Overblog Follow this blog
Administration Create my blog
October 27 2016 5 27 /10 /October /2016 13:30

Here’s another Project Veritas video exposé showing the Dems as scheming voter fraud kingpins that they are. Take note that Crooked Hillary is the chief kingpin this election cycle.

 

WARNING for those of us that appreciate Biblical morality: When Dems don’t know, they are being documented by video they do not withhold their profane language.

 

JRH 10/27/16 (Hat Tip: Hurri cane Matthew on G+ The Black Robe Regiment)

******************

VIDEO: Rigging the Election – Video III: Creamer Confirms Hillary Clinton Was PERSONALLY Involved

 

 

Posted by Project Veritas Action

Published on Oct 24, 2016

 

Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations. “In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges. “So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.” It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: “Don’t repeat that to anybody.” The first video explained the dark secrets and the hidden connections and organizations the Clinton campaign uses to incite violence at Trump rallies. The second video exposed a diabolical step-by-step voter fraud strategy discussed by top Democratic operatives and showed one key operative admitting that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years. This latest video takes this investigation even further. 

First video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY  

Second video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs  

Websitehttp://projectveritasaction.com/
 

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVeritasAction/

 

Twitter: https://twitter.com/@Pveritas_Action

 

_______________________

About Project Veritas

 

Founded by James O’Keefe, the mission of Project Veritas is to:

 

Investigate and expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions in order to achieve a more ethical and transparent society.

 

Project Veritas is the most effective non-profit on the national scene, period.

 

We’ve had dozens of successes, many of which are detailed on this site.  The pattern is clear:

 

Project Veritas launches an investigation with the placement of our undercover journalists. The rollout of our findings creates a growing and uncontainable firestorm of press coverage. Corruption is exposed, leaders resign, and organizations are shut down.

 

We get immediate, measurable and impactful results, and our return on investment is unparalleled.

 

Project Veritas is a registered 501(c)3 organization.  Project Veritas does not advocate specific resolutions to the issues that are raised through its investigations, nor do we encourage others to do so. Our goal is to inform the public of wrongdoing and allow the public to make judgments on the issues.

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics Crime
write a comment
October 26 2016 4 26 /10 /October /2016 12:14

Kelly-Gingrich sparing of who is Sex Predator

 

Megyn Kelly caught defending Crooked Hillary perspective while denigrating Trump over unproven sex predator allegations. Newt Gingrich takes her to task so much that the interview ends - suddenly. Kelly finishes the interview obviously, a bit distraught that Newt pinned her down by daring her to call Bill Clinton a sex predator as she was doing to Trump. SHE WOULD NOT DO SO! Then she ended the interview by telling Newt to go deal with his anger issues. As Newt was fading out you could hear him saying, “You too”.

 

JRH 10/26/16 (Hat Tip: Allen West Republic)

****************

Newt Gingrich Challenges Megyn Kelly on Anti-Trump Bias in Epic ShowdownMegyn Won’t Call Bill Clinton a ‘Sexual Predator

 

By Pat[r]ick Howley

Originally Breitbart

October 25, 2016

The Counter Jihad Report

 

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich engaged Megyn Kelly in an epic showdown over her anti-Donald Trump “bias” on Kelly’s Fox News show Tuesday night.

 

Gingrich accused Kelly of being “fascinated with sex” after Kelly used the term “sexual predator” to describe Trump. Gingrich challenged Kelly to call Bill Clinton a sexual predator, but Kelly refused to do so, staunchly defending the Clinton ticket and even saying that the polls show people don’t care as much about Bill Clinton’s sexual indiscretions as they do about Trump’s alleged incidents.

 

At the end of the segment, Kelly accused Gingrich of “anger issues.”

 

Here are the fireworks:

 

VIDEO: Gingrich, Kelly duke it out over alleged media bias

 

 

Posted by Fox News

Published on Oct 25, 2016

 

Former House speaker discusses the balance of power on 'The Kelly File'

 

NEWT: I am sick and tired of people like you using language that is inflammatory that’s not true!

 

MEGYN: Excuse me, Mr. SpeakerYou have no idea whether it’s true or not.

 

NEWT: Neither do you.

 

MEGYN: That’s right. And I’m not taking a position on it, unlike–

 

NEWT: Oh yes you are. When you used the words, you took a position. And I think it is very unfair of you to do that, Megyn.

 

MEGYN: Incorrect.

 

NEWT: I think that is exactly the bias that people are upset by.

 

MEGYN: I think that your defensiveness on this may speak volumes, sir.

 

NEWT: No, may I just suggest to you–

 

MEGYN: No! Let me make my point and then I will give you the floor. What I said is, IF Trump is a sexual predator then that’s a big story. And what we saw on that tape was Trump himself saying that he likes to grab women by the genitals and kiss them against their will. That’s what we saw. Then we saw ten women come forward after he denied actually doing it at a debate to say, ‘That was untrue. He did it to me! He did it to me!’ We saw reporters, people who had worked with him, people from Apprentice, and so on and so forth. He denies it all. Which is his right. We don’t know what the truth is. My point to you is, as a media story, we don’t get to say that the ten women are lying. We have to cover that story, sir.

 

NEWT: Sure. Okay, so it’s worth 23 minutes of the three networks to cover that story, and Hillary Clinton in a speech in Brazilsaying her dream is an open border where 600 million people could come to America. That’s not worth covering?

 

MEGYN: That is worth covering.

 

NEWT: You want to go back through the tapes of your show recently? You are fascinated with sex and you don’t care about public policy.

 

MEGYN: Me, really?

 

NEWT: That’s what I get out of watching you tonight.

 

MEGYN: Well, you know what, Speaker, I’m not fascinated by sex. But I am fascinated by the protection of women and understanding what we’re getting in the Oval Office. And I think the American voters would like to know–

 

NEWT: Ok, and therefore we’re going to send Bill Clinton back to the East Wing, because after all you are worried about sexual predators.

 

MEGYN: Yeah, listen, it’s not about me, it’s about the women and men of America. And the poll numbers show us that the women of America in particular are very concerned about these allegations and in large part believe that they ARE a real issue. Don’t dismiss the women summarily!

 

NEWT: Do you want to comment on whether the Clinton ticket has a relationship to a sexual predator?

 

MEGYN: We on the Kelly File have covered that story as well, sir.

 

NEWT: No I want to actually hear you use the words. Bill Clinton, sexual predator. I dare you. Bill Clinton, sexual predator.

 

MEGYN: Mr. Speaker, we’ve covered–

 

NEWT: Disbarred by the Arkansas bar. Disbarred by the Arkansas bar.

 

MEGYN: Excuse me. Excuse me.

 

NEWT: $850,000 penalty?

 

MEGYN: Excuse me, sir. We on the Kelly File have covered the Clinton matter, as well. We’ve hosted Kathleen Willey, we’ve covered the examples of him being accused as well, but he’s not on the ticket, and the polls also show that the American people are less interested–

 

NEWT: He’ll be in the East Wing.

 

MEGYN: In the deeds of Hillary Clinton’s husband than in the deeds of the person who asks us to make him president, Donald Trump. We’re going to have to leave it at that. And you can take your anger issues and spend some time working on them, Mr. Speaker.

 

NEWT: And you, too.

______________

About The Counter Jihad Report

 

There is an urgent need for the public to become informed about the Global Islamic Jihad Movement. We must demand from our leaders that they become familiar with Islamic Law and jihadist ideology so that our counterterrorism policies can better protect us from this growing threat.

