Overblog Follow this blog
Administration Create my blog
March 24 2012 7 24 /03 /March /2012 11:10

Mohamed-Merah---Jihadi-Murderer.jpg

 

The West not only ignores the emergence of global Anti-Semitism but also facilitates the hatred of Muslims toward non-Muslim – especially Jews – by ignoring the writings, speeches and words of hate that come from Islamic sources.

 

Carolyn Glick examines this hatred of Jews projected from Muslims with the latest act of infamy occurring in Toulouse, France.

 

JRH 3/24/12

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
March 22 2012 5 22 /03 /March /2012 11:57

Walker-v-Union-Machine.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© March 22, 2012

 

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is facing a recall election because of the sour grapes and vilification of Unions and Leftists. In a failed effort to reverse successes achieved by Governor Walker the Leftist Dems and Unions tried to regain the Senate majority be doing a recall election of State Senators. The ploy failed! The Republican remained the majority political party.

 

So the Dems and Unions set their eyes on Governor Walker himself. The Governor faces a recall election on June 5. The path to the recall already demonstrated probable voter fraud to register signatures on petitions as legal voters. When the Walker camp wanted to examine the signatures to verify they registered voters rather than dead people or Mickey Mouse, a Wisconsin Judge nixed the examination.

 

The refusal of the State Appellate Court to uphold the original ruling of the State Circuit Court seemed a bit suspicious. Twenty-nine Wisconsin Judges had signed the recall petition to dump Governor Walker. These 29 Judges should have recused themselves from any Court cases involved with a recall election and especially pertaining to the validity of petitions put forth by the corrupt Unions and the nefarious Leftist Dems.

 

So what has raised the ire that Unions and Dems are resorting to machine politics of yesteryear against Governor Scott Walker?

 

 

Walker is the target of a recall effort funded by national labor unions. Why? Reforms he made to balance the budget have dramatically diminished the influence of public employee unions. If not reversed, these reforms will inspire similar efforts across the country, and the outsized power of public sector unions will finally be reined in.

 

 

Walker came to office in the Republican wave of 2010. He inherited a mess. Under his profligate predecessor, Jim Doyle, state government had operated almost as a slush fund for public employee unions. Giveaways to teachers and others put the state on an unsustainable fiscal path, so Doyle raised some taxes and threatened to raise others. He raided a state fund set up to cover medical liability, essentially stealing contributions doctors had made to the pooled account. The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled against that pilfering, but the money had already been spent. Even after budget gimmickry that would make Fannie and Freddie blush, the official deficit was $3.6 billion.

 

Just over a year later, Walker and the Republicans in the state legislature have nearly eliminated the deficit. For the two-year budget cycle, the state will show a $143 million shortfall because the stagnant economy has resulted in lower tax receipts than had been projected. But the shortfall is for the first half of the cycle; Wisconsin will run a surplus in the current fiscal year. And Walker said last week that he will eliminate the remaining shortfall without raising taxes. It’s a credible claim. He reduced the deficit without raising taxes. In fact, one of his first moves upon being sworn in was to cut taxes on businesses. His subsequent reforms have allowed property tax receipts to go down for the first time in years—by some $47 million.

 

The recall vote Walker faces comes because of these results. The key to his success was his restructuring of health and retirement benefits for many state employees, asking them to contribute 5.8 percent of their salary to their pensions (up from 1 percent or less) and to pay 12.6 percent of their health insurance premiums (up from 6 percent or so).

 

 

The unions correctly understood these changes as a mortal threat. Without compulsory membership, unions would lose a major source of funds. And without the ability to bargain collectively for benefits, the unions would lose their most compelling argument to convince public employees to contribute a chunk of their income—in many cases more than $1,000 per year—for the privilege of membership. So they took to the streets in massive numbers and pressured the Democrats they’d elected to do everything possible to sabotage Walker’s plan. Democrats in the state senate fled to Illinois. Protesters occupied the state capitol. The fight captured national attention for months in 2011.

 

The unions lost that battle, but they did not give up the war. They launched an aggressive effort to recall several Republicans in the state senate with the hope of reversing the reforms before it became clear that they were working. They spent heavily—an estimated $30 million—and lost again.

 

Meanwhile, the results of the changes began coming in. In Milwaukee, the reforms saved some $11 million, an embarrassing windfall for Democratic mayor Tom Barrett, who had predicted that the city’s structural deficit would “explode.” Localities across the state have seen similar savings. There is no disputing the central fact of Walker’s tenure as governor: His reforms are working.

 

That’s a huge problem for the public employee unions as they try to convince Wisconsinites that the man responsible for this dramatic turnaround should be recalled. So they’re focusing on two other issues: his 2010 campaign and an investigation into the activities of former Walker employees.

 

 

In light of the success of Walker’s reforms, complaining about what he said in 2010 seems unlikely to win many votes. So Walker’s opponents want to change the subject. Last week, Mike Tate, chairman of the Wisconsin Democratic Party, toured the state in an attempt to link Walker more closely to an investigation of some of his former employees. Here again, Democrats have resorted to distorting reality in order to smear Walker.

 

… (Great Scott; by STEPHEN F. HAYES; Feb 20, 2012, Vol. 17, No. 22; Weekly Standard)

 

The campaign against Governor Walker is not based on what is good for Wisconsin. Rather the thuggish Union and the Leftist Dems of Wisconsin are out to get their duly elected Governor because his success in Wisconsin could very possibly mean the destruction of the power base that has perpetuated corrupt Unions and fiefdom Democrats.

 

The Unions are not hedging their bets with the recall election of Governor Walker. They are still doing the thug thing. Republican State Senator Pam Galloway is resigning early from her first term in Office. Officially she is telling that the ill health of a couple of family members has led to her decision. And yet some media investigation which some credit to Media Trackers, that Union thug boss John Spiegelhoff had been running a campaign of intimidation against soon resigning Senator Galloway to scare her from voting for Governor Walker's economic change around for Wisconsin.

 

Whether you live in Wisconsin or not, friends of sane politics and actual Liberty really should support Governor Scott Walker to overcome the huge amount of money from the nefarious sources of corrupt Unions and Leftist Democrats that have been twisting data into lies and/or simply outright lying to place irresponsible government back into Wisconsin.

 

Why should those of us outside Wisconsin support Governor Walker? The reason is because Wisconsin Unions and Leftists are merely mirroring the underhandedness of Leftist-in-Chief President Barack Hussein Obama.

 

JRH 3/22/12

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment
March 21 2012 4 21 /03 /March /2012 14:57

School-Homo-Indocrination.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© March 21, 2012

 

Homosexuality is a perverted abomination practiced by morally reprobate individuals that mock the Word of God.

 

22 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination. (Leviticus 18: 22 NKJV)

 

24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

 

26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.

 

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting;

 

32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them. (Romans 1: 24-28, 32 NKJV)

 

Regardless of what homosexual activists, Democrats, Secular Humanists, Moral Relativists and so on will tell you; homosexuality is a wicked lifestyle to practice. I do say this knowing that a significant amount of homosexuals are otherwise decent citizens following the rule of law as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution. On the other hand there are a large segment of homosexuals that are so militant to demand societal acceptance that they take their perverted debauchery to the public square. AND many cities do NOTHING to stop the parades or the homosexual festivals that exude public displays of debauchery for all to see.

 

NOW Congressional legislators that are homosexual activists are preparing to push through legislation that would force Public Schools to that homosexuality is a normal lifestyle followed with explanations on how the homosexual sex act is performed. The legislation is called the Homosexual Classrooms Act. In the House it is HR 988 and in the Senate it is S 555. Homosexual activists have actually began to acquire broad support for this pervert legislation in Congress. Friends, YOU HAVE TO WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMEN!

 

Now let’s be honest though. Neither HR 998 nor S 555 is designed to promulgate the homosexual agenda onto America’s Public Schools. The real name for the Homosexual Classrooms Act is actually Student Non-Discrimination Act. The aim is to stop bullying of sexual orientation that is not heterosexual (i.e. normal). Those that have come out against the Student Non-Discrimination Act (SNDA) have cited some misleading information and directly attributing the information to the wording to SNDA. Here are some examples:

 

*** Require schools to teach appalling homosexual acts so "homosexual students" don't feel "singled out" during already explicit sex-ed classes;

 

*** Spin impressionable students in a whirlwind of sexual confusion and misinformation, even peer pressure to "experiment" with the homosexual "lifestyle;"

 

*** Exempt homosexual students from punishment for propositioning, harassing, or even sexually assaulting their classmates, as part of their specially-protected right to "freedom of self-expression;"

 

*** Force private and even religious schools to teach a pro-homosexual curriculum and purge any reference to religion if a student claims it creates a "hostile learning environment" for homosexual students.

 

In the summaries of HR 998 and S 555 I cannot find anything close to the suggested outcome predicted by some of my fellow Pro-Biblical Morality compatriots. Forcing students to learn that homosexuality is normal, that homosexual sex acts are not perverted, encouraging homosexual experimentation and punishing heterosexuals for being angry and/or offended by a homosexual proposition of same-sex dating or sex is crazy ridiculous.

 

If HR 998 and S 555 are approved it will be Congress moving the homosexual abomination to a level equal to that of race, religion, sex, creed or national origin. According the First Amendment homosexuals have the right to choose abomination but that does not need the rule of law must afford a special legal status for Lesbians, Gays, Bi-Sexuals and Transgender people (aka LGBT). LGBT people are either a part of a race, a religion, a male or female sex, a creed or a variant national origin than is typical of Americans.

 

The SNDA provides a legal status that will render the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) irrelevant. The SNDA will open the door to the persecution of Christians as homophobe bullies when there is open criticism that homosexuality is an ungodly lifestyle practice. And all those fears of homosexual acceptance in academics listed above will become educational curriculum but not because of SNDA wording. Rather a legal status for LGBT people will lead to an already Left leaning educational environment to begin teaching homosexual acceptance to curtail bullying against LGBT students.

