Overblog Follow this blog
Administration Create my blog
November 6 2011 1 06 /11 /November /2011 13:10


Kryzhanovsky, Clinton, Bush, Obama


Posted November 6, 2011


This is part of the ongoing chapters sent by Tom Smith in comment form to SlantRight.com of Mikhail Kryzhanovsky’s manual – The Professional - for Presidents to attain power, remain in power and deal with power. Since I began editing and posting the chapters that Tom Smith sent me I have ran into a website that is doing the same thing and apparently has received directly content from Kryzhanovsky. That website is Pooler-Georgia-Homepage. Interestingly PGH is not a conspiracy theory or a political blog as much as it is an information website for Pooler, GA. PGH begins with The Professional introduction which includes a disclaimer from PGH. Since the content is from Kryzhanovsky at PGH it is probably closer to its original form than what I am editing from the Tom Smith comment version sent to me. Frankly I am reading the Tom Smith version as I am editing it. I have no idea how many actual chapters there are in The Professional. The only real reason for posting Kryzhanovsky’s manual is to honor my commitment to fairness in comments sent to the SlantRight.com website. From what I have read about Mikhail Kryzhanovsky he is a bit too fantastic to believe; however his focus currently seems to be anti-Obama. That works for me!


The PGH website gives two links to Kryzhanovsky websites if you believe his stuff:




Barack Obama 2012 - Kryzhanovsky blog


Here are the three chapters I have posted to date:


Chapter 1


Chapter 2


Chapter 3


Video: Mikhail Kryzhanovsky, KGB, rules USA




Chapter 4 on SlantRight 2.0


JRH 11/6/11

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Conspiracy Theory
write a comment
November 5 2011 7 05 /11 /November /2011 16:59




John R. Houk

© November 5, 2011


There have Third Parties in America in frequency since the early 1900s. Most of these Third Parties have served as a rallying point for Americans that are disenchanted with the politics as usual in Washington, DC. This means the disenchantment was aimed at both the Democrats and Republicans.


As time has gone on though the fire that attracted people to a particular Third Party in America’s modern era began to feel more enfranchised by associating themselves with the closest elements representing their politics whether it be Democrats or Republicans. I suspect that is the reason fringe Leftist and fringe Right groups never really grow because they represent a narrow political agenda of the political spectrum.


I have noticed though that it seems Leftist fringe political parties tend to have existed longer than political parties considered on the fringe Right. For example there has been a national Communist Party (in one form or another) since the Bolshevik Revolution that brought Communists to power in Russia circa 1917.


Third Parties of the political Right tend to be centered on Christianity and Original Intent Constitutionalism. Some of these political parties may have had a blip of importance in national politics; however one or two things tended to evaporate these Third Parties on a national scale.


The first thing is the ire of voters seems to coalesce on a national grassroots basis. Voter ire seems to dissipate as factions within the Republican Party begin to carry the voice of disenfranchised voters draining a prominent Third Party of national support.


The second thing is a charismatic person attracts Conservatives like a magnate because the person appears to represent the voice of disenfranchised voters on a national basis. Ross Perot comes to mind.


Today’s Tea Party Movement has not evolved into a National Tea Party primarily as the result of the grassroots nature of the Movement. Tea Partiers have wisely kept themselves enfranchised and influential by allying themselves to the Republican Party. Thus there is a local effort to promote Republican candidates that have Tea Party values over the Republican establishment or RINOs.


Still there are Conservative political Third Parties attempting to gain national attention (List of 3rd Parties of Left & Right) to offer a candidate that is able to reject Center-Left to Fringe-Left political ideas that reject Christianity, Constitutional Originalism and Conservative Politics.


The Constitution Party currently has the reputation as the largest of the Conservative Third Parties. I have considered several times to inch up to the Constitution Party; however I have come to the conclusion that the only way to keep President Barack Hussein Obama a one term President is to vote Republican whoever the GOP candidate turns out to be.


Now the whole reason on this little thought process of Third Party politics in the USA is a WorldNetDaily article of the American Independent Party nominee for President – Laurie Roth.


Ms Roth is a radio talk show host from my home State of Washington (Currently I reside in Oklahoma). The whole idea of a Conservative candidate hailing from the unfortunate Left leaning Washington State fascinated me. Washington State is God’s country in beauty, but it is horribly twisted politically – to my shame.




Laurie Roth’s About.com Profile:


Radio: "The Roth Show" broadcasts to over 45 stations nationally on the IRN-USA Radio Network. It airs 6 - 9 p.m. ET, 3 - 6 p.m. PT.


The flagship station is KSBN AM 1230 in Spokane Washington. The Laurie Roth Show is conservative-leaning talk.


She has hosted successful talk shows on radio stations from Boston to L.A.


Background: Laurie Roth has a Ph.D. in counseling and a black belt in Tae Kwon Do.


She is a singer/songwriter with five CD albums to her credit, one track which landed her in Billboard's top 40 ranks and on the cover of Cash Box Magazine.


She plays the piano, keyboard, and violin.


Did You Know: Roth came back from a devastating deer accident while riding her motorcycle in 2005.


Television: She was the Host and Co-Producer for the popular PBS Show, CD Highway, which was broadcast on 155 stations across the country.


Here is Laurie Roth’s announcement for the Office of President from her Ning site which includes a bit of her political agenda:


Dr. Laurie Roth declares her run for President of the United States


Posted by Rev. LED Dowell

November 3, 2011 at 3:51pm

Roth Revolution Blog

Rev. LED Dowell's Blog


November 2nd, 2011


Dr. Laurie Roth is officially declaring her bid to run for President of the United States as a patriot, conservative, independent candidate. In California she will be on the ballot, running on the American Independent Party ticket.  Dr. Laurie Roth is a National Radio Talk show host on air for over 11 years www.therothshow.com. She follows and covers the hard hitting issues that affect and infect our entire country. She is a publisher of articles in many conservative journals that put light on critical issues America faces most and media and political power class avoid.