 

This blog is mainly a news aggregating site but also includes an extensive library of resources for studying Islam and networking with other Counter Jihad activists. My goal has been to pull from a variety of the most trusted and reliable sources to educate the public on the counter jihad movement. The many RSS feeds and counterjihad twitter feed in the sidebar are meant to provide a time saving jumping off point to access all the headlines and breaking news.

 

My Interest in Islamic Jihad stems from the 1983 Hezbollah truck bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut in which my cousin, Ken Haas, was killed. Ken left a career as a philosophy professor to READ THE REST

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment
October 25 2016 3 25 /10 /October /2016 17:08

Crony Capitalists assuming Crooked Hillary will be elected on November 8, 2016 are already inquiring about pay-to-play opportunities. It is a bit disturbing that the Left Stream Media is pushing pre-election poll results that Crooked Hillary is a sure winner. DO YOU WANT THIS CROOK TO BE PRESIDENT? COME ON REALLY?

 

VOTE TRUMP ON EARLY VOTING & ELECTION DAY!

 

JRH 10/25/16

***************

"Executive Orders For Sale": Leaked Email Shows Hillary Auctioning Off 'Laws' To The Highest Bidder

 

POSTED BY JERRY

Intro by Tyler Durden

Authored by The Daily Sheeple's Melissa Dykes vis SHTFPlan.com

Oct 25, 2016 11:07 AM

Commonsense & Wonder

 

Unaccountable power multiplies, but this is astounding. This is a very good example of the reasons that the founders sought to limit and check power. But of course, over the years, those protections have been whittled down, and the loopholes are big enough drive tanks through. Corruption doesn’t even begin to cover it if wealthy donors – and even foreign powers – can just write checks, contribute to the Clinton Foundation, etc. – and just buy a law in return. 

Why is no one standing up to this tyranny? Critics have taken George W. Bush and Barack Obama to task for abusing their power to write executive orders – and legislate with a pen when they have no constitutional power to make law at all. But Hillary, before she even takes power, is already leaving these two in the dust. So everyone is just going to take it, along with the ‘first female’ t-shirts they will be sending out as promos in the mail?

As MLK famously wrote [6] from his Birmingham jail cell: “At first glance it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws. One may well ask: “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?” The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all.”

 

Executive Orders for Sale? Leaked Email Shows Hillary Camp Answering Wealthy Donor’s Questions about How Executive Orders Work

 

by Melissa Dykes 

 

If you already thought the Executive Order system falls somewhere between problematic and completely unconstitutional, this takes it to a whole new, never before seen level of corruption.

 

Thanks to all the leaks, America now knows our government is essentially one giant pay-for-play operation. That’s how it works. That’s how the DNC works [7]. That’s how the Clinton Foundation works [8].

 

But how far does that go?

 

How about bypassing Congress entirely with money in the most literal sense possible.

 

This leaked email chain hints at something that kind of makes votes and lobbyists and, well, all of it rather pointless.

 

If someone’s wealthy enough, can they straight up buy an executive order?

 

These days, the president uses Executive Orders to bypass Congress, even though there is no constitutional provision that explicitly permits the use of executive orders. It’s a system that’s been heavily abused in the past but now, apparently, it’s for sale.

 

A new revelation buried in the Wikileaks trove of tens of thousands of Hillary campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails shows him discussing executive orders in relation to an “idea” a wealthy donor has.

 

In a leaked email thread [9] between Podesta and Mary Pat Bonner, a “donor adviser” who  gets millions for her elite connections in bringing in donors and for being what The New York Times describes as [10] a “master of making donors happy,” it’s all but admitted that Executive Orders are another pay-for-play item on the corrupt American political menu.

 

### Blog Editor: For some reason “JERRY” of Commonsense & Wonder did not post below this mark. Here’s the rest of the story from SHTFplan.com that includes a photocopy of email in question ###

 

Read this from the bottom up:

 

(click to enlarge)

 

 

Is there someone who understands EOs email

 

In an email with the subject line, “Is there someone in your shop,” Bonner writes, “Who totally understands ‘executive orders’. It is to answer a very big donors questions.”

 

Podesta responds with simply, “Me.”

 

Bonner: “It is for Michael King.”

 

Podesta: “What does he need?”

 

Bonner: “He has an idea and just need answer [sic] to a bunch of easy questions about how this works.”

 

Oh goody. Mega wealthy donor Michael King has an “idea” about executive orders

 

The Michael King they are likely referencing is rich TV mogul Michael King, the exec who inherited King World Productions later acquired by CBS. To give you an idea, King World Productions launched Harpo’s The Oprah Winfrey Show and Dr. Phil’s talk show.

 

Back in 2012, Bill Clinton teamed up with King on a pricey fundraiser for President Obama at King’s Pacific Palisades estate where tickets ranged from general seating starting at $1,000 and went all the way up to $40,000 premium seats with meet-and-greets.

 

While on the campaign trail over a year out from the election, Hillary Clinton has already vowed she will use Executive Orders to pass gun control regulations, for example.

 

Based on this email thread, you have to wonder what other EOs Hillary plans to pass as president and whose idea they are.

And how much that idea cost.

 

This article was written by Melissa Dykes and originally published at The Daily Sheeple.

_______________

Commonsense & Wonder Home Page

 

Web Design and Content Copyright 2007 - 2015 SHTF Plan - When It Hits The Fan, Don't Say We Didn't Warn You - All Rights Reserved

 

The content on this site is provided as general information only. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a financial interest in any company or advertiser referenced. Any action taken as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately the responsibility of the reader.

 

SHTFplan is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Crime Politics
write a comment
October 25 2016 3 25 /10 /October /2016 13:34

John R. Houk

© October 25, 2016

 

Latino-Americans are typically anti-Trump and anti-Conservative GOP due to the stand against illegal aliens flowing into the U.S. and often remaining in an undocumented status. And the Dems view Latino illegal aliens as a potential expansion of future Democratic Party voters. Hence the Dems bend over backward to accommodate the illegals due to a potential favorable future that benefits the Dems.

 

Here’s the irony that might backfire on the Dems future political power:

 

 

Pew: 3 pts on Social, Political & Religious Hispanic Spectrum

 

This chart shows three perspective of Hispanics residing in America (I am uncertain of the percentage that are illegal Hispanics, I’d be surprised if any Hispanics surveyed notified an illegal immigration status:

 

These three Hispanic religious groups also have distinct social and political views, with evangelical Protestants at the conservative end of the spectrum, the unaffiliated at the liberal end and Hispanic Catholics in between.

 

The survey was conducted May 24-July 28, 2013, among a representative sample of 5,103 Hispanic adults (ages 18 and older) living in the United States. The survey was conducted in English and in Spanish on both cellular and landline telephones with a staff of bilingual interviewers. The margin of error for results based on all respondents is plus or minus 2.1 percentage points. 

 

 

Social and Political Views

 

When it comes to social and political views, Hispanics also fall into distinct groups along religious lines.