 

So the SNDA text may not be directly point to homosexual propaganda and moral acceptance in school; however the existence of such legislation will lead to the equivalent of a Homosexual Classrooms Act not codified by Federal law but foisted by Federal Policy to make LGBT students feel comfortable about living in abomination as defined by God’s Word in the Bible.

 

If there is a Federal level Bill against bullying, it SHOULD NOT make LGBT people a separate and equal legal status as in race, religion, sex, creed and national origin. A Bullying Bill should exist for all students regardless of race, religion, sex, creed and national origin which would be inclusive of confused kids being taught be part of the LGBT lifestyle is just fine.

 

So we must stop the Student Non-Discrimination ACT to prevent the next step of a Homosexual Classrooms Act. Trust me, the next step will be to brainwash our children to agree with Moral Relativism in a Public School setting. Or worse, Christian schools may be ultimately be forced homosexual lifestyle acceptance to students even though the Bible specifically calls homosexuality an abomination.

 

Eugene Delgaudio representing the Public Advocate of the United States has sent an email out that explains the situation about Homosexual Classrooms Act from the point of view such a law will lead to direct propaganda education in Public School. Then Delgaudio points you to a petition to sign. Yes there will be pleas for donations and you should consider giving some of your money to fight a cause that too many are afraid to do so because a Left Wing MSM and Left oriented Hollywood and TV harangue promoters of Biblical Morality as bigots. If I am a bigot for writing against homosexuality then I am a proud bigot; however I am a supporter of God’s Word. If I am with God then I am in good company. If you are a promoter of the homosexual agenda then you are fighting against God.

 

Delgaudio may be a bit off on the effect of the anti-bullying homosexual Bill; nonetheless there is a can of worms that when opened quite probably will lead classroom propaganda listed in the Delgaudio take action email.

 

JRH 3/21/12

*************************************

Obama to mandate immoral education in schools

 

By Eugene Delgaudio

Sent: 3/20/2012 2:43 PM

Sent from: Public Advocate of the United States

 

Dear Pro-family American,

The Radical Homosexuals infiltrating the United States Congress have a plan:

Indoctrinate an entire generation of American children with pro-homosexual propaganda and eliminate traditional values from American society.

Their ultimate dream is to create a new America based on sexual promiscuity in which the values you and I cherish are long forgotten.

I hate to admit it, but if they pass the deceptively named "Student Non-Discrimination Act," (H.R. 998 & S. 555) that's exactly what they'll do.

Better named the "Homosexual Classrooms Act," its chief advocate in Congress is Rep. Jared Polis, himself an open homosexual and radical activist.

And it's dangerously close to becoming the law of the land.

H.R. 998 already has 157 co-sponsors in the House!

And S. 555 already has 37 co-sponsors in the Senate!


That's why I need you to act quickly -- right away -- to protect our nation's youth.

I have prepared the official "Protect Our Children's Innocence" Petition to Congress for you to sign.

Please click here to sign it right away so I can rush it to the Capitol with thousands more.

 

You and I must defeat this disastrous legislation.

You see, the Homosexual Classrooms Act contains a laundry list of anti-family provisions that will:

 

*** Require schools to teach appalling homosexual acts so "homosexual students" don't feel "singled out" during already explicit sex-ed classes;

 

*** Spin impressionable students in a whirlwind of sexual confusion and misinformation, even peer pressure to "experiment" with the homosexual "lifestyle;"

 

*** Exempt homosexual students from punishment for propositioning, harassing, or even sexually assaulting their classmates, as part of their specially-protected right to "freedom of self-expression;"

 

*** Force private and even religious schools to teach a pro-homosexual curriculum and purge any reference to religion if a student claims it creates a "hostile learning environment" for homosexual students.

 

And that's just the beginning of the Homosexual Lobby's radical agenda.

In fact, it will set them up to ram through their entire perverted vision for a homosexual America.

My friend, I'm sure I don't have to tell you this is not a fight we can afford to lose.

That's why Public Advocate is leading the fight against this immoral legislation.

This is a battle for the survival of American values and the fact is, there's no time to waste.

 

This is a battle for the survival of American values and the fact is, there's no time to waste.

The Homosexual Classrooms Act will turn America's schools into indoctrination centers and its classrooms into social laboratories -- and they're pulling out all the stops to pass it.

You see, they've disguised the bill's wicked purpose behind an innocent name: "The Student Non-Discrimination Act."

The Homosexual Lobby knows that if the public knew the truth about their radical agenda, they'll have no hope of success.

And their dangerously close to ramming their perversity into law.

H.R. 998 already has 157 co-sponsors in the House!

And S. 555 already has 37 co-sponsors in the Senate!


You and I need to take action right now to stop the growing momentum of this disastrous legislation.

I've developed a massive program to launch the second they try to push this bill through -- mail, email, phones, and even radio and TV ads.

But that's only possible with your support...

None of these things are cheap.  In fact, running a program of the size necessary to defeat this bill can get quite expensive especially with increases in postage and printing costs.

That's why I need your generous contribution.  In addition to your signed "Protect Our Children's Innocence" Petition, will you contribute $250, $100, $50 or even just $35 right away.

And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.

 

Unfortunately, this agenda is nothing new.

In fact, other countries like Britain are already experimenting with this kind of legislation, such as mandating public schools inject pro-homosexual content into every aspect of education.

Word problems in math classes are now to include homosexual characters.  History classes will document the "civil rights" struggle against the "oppressive" pro-family establishment.

And it's even started to infiltrate our state governments.

In California, lawmakers want to "require schools to portray lesbians, homosexuals, transsexuals ... as positive role models to children in all public schools."

Sexual deviants being held up as models of virtue?

If that makes you as sick as it makes me, you simply must join me in this battle for America's children.

Please sign the "Protect Our Children's Innocence" Petition to Congress and then send a generous contribution right away.  Your action will make all the difference.

 

And if all that wasn't enough to convince you that action must be taken immediately, there's more.

Many say that there will always be private schools and traditional homeschool families to teach traditional values to the next generation.

But the truth is, this radical agenda is NOT restricted to public schools.

Kevin Jennings, Obama's "Safe Schools Czar," has clearly stated that "every school, public, private or parochial has an obligation" to teach a pro-homosexual curriculum.

In fact, Jennings denounced school choice programs as "very dangerous" because they make it much harder to impose the Homosexual Agenda on our kids.

"Lord forbid a Baptist or Mormon school," he added.

Jennings' ultimate goal is for all curriculum in "kindergarten, and first grade, and second grade - every grade" be infused with a pro-homosexual slant.

Traditional values will be squashed and demonized as old fashioned or out of date, or even as bigotry.

You and I cannot let them succeed.

Please sign the "Protect Our Children's Innocence" Petition to Congress I've prepared for you right away.

And along with your petition, would you please send a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35.

And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.

Thank you so much for all you have done.

Sincerely,

 

Eugene Delgaudio
President,
Public Advocate of the U.S.

 

Radical Homosexuals in Congress have a plan to indoctrinate our children in schools -- both public and private.

But Public Advocate is taking a stand.  Will you join me?

Please sign the "Protect Our Children's Innocence" Petition to Congress I've enclosed.

And please, along with your petition, would you please send a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35 right away?

And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.

____________________________________

Homosexuals DO NOT Need a Special Legal Status

John R. Houk

© March 21, 2012

____________________________________

Obama to mandate immoral education in schools

 

Because Public Advocate of the U.S. lobbies against the Homosexual Lobby, contributions are not tax deductible for IRS purposes. This email was not produced or e-mailed at taxpayer expense.

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Christianity
write a comment
March 20 2012 3 20 /03 /March /2012 19:08

 

Truth about Islam

 

John R. Houk

© March 20, 2012

 

You do realize it is important to teach religion as history in public schools. It is important because the culture we live in today is largely the result of Greek, Roman and Judeo-Christian culture. People should know the roots of their culture to understand the present.

 

Since 9/11 the American education system has been drawn to add more information in text books for grade levels six through twelve. That is understandable because prior to 9/11 Americans thought of Muslims more as Arabs. And Arabs were thought of as camel jockeys stuck in medieval mode in a modern age.

 

The image is not exactly a complimentary one in the description of Muslims. The 9/11 attack perpetrated on American soil did little to brush up that image with the American mind. The majority of the Muslim terrorists that hijacked jets were of Saudi Arabian origin and all were at least Middle Eastern.

 

The fact that the terrorists were from a nation in which Radical Islam is the State Religion of the land is important to know. The Saudi kingdom is dominated by Wahhabism. The purist Islam of the Wahhabis is derived from a Sunni Muslim Cleric that lived in the 18th century. The founder of Wahhabism is Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (c. 1702–c. 1791).

 

The 9/11 terrorists were influenced by the Wahhabism of Saudi Arabia (the bin Laden al Qaeda origin); the Wahhabis are not the only Caliphate minded Radical Islamic (i.e. purist Islam) groups around. There are others. I will not pretend to make an exhaustive list here but here are a few other Radical Muslim groups:

 

Salafists:

 

Jihadi ideology is based today on what is commonly known as Salafism, an ambiguous concept that has served to designate various and very different movements throughout the years. The term is derived from the word Salaf, which means �to precede.� In Islamic vocabulary, it is used to describe the followers of al Salaf al salih, the virtuous fathers of the faith who were the companions of the Prophet. The group includes the first three generations of Muslims.[1] Since they learned Islam directly from the Prophet, they understood the true meaning of the religion. Salafis aim to eradicate the impurities introduced during centuries of religious practice. Interpretations not based on the original sources of the religion are viewed as distortions that lead Muslims to stray from the path of God. Salafis have constructed a method (manhaj) to help the search for religious truth. It is a methodology for determining the correct interpretation of the religion, based on the Koran, the Sunna, and the example of the first Muslims.