Journals include:














The issues:


* Forced an unconstitutional health care bill.


* Obama sued and stood against his own Governors.


* Threatened and targeted coal plants for closure.


* Breached the war powers act of 1973 and put us in an illegal war in Libya


* Lack of border security. 200 billion in drug trade and between 10-40 million illegal aliens who receive citizen tax payer dollars for health care, education and housing.


* Insulted and turned against Israel.


* Obama is ineligible to be President. He has presented a verified forgery of his long form birth certificate on April 27th 2011.


Dr. Laurie Roth supporters which include companies and individuals, join together in confidence of her candidacy. This will lead to victory for our nation. She and others know she is the candidate who will make the real difference for our country.


Many have prayed about this and are confident that Dr. Laurie Roth is what America needs. In her published book ‘The People’s President’ her platform is clear. It is available at www.amazon.com and book stores.


As the leader Dr. Laurie Roth will:


Institute a Federal 2% point of purchase tax. No group will be exempt. 10-20 trillion dollars annually will be collected, while citizens are liberated from massive, controlling tax oppression.


Become totally energy Independent in 4 years. America will be the largest exporter of energy in the world. Disconnect from OPEC. Employ 20 million people in energy infrastructure jobs: natural gas, oil, nuclear, solar and alternative fuels.


Secure Americas borders. Stop illegal aliens. Stop illegal drug trade. Use all technology available. Honor those who choose to be a citizen of the United States who do it properly and legally.


Create Jobs. The 2% point of purchase tax will create millions of jobs in the nation. Infrastructure projects, small businesses and home based businesses will be supported.


Restore international relationships and image. Lead America with the revision of the American Start Treaty. Stand against Islamic fundamentalism and radicalism. Institute fair trade agreements.


Promote Judeo Christian values in America. This includes our nation’s historical strength from God and the Holy Bible – including Christian principles – prayer, freedom, exceptionalism and supporting a movement away from regulation, taxation and litigation. Those who disagree are not assailed.


Dr. Laurie Roth is a patriot and survivor who loves God, family, country and the Constitution of the United States.


For victory we need:


* Endorsements


* Financial contributions


* Volunteers


Roth is running on the party of ‘REAL’ – Responsive, Excellence, Americanism and Liberty. Dr. Roth’s experience dedication and courage will serve America.


You will be a partner to make America great. Your support will be what is necessary to create the momentum to make America the country that people strive to be a citizen of, because of strength, opportunity and freedom.


Join this movement.












http://www.twitter.com/teamlaurieroth  / @teamlaurieroth


Your emails, endorsements and financial contributions are appreciated.


Donations made out to: Laurie Roth campaign


Thank you and God bless you.




Laurie Roth


drljroth@aol.com  / www.rothrevolution.ning.com


Sheryl McGrath / sherylmcgrath@comcast.net


Rev. Lainie Dowell / revldowell-clergywomen@erols.com


JRH 11/5/11

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment
November 4 2011 6 04 /11 /November /2011 12:01

John R. Houk

© November 4, 2011






Remember when Democrats, Left Wing pundits, MSM and race card organizations like the NAACP accused the Tea Party Movement of being a combination of Right Wing Extremists and racists bent toward a path of guns and violence? Let’s compare the real Tea Party Movement to the Occupy Mobs that are spreading across America.





In a video circulated Tuesday by conservative commentator Glen Beck’s website The Blaze, Indiana Rep. Andre Carson said the Tea Party was preventing African Americans from making progress toward equality.


“This is the effort that we are seeing of Jim Crow. Some of these folks in Congress right now would love to see us as second class citizens. Some of them in Congress right now with this Tea Party movement would love to see you and me… hanging on a tree,” Carson said at a Aug. 22 Congressional Black Caucus Job Tour even in Miami.



Another Congressional Black Caucus member Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., also had harsh words for the Tea Party last week when she said members of the movement could “go straight to hell.”


“I’m not afraid of anybody. This is a tough game. You can’t be intimidated. You can’t be frightened. As far as I’m concerned the Tea Party can go straight to hell,” Waters said at an Aug. 20 “Kitchen Table Summit” which she hosted with her fellow California Democrats Rep. Karen Bass and Rep. Laura Richardson. (Rep. Andre Carson: Tea Party Wants To See Blacks ‘Hanging On A Tree’; By Amy Bingham; ABC New – The Note, Aug 31, 2011 10:51am)


Left Wing Pundits



We also held the belief that the Tea Party movement was inherently dishonest, and certainly dangerous. One need only look at their signs and their rhetoric at their so called rallies. Or the town hall meetings where they set the standard for thuggish behavior and mob mentality intended to intimidate and threaten. Or how they attack those they disagree with, like the man with Parkinsons at a healthcare reform rally or the woman that three men from the Tea Party beat up at a Rand Paul political rally.


Given the movement’s evil and hateful foundation, we also thought the movement would implode on itself at some point and for any number of reasons. Perhaps the abject greed that is its foundation would cause it to feed on the very people who supported it. Or maybe the core of hatred that sustains it would result in internacine warfare. Or with so many Republican ‘Tea Party’ candidates having taken advantage of the limited attention span of the American voter and getting elected, America would finally see the despicable character of the individuals who expediently rode the anger and vitriol of the movement for their own personal, and the GOP’s gain, like dead-beat dad Joe Walsh of Illinois, and realize they had been duped into supporting people that represented a movement that could care less about effective governance, or the well being of the United States of America as a whole.