 

Same-Sex Marriage

 

Religiously unaffiliated Hispanics favor allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally by a roughly four-to-one margin (67% to 16%). Hispanic Protestants tilt in the opposite direction, with evangelical Protestants much more inclined to oppose same-sex marriage (66% opposed, 19% in favor). Hispanic Catholics fall in between, though more say they favor same-sex marriage (49%) than oppose it (30%). Mainline Protestants are closely divided on the issue, with nearly four-in-ten (37%) opposed to same-sex marriage and 44% in favor. These differences among Hispanic religious groups are largely in keeping with patterns found among the same religious groups in the general public.12

 

Abortion

 

Hispanics tend to be more conservative than the general public in their views on abortion. While 54% of U.S. adults say that abortion should be legal in all or most circumstances, just four-in-ten Hispanics take this position.

 

 

Religion in Politics

 

While 47% say that churches should express their views on social and political issues, a similar share (44%) say they should not. In the general public, more Americans say that churches should keep out of politics (54% to 40%), according to a 2012 Pew Research survey.

 

About six-in-ten Hispanic evangelical Protestants (61%) say that church leaders should express their views on social and political issues, while about a third say church leaders should keep out of political matters. By contrast, half or more of religiously unaffiliated and mainline Protestant Hispanics say that church leaders should stay out of political matters. Hispanic Catholics are more divided on this issue, with about half (49%) saying church leaders should express their views and 41% saying church leaders should keep out of political matters.

 

... READ ENTIRETY (The Shifting Religious Identity of Latinos in the United States; Pew Research Center; 5/7/14)

 

Admittedly I am not a certified analyst of statics to draw a conclusion. Yet it appears that Hispanics have more in common with citizen American Conservatives than with the typically anti-Christian agenda of the Democratic Party more interested in transforming America into a Secular Humanist make-up social ethics as defined by Leftist elites.

 

The current affinity of Hispanics to Dems is due completely to an open borders immigration policy more than the socio-political utopianism the American Left desires to transform America from the Constitutional Rights and Liberties instituted by our Founding Fathers.

 

Does my guess pertaining to Hispanics and the traditional E Pluribus Unum (Out of Many, One) of the Constitution mean I support open borders? The “One” being one culture rather than the idiocy of multiple cultures promoted side-by-side.

 

My answer to open borders is a humongous NO!

 

I have no problem with Latin Americans or other foreign immigrants coming to America as long as it is accomplished legally and with the concept of assimilation being the key. The massive influx of illegal aliens only serves to disrupt the uniqueness of Americans with the disaster of Multiculturalism currently being experienced in Europe.

 

So, what does that mean for illegal aliens that have resided in America for years with the more than likely probably of having children born in America? It is my opinion that a blanket expulsion is not only unrealistic but also harsh for an illegal alien merely because they managed to survive by blending in enough to maintain a job.

 

ON THE OTHERHAND, if an illegal alien – Hispanic or otherwise – maintains some form of criminal job (drugs, organized crime, terrorism, etc.), such illegal aliens must be expelled EVEN IF they have American born children. And if an illegal alien somehow can participate in the American welfare system without the privileges of citizenship, examination of fraud pertaining to the circumstances should occur and if such fraud is discovered then expulsion must occur - again – even if American born children are involved.

 

There’s an old adage: If you can’t pay the time don’t do the crime.

 

If an illegal alien faces expulsion because of crime, having American born children is not a valid reason to remain! Even an American citizen is separated from their children when convicted of a crime and sent to jail or prison.

 

On the subject of illegal aliens, did you know the Obama Administration is interfering with local law enforcement to NOT arrest illegal aliens? Evidently part of that local interference is focused on Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County Arizona for not complying on a Federal Judge’s order to stop locally patrolling for illegal aliens. Evidently the Federal Judge did not appreciate Sheriff Joe profiling Latino looking individuals since most illegal aliens crossing the Mexican border into Arizona appeared to be Latino. Thus the Judge found Sheriff Joe in contempt.

 

Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona will soon face criminal charges from federal prosecutors over his immigration patrols — just a month shy of an Election Day in which he’s angling for re-election.

 

Federal prosecutors say they will charge him with contempt-of-court after he allegedly failed to obey a judge’s order to halt controversial immigration policies  (Sheriff Joe Arpaio To Be Criminally Charged Just Before Election Day; By Bre Payton; The Federalist; 10/11/16)

 

Sheriff Joe did violate the Federal injunction to stop patrolling for illegal aliens in his County. The question Americans must ask themselves is this: Why would Joe Arpaio, who is aged 83 and still working to enforce the law after decades, ignore a Federal law demand? The answer is the Obama Administration is corrupt with ulterior motives for bringing illegal aliens into America. Sheriff Joe’s actions are acts of civil disobedience to a corrupt government. (Which of course Crooked Hillary would continue if elected to POTUS!)

 

Paul Bremmer has written the details which I found on WND.

 

JRH 10/25/16

*******************

Charges against Sheriff Joe 'Orwellian beyond imagination,' says author: DOJ charged Arpaio for enforcing federal immigration law

By  PAUL BREMMER

October 22, 2016

WND

 

 Sheriff Joe Arpaio

 

When the U.S. Department of Justice filed criminal contempt charges against Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Oct. 17, accusing the well-known lawman of intentionally violating a federal judge’s order not to arrest illegal aliens without evidence they had broken state law, it was beyond even the imagination of George Orwell.

So says Daniel Horowitz, senior editor at Conservative Review.

 

“Our Founders are rolling over in their graves at the sight of a sheriff being placed on trial for taking common sense steps to protect his state’s sovereignty and applying federal law in cases of reasonable suspicion – laws over which Congress, not the judiciary, has plenary authority,” Horowitz declared in a recent column.

 

Federal judge Susan Bolton requested the criminal charges at a hearing the previous week. In August, Judge G. Murray Snow of the U.S. District Court of Arizona had referred Arpaio for misdemeanor criminal contempt charges for not obeying a previous court injunction against his practice of apprehending those he reasonably suspected of being in the country illegally.

 

The injunction grew out of a 2007 class-action lawsuit brought by the ACLU and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund accusing Arpaio of racial profiling.

 

Horowitz noted the Arizona sheriff is essentially being punished for enforcing federal immigration law within his jurisdiction while violent criminal aliens remain on the run all over Arizona. He called the situation “Orwellian beyond imagination.”

 

“While thousands of criminal aliens are being released onto the streets of Arizona, Sheriff Arpaio is the one who is facing the prospect of jail time,” Horowitz said. “There is something fundamentally wrong when a state like Arizona is being destroyed by a foreign invasion and local elected officials are hamstrung from defending the state, even though they are following federal law. At the same time, sanctuary cities that thwart federal immigration law are being rewarded by the federal judiciary.”

 

This is the type of juxtaposition Horowitz writes about in his book “Stolen Sovereignty: How to Stop Unelected Judges From Transforming America.”

 

“While Arpaio admits to mistakenly violating the injunction, the broader question is how a federal court can issue an injunction against sovereignty laws of a nation using you guessed it the Fourteenth Amendment, Horowitz said. Arpaio was acting according to federal law, which requires the federal government to respond to state inquiries on an individual’s immigration status [8 U. S. C. §1373c]. Yet, he is potentially facing jail time while illegal aliens chanted ‘Si se puede! Si se puede!’ outside the court house. This is an image and a perverse juxtaposition even Orwell could never have imagined.”

 

Who REALLY rules America? Stand up against the unelected tyrants in black. Find out how in “Stolen Sovereignty: How to Stop Unelected Judges From Transforming America.” Available now at the WND Superstore!