 

The method is based on a series of core concepts, foremost among them the tawhid or belief in the uniqueness of God.[2] Another essential concept in Salafi ideology is bid'a or any innovation in the faith. Salafis argue that since the Koran and Sunna reveal the true nature of Islam, any innovation is a distortion of the path to God and is therefore to be rejected.[3] Salafis also devote considerable attention to the science of the hadiths, and call themselves the �People of the Hadith� (Ahl al-Hadith).�In their opinion, the hadiths are, according to the Koran, the most important source of religious knowledge and guidance, providing the best example of how Islam was practiced when it was first introduced. Hence, many Salafi scholars devote themselves to the science of the hadiths in order to eliminate those that are false and thus be able to propose an exact version of the tradition of the Prophet. Lastly, Salafis consider the division of Muslims into separate schools to be unacceptable, because there can only be one correct interpretation or opinion. One of the main problems the Muslim community is experiencing is precisely this blind adherence or imitation (taqlid) of a particular school. Salafis insist, therefore, that the truth is to be found in the sources, not in the texts written by jurists.

 

Salafism is thus a path and a method to search for religious truth, a desire to practice Islam exactly as it was revealed by the Prophet. The Salafi mission is grounded on avoidance of bid'a and shirk, strict adherence to the principle of tawhid and a desire to transcend the differences between the various schools, as well as the quest for religious truth in the original sources of Islam.[4]

 

 

… The most radical Salafis base their interpretation of jihad on the writings of Ibn Taymiyya [10] and, like him, they consider that actions by governments that are contrary to Islamic law can be considered proof in order to declare them non-believers. The takfir thus became an instrument that could be used to oppose any regime whatsoever through armed struggle.

 

 

In tandem with the evolution of Salafism, jihadi ideology gradually gained ground in Afghanistan and eventually merged with Salafism. Its chief proponent was Abdallah Azzam, who in 1984, founded the Maktab al-Khidamat (MAK), an office for recruiting Arabs to fight against the Soviets in Afghanistan. Azzam was to have a decisive influence on Usama bin Ladin. In his work, The Main Obligation of Muslims is to Defend the Land of Islam, Azzam writes that jihad is a moral obligation for all Muslims, the sixth pillar of the faith. Using an epic and mystic language, he sets out a vision of the world based on strict Salafism and on calls to martyrdom, stressing the permanent state of humiliation suffered by the umma, as a result of the actions of �crusaders and Zionists.� His work was to have a decisive influence on the jihadi radicalism of the 1990s.[12]

 

 

The global proliferation of fighting Salafism and its fusion with jihadi ideology were further consolidated under bin Ladin. His declaration of war on the West-backed by the creation in 1998 of the World Islamic Front for Jihad against Jews and Crusaders caused groups that had originally been set up to provide logistical support to al-Qa'ida (e.g. the Islamic Group of Moroccan Combatants) and had originally sought to purify and punish society, to now set their sights on the West. The struggle was no longer confined to the nearest enemy but also to those further away. Fighting Salafism assumed the role of globalizing the jihad born out of the Afghan experience and became the core ideology of the new radical Islamism.  

 

 

Salafism is first and foremost a method for the search of the religious truth; a desire to practice Islam exactly as it was revealed by the Prophet. It is a religious method whose influence has spread throughout the Arab world and also in Europe, thanks to the support received from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, which have helped expand this peculiar vision of Islam that is very close to Wahhabism. Its influence is on the rise and it has successfully impregnated several Islamist movements, including some sectors of the Muslim Brotherhoods. …

 

The fighting version of Salafism has also become the core ideology of the global jihadism sponsored by al-Qa’ida and the radical utopia of Abdallah Azzam. This ideology, aided by the proselytizing work of radical clerics, has led to the emergence in Europe of small groups with the capability to carry out independent terrorist strikes. … [Excerpted from a very long essay – Read Details in Entirety. I am guessing the question marks is grammar my browser did not pick-up correctly]

 

Barelvi Islam:

 

The Legacy Of Syed Ahmad Barelvi In India

 

By R. Upadhyay

October 30, 2010

Eurasia Review

[Excerpts]

 

 

Despite the continuity of Islamic rule for centuries in larger parts of the sub-continent, the Muslim community in India was sharply divided into two exclusive segments namely those who were the descendents of Arab, Turk, Iranian and Afghan conquerors known as Ashraf (Noble Muslims) and those neo-convert Indians who were known as Ajlafs (Low category Muslims). Since the priestly class of this society mostly remained aligned with Ashrafs, orthodox Islam did not penetrate deep into the daily lives of the Muslim proletariat (Ajlafs) who maintained continuous emotional link with their Hindu past and were even practicing their pre-Islamic customs and celebrations. Therefore, Waliullah’s movement was meant for purifying the Ajlafs. It is said that Waliullah era was the beginning of Muslim renaissance following the decline of Islamic rule.

 

After the death of Waliullah in 1762 , his son Abdul Aziz (1746-1822) succeeded him in the theological saddle of Delhi and carried forward the ideological heritage of his father’s movement. Since the Marathas were already on retreat after their defeat by Abdali in the third battle of Panipat in 1761 and the British were marching towards Delhi, he converted the movement launched by his father into Jihad against the British after declaring India as Darul Harb (House of war). When the British army marched to Delhi in 1803 and Mogul emperor became a British vassal, he also issued a fatwa appealing to the Muslims for launching Jihad against the British and for restoring the rule of Islamic glory. Finding his disciple one Syed Ahmad Barelvi who was born in November 1786 in Rai Bareilley in the present Uttar Pradesh and belonged to the family distantly related to his family suitable for leading the Jihad, … Later he sent Ahmad Barelvi to Mecca in order to acquire the ideological knowledge of Islam from the Wahhabi clerics of Arabia. During course of his stay in Arabia he was greatly influenced with the spirit of Wahhabism and returned to India sometime in the early years of 1820s.

 

On his return from Mecca, Ahmad Barelvi also known as founder of Wahhabi movement in India, founded an organization namely Tariqah-i Muhhamdiyah (The Way of the Prophet Muhammad) and designated himself as Amir al Mumin (Commander of the Believers). Fully inspired with Waliullah’s political thought for converting the Ajlafs into true Islamists, he toured the length and breadh (sic) of the country particularly Bihar, Bengal, Punjab and Kashmir and found that the Ajlafs were still following Islam within their pre-Islamic cultural mindset like visiting even the Hindu mystics, also following their recommendations for overcoming their worldly problems, having no inhibition in wearing their pre-Islamic dresses. They constituted the larger majority of Muslim society and were therefore the main target area of Barelvi for their brainwashing and turning them into full-fledged Muslims.

 

[The above excerpts are written by a person notably that is an aficionado of Marxism. Read the essay in Entirety]

____________

 

 

Syed Ahmed Shaheed Barelvi

 

June 11, 2010

Guess Papers

[Excerpts]

 

 

The Mujahideen Movement

 

Syed Ahmed Shaheed Brelvi started a great movement in the North of India; this movement is known as “The Mujahideen Movement” or “The Movement o Jihad”. This movement arranged a power for the struggle of freedom in Muslims which produced a spirit of survival and they started freedom struggle.


Background of the Mujahideen Movement


Syed Ahmed Shaheed Brelvi selected a particular way on the command of his spiritual guide Shah Abdul Aziz and devoted himself in the preparation of the holy war. He started a national movement for this purpose in 1818 and organized this movement after [h]is arrival from Hajj as the Mujahideen Movement in 1831.

 

Objectives of Mujahideen Movement

 

He wanted to make the Muslims as the true lover of Islam, for this purpose he started the Mujahideen Movement.


The main objectives of the Mujahideen Movement were following;

 

·         To preach unicity of Almighty Allah.

 

·         To revive the teachings of Islam and prepare the Muslims to pass their lives simply according to the teachings of Islam.

 

·         To protect the Muslims against such acts and ideas which are contrary to Islamic values.

 

·         To protect the Muslims from the worship of other things except Allah.

 

·         To preach Jihad because it was not possible to get freedom from evil force without armed struggle.

 

Syed Ahmed Shaheed Brelvi wanted to eliminate the domination of Sikhs in Punjab and N.W.F.P to revive Islamic values and traditions.

 

[Read essay in Entirety]

 

______________________

Barelvi Islam

 

GlobalSecurity.org

[Excerpts]

 

Deobandis and Barelvis are the two major groups of Muslims in the Subcontinent apart from the Shia. Barelvi Hanafis deem Deobandis to be kaafir. Those hostile to the Barelvis deprecated them as the shrine-worshipping, the grave-worshiping, ignorant Barelvis. …

 

 

The differences between these sects can be difficult to understand. For the Barelvis, (who are mostly from the Pakistan province of Punjab) the holy Prophet is a superhuman figure whose presence is all around us at all times; he is hazir, present; he is not bashar, material or flesh, but nur, light. The Deobandis, who also revere the Prophet, argue he was the insan-i-kamil, the perfect person, but still only a man, a mortal. Barelvis emphasise a love of Muhammad, a semi-divine figure with unique foreknowledge. The Deobandis reject this idea of Muhammad, emphasising Islam as a personal rather than a social religion.

 

 

… The Wahhabi (Arabia), Deobandi (Pakistan and India) and Jamaat-I-Islami all are anti-sufi, and against the over devotion to Muhammad, whereas the Barelvis emphasize Muhammad's uniqueness. Indeed, nearly 85% of South Asia's Sunni Muslims are said to follow the Barelvi school, closer to Sufism. The remaining 15% of Sunnis follow the Deobandi school, more closely related to the conservative practice of Islam. Most Shiites in the subcontinent also tend to be influenced by the Sufis. Pakistan's Muslims, like other Muslims in the region, tend to follow a school of Islam which is less conservative, and hence the support for strongly and overtly religious parties has been minimal.

