Overblog Follow this blog
Administration Create my blog
April 12 2016 3 12 /04 /April /2016 18:34

Omar Alnatour

 

Bill Warner has a teaching moment about Islam and the Islamic propaganda line that goes something like this: Terrorism committed by Muslims does not represent Islam, ergo Muslims have no need to apologize for Islamic terrorism.

 

JRH 4/12/16

***********************

Acknowledge, Don’t Apologize

 

By Bill Warner

Mar 29 2016

Political Islam

 

Every time jihadis kill Kafirs, our leaders and Muslims launch another “Don’t blame Muslims” campaign. The latest campaign is presented by Omar Alnatour. He takes the approach of Muslims should not apologize for what criminals do, because terrorists have nothing to do with Islam.

 

OA: “Radicals have hijacked his religion”
If a Muslim imitates Mohammed, he is following the Sunna, which the Koran commands Muslims to do. It is not a crime, if you do what Mohammed did.

 

OA: “Islam teaches peace”
Islam does preach peace, but it also preaches jihad. Mohammed rose to power on politics and jihad, not peace.

 

OA: “Islam says not to kill the innocents”
Yes, but Kafirs are guilty of rejecting Mohammed and are not innocent.

 

OA: “Muslims are not terrorists”
No, Muslims are called to be jihadis, not terrorists. The Koran devotes 24% of the Medinan Koran to jihad.

 

OA: “Muslims condemn terrorism”
Perhaps, but will Muslims acknowledge that they cannot condemn what Mohammed did? They cannot condemn Mohammed’s jihad.

 

OA: “Good Muslims have no relationship to terrorists”
Peaceful Muslims say the same prayers, read the same Koran and follow the Sunna as the jihadis.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/omar-alnatour/why-muslims-should-never-have-to-apologize_b_9526296.html

 

Why Muslims Should Never Have To Apologize for Terrorism

 

[Propaganda] By Omar Alnatour - Palestinian-American Muslim. Student. Humanitarian.

03/24/2016 03:30 pm ET | Updated Mar 24, 2016

The World PostA Partnership of The Huffington Post and Berggruen Institute [Snapshot of Nicolas Berggruen]

 

 

… Can you imagine always being blamed for things that you have absolutely no control over? Can you imagine always being asked to apologize for these things? Can you imagine being hated whether or not you do apologize? This is what being a Muslim in America today feels like.

 

 

Here Are Five Reasons Why Muslims Should Never Have To Apologize for Terrorism:

1) It’s ridiculous to ask us to apologize.


As a practicing Muslim, I know that my religion teaches peace. I am so certain of this fact that I will award anyone $10,000 if they can find me a verse in the Quran that says it’s ok to kill innocent people or to commit acts of terror. This is an open offer that will never expire.

 

I also know that Muslims, as a religious group, are not terrorists. I have factually proved this. I also YOU GET THE PROPAGANDIST IDEA

 

VIDEO: Acknowledge, Don’t Apologize

 

 

Posted by Political Islam

Published on Mar 29, 2016

____________________

© 2007-2016 CSPI, LLC. all rights reservedSales Tax Information.

 

What is Islam?

 

Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.

 

Our Mission

 

Political Islam has subjugated other civilizations for 1400 years. Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.

 

The Five Principles

 

Islam’s Trilogy of three sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When the Trilogy is sorted, categorized, arranged, rewritten and analyzed, it becomes apparent that five principles are the foundation of Islam.

 

All of Islam is based upon the Trilogy—KoranSira (Mohammed’s biography) and Hadith (his Traditions).


Most of the Islamic doctrine is political, not religious. Islam is a political ideology.

Islam divides the world into Muslims and unbelieverskafirs.

 

Political Islam always has two different ways to treat kafirs—dualistic ethics. Kafirs can be abused in the worst ways or they can be treated like a good neighbor.

 

Kafirs must submit to Islam in all politics and public life. Every aspect of READ THE REST

 

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
April 11 2016 2 11 /04 /April /2016 14:46

These days if you hear or learn about the Crusades in an academic setting, from a Leftist Apologists or Muslim Apologists; the info is usually disdainful against the Crusader Knights.