 

Adding to the “perverse juxtaposition” is the fact that, as Horowitz pointed out, courts have granted illegal aliens standing to sue over the enforcement of federal immigration laws, but Arpaio was never able to get standing to sue President Obama for violating federal immigration law when he implemented DACA.

 

Horowitz noted Arpaio has been so tough on illegal immigrants because his jurisdiction is among the most dangerous hotbeds of illegal alien crime in the country. The author shared some facts from his book.

 


“As of 2013, it was estimated that there were 630,700 illegal aliens residing in Arizona (including American-born anchor babies),” Horowitz wrote. “That is a population of foreign invaders larger than the total population of any single colony at the time of our founding.

 

“Over 10 percent of the state’s public school population is comprised of illegal alien children. When coupled with the fiscal strain of health care and incarceration, the total cost of illegal immigration is $2.4 billion a year.

 

“The Arizona Department of Corrections estimates that illegal aliens comprise 17 percent of its prison population and 22 percent of all felony defendants in Maricopa County.

 

“Arizona has become the drug smuggling capital of the country. From 2010 to 2015, heroin seizures in Arizona have increased by 207 percent, while methamphetamine seizures grew by 310 percent. In FY 2014, there were more pounds of marijuana seized in the Tucson corridor than every other border sector combined.”

 

The 84-year-old sheriff, who faces up to six months in jail if convicted, will find it tough sledding because of the current makeup of the federal courts, according to Horowitz.


“Arpaio has a grim road ahead of him – as does the entire state of Arizona – if Congress doesn’t strip the courts of their foray into immigration law,” he suggested. “Judge Bolton was the original district judge who placed the injunction on SB 1070, Arizona’s enforcement law. The Ninth Circuit is well the Ninth Circuit. And [Chief Justice John] Roberts has already agreed with the five leftists on the court that states must follow the whims of international law and the Obama administration instead of congressional statutes.”

 

Who REALLY rules America? Stand up against the unelected tyrants in black. Find out how in “Stolen Sovereignty: How to Stop Unelected Judges From Transforming America.” Available now at the WND Superstore!


_________________

Conservatives: Court Latino-Americans with your American Principles

John R. Houk

© October 25, 2016

______________

Charges against Sheriff Joe 'Orwellian beyond imagination,' says author

 

© Copyright 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Immigration Politics
write a comment
October 24 2016 2 24 /10 /October /2016 14:41

America is in a state crisis. If Crooked Hillary is elected President, that crisis will evolve into the destruction of the America the Founding Fathers envisioned. Justin Smith has some details for thought.

 

JRH 10/24/16

************************

America in Crisis

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 10/22/2016 1:47 PM

 

"This isn't just the fight of my life, it's the fight of our lives -- together -- to save our country ... Together we will make America strong again." - Donald Trump in Charlotte, NC on August 18th

 

The future of America is at stake, and Donald Trump is the only clear choice when compared to Hillary Clinton, who will continue Obama's agenda and introduce new and worse policies that will certainly exacerbate this current moment of crisis in America. Whatever flaws are associated with Trump; they pale in comparison to the machinations and malevolence behind the transformation Hillary s designing for America.

 

Donald Trump loves America, Her heritage and traditions. And Hillary Clinton obviously hates America and the U.S. Constitution and America's founding principles.

 

Early this month, a fiercely disturbing and stomach-turning speech Hillary delivered to Brazilian bankers from Banco Itau was leaked, in which Hillary confesses [Canada Free Press] that she "dreams" of a "hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders", essentially ending U.S. sovereignty and our existence as an independent nation. She envisions a superstate rising from a merger of North, Central and South America [Fox News – Newt Gingrich].

 

Can't everyone understand the damage this would do? America as She has stood for over two centuries and Her framework for Freedom under the U.S. Constitution would be ultimately and completely destroyed, along with the Founding Fathers' vision of a place of never-ending all-encompassing Liberty for all, and Hillary's fellow Commie Travelers would be ecstatic [Townhall].

 

With thousands of non-citizens found to be registered to vote in 95 counties and 38 cities across Pennsylvania and Virginia over the past few weeks, thanks to an American Civil Rights Union lawsuit, America once more sees the lengths the "progressives" and ruling elites will go to reach their goal, as they oppose photo ID laws in order to advance a globalist agenda at America's expense [Michelle Malkin]. This alone represents an excellent reason to vote for Donald Trump, who favors photo ID laws, upholding existing immigration laws and utilizing E-Verify and intense scrutiny of immigrants from regions that breed Islamic terrorism.

 

The last chance to restore America is slipping away, as Donald Trump explained on Christian Broadcasting’s Brody File” on September 9th: “I think this will be the last election if I don’t win because youre going to have people flowing across the border, youre going to have illegal immigrants coming in and they’re going to be legalized and they’re going to be able to vote, and once that all happens, you can forget it.” [Bold & Italics by Blog Editor]

 

Paying $250,000 a person [Breitbart], a thousand homos listened to Hillary speak at the LGBT Gala at Cipriani Wall Street (and progressives call me "stupid"). She called Trump supporters “the deplorables, the racists, and the haters, and the people who think [Trump is] going to restore an America that no longer exists. ... {Adding) "So, just eliminate them from your thinking.



When Hillary and her plutocratic LGBT lovers laugh and mock Trump supporters, they are mocking the Silent Majority and the generation that brought America through the Great Depression and young American patriots of similar strength of character. They mock those Americans residing in red states like Tennessee, Kentucky, Texas and West Virginia, that have provided a disproportionate share of U.S. Armed Forces members who fought and died to guarantee Hillary's freedom to receive $250 million dollars to mock them.



Even worse, without freedom of speech and freedom of religion, guaranteed and protected in the First Amendment to our Constitution, a path is cleared for government oppression and tyranny. And yet, Hillary Clinton has stated that she will present an amendment to the Constitution to abridge that right within thirty days of becoming President [The Nation], in order to "stand up against mean and divisive rhetoric wherever it comes from." [Townhall] Of course, Hillary and her "progressives" will define what is or isn't "hate-speech."



And while Hillary may not admit she's here "to take away your guns", touting "common sense" gun laws, she does promote suing gun manufacturers [Breitbart], if a gun made by them was used in a crime, despite being sold legally. This works against the 2nd Amendment by putting gun manufacturers out of business.



Donald Trump may not always articulate the subjects well, but he stands strong for life and the rights of the unborn child. He advocates for the right to "keep and bear arms and the entire Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution; and, he stands for law and order, which has brought him endorsements from the U.S. Border Patrol, the Fraternal Order of Police, the National Rifle association and one thousand Christian Evangelical pastors across America.



The latest batch of WikiLeaks emails has revealed a 2011 [Christian Post] email conversation between Hillary's Campaign Chairman John Podesta and John Halpin from the Center for American Progress. Halpin wrote that the conservative movement within the Catholic Church is "an amazing bastardization of the faith ... They must be attracted to the ... severely backwards gender relations ...".

 

It's not a leap of logic to say that Hillary quite probably agrees with Halpin, since she suggested that Christians must change their religious beliefs and accept the expansion of abortion in 2015. Clinton stated [Washington Post]: "Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will ... And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed."



One should note that Hillary supports partial birth abortions [LifeNews.com\. She also wants U.S. taxpayers to subsidize this atrocious social ill [LifeNews.com].



Hillary's agenda attacks the very foundations of U.S. Constitutional government. She is working to end the independence for which our Founding Fathers fought the American Revolution.