 

[Read in Entirety]

______________________________

 

Sufi Militants Struggle with Deobandi Jihadists in Pakistan

 

Article from Jamestown Foundation (JF Homepage)

Pub. Date: 24 February 2011

Refworld (affiliated with UNHRC)

 

As Punjab governor Salman Taseer came out of a restaurant in an upscale area of Islamabad, one of his bodyguards uttered the slogan “Allahu Akbar” and fired on the man he was supposed to guard, killing him on the spot. The assassin in the January 4 killing, Malik Mumtaz Qadri, belonged to the Elite Punjab Police, a force specially trained in counterterrorism work and the protection of important individuals (Dawn [Karachi], January 5). Qadri was also believed to be associated with the South Asian Barelvi Sufi movement. The other bodyguards from the elite force did not try to stop him and the smiling Qadri surrendered to his fellow officers after he made sure the governor was dead. He later told the police that he had killed the governor because Taseer had insulted the Prophet of Islam by describing Pakistan’s controversial blasphemy laws as “black laws.” …

 

 

… the killer belonged to the Dawat-e-Islami, a Barelvi Sufi group which normally shuns violence and has been in the forefront of the struggle against Deobandism (a conservative Sunni religious movement that has become associated with militancy) and the Ahle Hadith jihadi groups. Founded in 1984 as a small group around Pir (spiritual leader) Mohammad Ilyas Attar Qadri, Dawat-e-Islami grew into a formidable organization by the mid-1990s when more than 100,000 persons gathered at its periodic ijtimahs (conventions). [1] Pir Ilyas Attar Qadri had sensed Deobandi extremism would grow as a result of the Afghan jihad and wanted to organize the Ahle Sunnat to face that challenge. However, Pir Ilyas believed in peaceful resistance. [2] Surprisingly, the Dawat-e-Islami is loosely structured on the model of the Deobandi Tablighi Jamaat (an international Islamic reform movement). …

 

 

Formation of the Sunni Tehrik

Pir Ilyas Qadri’s reluctance to adopt violence against Deobandi jihadi groups led to a mini-rebellion among his followers, particularly those who had studied at Barelvi madrassahs. Consequently, a small group led by Saleem Qadri founded the Sunni Tehrik in 1990. Saleem Qadri wanted to meet Deobandi violence with more violence, as Pir Ilyas Qadri’s “non-violence was not taking the Barelvis anywhere.” [4] However, Saleem Qadri did not break his religious allegiance to Pir Ilyas Qadri even after leaving his group, nor did he ask his followers to break links with the Dawat-e-Islami. This approach worked and soon the ranks of the Sunni Tehrik swelled. The membership of the Dawat-e-Islami and the Sunni Tehrik also overlaps at the lower levels with several other Barelvi groups.

The Sunni Tehrik was the first Barelvi group to articulate the demands of the majority Barelvi sect and to use violence to achieve them. Their four basic demands were:



• The protection of Ahle Sunnat beliefs.

• The protection of the rights of the Ahle Sunnat.

• The protection of Ahle Sunnat mosques.

• The protection of the Ahle Sunnat awqaf (religious endowments), such as shrines. [5]


The Sunni Tehrik was ready to use violence to achieve the last two demands in response to Deobandi groups’ use of violence to take over Barelvi mosques and awqaf property.  …

 

 

… the most important thing was that the Jamaat Ahle Sunnat had adopted the Sunni Tehrik narrative of a forceful defense of Barelvi interests as its own. The Jamaat Ahle Sunnat emerged much stronger after the convention and began to play a major part in the country’s Islamist politics.

 

 

The assassination of Governor Salman Taseer shows that Sufi Islamism can be a bulwark against or an alternative to Deobandi and Ahle Hadith jihadism but it is in its own way as great a threat to international security as the militancy of the Deobandi and Ahle Hadith movements. [Read in Entirety]

 

Deobandi

 

Deobandi Islam: The Religion of the Taliban

Information provided and used with permission from the Defense Language Institute at: wrc.lingnet.org (Google goes HERE for the link)

 

Posted by GlobalSecurity.org

PDF dated: 2001

 

 

From its inception the school at Deoband made a sharp distinction between ‘revealed’ or sacred knowledge, and ‘human’ or secular knowledge. The school excluded all learning that was not obviously Islamic by firmly rejecting other religious traditions (the Hinduism of India and the Christianity of the British missionaries) and forbidding Western-style education and the study of any subjects not directly related to the study of the Quran.

 

The school was also highly critical of Islam as it was practiced in the modern world, especially India. They felt the established religious order had made too many compromises with its foreign environment and therefore Islam needed to be purified of these foreign elements. To live out the pure Islamic tradition they embraced Taqlid (acceptance of the old interpretations) and rejected ijitehad or reinterpretation of Islamic precepts to accommodate the changing times. It should also be noted that they are strict adherents to the Hanafi school of thought.xii

 

 

… In the late 19th and early 20th century the Deobandi school was embroiled, and to a great extent preoccupied, in a verbal “fatwa war” with the Bid’ati school. With more than a quarter of a million fatwas (legal opinions) being issued on some of the most ordinary issues of daily life, the fatwa war helped the Deobandi scholars clarify their thinking. It also served to harden their deeply conservative theological and ethical positions. As a result of the fatwa war the Dar-ul-Uloom madressa became much more traditional than it was when first established in 1866. That is, it moved much further to the right than the founding fathers would have ever imagined.

 

As the school grew in years it also grew in size and prestige. xiii Dar-ul-Uloon became ‘the’ place to prepare young men to become educated in the Islamic tradition. …

 

 

Indian independence from British rule in 1947 was met with a bloody partitioning of the subcontinent into two independent nations…India and Pakistan. …

 

Dar-ul-Uloon however, had a strong history as a hotbed for anti-British activities that were fueled by its conservative, uncompromising theological stance. After the creation of the nation of Pakistan in 1947 numerous satellite Deobandi madressas sprung up throughout Pakistan. These madressas carried on not only the strict Deobandi theological tradition but also its political activism, only now the target had changed. It was no longer the English but the Indian oppression of Muslims in the disputed area of Kashmir that inspired resentment. Later, with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 this resentment would expand to include communism. After the Soviets left the U.N. and the U.S. became demonized as the foreign invading and corrupting powers that threatened the pure expression of Islam.

 

 

In the spring of 1994 two teenage girls from the village of Sang Hesar were abducted by the majahedim and repeatedly raped at the local checkpoint. Mohammed Omar, a retired Afghan commander studying at a local madressa, gathered 30 fellow taliban (students) and mounted a successful rescue. The Majahedim commander was hung from a slowly ascending tank-barrel. This was the birth of a movement that came to be known as the Taliban.

 

 

The majahedim were Islamists who carried the banner of Islam and combated secularism and then communism in Afghanistan. Islamists are modernists who seek a contemporary political interpretation of Islam. Educationally they tilt towards Al-Azhor University in Egypt where they have been strongly influence by the political orientation of the fundamentalist group the Muslim Brotherhood. Because they drew from this model other governments were quick to recognize their authority and they were able to form highly organized political parties.

 

The Taliban are traditionalists who have only entered the political stream in Afghanistan since 1994. They view the roll (sic) of government and society very differently from the majahedim. They do not see Islam in political terms but in religious terms. They seek to return to the purity of the teachings of the Quran and the Sunnah (the practices of the Prophet). They are products of religious madrassas in Pakistan whose roots go back to the Dar-ul-Uloon seminary in Debond, India. Their history makes the Taliban inclined to organize themselves around regional associations rather than political parties.

 

Religious edicts are believed to have a divine source so they carry more authority in this society than humanitarian law that stress individual freedoms. The purpose of government is to be a reflection of the divine will (as interpreted by the Deobondi scholars), not a guardian of individual rights and liberties as insisted upon by the West. [Read PDF in Entirety]

 

So what the heck, John? Why are you rehashing these theo-political strains of Radical Islam?

 

Well feel lucky, I was going to examine some of the organization – I mean – terrorists that adhere to these Radical Islamic ideologies. You know like the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, CAIR, Jamaat ul-Fuqra and so on.

 

The point of this exercise is that American text books are leaving this kind of information out. Since these organizations look back to purist Islam. It is important to tell American students that the Islam that inspires these Islamic terrorists and Radical Muslims is the Islam of Mohammed and the following so-called Rightly Guided Caliphs (i.e. First four Caliphs that were actual buddies with Mo).

 

ACT for America has put together an analysis of text books in America from sixth grade through twelfth grade. Here is the ACT email:

 

Textbook analysis report released today!

A special message from Brigitte Gabriel, President, ACT! for America Education

 

By Brigitte Gabriel

Sent: 3/19/2012 2:04 PM

Sent from ACT for America

 

www.ACTforAmericaEducation.com/

 

It is with great delight that I announce to you that today we released “Education or Indoctrination? The Treatment of Islam in 6th through 12th Grade American Textbooks.”

 

ACT! for America Education Executive Director Guy Rodgers and I began discussing this project nearly four years ago. Today, that project is a reality—and I believe that one year from now you and I will look back on this as a truly historic accomplishment that helped change the course of education in America.

This report shines a bright light on a pattern of errors, omissions and bias in the textbooks reviewed. Our children deserve better. Our children deserve facts and accuracy, not historical revisionism.

To give you just one example of the errors our research uncovered, in discussing the 9/11 attacks, the textbooks typically fail to mention the perpetrators were Muslims or that they acted in the cause of Islamic jihad. In one book the terrorists are portrayed as people fighting for a cause. In just a few years after September 11th, the history of what happened on that tragic day was rewritten in our school textbooks. Omitting this vital information, that jihad was the motivation for the attacks, makes it difficult, if not impossible, for today’s young teens, who don’t remember 9/11, to really understand what happened that day—and why.