 

There was indeed some brutality committed by the Crusaders; ironically as much against (Eastern Orthodox or Eastern Rite) Christians and Jews as against Muslims. Except perhaps the bloody conquest of Jerusalem involving Jews and Muslims, the Muslims as even today were just or more brutal. In fact, Muslim acts of brutality began from day one Mohammed’s conquest of Medina and through the next four hundred or five hundred years against Christians (and Hindus in India) that has not abated to this present day. Hmm … When did the Crusades end?

 

Those years of activity by Crusaders lasted roughly from 1095 to 1291 and perhaps a few extra decades as Muslims mopped away – QUITE BRUTALLY – the Crusader remnants in the Middle East and Mediterranean.

 

Dee Fatouros found this brief history of the Crusades and cross posted at The Realistic Observer that accurately portrays the real reason the Crusades came about.

 

As a bonus after the Brian English history lesson, I am posting an approximately five-minute video about the Muslim White Slavery trade. The video format is vidmax.com. I couldn’t figure out how to embed that format so I cross posted the video on my YouTube page at John Houk.

 

JRH 4/11/16 (Hat Tip: Dee Fatouros)

*********************

A Bit Of History: The Crusades Were In Fact A Response To Islamic Jihad

By Brian M. English
Crisis Magazine

Posted by Dee Fatouros

April 10, 2016

The Realistic Observer

 

No matter How much you may or may not know about the Crusades, you will undoubtedly learn a great deal more from the following article.

 

Following 9/11, there was renewed interest in the Crusades as explanations were sought for the brutal attacks. As terrorist attacks have continued throughout the years, and now with the rise of the Islamic State, this interest in the Crusades has not abated. Unfortunately, increased interest has not necessarily translated into increased knowledge. Prof. Thomas F. Madden has lamented: “An interested person who simply strolls into a bookstore looking for a history of the crusades is much more likely to walk out with a book written by a novelist, journalist, or ex-nun than one written by a professional historian and based on the best research available. The heightened public interest in the crusades since 9/11 has created a market for popular histories, many of which simply retell myths long ago dispelled by historians.”

One particularly persistent myth is that the Crusades were the catalyst for conflict between Christianity and Islam. From President Clinton’s speech at Georgetown University less than a month after the 9/11 attacks, to President Obama’s speech at last year’s National Prayer Breakfast, and in pieces of popular culture like Ridley Scott’s film Kingdom of Heaventhe theme is consistent—the confrontation between Christianity and Islam began at the end of the eleventh century when a band of Christian savages invaded the peaceful lands of Islam. History tells a very different story.
 
In the seventh century a new faith stormed out of Arabia and sought to engulf the world. The Arab armies seeking to spread the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed in the East destroyed Sassanid Persia and drove the Byzantine Empire back into Asia Minor (modern Turkey). Included among the early conquests of the soldiers of Islam was the city of Jerusalem, which fell to them in 638. In the West, Muslim armies surged across North Africa and in 711 engulfed Spain.

The Islamic march towards Europe from the East was halted in 718 when the Byzantines, led by Emperor Leo III, annihilated the Muslim army that had besieged Constantinople for over a year. Muslim expansion in the West was halted by Charles Martel and the Franks in 732 at the battle of Tours, in what is now central France. However, the blocking of the land routes into Europe did not end the Muslim conquests. The Muslims, who became known in Europe as “Saracens,” took to the seas in a campaign of conquest and pillage that terrorized the western Mediterranean for three hundred years.

Early in the ninth century, both Corsica and Sardinia came under Muslim control. In 827, the Saracens began a 50-year conquest of Sicily and over the next several decades established bases in Italy and southern France. From these bases, Saracen raiders struck with impunity throughout Italy, into France, and even into Germany. The most symbolically horrifying of these raids took place in 846, when the suburbs of Rome were burned and the basilicas of Saint Peter and Saint Paul were desecrated.

War raged in Sicily for 50 years, ravaging the land and people. Finally in 878, Syracuse, the preeminent city of Sicily, fell. Its citizens were slaughtered and the fabulous wealth of the city was looted. That victory effectively completed the Saracen conquest of Sicily, although the fortified town of Taormina held out until 902, when its walls were finally breached and its inhabitants massacred.