If Trump is "a gamble" as some pundits have suggested, I'll take that gamble today, tomorrow and everyday forward over the known quantity of evil Hillary brings to the table.



In every moment of crisis in America's history, our nation has had a moment of opportunity. Donald Trump represents that moment and our one best chance in decades to shake up the status quo in D.C. and restore American leadership domestically and around the world. He will fumigate the D.C. snake-pits and make the ruling elites writhe like a beast in the throes of death. He will halt Hillary's attempts to oppress the American people and destroy the Constitution, and in so doing, he will have preserved freedom and liberty for all, our Children and their Children's Children.


Justin O. Smith

____________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text embraced by brackets are by the Editor. Text embraced by parentheses are by Justin Smith. All links are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics Conspiracy Theory
write a comment
October 23 2016 1 23 /10 /October /2016 14:26

On June 13, 2012 five U.S. Congressmen sent a letter of concern to the Inspector General’s Office of the State Department pertaining to Huma Abedin’s extremely close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood:

 

1)    Michele Bachmann

 

2)    Louie Gohmert

 

3)    Lynn Westmoreland

 

4)    Trent Franks

 

5)    Thomas Rooney

 

The problem is Huma Abedin has extremely close ties to Crooked Hillary going back to President Slick Willie days. All the time from the Clinton Administration to this present-day Huma Abedin’s ties to the Radical Islamic Muslim Brotherhood have been given a pass and ignored!

 

Determine the Networks has the Huma breakdown ignored by the Executive Branch under Obama when Bachmann raised the red flag on Huma Abedin.

 

JRH 10/23/16

*******************

HUMA ABEDIN

Discover the Networks

 

o   Daughter of Saleha Mahmood Abedin, a pro-Sharia sociologist with ties to numerous Islamist organizations including the Muslim Brotherhood

 

o   Longtime assistant to Hillary Clinton

 

o   Wife of former congressman Anthony Weiner

 

o   Longtime former employee of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, which shares the Muslim Brotherhood's goal of establishing Islamic supremacy and Sharia Law worldwide

 

See also:  

 

Ø Saleha Abedin

 

Ø Hassan Abedin

 

Ø Syed Abedin 

 

Ø Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs   

 

Ø Hillary Clinton

 

Ø Muslim Brotherhood 

 

Ø Anthony Weiner

 

Huma Abedin was born in 1976 in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Her father, Syed Abedin (1928-1993), was an Indian-born scholar who in the early 1970s had been affiliated with the Muslim Students Association at Western Michigan University.

Huma's mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, is a sociologist known for her strong advocacy of Sharia Law. A member of the Muslim Sisterhood (i.e., the Muslim Brotherhood's division for women), Saleha is also a board member of the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief. This pro-Hamas entity is part of the Union of Good, which the U.S. government has formally designated as an international terrorist organization led by the Muslim Brotherhood luminary Yusuf al-Qaradawi.

When Huma was two, the Abedin family relocated from Michigan to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. This move took place when Abdullah Omar Naseef, a major Muslim Brotherhood figure who served as vice president of Abdulaziz University (AU), recruited his former AU colleague, Syed Abedin, to work for the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), a Saudi-based Islamic think tank that Naseef was preparing to launch. A number of years later, Naseef would develop close ties to Osama bin Laden and the terrorist group al Qaeda. Naseef also spent time (beginning in the early 1980s) as secretary-general of the Muslim World League, which, as journalist Andrew C. McCarthy points out, "has long been the Muslim Brotherhood’s principal vehicle for the international propagation of Islamic supremacist ideology." IMMA's close ties to the Muslim World League are further evidenced by the fact that IMMA's in-house publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA), has long listed its official address as 46 Goodge Street in London -- precisely the same address as that of the Muslim World League's London office. In one noteworthy article written by Abedin's mother, JMMA blamed America for having brought the 9/11 attacks upon itself. Another JMMA piece, from 1999, alleged that Jewish Americans who were pro-Israel had been able to "work the [political] system" in the United States to their own advantage, and had been "greatly aided by the American memory of the Holocaust."

It is vital to note that IMMA's "Muslim Minority Affairs" agenda was, and remains to this day, a calculated foreign policy of the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs, designed, as Andrew C. McCarthy explains, "to grow an unassimilated, aggressive population of Islamic supremacists who will gradually but dramatically alter the character of the West." For details about this agenda, click here.

At age 18, Huma Abedin returned to the U.S. to attend George Washington University. In 1996 she began working as an intern in the Bill Clinton White House, where she was assigned to then-First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. Abedin was eventually hired as an aide to Mrs. Clinton and has worked for her ever since, through Clinton's successful Senate runs (in 2000 and 2006) and her failed presidential bid in 2008.

From 1997 until sometime before early 1999, Abedin, while still interning at the White House, was an executive board member of George Washington University's (GWU) Muslim Students Association (MSA), heading the organization's “Social Committee.”

It is noteworthy that in 2001-02, soon after Abedin left that executive board, the chaplain and "spritual guide" of GWU's MSA was Anwar al-Awlaki, the al Qaeda operative who ministered to some of the men who were among the 9/11 hijackers. Another chaplain at GWU's MSA (from at least October 1999 through April 2002) was Mohamed Omeish, who headed the International Islamic Relief Organization, which has been tied to the funding of al Qaeda. Omeish’s brother, Esam, headed the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Brotherhood’s quasi-official branch in the United States. Both Omeish brothers were closely associated with Abdurahman Alamoudi, who would later be convicted and incarcerated on terrorism charges.

From 1996-2008, Abedin was employed by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) as the assistant editor of its aforementioned publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA). At least the first seven of those years overlapped with the al Qaeda-affiliated Abdullah Omar Naseef's active presence at IMMA. Abedin's last six years at the Institute (2002-2008) were spent as a JMMA editorial board member; for one of those years, 2003, Naseef and Abedin served together on that board.

Throughout her years with IMMA, Abedin remained a close aide to Hillary Clinton. During Mrs. Clinton's 2008 presidential primary campaign, a New York Observer profile of Abedin described her as "a trusted advisor to Mrs. Clinton, especially on issues pertaining to the Middle East, according to a number of Clinton associates." "At meetings on the region," continued the profile, "... Ms. Abedin’s perspective is always sought out."

When Mrs. Clinton was appointed as President Barack Obama's Secretary of State in 2009, Abedin became her deputy chief of staff. At approximately that same point in time, Abedin's name was removed from the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs' masthead.

Apart from their working relationship, Abedin and Mrs. Clinton have also developed a close personal bond over their years together, as reflected in Clinton's 2010 assertion that: “I have one daughter. But if I had a second daughter, it would [be] Huma.” In 2011, Secretary Clinton paid a friendly visit to Abedin's mother, Saleha, in Saudi Arabia. On that occasion, Mrs. Clinton publicly described her aide's position as “very important and sensitive.”

On July 10, 2010, Huma Abedin, a practicing Muslim, married then-congressman Anthony Weiner in a ceremony officiated by former president Bill Clinton. A number of analysts have noted that it is extremely rare for Islamic women—particularly those whose families have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood—to marry non-Muslims like Weiner, who is Jewish. Indeed, Dr. Anwar Shoeb, the highest-ranking faculty authority at the prestigious College of Sharia and Islamic Studies in Kuwait, formally declared that Abedin's marriage to Weiner was “null and void” under the dictates of Sharia Law, which explicitly forbids matrimony between a Muslim woman and an "infidel"; in fact, Shoeb classified the Abedin-Weiner union as a form of “adultery.”