Please forward this email to anyone and everyone you know. Help us get the word out far and wide! Over the next few months we hope to wake up America to what this report has uncovered!

To access the report log on to www.ACTforAmericaEducation.com/. Once there you will find the following:

 

·         The Executive Summary of the Report, which was mailed to over 70,000 state and local school board members nationwide;

 

·         The full Report;

 

·         Sub-reports, sorted by each textbook publisher;

 

·         A plan for taking action.

 

 

The few have always made a difference in this crazy, dangerous but wonderful world we live in. This is our time, those of us who “get it” and are concerned about the direction of our future, to come together and work together to make a difference for our country and our future generation.

I am honored to put my hand in yours and work with you to ensure our children receive the best historical education, and America remains the greatest and brightest nation on earth.

Brigitte Gabriel

 

Now here is the link to the Executive Summary to this analysis in which you can also access the full report:

 

http://www.actforamericaeducation.com/textbook-project

 

Below is the welcome message from Brigitte Gabriel to ACT for America Education.

 

JRH 3/20/12

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
March 19 2012 2 19 /03 /March /2012 10:36

NSA-Domestic-Spying.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© March 19, 2012

 

Much to the chagrin of many of my fellow Conservatives I have been a National Security guy over the Right to Privacy guy in terms of the embroilment in war. And yes I believe America is in a state of war even though there has been no formal Declaration of War.

 

Frankly the times have changed that makes a formal Declaration of War difficult in some instances. One instance is the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). There simply is no guideline available to Declare War on transnational terrorist organizations that have no sovereignty and no allegiance to a national government. Thus when an ideology is well financed by individuals that may or may not be directly involved in the governing status of a nation there is a problem of using our military instrumentality against terrorists that might be harbored intentionally or unintentionally by a foreign government. In these days of the need of the smoking gun proof even with the ample circumstantial evidence to draw a conclusion it is simply difficult to justify military action in an international forum of nations.

 

After 9/11 American authorities knew that the responsible terrorists resided in Afghanistan under the protection of the Taliban government. Following international protocol the first step was to demand the Afghan government turn over al Qaeda leadership responsible for the transnational terrorist authorization of the attack on American soil. In this case the big dog was Osama (or Usama) bin Laden. After a bit of stalling Taliban leader Mullah Omar (Here is a more scathing profile of Omar that slights his intelligence. I don’t think Omar is stupid or he wouldn’t be around still, but I like the characterization of the American enemy) refused to give up bin Laden.

 

This is the point that President Bush should have asked Congress to Declare War on Afghanistan rather than simply acquiring the huge Congressional support that was easily forthcoming. This is the point that America informally entered the Global War on Terrorism with Islamic terrorists primarily of the transnational non-governmental organization nature.

 

There is no Declaration of War in a decade long GWOT and yet there is a war being fought. No matter how Leftists attempt to propagandize American minds from the fact we are at war by changing the definitions to less hostile words, we still are at war. Believe me there is no dumbing down of the terminology from the Islamic terrorist perpetrators of war.

 

In realizing that America’s enemies are Islamic terrorists that hate the American way of life and in following their purist examples of Islamic holy writings, Americans must realize the war perpetrated on America is serious and is more than overseas battles. The Islamic terrorists do not have the technological access to weapons to directly overcome the American military. In the AfPak war zone Islamic terrorists are relegated to guerilla warfare of strike and retreat into inaccessible geographical areas and repeat. Hence the continuation of a decade long war because Americans are unwilling to use the full might of the Military that undoubtedly would cause the collateral deaths of the civilian population which hates the presence of Americans anyway.

 

Here is a sidebar: America has fairly successfully carved out the instruments of an organized government in Iraq. Rather or not that government is remains an ally to America after American troop withdrawal is another story. – End of sidebar

 

There has been no success in carving out a bona fide government in Afghanistan. If America pulled out today, the corrupt government of Karzai would probably lose a civil war to a popular Taliban purist Islamic movement. It is evident that America’s goals for Afghanistan must change.

 

For example if the goal changes from defeating the inaccessible Taliban to killing or capturing the people responsible for planning the attack on American soil, military success has greater viability. It took a decade but Osama bin Laden has been killed. In my mind that is a more than half way to winning military engagement in Afghanistan. The capture or killing of Mullah Mohammed Omar would cement that victory for me.

 

Because of the nature of Islamic teachings on a Muslim Ummah, there is a problem that extends beyond the battlefields of the AfPak area. Radical Islam is alive and well in America. That means there are Radical Muslims in America that have a Fifth Column mentality to infiltrate Local, State and Federal governments and/or perpetrate acts of terrorism on American soil in a continuation to war for Allah against the infidel (i.e. the unbelieving kafir). So America has organized cells of Islamic terrorists and Islamic purist believing individual Muslims inspired by the teachings of Radical Islam that take upon themselves to perpetrate acts of terrorism.

 

This is where I get in trouble with Conservatives and Leftists alike. I believe civilian safety is more important than some Liberties in a time of war. Make no mistake there a GWOT going on in the shadows on American soil. Light must shine into those shadows in order to protect the Life and Liberty of Americans that believe in the Constitutional government established by our Founding Fathers.

 

This is where it gets tricky. When Communism was the overt enemy of American constitutionalism it was relatively easy to separate that fine line between security and Liberty. When the old Soviet Union collapsed under the uselessness of Communist ideology during the Reagan years there was a sense Homeland Marxists were discredited enough that they were no longer a threat to constitutional government. This is especially the case since the powerful spy/insurgent apparatchik of USSR infiltration was rendered disorganized with the end of the Soviet government. In the Western sense Islam is a religion and thus protected by the First Amendment in Religious Freedom.

 

Unlike Christianity, Islam is as much political as it is religious. Now Christianity has a history of political interaction in government from the days of Constantine made the Christian faith a State religion in the early 300s AD. History shows that Christian ecclesiastical individuals attained significant political authority. Clerical political authority began to diminish and became relegated to theological authority only. This ebb and flow of political authority within the Christian Church could occur because Christian Scriptures provides for political suzerainty when King Jesus returns to establish the Kingdom of God among the nations of earth.

 

In Islam theological and political authority are encoded as part and parcel of religion and the rule of law. Thus the conquering Caliphs that followed Mohammed in authority in Islam were just as much rulers of land as they were authorities on theology. Hence Islam is a theo-political religion by design rather than by Clerical assumption.

 

In America, the Constitution guarantees Religious Freedom by instructing Congress can make no laws restricting religion; however the Constitution also demands that the government cannot establish a State Religion. Refusing the existence of a State Religion is categorically antithetical to the theo-political religion of Islam.

 

Muslims dedicated to the purist tenets in the Quran, Hadith and Sira will seek to destroy America as we know it and replace secular republican government with an Islamic Caliphate under Sharia Law.

 

As long as Radical Muslims receive monetary support from outside of America the effects of the GWOT will be a threat to Liberty in America within the American homeland. As long as the Radical Islam of the Muslim Brotherhood, Wahhabi Saudis or al Qaeda/Taliban-like believes it can and must destroy America, there will be a danger to American lives of all religions and atheistic ideologies.

 

Because of the inherent threat that is on American soil and the fine line between Religious Freedom for Islam and political restrictions for Political Islam to the threat of American Constitutional government, religious profiling should be an acceptable policy for preserving public safety.

 

I believe First Amendment Freedoms must be preserved and guaranteed except where profiling shines a light that individuals are planning to subvert the Constitution and public safety.

 

SO I have mixed feelings about the newest National Security Agency’s (NSA) tool to keep an eye on threats from foreign and domestic cooperation with foreign aspirations to harm America. The technology tool has been dubbed Stellar Wind. This Stellar Wind technology has the ability to monitor indiscriminately communications between people through phones, mobile phones, emails and etc:

 

Under construction by contractors with top-secret clearances, the blandly named Utah Data Center is being built for the National Security Agency. A project of immense secrecy, it is the final piece in a complex puzzle assembled over the past decade. Its purpose: to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world’s communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks. The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.” (bold emphasis mine) It is, in some measure, the realization of the “total information awareness” program created during the first term of the Bush administration—an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans’ privacy.

 

But “this is more than just a data center,” says one senior intelligence official who until recently was involved with the program. The mammoth Bluffdale center will have another important and far more secret role that until now has gone unrevealed. It is also critical, he says, for breaking codes. And code-breaking is crucial, because much of the data that the center will handle—financial information, stock transactions, business deals, foreign military and diplomatic secrets, legal documents, confidential personal communications—will be heavily encrypted. According to another top official also involved with the program, the NSA made an enormous breakthrough several years ago in its ability to cryptanalyze, or break, unfathomably complex encryption systems employed by not only governments around the world but also many average computer users in the US. The upshot, according to this official: “Everybody’s a target; everybody with communication is a target.” (bold emphasis mine)

 

 

In the process—and for the first time since Watergate and the other scandals of the Nixon administration—the NSA has turned its surveillance apparatus on the US and its citizens. It has established listening posts throughout the nation to collect and sift through billions of email messages and phone calls, whether they originate within the country or overseas. (bold emphasis mine) It has created a supercomputer of almost unimaginable speed to look for patterns and unscramble codes. Finally, the agency has begun building a place to store all the trillions of words and thoughts and whispers captured in its electronic net. And, of course, it’s all being done in secret. To those on the inside, the old adage that NSA stands for Never Say Anything applies more than ever.