Throughout the tenth century the raiding continued, sometimes on a massive scale. Genoa was devastated in 935, its people killed or enslaved, by a fleet from Africa. In 950–952, Calabria was sacked and Naples besieged. However, the tenth century also marked the first stirring of the counter-attack of Western Christendom—a counter-attack spearheaded by the Catholic Church. In 915, the main Muslim base in Italy, located on the River Garigliano, was destroyed by a force organized and partially led by the warrior Pope, John X. That initial success was merely a precursor of the response that would later be generated by a call to arms by the Church.

The eleventh century marked the turning point in the clash between Islam and Western Christendom. At the end of its first decade, the Egyptian Caliph al-Hakim destroyed the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem—the Church built on the location of Christ’s crucifixion, burial and resurrection—and no military response was possible. Before the close of the century’s final decade, Christian warriors were storming the walls of the city.

In 1016, Pope Benedict VIII forged an alliance between Genoa and Pisa, and the combined fleets of the trading cities destroyed a Saracen force from Spain that had occupied Sardinia. The Muslims were permanently ejected from Sardinia and the Pisans occupied the island. This military success by two of the leading commercial cities in Europe demonstrated the growing economic vitality of the West; a vitality that would translate into the ability to launch a major offensive aimed at recapturing territory conquered by the Muslims.

The Christian reconquest of Europe began in earnest in the second half of the eleventh century. At the forefront of that reconquest were the ubiquitous Normans. The Normans were descended from Vikings who had settled in northern France at the start of the tenth century. They took the land as a bribe from the king of France so that they would stop their raiding of French territory. They converted to Christianity and established an energetic and adventurous kingdom.

The most famous Norman Conquest took place in 1066. However, a few years earlier, a group of Normans led by Robert of Hauteville, who would become known to history as Robert Guiscard (“Robert the Wary”), and his younger brother Roger, had landed in Sicily and embarked on a conquest of their own. The Hautevilles and their men arrived in Sicily in 1061. They soon conquered Messina and by 1072 the city of Palermo, which under Muslim rule had replaced Syracuse as the leading city of Sicily, had fallen. During this campaign, Roger and his men marched under a papal banner, which signified the Church’s approval of their mission.

During the same time period that the Normans were prosecuting their conquest of Sicily, the Christian kingdoms in the north of Spain, aided by Norman and French knights, embarked on a second offensive in the counter—attack of Western Christendom. Just as in Sicily, papal approval was granted to the campaign. This effort culminated in 1085 with the capture of Toledo, the city in Spain with the greatest religious significance for Muslims, by the forces of Alfonso VI, king of Leon and Castile.

A dramatic change in the character of the West’s counter-attack took place in 1087, when the Genoese and Pisans allied once again pursuant to papal requests; this time they carried the war home to the Saracens in north Africa. The city of Mahdiya on the north-African coast was the chief port used by Muslim raiders and pirates. The Genoese and Pisan force, serving under the command of a bishop acting as a papal representative, plundered the city and burnt the Saracen fleet in the harbor.

While the power of Muslim forces waned in the West, Muslim expansion in the East was reinvigorated with the conversion of the Seljuk Turks to Islam in the second half of the tenth century. These ferocious horse-archers from Central Asia conquered both Iran and Iraq by 1055. In 1055, a Seljuk chieftain, Tughrul-Beg, entered Baghdad and in 1058 was proclaimed “Sultan,” the secular leader of the Sunni branch of Islam.

By 1059, the Seljuks controlled an empire that stretched from Iran to the Byzantine border in Asia Minor and the border in Syria of an Islamic kingdom, the Fatimid Caliphate, whose power emanated from Egypt. In 1071, the Turks struck a blow against the Byzantine Empire that sent shock waves throughout Christendom. In that year the Byzantine Emperor, Romanus Diogenes, gathered a large—but poorly integrated—army and marched into Armenia to face the Turks. The Seljuk Sultan, Alp Arslan, hearing of the Byzantine advance, galloped with his army to confront the emperor. The two armies met at the Armenian city of Manzikert, located near Lake Van.