Abedin went on maternity leave after giving birth to a baby boy in early December 2011. When she returned to work in June 2012, the State Department granted her an arrangement that allowed her to do earn outside income as a private consultant, even as she remained a top advisor in the Department. This arrangement was made possible when Mrs. Clinton personally signed off on documents—dated March 23, 2012—that changed Abedin’s title from "deputy chief off staff" to “special government employee.” Abedin's outside clients included the U.S. State Department, Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, and Teneo (a New York-based global advisory firm co-founded by Doug Band, a former counselor for Bill Clinton). 

Abedin did not disclose on her financial report either the special employment arrangement or the $135,000 she earned from it, in violation of a law mandating that public officials reveal significant sources of income. In fact, her title change did not become public knowledge until May 2013. Good-government groups warned of the potential conflict-of-interest inherent in an arangement where a government employee maintains private clients.

Documents obtained by Judicial Watch in a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit showed that both before and after Mrs. Clinton signed off on the special employment deal for Abedin in March 2012, Abedin repeatedly—for months on end—dodged State Department requests that she disclose financial and employment information about her husband, Anthony Weiner, who had left Congress amid personal scandal in June 2011. For details about Abedin's repeated failures to comply with those requests, click here.

In June 2012, five Republican lawmakers (most prominently, Michele Bachmann) sent letters to the inspectors general at the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State, asking that they investigate whether the Muslim Brotherhood was gaining undue influence over U.S. government officials. One letter, noting that Huma Abedin's position with Hillary Clinton "affords her routine access to the secretary [of state] and to policymaking," expressed concern over the fact that Abedin “has three family members—her late father, mother and her brother—connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations.” Some other prominent Republicans such as John McCain and John Boehner disavowed the concerns articulated in the letters.

On February 1, 2013—Hillary Clinton's final day as Secretary of State—Abedin resigned her post as Mrs. Clinton's deputy chief of staff. Yet she would continue to serve as a close aide to Clinton. 

On March 1, 2013, Abedin was tapped to run Clinton’s post-State Department transition team, comprised of a six-person “transition office” located in Washington. 

In early March 2015, it was reported that throughout her entire four-year tenure as Secretary of State (SOS), Hillary Clinton had never acquired or used a government email account, and instead had transmitted -- in violation of government regulations -- all of her official government correspondences via a personal email account that was housed on a private server. In addition, Abedin and Mrs. Clinton's chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, also had email addresses on the secret server while employed at the State Department.

 

After Hillary Clinton announced in the spring of 2015 that she was running for president (2016), Abedin was named vice chair of the Clinton campaign.

 

On August 28, 2016, the New York Post published excerpts and photos from sexually explicit texting exchanges in which Weiner had engaged with two women in the summer of 2015. The next day, Huma Abedin announced that she was separating from Weiner. She said in a statement: "After long and painful consideration and work on my marriage, I have made the decision to separate from my husband. Anthony and I remain devoted to doing what is best for our son, who is the light of our life. During this difficult time, I ask for respect for our privacy."

 

Huma Abedin's brother, Hassan Abedin, has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and is currently an associate editor with the JMMA. Hassan was once a fellow at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies, at a time when the Center's board included such Brotherhood-affiliated figures as Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Abdullah Omar Naseef.

Huma's sister, Heba Abedin (formerly known as “Heba A. Khaled”), is an assistant editor with JMMA, where she served alongside Huma prior to the latter's departure.

__________________

Copyright 2003-2015 - DiscoverTheNetworks.org  

 

DTN Issues

 

This section serves as one of several portals to the DiscoverTheNetworks database. It is intended as a guide to the content of the site and to critical issues involving the political left. The contents of this section will grow over time. To request additional topics, or to provide additional information or related text and article links, use the READ THE REST

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad Conspiracy Theory
write a comment
October 22 2016 7 22 /10 /October /2016 11:02

John R. Houk

© October 22, 2016

 

Is it illegal to hack an individual’s email account? YES! Is it illegal to hack government email accounts? YES! Is it illegal for government employees to conduct government business on a private email or private server? YES! Is Wikileaks reprehensible if their organization is involved in any illegal hacking whatsoever – which would be illegal? YES!

 

Did Russia hack the Democratic Party emails? THERE IS NO PROOF, other than the words of the Obama Administration and the Democratic Party!

 

These are the same people who told America in 2012 that the Benghazi Islamic terrorist attack that killed FOUR Americans was the result of an obscure Youtube Movie trailer. That was a lie fabricated to make sure Barack Hussein Obama was reelected. It was a cover-up in part to make Obama/Crooked Hillary Foreign Policy and Clandestine decisions to make them appear competent rather than inept.

 

Crooked Hillary claimed in the third Presidential Debate that SIXTEEN American Intelligence organizations pointed their fingers at Russia and Putin as the definite hackers of the Dem National Committee emails. I have to ask, “Which vague 16 Intelligence organizations claim that Russia is responsible for the hacking?”

 

I gotta tell you. Crooked Hillary’s condescending and vague accusation against Russia to make Donald Trump look nefarious brought me back to the Benghazi Lies of 2012. At this point the difference Crooked Hillary’s accusation is probably a Benghazi-like lie. A LIE TO GET ELECTED President of the United States!

 

These Leftist Dems will say anything to get elected to any Office.

 

It has come my attention a former British Ambassador - Craig Murray - that lost his British diplomatic job with the UK government for “exposing the UK government's knowing use of intelligence obtained from suspects who had been tortured by the Uzbekistan Government,” is vouching for Wikileaks that the hacked emails did NOT COME from Russia. AGAIN! The Dems are lying to win the election. The Dem lie has the complete cooperation of America’s Left Stream Media who are not focusing on the Wikileaks exposing just how nefarious Crooked Hillary and the Dems truly are.

 

My fellow American voters, DO YOU WANT CROOKED HILLARY TO BE POTUS KNOWING SHE AND HER DEMS ARE THIS CORRUPT? REALLY?

 

Everything Crooked Hillary says she will do to benefit Americans at worst is a nefarious evil lie with another agenda she desires to be hidden. At best whatever Crooked Hillary speaks to Americans is well-meaning deception to bring America into a disastrous transformed Leftist utopia that tears up EVERYTHING the Founding Fathers put on paper that would lead America to become great.

 

MY GOD DEAR VOTERS – VOTE TRUMP TO GIVE AMERICA A CHANCE!

 

Below is the Constitution.com article about Craig Murray denying the Dem-line that Russia is behind the hacking thorn in Crooked Hillary’s side.

 

JRH 10/22/16

******************

Breaking! British Politician says Russia has NOTHING to do with the DNC Email Leaks!

 

By Onan Coca

October 21, 2016

Constitution.com

 

Former British Ambassador Craig Murray is an ally and friend of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and he visited Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy on Wednesday to discuss his ongoing plight. What Murray learned could have a huge impact on the 2016 election, if the American people are allowed to hear it.

 

One of the main media arguments for people not to give credence to the hacked DNC, Clinton emails is that this is a deliberate attempt by Vladimir Putin and Russia to impact our electoral process. The narrative goes something like this; ‘Russia illegally hacked the DNC and are now trying to steal the election from Clinton. So Republicans shouldn’t use the ill-gotten information, the media shouldn’t report on it, and the American people shouldn’t pay attention to it. In that way, we’ll be standing up to the tinpot dictator Putin.’ The only problem with this is that it means we should all completely ignore the criminality and corruption at the DNC and in the Clinton campaign team! It’s a stupid argument, but it’s become so prevalent that even some conservatives are parroting it.