 

Before yottabytes [SlantRight Editor: Here is an idea of how big a yottabyte is] of data from the deep web and elsewhere can begin piling up inside the servers of the NSA’s new center, they must be collected. To better accomplish that, the agency has undergone the largest building boom in its history, including installing secret electronic monitoring rooms in major US telecom facilities. Controlled by the NSA, these highly secured spaces are where the agency taps into the US communications networks (bold emphasis mine), a practice that came to light during the Bush years but was never acknowledged by the agency. The broad outlines of the so-called warrantless-wiretapping program have long been exposed—how the NSA secretly and illegally bypassed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which was supposed to oversee and authorize highly targeted domestic eavesdropping; how the program allowed wholesale monitoring of millions of American phone calls and email. In the wake of the program’s exposure, Congress passed the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, which largely made the practices legal. (bold emphasis mine)Telecoms that had agreed to participate in the illegal activity were granted immunity from prosecution and lawsuits. What wasn’t revealed until now, however, was the enormity of this ongoing domestic spying program.

 

For the first time, a former NSA official has gone on the record to describe the program, codenamed Stellar Wind (bold emphasis mine), in detail. William Binney was a senior NSA crypto-mathematician largely responsible for automating the agency’s worldwide eavesdropping network. READ ENTIRE POST

 

I have a problem with the government having indiscriminate power to watch any American for no cause. That is way too intrusive in a war like this unconventional fight against global terrorism. AGAIN this is why profiling must become an accepted practice in preventing foreign threats and domestic threats aligned with foreign ideology even if that ideology is theo-political like Islam.

 

Profiling must become acceptable especially aimed at non-citizens where there is the potential to a nefarious terrorist connection. Thus would include narco-terrorists since in many cases narco-terrorism and Islamic terrorism are black market buddies (SA Ettinger Report) to finance nefarious and GWOT activities. So yes, profiling would include profiling connections between foreign Hispanics and domestic Hispanics especially in cases of illegal aliens.

 

When the GWOT is marginalized to an ineffective violent movement much like Soviet Communism has been neutralized then security/safety nature must be drawn back to more peaceful parameters in which traditional search warrants protect the rights of American citizens.

 

It should be noted that the National Security Agency has a long history of questionable domestic spying that should be unconstitutional. A brief article written in 2009 provides a decent picture of NSA intrusion.

 

For a view that opposes any form of usage of Stellar Wind in a domestic sense there is a good article at American Thinker by Hugh de Payns.

 

JRH 3/19/12

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment
March 17 2012 7 17 /03 /March /2012 12:55

Bradley-Manning-Traitor.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© March 17, 2012

 

On December 2, 2010 I posted a segment of Hannity talking with Ann Coulter about the Wikileaks release of documents and videos the traitor Bradley Manning had hacked and distributed.

 

The YouTube video I posted demonstrates just how strong homosexual activism and how strong the propaganda of Leftist hate-America-first people is. Regrettably most of the comments on the post are supportive Wikileaks criminal Julian Assange. I have taken the time to defend my position on Manning and Assange. Indeed, here we are in 2012 and people are still defending the traitor and the criminal at that SlantRight YouTube Channel post.

 

Here is one comment trying to heap guilt on me because of the alleged goodness that Manning perpetrated in releasing classified data to Assange:

 

PeterCarthy – March 16, 2012:

 

When the documents in question show video footage of soldiers killing journalists, civilians and even children, in a matter of minutes, with no remorse when they realise (British rendering) they were no threats, and even arrogantly shifting blame on the civilians for "bringing their kids to a gunfight" then that’s when an American soldier has the right to release classified documents that show your government is lying to its people.

 

Frankly the documents I am most aware of are the ones that expose confidential cables between the diplomatic corps and the State Department which are meant to provide an honest evaluation of foreign national intentions, foreign diplomats, foreign dignitaries, foreign military figures and foreign government leaders. Note the word “foreign” as in not American. Whether the foreign is an ally, an enemy or a neutral; reports are bound to occur that should not be public because the analysis might not be flattering.

 

I was not paying close enough attention and did not realize there was a video released that showed the engagement between the U.S. Military and Islamic terrorists in Iraq. The video dubbed by Wikileaks is called “Collateral Murder.” The reasoning for the epithet is because civilian casualties occurred in this engagement. Anti-war idiots, Leftist apologists and homosexual activists are proclaiming the traitor Bradley Manning a whistleblowing hero because of the propaganda this video exposes that the American Military is involved in war crime atrocities.

 

I can sum up the truth of this engagement with Islamic terrorists with the comment I left for PeterCarthy:

 

SlantRight March 17, 2012:

 

Yeah, I watched the entire video from beginning to end. I saw soldiers nailing Islamic terrorists with AK-47s and RPGs preparing to engage US troops. We got them first and then discovered there were kids among the terrorists probably as human shields. The kids' injuries or deaths were the fault of terrorists and NOT US troops! Manning is a traitor for releasing other documents compromising the secret reports of State Dept cables that provide honest evaluations in diplomacy.

 

That’s right, the video clearly shows professional soldiers locating Islamic terrorists with AK-47s and RPGs. From the audio of the video you can tell that the Islamic terrorists were preparing to engage US troops with the weaponry. The Islamic terrorists were targeted from the air and nailed. Some ran into a building and the building was destroyed. When the ground troops arrived for clean-up purposes it was discovered that some children was among the wounded.

 

You have to realize that Islamic terrorists preparing to engage American troops had children with them. The children could not be seen from the video vantage. The children were discovered by the ground troops. A soldier can be heard calling for emergency evacuation of the children to get them to a hospital for treatment. I have to wonder if people wounded by Islamic terrorists would have received the same medical attention as American troops provided to civilians they had wounded. In fact I am willing to bet that Islamic terrorist would not only target purposely American-friendly Iraqis and their children but would have tortured them if they had survived their wounds.

 

This so-called “Collateral Murder” video demonstrates just how manipulative Leftists and American-haters can be in twisting the facts. You can see for yourself in this 39 minute video courtesy of AlJazeeraEnglish on Apr 7, 2010.

 

VIDEO: WikiLeaks video: 'Collateral murder' in Iraq

 

 


 


 

 

JRH 3/17/12 (Hat Tip: Adam Sharp of SharpElbows.net)

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment
March 16 2012 6 16 /03 /March /2012 12:28

Ahmadinejad---BHO-on-Israel.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© March 16, 2012

 

Danny Jeffrey wrote a post entitled “THE COMING ASSAULT ON ISRAEL...PART TWO”. The theme is that Obama instrumentality in the deposing of Mubarak of Egypt and Qaddafi of Libya are actions that will also lead to the deposing of Assad in Syria. Libya was an Obama test run to perhaps see what would happen if America became involved in Assad’s departure. Jeffrey raises Constitutional questions of Obama’s use of power without Congressional approval (which means without taxpayer/voter approval). Also that Obama’s extra-Constitutional paradigm will ultimately lead to America abandoning Israel to the fate of Jew-hating Muslim nations.

 

Danny I had mixed feelings concerning Libya. Yes, the anti-Qaddafi rebels are emerging Islamist leaders. On the other hand Qaddafi has had his hand in protecting and/or utilizing Islamic terrorists for a couple of decades. The Islamic terrorists looked for Jews and Americans. In my opinion Qaddafi had to go. Qaddafi's departure occurred with a minimum loss of U.S. military personal.

 

Mubarak on the other hand was a staunch American ally even if he was a brutal dictator. If the Egyptians believe that government brutality will be less under a Muslim Brotherhood led government I believe they will be unpleasantly surprised. From my perspective a MB led government will even make things worse for the largest Christian population among Muslim dominated nations. Mubarak's sell-out by Obama reeks of Carter's sell-out of the Shah of Iran.

 

Assad of Syria is much like Qaddafi of Libya. Assad has been a patron of Islamic terrorists and a client of America's greatest enemy in the Middle East in Iran. He has to go.

 

Again, though a problem arises with Assad's departure, the Syrian rebels that desire to depose Assad are Sunnis that are influenced by Islamists. These rebels have already said that after a victory they would wipe Assad's Alawite-Shias. This would be followed by returning Islamic hatred toward Israel. Whoever leads Syria will not be beneficial to Israel except perhaps in the momentary confusion that will exist as Sunnis assert government leadership for the first time in half-a-century. The Sunnis are the majority population in Syria.

 

I agree on one though. Obama will sell-out Israel if he is reelected as President of the USA. I believe Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and an Iraq without American troops will begin hostilities with Israel as Islamist ideologies begin to dominate those nations. Israel will be back in the same precarious situation it faced in its 1948 independence when it was invaded by 5 or 6 Jew-hating Muslim nations. President Barack Hussein Obama will not help Israel.

 

I have not read Part One, but I will definitely get to it. You write thought provoking essays. For the most part we agree. It is in the minor details we might see things differently. I thought Qaddafi had to go and I believe Assad has to go. Obama’s use of military power without a commitment of a troop invasion of Libya was a good thing. The question you bring up though is excellent. Was Obama’s actions Constitutional. You provide a good argument for Obama’s military aid to Libya for being unconstitutional in that neither a Declaration of War approved by Congress was forthcoming or any consultation with Congress about using Military resources against Libya. At least President Bush got the democrats on board to invade Afghanistan and Iraq even though a formal Declaration of War was not forthcoming.

 

It is disturbing that the Obama Administration through the voice of Secretary of Defense Panetta that engagement militarily in Syria would be up to NATO or some form of foreign leadership coalition agreement. This is voicing an actual intent to exclude Congress from its Constitutional duty to validate or invalidate taxpayer money for a war to be fought with American resources. If Obama proceeds with such an option it sets a precedent to invest military power into the Executive Branch that has no accountability to a voter elected Congress.

 

Such an Obama action MUST NOT stand!

 

If Danny Jeffrey is correct and the Obama extra-Constitutional paradigm leads Obama to have an excuse to abandon Israel to the fate of Jew-hating Muslim nations of both the Sunni and Shia persuasion, then Obama would have perpetrated one of the most reprehensible cowardly agendas in the history of America’s existence.