Of course, this does not mean that the Tea Party is gone, or that it won’t still pose a threat to fair minded and patriotic Americans. In the months ahead, we can expect to see the movement become more angry, more volatile, and even more dangerous as it desperately seeks to remain relevant. However, as the recent polling has shown, it is far, far too late for the Tea Party Movement to save itself or the hateful doctrine it embraces. It was always a movement founded on lies, disinformation and fear, and such a movement cannot, and will not survive in the greatest country on earth. (The Tea Party doctrine of hate makes the movement less popular then Gays and Muslims!; By E. Gray; Don’t Tea on Me, September 6, 2011)


Mainstream Media



And while the public image of the Tea Party focuses on a desire to shrink government, concern over big government is hardly the only or even the most important predictor of Tea Party support among voters.


So what do Tea Partiers have in common? They are overwhelmingly white, but even compared to other white Republicans, they had a low regard for immigrants and blacks long before Barack Obama was president, and they still do.


More important, they were disproportionately social conservatives in 2006 — opposing abortion, for example — and still are today. Next to being a Republican, the strongest predictor of being a Tea Party supporter today was a desire, back in 2006, to see religion play a prominent role in politics. And Tea Partiers continue to hold these views: they seek “deeply religious” elected officials, approve of religious leaders’ engaging in politics and want religion brought into political debates. The Tea Party’s generals may say their overriding concern is a smaller government, but not their rank and file, who are more concerned about putting God in government.


This inclination among the Tea Party faithful to mix religion and politics explains their support for Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and Gov. Rick Perry of Texas. Their appeal to Tea Partiers lies less in what they say about the budget or taxes, and more in their overt use of religious language and imagery, including Mrs. Bachmann’s lengthy prayers at campaign stops and Mr. Perry’s prayer rally in Houston.


Yet it is precisely this infusion of religion into politics that most Americans increasingly oppose. While over the last five years Americans have become slightly more conservative economically, they have swung even further in opposition to mingling religion and politics. It thus makes sense that the Tea Party ranks alongside the Christian Right in unpopularity.


On everything but the size of government, Tea Party supporters are increasingly out of step with most Americans, even many Republicans. Indeed, at the opposite end of the ideological spectrum, today’s Tea Party parallels the anti-Vietnam War movement which rallied behind George S. McGovern in 1972. The McGovernite activists brought energy, but also stridency, to the Democratic Party — repelling moderate voters and damaging the Democratic brand for a generation. By embracing the Tea Party, Republicans risk repeating history. (Crashing the Tea Party; By DAVID E. CAMPBELL and ROBERT D. PUTNAM; New York Times – The Opinion Pages, August 16, 2011)


Left Wing – Race Card Organizations


“A watched tea pot never boils.”


That’s the rallying slogan of a new online “watchdog” site launched by the NAACP, in conjunction with partners ThinkProgress, George Soros’ Media Matters and a group called New Left Media.  TeaPartyTracker.org advertises itself as a site that “monitors racism and other forms of extremism within the Tea Party movement.”


According to the Daily Caller, the NAACP reached out to the various groups for help in compiling information implicating the Tea Party:


Media Matters and Think Progress representatives said their content and reporting haven’t changed and that the NAACP approached their organizations seeking only to republish select content they’ve produced. The NAACP’s new teapartytracker.org is aimed specifically at highlighting “racism” in the Tea Party.


New Left Media, the duo of Chase Whiteside and Erick Stoll who use a “Trojan trick” to get interviews with Tea Partiers, is also a partner organization on the new site.


As for what Media Matters, New Left Media, Think Progress and the NAACP plan to do with teapartytracker.org, Think Progress editor Faiz Shakir and Media Matters Vice President for Research and Communications Ari Rabin-Havt said the NAACP contacted them about sharing content related to the Tea Party.


Tea Partiers beware — the NAACP is watching you, and they now have a website where people can post “evidence” of racism and extremism.  But despite Andrew Breitbart’s offer of a sizable reward for solid evidence, there remains none. (NAACP Joins Left-Wing Groups to ‘Monitor’ Tea Party Groups; By Meredith Jessup; The Blaze, September 3, 2010 at 1:39am)


In their report, “Rage on the Right: The Year in Hate and Extremism,” Intelligence Report, Spring 2010, asserts that the Tea Party movement is “shot through with rich veins of radical ideas, conspiracy theories and racism.” They quote radical scribe Chip Berlet, who breathlessly charges, “We are in the midst of one of the most significant right-wing populist rebellions in United States history.” The SPLC goes on to complain that only 25 percent of respondents to a recent NBC News/ Wall Street Journal poll think the federal government can be trusted. And, according to the SPLC, another dangerous sign of the times is the introduction in 37 state legislatures of “Tenth Amendment Resolutions,” based on the constitutional provision keeping all powers not explicitly given to the federal government with the states. (Targeting the Tea Parties; By Wayne Lutton; The Social Contract Press, Volume 20, Number 3 (Spring 2010), Issue theme: "The Southern Poverty Law Center - A Special Report")






All of these fears that are actually propaganda lies from the Left are pointed to the Tea Party Movement. NOW, after the Occupy Movement is spreading across the nation, there is an extreme lack of reporting on the real violence and thuggery going on inspired by the Left.


Jeff Jacoby has written an article entitled, “Occupiers, Tea Partiers, and the Tenth Amendment.” Jacoby exposes this Leftist hypocrisy of accusing the Tea Party Movement rallies of all kinds of despicable acts when the reality is these dysfunctional Occupy kids not only have no idea what they are protesting but are receiving an education on how to protest from Left Wing interests that are promoting violence and anarchy against the legal authorities AND also exacting vandalism, theft and rape. I dare anyone that is not a lunatic that say this same action occurs at Tea Party Movement rallies.