At the Battle of Manzikert, the Seljuks destroyed the Byzantine army and captured the emperor. The Byzantine Empire was thrown into disarray. Emperor Alexius I, who seized the imperial throne in 1081, managed to stabilize the situation during the 1080s through a combination of military force and diplomatic skill. However, a series of disastrous reversals between 1091 and 1095 in Asia Minor brought the Turks within 50 miles of the Byzantine capital of Constantinople. Alexius, fearing the encroaching Seljuks, sent a delegation to Pope Urban II begging for military help against the Turks. Fortunately for Alexius, Urban and the knighthood of Western Europe were ready to hear and respond to this call for help.

On November 27, 1095, Urban appeared at Clermont in southern France and called on the knighthood of France to liberate the Christians of the East and the Holy City of Jerusalem from the scourge of the Turks. This liberation would be accomplished through the use of a new form of pilgrimage: the armed pilgrimage. Urban’s pilgrims would not be the simple penitents dressed in plain garments who had been traveling to Jerusalem in the past; they would be warriors clad in iron, with the goal of wresting Jerusalem from the Turks by force. This pilgrimage appeared so difficult and dangerous that Urban decreed that all past sins of those who shouldered this burden would be forgiven.

Although Urban’s appeal had been specifically aimed at the French, knights from all over Europe pledged to fight their way to Jerusalem. The only knights who were turned away were the Spanish: Urban reasoned that the efforts of Spanish knights in the Holy Land would be futile because their absence endangered Christians in Spain. Urban intended that the crusade in the East would be the opening of a second front in the war of Christian liberation that was already being fought in Spain.

Contrary to popular belief, the primary motivation for the majority of the crusaders was not the acquisition of wealth or land in the East. Nor was the crusade seen as an easy way to ship off younger sons who, by the laws of inheritance, would be denied a share of their father’s lands.

A crusader and his family endured crushing hardships and incurred enormous expenses to obtain the resources to support the crusader’s dangerous journey to Jerusalem. These costs were only magnified when, as was often the case, several members of a family joined the crusade. It is unlikely that many of those who joined the crusade were foolish enough to believe that they would recover their costs and would go on to amass great wealth. The vast majority of West European knighthood either did not consider answering the pope’s appeal or considered the obstacles to responding to Urban’s call too daunting.

In the minds of the knights who actually took the cross, the primary benefits of joining the crusade were of a more intangible nature. The forgiveness of sins was certainly a powerful inducement: most crusaders had spent their lives immersed in a culture of violence and that violence had been directed at other Christians. Many had probably committed acts they were ashamed of and achieving forgiveness for those transgressions would be a powerful motivation.

Joining the crusade also appealed to a spirit of adventure. Heading out into the unknown on a divinely ordained mission represented a union of the secular and the sacred that must have been difficult for an idealistic member of the knighthood to resist. The crusade offered not only an opportunity for heroic acts, but heroic acts performed in the service of the Church.

The great army that responded to Urban’s call had gathered at Constantinople by the spring of 1097. The Age of Crusading was about to begin—a chapter in, not the beginning of, the history of conflict between Christianity and Islam.

 

Source: Christian Action Network

____________________

Islam Unveiled Facebook Group info on VIDMAX VIDEO:

 

Caroline Ghorayeb

Facebook Islam Unveiled Group

April 8, 2016 10:08pm

 

The history you seldom hear about, Millions of White Europeans enslavement for nearly 1000 yrs

 

This is the history that some activists in the United States refuse to acknowledge even took place, regardless of the fact that it did and it lasted…

VIDMAX.COM

 

At Vidmax.com posted by RagnarLothbrok

 

My YouTube Page Cross Post:

 

VIDEO: The history you seldom hear about, Millions of White Europeans enslavement for nearly 1000 yrs

 

Posted by John Houk

Published on Apr 11, 2016

 

This is a five-minute audio history of Muslim White Slavery with pictures taking place roughly after the USA became a Constitutional Republic.

 

___________________

A Bit Of History: The Crusades Were In Fact A Response To Islamic Jihad

 

Edited for this blog by John R. Houk

Intro by Editor

 

The source link given about Prof. Thomas F. Madden quote is from Crisis Magazine.

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
April 10 2016 1 10 /04 /April /2016 16:29

 

Justin Smith writes of the impotent actions of the Obama Administration to engage ISIS concerning the Islamic genocide against Christians.