 

WATCHING WIKILEAKS

 

VIDEO: Breaking British Politician says Russia has NOTHING to do with the DNC Email Leaks - The Constitution [ORIGINALLY LIFEZETTE]

 

Here’s the thing theres no proof that Russia did any of this. Theyve never admitted to it, and our intelligence community has never proven it. Its simply a theory that the media and the Clinton team have implied is fact.

 

Well, Ambassador Murray is here to dispel the rumors and to clear the air. Vladimir Putin and Russia had nothing to do with hacks on the Democrats, nor with the release of the hacked emails.

 

Here’s what Ambassador Murray had to say from his personal website:

 

I left Julian after midnight. He is fit, well, sharp and in good spirits. WikiLeaks never reveals or comments upon its sources, but as I published before a fortnight ago, I can tell you with 100% certainty that it is not any Russian state actor or proxy that gave the Democratic National Committee and Podesta material to WikiLeaks. The claim is nonsense. Journalists are also publishing that these were obtained by “hacking” with no evidence that this was the method used to obtain them.

 

The control of the Democratic party machinery deliberately to unfairly ensure Clinton’s victory over Bernie Sanders is a matter of great public interest. The attempt by the establishment from Obama down to divert attention from this by a completely spurious claim against Russia, repeated without investigation by a servile media, is a disgrace.

 

The over-close relationship between the probable future President and Wall Street is also very important. WikiLeaks has done a great public service by making this plain.

 

The attempts by the mainstream media to portray WikiLeaks as supporters of Trump and Putin because they publish some of Clinton’s darker secrets is completely illogical and untrue in fact. The idea we must pretend Clinton is a saint is emetic.

 

But the key point is that WikiLeaks is a publisher. It is a vehicle for publishing leaks, and is much more of a vehicle for whistleblowers than for hackers. It does not originate the material. I have often seen comments such as “Why has WikiLeaks not published material on Israel/Putin/Trump?” The answer is that they have not been given any. They publish good, verifiable material that they are given by whistleblowers. They are not protecting Israel, Putin, or Trump. Nobody has given them viable material.

 

Did you get that?

 

1)   Russia did not get/give WikiLeaks any of the leaked emails/data.

 

2)   The media says the info was “hacked,” but WikiLeaks has never said that the information was gathered in that manner. Meaning, it could have been leaked by a whistleblower.

 

3)   The same people who “stole” the Democrat nomination from Bernie Sanders are now trying to shift attention from their corruption to Russia.

 

4)   Obama and the media are complicit in both the corruption and the cover up of the corruption.

 

5)    WikiLeaks doesn’t have a “dog in the fight;” they simply publish the information that is given to them by whistleblowers.

 

Ladies and gentlemen, please don’t buy the media/establishment spin on the WikiLeaks releases. This isn’t about Russia, or hacking, or anything like that –

 

This is all about how the Democrat Party is corrupt, anti-democratic, and very likely criminal.

 

This is all about how the media has been complicit, not only in the crimes of the Democrat Party, but in covering up their crimes as well.

 

This is all about how liberals will literally do whatever it takes to win. In their minds the ends always justify whatever dastardly means must be employed to ensure victory.

 

This is all about how the American people continue to have their rights stripped away from them by a bloated and corrupt government.

 

Don’t let them get away with it.

 

_________________

Russia Hacked Emails like a Movie Caused Benghazi

John R. Houk

© October 22, 2016

_________________

Breaking! British Politician says Russia has NOTHING to do with the DNC Email Leaks!

 

Onan Coca

 

Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Liberty Alliance media group. He's also the managing editor at Eaglerising.com, Constitution.com and the managing partner at iPatriot.com. Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their three wonderful children. You can find his writing all over the web.

 

Copyright © 2016 The Constitution. All Rights Reserved. 

 

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics Crime
write a comment
October 21 2016 6 21 /10 /October /2016 17:25

The David Horowitz Freedom Center sent a for insightful essay by Daniel Greenfield that demonstrates what life probably will be like in Crooked Hillary’s America.

 

The essay is not linked, but I’m confident a simple Google search would find many locations for the essay.

 

JRH 10/20/16

******************

A Frightening Preview of Hillary's America 

Dark and unaccountable

 

By Daniel Greenfield

Dated: October 20, 2016

Sent: 10/21/2016 8:00 AM

Sent by: David Horowitz Freedom Center

 

Hillary Clinton, of all people, summed up this debate and this election best.

"What kind of country are we going to be?"

The Evita of Arkansas is a compulsive liar who has never told the truth in her life. But this time around she was right. This election does not come down to the personalities. It comes down to the kind of country we are going to have. And in the third debate, the one that took a break from the petty haranguing of media lackeys like Lester Holt and Martha Raddatz, the issues took center stage.

The core issue came into focus with the very first question asked by Chris Wallace. Wallace asked Hillary and Trump if their vision for the Supreme Court was based on the Constitution or not. Hillary launched into a spiel about a Supreme Court that would stand for class warfare and gay rights. The only time she mentioned the Constitution was when she insisted that the Senate was constitutionally obligated to confirm Obama's nominee. That is her vision of the Constitution; a document that grants her power to reshape the country without regard to the Founders or any previously existing rights or freedoms.

It fell to Trump to speak of justices who would "interpret the Constitution the way the founders wanted it interpreted". And that is the core issue. Personalities and politicians come and go. Today's trending topic has been forgotten a day later. Outrages explode like fireworks and then fizzle out.

The weapons of mass distraction have been deployed and detonated. They keep going off in blasts of media gunpowder to divert our attention from whether we will live under the Constitution or under the Hillary. Will we have the rights and freedom bound into the Constitution or corruption justified with cant about the need to defend the oppressed by giving unlimited power to the oppressors.

The final debate finally focused on the issues. Instead of leading with the scandals, it asked about gun control, amnesty and open borders. It asked what kind of country are we going to be?

And, are we going to be a country at all or an open border weeping undocumented migrants destroying what's left of the middle class as the masterminds rob the country blind while preaching piously to us about all the poor Syrians, Mexicans and LGBT youth they want to protect?

Americans have had a preview of the country that Hillary Clinton would create under Obama. They received yet another preview of it at a final debate in which Hillary echoed Obama's Orwellian language in which endless spending was dubbed "investing" and in which government would save the middle class by regulating and taxing it out of existence for the greater good of the officially oppressed.

Hillary Clinton promised free college and cradle to grave education that would be debt free. Americans would be the ones plummeting deeper and deeper into debt to pay for degrees in gender studies. She promised viewers pie in the sky to be paid for by higher taxes on the rich. But as Trump pointed out, that's the class that her donors come from. Did Warren Buffett and George Soros invest all that money into her victory just to pay higher taxes? Did they do it right after they bought the Brooklyn Bridge?

Or will Americans buy the bridge believing Hillary's promise that she "will not add a penny to the debt"?

The only way Hillary can hope to do that is to appoint Bernie Madoff to be her Treasury Secretary.

When Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump wrangled over tax hikes or tax cuts, the debate is whether crooks like the Clintons should have a massive pot of taxpayer money to "invest" into their donors.