 

JRH 3/16/12

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Israel
write a comment
March 14 2012 4 14 /03 /March /2012 18:07

Soledad-O-Brien-v.-Joel-Pollack-2.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© March 14, 2012

 

If you are wondering way President Barack Hussein Obama’s Harvard U student embrace of Professor Derrick Bell is important then watch this Soledad O’Brien Leftist attempt to inform CNN (known to Conservatives as the Communist News Network) viewers that Bell’s Critical Race Theory is not about calling White people supremacists in general. Editor-in-Chief Joe Pollak of Breitbart.com handles himself quite well with O’Brien’s invective defense of BHO’s warm affection for Professor Bell.

 

VIDEO: The Vetting: CNN Implodes Over Breitbart's Obama/Bell Video

 

 

Now here is the thing about Soledad O’Brien’s misrepresentation of Critical Race Theory. Pollak busted O’Brien on her inaccuracy about the White Supremacist component about the theory which cited from Wikipedia. Unfortunately for O’Brien the original Wikipedia article sided with Pollak. Evidently a large amount of people attempted to go into the article to change it to match O’Brien’s inaccurate rendering so Wikipedia “froze” the article and put an older version of Critical Race Theory. Can you say Left Wing cover-up?

 

The Daily Caller reports that Wikipedia has frozen its entry on Critical Race Theory, reverting to the version of the page that existed before her on-air implosion in debate with Breitbart.com's Joel Pollak.

 

At the time, O'Brien--evidently citing the first line of the Wikipedia entry--claimed that Critical Race Theory had nothing to do with white supremacy. However, the same entry she relied upon--or which producers provided via her earpiece--mentions white supremacy twice.

 

The Daily Caller quotes a senior Wikipedia editor as saying that the entry is being frozen for a short time because of attempts to cover for O'Brien--and competing attempts to uncover the cover-up: "Given the flurry of reverts by and of anons yesterday I’m semi-protecting the article for a week."

 

As for O'Brien, she has yet to correct the record, and attacked Pollak for an entire segment in her Monday show, leading even sympathetic media critics to mock her attempted "do-over." She has asked angry viewers to "stop tweeting" her about the subject. (Brietbart.com 3/13/12)

 

So let’s look at Critical Race Theory from another source than Wikipedia.

 

Slate.com is a website that I think everyone would agree is Leftist oriented. And in being Left Wing Slate author Will Oremus defends Critical Race Theory and therefore Professor Derrick Bell and ultimately President Barack Hussein Obama.

 

Oremus first goes through a brief educational moment on Critical Race Theory (CRT). I am going to excerpt the part of his article that defends CRT as a non-supremacist race theory in the sense that CRT does not accuse the entire White Race of the supremacism that emanates from say the Ku Klux Klan, Arian Nation idiots and the like.

 

 

Bell in particular advanced what he called “interest convergence theory,” which holds that whites will support minority rights only when it’s in their interest as well. For example, he saw the Supreme Court’s landmark 1954 school-desegregation decision, Brown v. Board of Education, as a part of a Cold War effort to improve America’s standing among Third World countries. To redress racial wrongs, he sympathized with black nationalists’ calls for separate black institutions but also pushed for affirmative action at Harvard and elsewhere.

 

On CNN, O’Brien and Pollak clashed over Pollak’s assertion that “white supremacy is at the heart of critical race theory.” It’s true that Bell often used that loaded term to describe what he saw as an entrenched racial hierarchy. He didn’t mean, however, that America is full of white supremacists, in the Ku Klux Klan sense. As Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic note in “Critical Race Theory: An Introduction,” those who subscribe to it believe that racism can be an everyday fact of life for people of color even if whites rarely notice it.

 

So is the theory radical? Yes, in the sense that it questions fundamental assumptions. Critical race theorists argue that what many Americans think of as the "white race" does not describe a distinct group of people but rather a social construct that serves to benefit some groups and marginalize others. And unlike some strands of academic and legal thought, critical race theory has an open and activist agenda, with an emphasis on storytelling and personal experience. It’s about righting wrongs, not just questing after knowledge.

 

But Bell and his fellow theorists, who include Kimberlé Crenshaw, Mari Matsuda, and Charles Lawrence, were not radical in the sense of advocating extreme tactics to achieve political ends, like Greenpeace or the Irish Republican Army. They fought their battles in the halls of academia, not on the streets. And many of their ideas are not radical today in the sense of being outside the mainstream: Critical race theory is widely taught and studied, not only in law but in sociology, education, and other fields. And it is part of the mainstream debates over affirmative action, immigration, and hate-crime laws. (Slate.com March 9, 2012, at 2:59 PM ET)

 

So Oremus is saying CRT was not advocating a Black Revolution to terminate the U.S. Constitution and redistribute power and wealth to give minority races (Bell is thinking African-Americans) a leg up on the White Race like violent White Supremacists would do to minorities to denigrate their racial existence. CRT is different than violent White Supremacists because the theory advocates a societal-cultural transformation by writing about it in academia. What? So CRT is good because it wants to destroy the American experiment in Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness of Constitutional government because the White Race wrote the instruments of power to remain superior to any other race on a subliminal level; ergo it must change. Change how? Oremus DOES NOT really delve into the CRT methodology of this transformative change. I think the methodology is evident in the Gramsci-Alinsky-Obama model to use the U.S. Constitution to destroy the U.S. Constitution.

 

The change Bell intended for America and that President Barack Hussein Obama subscribes to may not be an immediate minority revolution to overthrow the White Race, but the Bell-Obama concept of Change is a racial theory to terminate the U.S. Constitution. After the Constitution is rendered to a relic of history the intention is to continue to whittle away the vision of the Founding Fathers to make America closer akin to a Marxist Amerika in which self-initiative, merit, power and property are redistributed in such a way that minorities tell the White majority how to exist in a kind of reverse Apartheid.

 

Violent or not, Professor Bell was an anti-White racist with a hatred that moved him to rip power and property from his perceived enemy race to bring equality to minorities in an egalitarian-authoritarian manner. In full disclosure I believe Bell intended to share that power and property with the enemy White Race, but only with those with a utopian Marxist like vision that eliminates property and Liberty that is still constitutional today.

 

Breitbart.com has a better explanation of Critical Race Theory than Oremus’ pro-CRT view. It is a bit lengthy but you need to read it to understand how anti-American Derrick Bell was and to understand that President Barack Hussein Obama totally buys into this theory to destroy the American way of life.

 

JRH 3/14/12

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment
March 14 2012 4 14 /03 /March /2012 11:50

Here is a short yet informative video that demonstrates why Israel is not occupying a land called Palestine. The essence of that reason is that Palestine as a nation or a national people have NEVER EXISTED!

 

JRH 3/14/12 (Hat Tip: HelpIslam01)

*******************************

VIDEO: Are the Palestinians an Occupied Nation?

 

 


 


 

 

Uploaded by DoYouWantoKnow

Uploaded: Feb 9, 2012

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Israel
write a comment
March 13 2012 3 13 /03 /March /2012 12:56

Gaubatz---Muslim-Mafia.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© March 13, 2012

 

Father and son – Dave and Chris Gaubatz – are American heroes. Dave Gaubatz and Paul Sperry co-authored the book “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that's Conspiring to Islamize America”. I have read this book and it is extremely informative backed up by original documents. The original documents were acquired by Chris Gaubatz in a civilian undercover capacity working inside the web of deceit inherent in the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). I have several posts concerning the book Muslim Mafia. Here is a link to one of the first that is actually a WND promo but is still a good synopsis of the book.

 

The thing is CAIR was not pleased with the publication of the Muslim Mafia because it exposed the true nature of CAIR’s inner workings. So CAIR – like so many Islamist organizations pretending to be Moderate Islam – decided to sue the Gaubatzes. Unfortunately for CAIR could not bring a suit for defamation or of character assassination because the book is backed up by CAIR documents that Chris Gaubatz managed to acquire for his dad and Paul Sperry to write the exposé on CAIR. There are NO inaccuracies in the Muslim Mafia. The Legal Jihad solution for CAIR was to sue the Gaubatzes for illegally obtaining private documents. If CAIR wins its lawsuit with the Gaubatzes the suit includes an order to destroy all the Muslim Mafia books that remain unsold.

 

 


 

 

 

 

The civil suit in essence is a ploy to hide the reality of a Radical Islamic agenda to replace the U.S. Constitution with Islam, Sharia Law and a Caliphate. In hiding that Radical Islamic agenda CAIR is trying to bury the Gaubatzes in legal fees to bankrupt them into submission as well as to removing the Muslim Mafia from the bookshelves.

 

Friends we must aid the Gaubatz family in fighting this Legal Jihad/lawfare civil suit to keep the truth about CAIR and Radical Islam alive. If or when you read the Muslim Mafia you will understand that Muslim apologists are lying to you when they tell you the religion of Mohammed is a harmless religion of peace. Islamic holy writings and commentaries from Islam’s earliest days are manuals to conquer the world to force people to embrace the mind-slavery of a theopolitical cult.

 

VIDEO: Muslim Brotherhood Frontgroup CAIR Battles To Silence Criticism About Islam

 

JRH 3/13/12

***********************************

Mother's nightmare: Husband, son persecuted by Muslim Mafia

 

By Lorrie Gaubatz

Email sent from WND

Sent: 3/13/2012 7:38 AM

 

Dear Friend,

 

My husband and my son, David and Chris Gaubatz, are being sued by the radical Hamas front group, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), because of a book my husband wrote about them.

In addition, CAIR is trying to trump up criminal charges against my husband and son in an attempt to have them sent to jail.

The legal bills for their defense already amount to more than $500,000.00 and these bills will climb to over $1,000,000.00 by next year.

This is a staggering amount and it will require that my husband and son work the rest of their lives to pay these legal expenses.