JRH 11/4/11

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment
November 3 2011 5 03 /11 /November /2011 14:34




John R. Houk

© November 3, 2011


Rep. Louis Gohmert (TX-R) exposes just how much the U.S. government has been infiltrated by the Radical Islamic Fifth Column today. Now I certain that President Bush began to allow this Fifth Column idiocy more out of advice to prevent American rage at all Muslims because of the Islamic act of war of attacking American soil on September 11, 2001. I believe that was bad advice acted upon with good intentions.


Then there is the Obama Administration! Even before President Barack Hussein Obama was elected to Office on the LIE of “Change,” he had many associations with Muslim apologists that defended Islam more as a deception to validate all Islam rather than to admit the dark side of Islam. It is the dark side of Islam that should illicit fear in Americans; hence Islamophobia. However, not the kind of fear that leads to hatred, rather the kind of fear that leads to anger. Angry at what?


Angry that the core values of Islam desires to “Change” American Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness because those values and rights do not exist in Islam particularly to non-Muslims. Islam does not care about the rights of non-Muslims; however it does care about the rights of Muslims except where Sharia Law is violated, Mohammed is insulted, Allah is insulted or Islam in general is insulted. The nature of Islam requires harsh punishment even for Muslims that step outside the box of listed freedoms available. Hence ALL criticism – warranted or unwarranted – in Islam for either Muslim or non-Muslim is punishable within Islamic culture.


Americans should be angry when anti-American Fifth Column Muslims operate to dilute the U.S. Constitution by using the word “Islamophobia” as a race violation. Islamophobes as I am, that expose the dark side of Islam are not racists. Exposing Islam is protecting the U.S. Constitution and American heritage. This is the America that Obama wants changed and will utilize Islamic culturalism to offset the Christian heritage with the agenda of allowing anti-religion Leftism to give Christianity the boot.


It is a foolish tact by Leftists because a neutralized Christianity quite probably enables Islam to touch human emotions. In the case of Islam those emotions are not love of fellow humanity but only the love of Muslims. All else must be eliminated for there to be submission of one mindset even if the elimination is processed in a violent and reprehensible manner.


With that in mind Rep. Gohmert takes Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to task about Radical Islamic people infiltrating the government that has more of an agenda to support Radical Islam (ergo Islamic terrorists) than the U.S. Constitution and American Culture with a Christian Heritage.


JRH 11/3/11


U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert Grills Napolitano


Sent by ACT for America

Sent: 11/01/2011 01:31 PM 


Have you signed the “protect your state from sharia law” petition?


U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert is a former Texas judge who spoke at the legislative briefing segment of our 2011 National Conference and Legislative Briefing. He really understands the threat of radical Islam!

Recently he grilled Department of Homeland Security director Janet Napolitano. Click on the image below to watch the short video. This is the kind of accountability and transparency we need.

Gohmert’s questioning turns to ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) at about the two minute mark. But he’s not done after that. Watch all the way through and you’ll be stunned at the security breach he exposes.

Join us on Facebook and give us your feedback on this video!



Video: Rep. Gohmert Questions DHS Sec. Janet Napolitano





Is Obama Administration Encouraging Islamic Fifth Column?

John R. Houk

© November 3, 2011


U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert Grills Napolitano


ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Conspiracy Theory
write a comment
October 29 2011 7 29 /10 /October /2011 12:19


Below is another lengthy comment from Tom Smith pertaining to Mikhail Kryzhanovsky. I just discovered that Tom Smith’s last comment on SlantRight.com was cut off by the website software making the post incomplete. I suspect that is why there is this follow-up by Smith. This comment on Mikhail Kryzhanovsky is actually some chapters from the Kryzhanovsky book The Professional. Smith sent this to SlantRight.com using the comment format.  My comment software does not send data in paragraph style and is also sent as plain text meaning links are not active. The editing for this post is minimal under the assumption Smith copy and pasted this from the Kryzhanovsky book. There is a big chance the format I went with does not comply with the original Kryzhanovsky book. Incidentally this comment was sent in September. The reason for the late posting is because the editing will be a task. I am posting the Tom Smith comment version of The Professional on SlantRight 2.0.


I have to mention that I believe that Kryzhanovsky’s claims are full of bologna; nonetheless there are amazing similarities to the past Obama campaign of 2008. I suspect the text is the result of witty observation rather than any actual connection to Clinton or Obama.


JRH 10/29/11

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Conspiracy Theory
write a comment
October 28 2011 6 28 /10 /October /2011 17:54



John R. Houk

© October 28, 2011


Compare the U.S. Constitution with Sharia Law. As an American you should become outraged. Most of the body of Sharia Law becomes irrelevant in America by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution:


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. (First Amendment)


In Sharia the religion of Islam MUST be established as the State Religion with all other religions (or lack of religion) not able to practice their faith openly or in many cases not at all.


A Dhimmi lives in fear of Islam but agrees that they will not resist political Islam and they will even support it. In return dhimmis can live safely. …



The Dhimmi was a unique invention by Mohammed. He created a new type of creature and that creature is a semi-slave. Dhimmis started with what Mohammed did to the Jews. He took their land and then let them work the land and the dhimmis paid a tax, the jhizya, that was half of their income. A Dhimmi was a kafir who lived in an Islamic country. The first dhimmis were the Jews, but Christians and others were added later.


