
© August 9, 2015
In Western Europe representative democracy is very elastic in relation to the rule of law. The rule of law is not etched in stone so-to-speak. Rather the rule of law is largely shaped to the paradigm of Multicultural Diversity and the whims of the various national parliament or legislatures. European legislatures in themselves are their constitutions. Those constitutions enact laws that are rarely checked by the desires of the electorate. The only political available to voters is when a legislative coalition of multiple political parties break down causing a voters referendum of their representation thus aligning the ruling elites to form or confirm a ruling legislative coalition. Nearly all politics in Europe are centrist, center-Left are just down right Leftist. That means no matter how disgruntled the electorate might be with a foreign Muslim culture disrupting the local cultural heritage, Multiculturalism will rule the day.
The only way for Europeans to end the Islamic cultural threat to European heritage is for a plurality of voters elect a combined political coalition that makes counter-cultural Muslim immigration persona non gratis and illegalize counter-culture Sharia Law. The difficulty for the European electorate is that they are so sold on a Socialist-Democratic paradigm for big government entitling citizens that there is not a center-right affiliation that will stamp out the counter-culturalism of Islam and maintain the entitlement programs the Europeans so love.
As much as President Barack Hussein Obama and his Left Wing Dem Party cohorts have done their utmost to Europeanize our American society with an anti-Christian and Social-Democrat political paradigm, he still is receiving significant push-back from Biblical-Christians, limited government Conservatives and preserving Originalism Constitutionalists. The problem for the American electorate that are pushing back against Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America” is that their political leadership is too dominated by Establishment Centrist Republicans who are only upset that Obama has gone too far to the Left.
If We the People that pushing back for our traditional Constitutional Rights emplaced by our Founding Fathers are to preserve our culture we will have to contend with Obamacrats and Establishment Centrists (more commonly known as RINOs).
As to Islam and Religious Liberty: I am totally supportive of people practicing the religious faith of their choice. This is the case even though the American Founders had variations of Christian Denominationalism or atheism in mind pertaining to Religious Liberty; rather than every Tom, Dick and Harry non-Christian religion.
But let’s be honest. There is not a single major religious faith that has among its tenets to overthrow the ruling order and impose itself by force on peoples or nations other than Islam. Sure enough rulers that believed in their favorite religious faith imposed their paradigm on their people and desired to export their religious faith by force if necessary; HOWEVER that was NOT according to their religious tenets – Unfortunately that includes Christianity’s history as well.
Even though a Muslim apologist might tell you there is no compulsion of religion in Islam, that assertion is very deceptive. What they really mean or don’t understand what they mean (you’d be amazed how many Muslims do not have a good handle on their Islamic tenets), there may be no compulsion outright to convert to Islam; however if one insults Islam it is a crime Quranicly speaking – worthy of death.
God help the Christian who tells a Muslim in an Islamic dominated society that Mohammed was a false Prophet compared to Jesus Christ the Son of God who was crucified to death and arose bodily with His Godly attributes intact as part of three distinct persons inhabiting the unity of ONE God. If the Muslim mob doesn’t kill that Christian, then the Muslim government will indict that Christian for blasphemy and sentence the person to prison or death.
If Christians do not conform to the superiority of Islam in a Muslim nation those Christians can expect loss of livelihood, property and person.
And this is why I am supportive of a Constitutional Amendment that singles out all religions that have tenets considered as holy and sacrosanct that contradicts the rule of law embedded in what we call the Bill of Rights that those adherents are not allowed to immigrate to the USA. Adherents already in the USA that cannot commit to the Bill of Rights should face incarceration if they are a citizen or expulsion if they are a legal immigrant even if that status is political asylum.
Just for clarity’s sake let’s take the First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (U.S. Constitution - Amendment 1; USConstitution.net)
If a religion infringes on the free exercise of another religion by advocating violence, then the infringing religion is proscribed of practicing the violent tenets. For example in Biblical Christianity sets forth that Jesus Christ in the ONLY WAY to the path to God. YET the New Testament specifically proscribes violence to make others believe in Jesus as The Way.