But beneath it is the same big question; do we live under the Constitution or under the Hillary?

In Hillary Country, just like in Obama Country, there are always more "investments" to make and you had better pay your "fair share". There are always special identity group interests that need money. There are always more regulations, taxes, fines and fees. And it's all for the children.

The ones that Hillary will grimace at when the cameras are on her and nudge away with the point of her shoe when the little red light turns off.

But there is no lie that Hillary Clinton will not tell and no lie that her pet media fact checkers will not back her up on. Obama doubled the national debt and yet Hillary insists that, "We're actually on the path to eliminating the national debt". That might be true only insofar as we're approaching the point that no one will lend us any money. We're headed toward a $20 trillion national debt.

And Hillary's plans won't add a penny to the national debt. They'll add hundreds of trillions of pennies.

Hillary talked of bringing "our country together" and not "pitting of people one against the other" and instead "we celebrate our diversity". If she does half as good a job as Obama, these celebrations of diversity will climax with race riots across America. How exactly does Hillary plan to unite with the "deplorables" of the country? How has Hillary united anyone in the country except in disdain?

Hillary Clinton's entire campaign pitch is based on demonizing Trump and his supporters. She believes that if she convinces enough voters that Trump is the devil, they may hold their noses and accept the return of the corrupt Clinton dynasty and everything that it represents. That gamble is what we are seeing on the news. It is what we heard at the debate. Hillary cannot win on her own merits.

She warned at the final debate of the "dark, unaccountable money to come into our electoral system". It's hard to imagine a bigger source of dark, accountable money than a foundation being used as an international slush fund that has been beyond unaccountable.

But it's Hillary's vision of government that is dark and unaccountable. From the beginning of the debate, she made it clear that she does not wish to be accountable to the Constitution. Her email cover up made it painfully clear that she does not want to be accountable to the American people. Instead Hillary would like everyone in the country to be accountable to her. A mass of regulations and enforcers will force everyone to be accountable to the dark and unaccountable force in the White House.

"It really does come down to what kind of country we are going to have," Hillary repeated.

It does indeed. Americans have had a preview of the kind of country that Hillary would bring into being.

 

________________

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

 

DONATE to DH Freedom Center

 

About David Horowitz Freedom Center

 

OUR MISSION: The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.

 

The David Horowitz Freedom Center combats the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to destroy American values and disarm this country as it attempts to defend itself in a time of terror.  The leftist offensive is most obvious on our nation’s campuses, where the Freedom Center protects students from indoctrination and intimidation and works to give conservative students a place in the marketplace of ideas from which they are otherwise excluded.  Combining forceful analysis and bold activism, the Freedom Center provides strong insight into today’s most pressing issue on its family of websites and in the activist campaigns it wages on campus, in the news media, and in national politics throughout the year.

 

VIDEO: Our Mission - Updated June 2013

 

 

David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club, the Individual Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic Freedom.

 

FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political commentary has 1.5 million visitors and over 870,000 unique visitors a month (65 million hits) and is READ THE REST

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics Crime
write a comment
October 21 2016 6 21 /10 /October /2016 09:16

 Yesterday I posted on Donald Trump’s assertion that he would wait and see before making any commitment to honor election results titled, “If I Was Trump, I’d Examine Election Results TOO!” The focus of that post is the fact that Dems admitted in an undercover video that the American Left had been committing voter fraud for decades.

 

While I was looking around in research I discovered an even better video at the G+ Conservative Community that addresses all the lies and deceptions of Crooked Hillary in the third Presidential Debate.

 

JRH 10/21/16 (Hat Tip Kevin Cunniff)

***********************

VIDEO: Decision 2016: A Guide for Hillary & Trump Voters

 

 

Posted by Black Pigeon Speaks

Published on Oct 20, 2016

 

Tip Jar: via PayPal to: NAVYHATO@gmail.com 
If you would like to support this channel, it would be GREATLY appreciated.

 
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/blackpigeon?ty=h

 

There is more to read unrelated to the video

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics Crime Conspiracy Theory
write a comment
October 20 2016 5 20 /10 /October /2016 16:32

John R. Houk

© October 20, 2016

 

I watched the Presidential Debate from Wednesday Oct. 19 on Fox News. After the debate one thing the Fox analysts was astonished by Trump’s saying he may not support the outcome of the election to be held on November 8. And sure enough one of the analysts did a quite online perusal of debate headlines and they called condemned Trump for his unwillingness to commit to supporting the election outcome if he lost.

 

The thing is I did not even think Trump’s stand was even close to being outrageous when he said that. I mean most Conservatives are quite aware the Dems either directly or indirectly through surrogates, have done their best to rig or fix elections toward a positive Dem Party outcome for decades.

 

Debate moderator Chris Wallace asked the Republican presidential nominee whether he would honor the election results despite his unfounded declaration that the election may be "rigged" against him.

 

"I will look at it at the time. I'm not looking at anything now. I'll look at it at the time," Trump replied.

 

Pressed again by Wallace moments later, Trump said he'll "keep you in suspense" about his decision. (Trump refuses to say whether he will accept results of election: 'I will keep you in suspense'; By Maxwell Tani; Business Insider; 10/19/16)

 

If you examine actually said in Chris Wallace question and the Donald Trump response, YOU will notice the context was in view of decades of Crooked-Fraudulent election acts by Democrats and Dem surrogates in voter fraud. James O’Keefe through Project Veritas have caught the Dems in their own words saying the very same thing that Donald Trump was talking about!

 

Here’s the Debate context which includes a blurb of Crooked Hillary obfuscating Dem voter fraud by trying to change the subject about half-truths (contrarily meaning half-false) on Donald civil problems. Keep in mind folks that any civil problems Trump has or has had is dwarfed by Crooked Hillary’s felonious activities as Secretary of State that FBI Director James Comey choose to ignore OR was told to ignore by higher ups.

 

VIDEO: Trump on accepting election outcome: “I’ll keep you in suspense”

 

 

Posted by AL.com

Published on Oct 19, 2016

 

Donald Trump responds to a question over whether he would accept the results of the election.

 

AND NOW Project Veritas:

 

VIDEO: Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

 

 

Posted by Project Veritas Action

Published on Oct 17, 2016

 

In this explosive new video from Project Veritas Action, a Democratic dirty tricks operative unwittingly provides a dark money trail to the DNC and Clinton campaign. The video documents violence at Trump rallies that is traced to the Clinton campaign and the DNC through a process called birddogging. 

A shady coordinated communications chain between the DNC, Clinton Campaign, Hillary Clinton’s Super PAC (Priorities) and other organizations are revealed. A key Clinton operative is on camera saying, “It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this m**erf***er." [Profanity editing by Blog Editor]

Website: http://projectveritasaction.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVerit... [Blog Editor: On browser this Facebook link comes up broken. After a Facebook search here are two pages related to the above link:]

 

o   project veritas

 

o   Project Veritas Action

 

Twitter: https://twitter.com/@Pveritas_Action

 

NOW! Do you think should examine an election loss before conceding OR WHAT?

 

JRH 10/20/16

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment

Overview

  • : ubiquitous8thoughts
  • ubiquitous8thoughts
  • : This is a Christian Right blog. This means there is religious freedom, free speech, Constitutional Original Intent, Pro-Israel, Anti-Islamist and a dose of Biblical Morality (Pro-Life & anti-homosexual agenda) content in this blog.
  • Contact

Search

Links