… The laws were Islamic; the dress was dictated by Islamic law. A Dhimmi was not really free. For instance a church couldn't ring its bells because bells are a sign of Satan, according to Mohammed. A Dhimmi couldn't hold any job that made him a supervisor over Muslims. This limited rank in the military. If Christians wanted to repair the church, or Jews the synagogue, they had to get permission from the government. All of these laws are dreadful because they established a second-class citizenship; the dhimmi did not have civil rights. A dhimmi couldn't sue a Muslim or prosecute a crime against a Muslim. This type of citizen had no power and had to pay a special tax--the Jhizya. The Koran says that the dhimmi had to pay the Jhizya. Classically when the Christian or the Jewish dhimmi came to pay their yearly Jhizya tax, they were humiliated-- grabbed by the beard, slapped in the face, or made to kneel and give the money. They were humiliated because that was the Koran said to humiliate the dhimmi. (From The Dhimmi; Political Islam 10/28/11)


There is no religious freedom in Sharia Law!


Can Sharia Law abide this portion of the First Amendment: “or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press”?


Here is an example of American law bending toward dhimmitude by ignoring Free Speech:


In 2009 the toxic, politically correct atmosphere in the U.S. reached out and touched an American Christian group personally. The Christian Action Network (CAN) had its non-profit status revoked [SlantRight Editor: If this CAN link fails, GO HERE for story] and was fined $4,000 by the state of Maine in 2009 for "an inflammatory anti-Muslim message."

CAN sent information to its members exposing schooling programs that took place in Byron, Calif., that required students to dress up as Muslims, chant "Praise be to Allah" and learn the Five Pillars of Islamic faith. The letter asked parents to sign a petition to the governor of their state to prohibit such Islamic teachings and activities in their public schools.

CAN eventually prevailed in court spending thousands of dollars to fight the precedent-setting fine for "insulting" Islam.
(From: Sharia Law’s Threat to Free Speech; by Connie Hair; Human Events; 10/11/10)


Clearly the State of Maine’s attempt to label the Christian Action Network of partaking in “inflammatory anti-Muslim message” for exposing a School District in California for forcing students to learn Islamic precepts while denying the same learning of Christian or Jewish precepts. The Leftists that be in Maine were upset with CAN for encouraging their supporters in Maine to send letters to their Governor urging the same issue does not spread to Maine.


Everything inherent in the tenets of Islam is diametrically opposed to the U.S. Constitution:


Islam has no fundamental concept of Inalienable Rights as mentioned in the Declaration of Independence. Islam does not permit the individual to enjoy the freedoms of action and association characteristic of the Democracy that so many Western cultures currently enjoy today. Islam is a religion in name only because of a reference to "Allah" as their Deity. A well known fact is that Islam is a totalitarian ideology that rejects Democracy, personal freedom, and every other religion. The ideals of anti-Semitism and anti-Western Culture run rampant throughout Islam. The Laws of Man are meaningless and have absolutely no relevance in Muslim culture because they are without any direct reference to the Koran or Shariah Law and therefore they have no place in Muslim life. Islamic law is completely incompatible with Freedom, Democracy, or any other government where the people have an actual voice in government or the will of the people matters.


"True Islam permits neither elections nor democracy."

-- Sufi Mohammed, Muslim Cleric


(From Islam - A Religion Based on Terrorism; TargetOfOpportunity.com)


The webpage about Islam from TargetOfOpportunity.com is humongous. The whole page is about exposing the dark side of Islam that includes quotes that Muslim Apologists will tell you are from Radical Muslims. The webpage has an article about “Moderate Islam”. You should check it out. The point you should notice is that Islamic holy writings is the basis for Radical Islam. In essence the writings of Islam are anti-American anti-Constitutional tenets that would doom the America we know if it is allowed to spread like a culture ending cancer as it has in Europe. There is no freedom to express speech or to freely write truth in the press.


The Sharia Law of Islam would not permit the last portion of the First Amendment which stipulates as the rule of law: “the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


Suppose Christians living in a Muslim land wanted to refurbish their Church or even build a new Church:


Egyptian Muslim leaders are caught in a storm of controversy after a human rights group confronted them about a fatwa (Islamic edict) that stated the building of a church is “a sin against God.”



The controversy began when the president of the Egyptian Union Human Rights Organization, Dr. Naguib Gabraeel, asked the Fatwa Council about a statement found in a textbook at Cairo University on inheritance and execution of wills.


Students, both Muslims and Christians, were taught “it is forbidden for a person to donate money for what would lead to sin, such as donating in his will money towards build[ing] a church, a nightclub, a gambling casino, towards promoting the alcohol industry or for building a barn for rearing pigs, cats or dogs.”



The council replied by affirming the law found in the textbook and issuing a fatwa on it.


Included in the fatwa is an explanation on why it is a “sin” to build a church. According to the fatwa, Christians believe salvation is achieved through belief in Jesus as Lord while Muslims don’t. Muslims believe that Issa [Jesus in Arabic] “is a slave of Allah and His Messenger, and that Allah is one.”


The Islamic edict said God did not have a son and that Christianity deviated from absolute monotheism. Therefore, a Muslim is forbidden to donate funds towards a building that does not worship Allah alone.


The author of the textbook, Mohammed el-Maghrabbi, said it is sinful for even a Christian to devote money in his will towards building a church because it would be considered in Islamas separation from God.


In other words, it is illegal for even non-Muslims to offer money in their will towards building a church or synagogue.



After receiving the shocking response by the council, Gabraeel and a delegation from his human rights group visited the Grand Sheikh Mohamed Sayed Tantawi of the famous Al-Azhar University, a chief Sunni Islamic learning center in the world.


Tantawi contradicted the council and said “sharia does not prevent Muslims from donating to the building of a church, as it is his free money.” He also went on to say sharia law does not interfere with other faiths “because religion, faith and what a person believes in is a relationship between him and his God.”