The Quran contrarily tells its adherents to spread Islam by converting, forcing the submission of the superiority of Islam or death:
Are Muslims permitted to force others into accepting Islam?
Muslims are told to fight unbelievers until they are either dead, converted to Islam, or in a permanent state of subjugation under Muslim domination. Allowing people of other faiths to live and worship independently of Islamic rule is not an option.
Qur'an (8:39) - “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.” Translation from the Noble Quran
Qur'an (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." Suras 9 and 5 are the last "revelations" that Muhammad handed down - hence abrogating what came before, which includes the oft-quoted verse 2:256 -"Let there be no compulsion in religion...".
Qur'an (9:5) "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them..." Prayer and charity are among the Five Pillars of Islam, assalat and zakat. See below. Islam sanctions violence as a means of coercing religion.
Qur'an (9:11) - (Continued from above) "But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then are they your brethren in religion" This confirms that Muhammad is speaking of conversion to Islam.
Quran (9:56-57) - "And they swear by Allah that they are most surely of you, and they are not of you, but they are a people who are afraid (of you). If they could find a refuge or cave or a place to enter into, they would certainly have turned thereto, running away in all haste." This refers to people living among Muhammad's own people who may not be true believers, but have to pretend to be in order to survive. They have no safe refuge to which to escape the Muslims. If Islam were a religion of peace, then why the fear?
Qur'an (2:193) - "And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion be only for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrong-doers." The key phrase is to fight until "religion be only for Allah."
Qur'an (3:83) - "Are they seeking a religion other than Allah's, when every soul in the heavens and the earth has sub mitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?" So much for the earlier verse (2:256) stating that there is "no compulsion in religion".
From the Hadith:
Sahih Muslim (1:33) The Messenger of Allah said: "I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer and pay zakat." The first part of this condition is the Shahada, or profession of faith in Islam. Violence is sanctioned until the victims embrace Muhammad's religion.
There is absolutely NOTHING in the Bible comparable to these revered Islamic writings!
AND SO, I am going to have to agree with Dajjal along these lines: Get wise, expel Muslim immigrants refusing to follow the Constitutional Rule of Law, incarcerate Muslim citizens who refuse to follow the Constitutional Rule of Law and prevent the future immigration of Quran/Sharia revering Muslims. While Conservatives are waging a competition for the hearts and minds of American voters with the American Left, a Quran/Sharia compliant American society will destroy the both the American Left and American Right with intolerant Islam.
Dajjal Thought on ‘Sex Slaves, Beheadings and Twitter Terrorism’
Multiculturalism??! Sharing space with a tribal honor/sham culture that holds you to be rebels against their god, najis [Interesting thought on najis in relation to Iran Nuke Deal] things on a par with dogs and excrement! Muslims believe that Allah is greater; that believers, therefore are superior. Your blood and property are not sacred to them.
They could not conquer you on the battlefield, so they are invading, occupying, out breeding you and will eventually out vote you. Their burden on your welfare systems is bankrupting you. You are feeding, clothing, housing and educating the Muslim hordes that will supplant and enslave you.
Radicalism, radicalization, extremists & extremism are camel excrement. Those false memes obscure the fact that Islam is intrinsically evil. Unholy war, terrorism & genocide are intrinsic sacraments of Islam and cannot be severed from it.
They go to war in Syria because it is their obligation: fard al-ayn. Go to war or go to Hell as per Surah At-Taubah 38 & 39. Fight those of the disbelievers nearest you; what part of that do you not comprehend- 9.123? What part of 9.120 is too complex or arcane for you to understand; Allah gives Brownie Points to terrorists?
Get wise: expel the Muslims and do not admit any more of them.
Submit to Constitution or LEAVE
John R. Houk
© August 9, 2015
Dajjal Thought on ‘Sex Slaves, Beheadings and Twitter Terrorism’
All explanatory links are by the Editor.