That's why I hope you will support our Legal Defense Fund with your contributions to defray these skyrocketing costs. For contributions of $25 or more, we'll send you copies of both the hardcover book, "Muslim Mafia," as well as the e-book version, which we encourage you to distribute freely to all those Americans who still need a wakeup call on the threat of Islamic subversion in the U.S.

As a wife and mother, this has become my worst real-life nightmare. The two most important men in my life are facing ruined reputations and complete financial devastation for exposing some of America's most dangerous enemies.

My husband's best-selling book, Muslim Mafia – Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America, exposes CAIR as a secret network organization that supports Hamas and other terrorist groups that promote Islamic jihad against the United States.

The book is the story of well-financed "terrorists in suits."

You may have never heard of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. The name sounds innocent enough and that is exactly why the leaders of CAIR picked that name.

CAIR wants everyone to think of them as a harmless non-profit organization that serves as a civil rights advocate for U.S. Muslims.

In grim reality, CAIR is part of a Muslim Brotherhood conspiracy to support Islamic terrorism and import deadly jihad and Islamic fascism to America.

CAIR even bears a striking resemblance to the Communist front organizations that were active in the United States fifty and sixty years ago.

Like the Communist front groups, CAIR publicly espouses friendship, tolerance and understanding...

...while the groups CAIR aligns itself with behind closed doors call for "death to America.'

CAIR was even named as an "unindicted co-conspirator" in a federal trial involving a group that was convicted on all 108 counts of fundraising on behalf of the terrorist group, Hamas.

The mainstream media and our elected officials have been hiding behind political correctness in failing to keep the American public informed about this "religious crime syndicate."

Now the leadership of CAIR has an army of lawyers working to financially destroy my family and also scare off any other patriotic American who might tell the truth about CAIR and its treacherous schemes.

My husband and son could work the rest of their lives in order to satisfy a CAIR legal judgment and pay the legal bills if they lose this lawsuit.

In addition, CAIR's lawsuit asks that all of the copies of Muslim Mafia be "expunged."

"Expunged," in this case means "destroyed."

That's why I hope you will support our Legal Defense Fund. For contributions of $25 or more, we'll send you copies of both the hardcover book, "Muslim Mafia," as well as the e-book version, which we encourage you to distribute freely to all those Americans who still need a wakeup call on the threat of Islamic subversion in the U.S.

CAIR wants all the copies of the book destroyed because that book contains facts and evidence that could lead to the criminal prosecution of CAIR on numerous charges.

CAIR's lawsuit does not challenge the "facts" in the book because the "facts" are all true and not in dispute.

CAIR simply wants all the copies of Muslim Mafia burned, thereby destroying the evidence against them.

This lawsuit is also CAIR's shot-across-the-bow of conservative authors and conservative television and radio hosts.

If CAIR wins this lawsuit against my husband and son, then you can bet that CAIR's lawyers will sue conservative commentators such as Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck and Michael Savage if they ever publicly speak of CAIR again.

A CAIR victory in this lawsuit will set the precedent that will enable even more CAIR high-dollar lawsuits against other CAIR critics.

And while CAIR publicly portrays itself as an advocacy group that promotes the understanding of Islam and friendly relations with non-Muslim Americans, it is actually a terrorist organization with the ultimate goal of "eliminating and destroying" American society "from within."

 

Before I go any farther, let me introduce myself and also tell you a little about my husband, David, and my son, Chris.

My name is Lorrie Gaubatz and I am a typical American housewife and mother who cares deeply about her husband and son...and my country.

My husband, David, is a twenty-year military veteran who spent twelve years with the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations working on "black projects" in the Middle East. He is an expert on the Arab culture and was the first U.S. civilian federal agent deployed into Iraq at the beginning of the Iraq War. While there, he led the rescue of the family of Mohammed Al-Rehaief, the Iraqi lawyer who helped rescue Pfc. Jessica Lynch, a POW.

My son, Chris, worked as his father's chief field investigator for the book. Chris has been a wonderful son. He's only 32 years-old and just starting out on a life of his own. He was instrumental in helping with the research for Muslim Mafia. In fact, Muslim Mafia could never have been written without Chris' efforts.

Click here to lean more about Muslim Mafia.

When David left the government, he started a consulting firm to train law enforcement in Arabic language and customs and he found himself working alongside CAIR officials. Like many, he assumed CAIR was a moderate group and invited its speakers to join his lecture series and they did.

But after federal prosecutors named CAIR as an unindicted co-conspirator in a major terrorism-financing case, David realized he'd been working with the enemy and he decided that CAIR deserved closer investigation.

Here are just a few of David and Chris' explosive revelations that were learned from their investigation:



• CAIR officials are secretly coaching terrorism suspects and witnesses to withhold information from FBI investigators and have successfully obstructed at least one investigation in Maryland.

• CAIR tried to obtain the prison release of one of their former headquarter officials who trained for jihad with the same Pakistani terrorist group that massacred more than 150 people in Mumbai, India in 2008.

• CAIR has previously unreported ties to al-Qaida, in addition to Hamas, and has worked closely with al-Qaida field commanders inside America.

• CAIR donated thousands of dollars to the legal defense fund of a Muslim cop killer.

• CAIR is running an influence operation against members of Congressional Homeland Security committees and planted spies in Congressional offices.

• CAIR tried to muscle out other groups to represent the so-called Flying Imams against US Airways by promising the Imams "large compensation."

• CAIR and the ACLU have formed a strategic partnership to target the FBI with "ethnicity related" civil rights complaints.

• CAIR is lobbying the Justice Department and local law enforcement to exempt Muslim wife-beaters from laws against domestic violence.

• CAIR executives travel regularly to the Middle East to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars from Saudi princes even though it claims to receive no foreign support.

• CAIR sent $40,000 to a Hamas front group shortly before that group wired $40,000 to Hamas.

• CAIR has partnered with Arab investors to finance its Washington, DC headquarters and also buy up an alarming number of real estate parcels in downtown Washington, DC.

• CAIR's founder hosted the notorious Blind Sheik at his home during the period in which the cleric was plotting to blow up the World Trade Center.

 

These revelations are just a few of the many shocking facts in my husband's book, Muslim Mafia.

You can easily see why CAIR wants to stop the book from being sold and why they want to threaten my husband and son with financial ruin.

CAIR has always had a high-power legal team that uses, and abuses, our legal system to its advantage.

Now the CAIR lawyers have my husband and my son in their crosshairs.

 

We can't expect any help from the media, our elected officials or even any mainstream religious leaders as they are afraid that CAIR will brand them as being "anti-Muslim" and bigoted.

This is why I thought that if I wrote to you and explain the situation, you would help my family in this way:

I hope you will help my husband and son with the overwhelming legal bills they have incurred.

Part of CAIR's legal strategy against David and Chris is to make the cost of defending themselves so high that they will just quit fighting in court.

As I am writing this letter, the legal bills for David and Chris are more than $500,000.00.

By the middle of next year the bills are expected to exceed more than $1,000,000.00, more money than my husband earned during his entire career in his military service to the United States.

This is far more than they can afford on their own and this is also why I'm writing you.

Will you please help David and Chris with a contribution to their legal defense fund?

I hope you can give $25 to their defense fund, if you can, I'll send you a copy of my husband's best-selling book, Muslim Mafia – Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America.

Please consider donating $50, that way you can keep one copy of Muslim Mafia for yourself and give the other copy to a friend or family member who needs to know the truth about CAIR.

I know we have never met and I don't like asking strangers for money but I am at the end of my rope and I don't know who else to ask.

Will you please help my husband and my son?

If you can give $25 – it will go a long way to help pay down the $500,000.00 in legal bills I will have to pay.

CAIR and their radical Islamic allies are counting on a victory in the lawsuit against my husband and son so they can then go after Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage and any other publication or television or radio personality that calls CAIR's true intentions into question.

So please use the enclosed reply envelope to rush back your "Note of Support" and your largest possible contribution to the David and Chris Gaubatz Defense Fund.

I hope you can donate $25.

 

Muslim Mafia reads like a Tom Clancy novel but you don't have to take my word for it. Here is a well-known national bookseller's description of Muslim Mafia:

Muslim Mafia is ...an undercover expose'...of the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations that resulted in the collection of thousands of pages of smoking-gun documents from this terror-supporting front group for the dangerous, mob-like Muslim Brotherhood. This is what Muslim Mafia delivers. It has all the elements of a top-flight mystery novel, but the situations and conversations are real. The book's frightening allegations are supported by more than 12,000 pages of confidential CAIR documents and hundreds of hours of video captured in an unprecedented undercover operation. This trail of information reveals the seditious and well-funded efforts of the Brotherhood under the nonprofit guise of CAIR to support the international jihad against the U.S..

So please, right now while you are thinking about it, grab your checkbook and make a contribution to the WND Legal Defense Fund for David and Chris Gaubatz today.



•  You may send a check to WND.com, P.O. Box 1627, Medford, OR 97501. (Be sure to mark your check "legal defense fund.")

•  Click here to donate by credit card or Paypal.

•  Finally, if you prefer, you may donate by calling our toll-free order line: 1-800-4-WND-COM (1-800-496-3266).


I thank you for taking the time to read my letter and I hope to hear back from you in the next five days as money is urgently needed to pay the legal bills incurred defending my husband and son from the Islamic jihadists at CAIR.

Sincerely yours,

Lorrie Gaubatz
Wife of David Gaubatz
Mother of Chris Gaubatz

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment

Overview

  • : ubiquitous8thoughts
  • ubiquitous8thoughts
  • : This is a Christian Right blog. This means there is religious freedom, free speech, Constitutional Original Intent, Pro-Israel, Anti-Islamist and a dose of Biblical Morality (Pro-Life & anti-homosexual agenda) content in this blog.
  • Contact

Search

Links