Immediately after Tantawi’s statements were publicized, there was a backlash from the Muslim community and he revoked his statements less than 24 hours after the visit by the human rights delegation. Tantawi claimed the delegation had misunderstood him, even though everything he said was recorded and sent to media outlets and uploaded on Coptic advocacy web sites. (From Egypt Muslim Council: Building of Churches is 'Sin' Against God; By Ethan Cole; The Christian Post; September 1, 2009)


Egypt has the largest concentration of Christians of any other nation in the Muslim Middle East (including North Africa). If Sharia Law trumps the secular Egyptian Constitution just imagine how much more intolerant other Muslim nations are that have a deeper affinity to Sharia Law would have with Christians building Churches to meet peacefully to practice their religious faith.


There is no freedom to assemble in Muslim nations if those assembling have a non-Muslim air pertaining to their assembly. The article above also demonstrates that a non-Muslim has little to zero right to petition the government for redress to a wrong. A government in a Muslim nation will either persecute the non-Muslim for daring to ask a redress pertaining to grievances or will be ignored if a Muslim nation has a pseudo-secular rule of law such as in Egypt.


Why in the world would anyone in the West especially in the United States of America even consider allowing a theopolitical legal system like Sharia Law even a little toehold in American jurisprudence? You would think even Leftists would be hip to the stupidity of Sharia adulterating the American rule of law, right? I mean the Left are the guys so big on making sure religion (cough … err … Christianity) has no part with anything to do with any kind taxpayer related function, right?


The moronic Left through activist Judges in the name of multicultural diversity and the Leftist imagination of the Living Constitution (pro-Living Constitution and Anti-Living Constitution) has used every legal maneuver to reverse the will of State voters that have passed laws to ensure that NO foreign jurisprudence can be used as judicial precedent by American Courts (at least on the State level). The intent of not allowing foreign jurisprudence into the American rule of law is aimed at Sharia Law however most bills and State Constitutional Amendments had the forethought to NOT ALLOW foreign jurisprudence like say a precedent from the International Court.


Unfortunately many State and Federal Judges have been allowing Sharia Law to creep into America by either outright allowing Sharia precedents into the American rule of law or wear blinders to legally not recognize an Islamic Sharia act occurring in America by refusing to read the merits of the Islamic religious nature of crimes committed in America.


Recently a Florida State Appeals Court upheld the ruling of State Judge Richard Nielsen to allow a decision based on Sharia Law. I have to give that State Appellate Court a little credit though. Its decision was purely based on the merits of the law. Judge Nielsen ruled that a dispute between Muslims over the control of money should be allowed according to the arbitration both sides agreed to for a ruling. The losing side of the arbitration went to litigation. Essentially Judge Nielsen did not rule in favor of the defense or the plaintiffs as much as he ruled with the agreed upon arbitrator.


The problem that Judge Nielsen made for American jurisprudence is that the arbitration was entirely based on Sharia Law. Judge Nielsen’s ruling essentially gave Sharia a toehold in Florida State’s legal system. Judge Nielsen’s ruling can actually be used as a precedent in future cases involving the acceptance of Sharia Law as precedent even if the precedent is unconstitutional.


Although the Florida Appellate Court validated Judge Nielsen’s ruling, it did so by shelving the plaintiff’s petition by not even looking at the danger of Sharia Law. The Appellate Court should have examined the petition! Ruled in favor of the arbitration decision, BUT specifically spell out the ruling was based on the merits of the law and NOT Sharia Law.  


JRH 10/28/11

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
October 27 2011 5 27 /10 /October /2011 09:15

NoGuff sent some religious humor concerning Islam. Warning, if you are a Muslim you will not appreciate the video. If you are a Kafir, you will laugh hilariously!


JRH 10/27/11


Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
October 26 2011 4 26 /10 /October /2011 10:31



John R. Houk

© October 26, 2011


I am posting Michele Bachmann’s plan after Herman Cain’s because she was my first favorite GOP Candidate when this race for the GOP nomination began with a list of Candidates (otherwise it would have been Sarah Palin).


I love Michele Bachmann as a Candidate primarily because of Social Conservatism. Also Michele Bachmann is huge in the Tea Party Movement (TPM). Bachmann represents Tea Party Congressmen in the House as the leader of the Tea Party Caucus.


A Wikipedia article (Not necessarily TPM friendly) describes the TPM thus:


It [The TPM] endorses reduced government spending,[8][9] opposition to taxation in varying degrees,[9] reduction of the national debt and federal budget deficit,[8] and adherence to an originalist interpretation of the United States Constitution.[10]


Wikipedia describes the Tea Party Caucus thus:


The Tea Party Caucus is a caucus of the United States House of Representatives and Senate launched and chaired by Minnesota Congresswoman Bachmann on July 16, 2010.[1] The caucus is dedicated to promoting what it considers fiscal responsibility, adherence to the movement's interpretation of the Constitution, and limited government. The idea of a Tea Party Caucus originated from Kentucky Senator Rand Paul when he was campaigning for his current seat.[2]


The caucus was approved as an official congressional member organization by the House Administration Committee on July 19, 2010[3] and held its first meeting on July 21. Its first public event was a press conference on the grounds of the U.S. Capitol, also on July 21.[4] Four Senators joined the caucus on January 27, 2011.[5]


Michele Bachmann’s credentials as a Tea Party Conservative with Conservative Social Values are impeccable. The Bachmann campaign has thus emphasized the economics of job creation, less government and National budget plans (e.g. not raising the budget ceiling).


Bachmann’s plan is best summed up on her website:


Bachmann Introduces “American Jobs, Right Now” Blueprint for Economic Prosperity and Job Creation


Posted on October 11th, 2011


Hanover, NH – Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann announced today her blueprint for economic prosperity and job creation titled “American Jobs, Right Now.” With 9.1 percent unemployment, $16.7 trillion in national debt, and a severely weakened U.S. dollar, Bachmann is unveiling her vision for restoring confidence in the our financial system, spurring economic growth, and creating jobs for out of work Americans.


“It’s evident that the current trajectory of our country is simply not sustainable and President Obama lacks the understanding of how to return to a position of economic prominence in the world,” Bachmann said. “My blueprint will create an environment which will create real jobs here at home, and return America to a position of economic prominence in the world.”


Eleven Points of “American Jobs, Right Now” Blueprint:


REPATRIATION. More than 1.2 trillion United States dollars could be brought back to America in days as an immediate “stimulus” if the government would zero out the tax rate on that money until December 31, and then permanently keep it here in the U.S. if taxed at a rate of 5 percent. Foreign earning totaling over $1.2 trillion is more than the President’s failed stimulus and it won’t come out of taxpayer wallets. It would increase the value of the dollar, provide valuable capital for the job creators in this country and pump tremendous amounts of money into our economy.


CUT SPENDING AND GOVERNMENT. I have already voted to cut federal spending in the years ahead, every single time I have had the opportunity. In addition, I would phase out quasi-governmental enterprises, such as Fannie and Freddie, and eliminate duplicative government programs and costs. We must decrease government salaries to bring them in line with their private sector counterparts, and we must decrease the number of government employees. Over-spending by the government hurts job creation by devaluing the dollar and stealing capital from the private sector.


REPEAL OBAMACARE. Healthcare is one-sixth of the U.S. economy and this unconstitutional takeover of healthcare by the federal government is creating crippling uncertainty for employers across this country. This legislation does nothing to address the true problem with our healthcare system – cost – and will cost states trillions. I believe it is an intentional backstop to imploding healthcare entitlement programs — Medicare and Medicaid — to transition toward a single payer-system. This is the number one hindrance to job creation in the United States (according to a recently released UBS study).


CUT TAXES. I’ve demonstrated a firm commitment to cutting spending and balancing the budget. We need to reduce the number of tax brackets, repeal taxes outlined in Obamacare, fix the Alternative Minimum Tax, and eliminate the Death Tax. In addition, we must make the corporate tax code simpler and fairer, and allow U.S. companies that generate earnings overseas to bring back those profits and invest them in American jobs and growth.


REPEAL THE JOBS AND HOUSING DESTRUCTION ACT, ALSO KNOWN AS DODD-FRANK. This law tightened regulations on banks, made it harder for Americans to obtain credit, and failed to address the systemic problem that caused the Wall Street collapse — leverage. This 849-page bill calls for 400 new sets of rules that will be written on 6000 Federal Register pages, all written by bureaucrats, many of whom have never worked in the financial services field. The law also creates a potentially intrusive Financial Services Consumer Protection Bureau that is not accountable to Congress and which has but a vague mandate to combat misconduct – so in the wrong hands, it could cause its own kind of misconduct.


LEGALIZE AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION AND AMERICA’S NATURAL RESOURCES. This could create 1.4 million jobs, bringing $800 billion of new revenue into the U.S. Treasury, and increasing domestic energy supplies by 50 percent. The price of energy has a direct impact on nearly ever[y] facet of our lives. We have to abandon the parochial and political energy policies of the past and install a comprehensive energy plan that not only reduces our reliance on unfriendly foreign regimes, but also creates millions of American jobs and generates increased tax revenues. According to the Congressional Research Service, the U.S. has more energy potential than any other country in the world. We should use that potential. It is a better policy to create American jobs and explore in an environmentally-sound way, than to rely on foreign dictators who give little regard to the environment. This includes specific strategies like reviving the logging, timber, mining and metals industries, and bringing federal lands back into productive activity by repealing radical environmental laws that kill access to natural resources.


REPEAL JOB KILLING REGULATIONS.America’s job creators and small business owners have lost economic liberty under the weight of $1.8 billion annually in compliance costs with government regulations. Together we sent $2.2 trillion in taxes to the federal government this year. By comparison, job creators spend nearly as much annually to comply with bureaucratic mandates. Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, and the string of mandates and rules from the Environmental Protection Agency — as well as other agencies — are creating such incredible uncertainty in the market. The House Republican leadership has identified 219 planned Obama administration regulations, each of which will cost the economy more than $100 million. This red tape rampage must stop.


INCREASE EXPORTS. This President has been holding hostage trade deals with Colombia, Panama and South Korea as he tries to negotiate favor for Big Labor. The world needs to know that we are open for business and U.S. Companies need to expand beyond our borders to the 95 percent of people who do not live here.


UNLEASH AMERICAN INVESTMENT. By eliminating unnecessary taxes and regulation, and expanding trade, we will create an incentive for investment in America again. We must do whatever it takes to restore our ability to manufacture here in the U.S. We can do this by reforming the tax code, providing incentive for growth, and allowing the private sector to control the market with little government involvement.


PAVE A PATHWAY FOR INNOVATION. Recent reports indicated that the United States has now slipped to 5th in the competitiveness rankings, and 47th in education. How do we expect to lead the world economically when we are not doing what is needed to inspire and foster innovation here at home? The future of the American economy lies with the innovation of this and future generations.


ENFORCE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWS. The failure of the federal government to enforce its immigration laws costs federal, state and local governments billions of dollars annually. Our nation was founded on the rule of law, and we must ensure U.S. immigration laws are respected and enforced not only to preserve our national security, but to protect federal, state, and local budgets, and to curb the unfair strain on our country’s job markets.


“My solutions are simple. We need to cut government spending, legalize America’s God-given natural resources, and stop taxing investment and productivity,” Bachmann said. “In other words, we need to do what growing economies do.”


Everything about Bachmann’s plan to right America is very Tea Party; however it is lacking in detail. The eleven points are good ideas but there is not an actual blue print to implement the plan. I think the lack of detail compared to Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 plan has lost her support among lower economic scale GOP voters because Republicans like the ability to read something concrete to counter Obama’s big government socializing counter-American Heritage transformation of Change. The lower Middle Class GOP voters represent the largest bloc of Republican voters.


It is very surprising that Michele Bachmann does not have a comparable tax plan to Herman Cain and now Rick Perry and Mitt Romney’s 59 points. My surprise is because part of Bachmann’s credentials to run for President is her experience as a tax lawyer.


Here is an excerpt on Michele Bachmann’s stand on taxation taken from a somewhat favorable website:




Congresswoman Bachmann consistently supports lower taxes for all areas, and has stated that taxes are simply too high. She was a strong supporter for extending the Bush tax cuts, and has repeatedly called for ending the death tax, the AMT, and removing the tax on capital gains.


Congresswoman Bachmann has proposed the Taxpayer Bill of Rights to put her views on taxes on the record. This bill of rights includes the rights to expect the government to balance the budget without having their taxes raised, and the right to a simple, fair tax code that they can understand.


In addition to calling for a simplification of the tax code, Congresswoman Bachmann has called for an end to the death tax. She stated that the tax was inefficient, a job killer, and discouraged saving.


In keeping with the idea of ending some taxes and simplifying the overall tax code, Congresswoman Bachman has proposed the Taxpayer Choice Act. This legislation would end the AMT, make the Bush tax rates on capital gains and dividends permanent, and create a voluntary Simplified Tax that would give individuals the option of paying under a highly simplified income tax system or under the regular income tax as it is structured now.


During the 2010 debate over extending the Bush tax cuts, Congresswoman Bachmann noted that higher tax rates do not mean higher tax revenues. She stated that higher rates or the uncertainty of a temporary extension would hamper economic growth.


Although she has not proposed a specific tax plan, Congresswoman Bachmann has outlined steps she would take if elected President. The steps proposed included numerous tax measures, including:


Make all the Bush tax cuts permanent.


Cut the corporate tax rate of 34 percent to "single digits" to spur growth and job creation.


Kill capital gains taxes.


Zero out the death tax.


Cap personal income taxes at 20 percent.


(Read the whole page that has Bachmann quotes on taxation.)


Recently Bachmann has made statements concerning a tax overhaul; however her statements have the picture of what she wants to do as President and is lacking the actual plan for Republicans to get excited about.


Bachmann has recently said she would return the country to a Reagan-era tax code.  Tonight Bachmann seemed to say something slightly different. “I will abolish the United States federal tax code and have a flatter, simpler, fairer income tax,” she said. (Last Paragraph of Bachmann @ IFFC speaks of “flatter, simpler, fairer income tax”; by O. Kay Henderson; 10/22/11)


I have not been able to find anything concrete as to what Bachmann means by a “flatter, simple, fairer income tax”. As much as I like Michele Bachmann if she does not come up with a blue print to match her “flatter, simpler, fairer income tax” she will be left behind GOP Candidates who do have a concrete plan. So far the only Candidate with a concrete plan that I like is Herman Cain.


JRH 10/26/11

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment
October 25 2011 3 25 /10 /October /2011 15:52



John R. Houk

© October 25, 2011


It is beginning to appear the Obama/Dem Party plan to upright the listing ship the USS America is by taxing the rich to provide entitlement money to the poorer Americans to begin spending money that will lead businesses to hire more people for jobs and thus produce jobs and revenue for the US government.


If you are a Conservative this plan is stealing property from the backs of owners on a gamble that has failed repeatedly in the past that creates NO jobs and thus decreases revenue to the American government keeping the American Economy on an ever shrinking wheel of sustainability for the livelihood of all Americans.


Some GOP candidates have figured out that one way to bring voters to their side is to create jobs by less taxation or by revamping the tax code altogether to a Conservative version of spreading the wealth. The Conservative version of spreading the wealth is to make a fairer and simpler tax code that the largest bloc of voters can understand and get on board to infuse money into the economy and thus raising more revenue for the American government that is fair to the entire economic scale between poor through Middle Class and on toward the wealthy.


I decided to take a closer look at the vision of the GOP candidates that have a plan for jobs in which the underlying premise is some form of fairer tax which may run from modifying the current tax code, to flat taxes or to national sales taxes or combinations of all the tax ideas.


When I first thought of doing this I thought I could find some inclusive breakdown of the GOP Candidates in the old Google Search Engine. Remarkably I discovered the top search engine results were criticisms of GOP tax ideas rather than evaluation. I guess I should not have been surprised be such Search Engine bias favoring the Left spectrum more than the Right spectrum. So I have decided to search out GOP candidates on an individual basis. I will attempt to post each individual GOP candidate tax and/or job plan based on their intentions rather than the criticisms of the Left or the Right; however keep in mind this is a Slanted Right Blog there will be a smattering of a positive Slanted Right filter.


I am going to begin with Herman Cain because it is the simplicity of his 9-9-9 tax plan that has given him a boost in polls without the huge war chest campaign funds.


JRH 10/25/11

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment
October 22 2011 7 22 /10 /October /2011 12:06

John R. Houk

© October 22, 2011


Hmm… Is the Occupy Wall Street crowd as honorable, more honorable or less honorable than the Tea Party Movement? The Occupy Wall Street crowd is just a bunch of American hating kids receiving guidance from Left Wing interests intent on transforming America into a Leftist utopia devoid of the precepts of the Founding Fathers and rational Christian ethics.


JRH 10/22/11 (Hat Tip: Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama)


Video: Democrats Shamefully support Occupy Wall Street

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment


  • : ubiquitous8thoughts
  • ubiquitous8thoughts
  • : This is a Christian Right blog. This means there is religious freedom, free speech, Constitutional Original Intent, Pro-Israel, Anti-Islamist and a dose of Biblical Morality (Pro-Life & anti-homosexual agenda) content in this blog.
  • Contact