 

JRH 4/10/16

*********************

Another Christian Genocide

Defend the Faith

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 4/9/2016 1:35 PM

 

"Silence in the face of evil is evil itself. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act." __ Dietrich Bonhoeffer

 

Christians are the primary focus of the Islamic State murderers in Iraq and Syria, who are also committing heinous acts against the Yazidis and other Muslims. Entire Christian communities are being eradicated through the most abhorrent and abominably evil acts imaginable. The Christian population of Aleppo, Syria, once numbering half a million, is now reduced to approximately 35,000. Virtually every last Christian has fled Mosul, Iraq, after being given "the choice" to convert to Islam or die. Christians qualify in many more significant ways to receive refugee status than any other people, and America and other predominantly Christian nations must provide them with immediate protection and sanctuary, or watch Christianity in the Middle East disappear.

 

While Muslims can move easily from one nearby Muslim nation to the next, Christians have nowhere to go, no safe haven, and any attempt to flee often ends in death. They cannot seek shelter in U.N. camps, hiding in private homes and secluded "safe-houses," instead they are attacked by Muslim "refugees" and killed by islamofascist jihadists, who raid the camps. And due to their inability to leave the country for fear of discovery on the trails of death, Christians have been denied "refugee" status through a technicality; this technicality has allowed the Obama administration to do absolutely nothing for five years, in the face of the worst Christian genocide since the Armenian genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire.

 

Some of America's finest citizens, such as Patrick Kelly (Knights of Columbus) and Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) finally pressured Secretary of State John Kerry and President Obama to give an official U.S. declaration on March 17th that the Islamic State is committing genocide against Christians, Yazidis and Muslims. Rep. Rohrabacher's 'Save the Christians from Genocide Act' (HR4017) passed the House and Senate last month, after receiving motivation from the December 4th, 2015 letter to Secretary Kerry, from thirty religious leaders, scholars and experts working with the Heritage Foundation, that documented "ISIS assassinations of Church leaders; mass murders; torture ... and systematic rape of Christian girls and women."

 

Dr. Jerry Johnson, an ethicist and president of National Religious Broadcasters, suggested [CS Monitor version]: "If some anti-Muslim group was gathering up the Muslims, putting them in cages ... dousing them in gas and lighting them on fire, or lining them up and beheading Muslims simply because they were Muslims, quite frankly ... our government would have declared this an outrage and a genocide a long time ago."

 

Despite Secretary Kerry's statement, "What Daesh (Islamic State) wants to erase, we must preserve", no one should view this too optimistically. The Obama administration was fully aware of the Christian genocide five years ago, and yet, Obama's Cabinet stubbornly refused to create a viable strategy to destroy these islamofascist murderers. Obama's defacto policy favored Muslim "refugees" and blocked Christians, and it will not change much now.

 

America has witnessed Obama's unconditional love of all things Islamic, like the Muslim call to prayer, and we have heard him apologize to the Middle East for "Western imperialism". He has repeatedly claimed that the chaos, violence and murders committed by Islamic State terrorists are not "Islamic" and the Islamic State jihadists are not "Islamic", when the historical evidence has documented torture and beheadings as the Muslim's preferred method of proselytism from the 7th century right into the present. No one should be astonished that for Obama, genocide is not genocide if it's committed against Christians.

 

If only reluctantly, the Obama administration declared this Christian genocide, and the U.S. is now obligated legally, under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948 [TreatiesUN.org], to "take all measures to prevent genocide which [are] within [its] power and which might [contribute] to preventing genocide." But, this obligation does not require direct military intervention, so the world should expect only the bare minimum effort from this administration and possibly the next: However, HR4017 does require Homeland Security to assign a heightened refugee status to these victims of genocide and to expedite visas for them.

 

Samantha Power observed in her 2002 book 'A Problem From Hell', that "No U.S. president has ever made genocide prevention a priority, and no U.S. president has ever suffered politically for his indifference to its occurrences."

 

Americans may not have "religious tests" for our compassion and immigration/refugee policies, however, an accurate security test must now necessarily convince Congress to block Obama's plan to give 10,000 Syrian "refugees" entry into America by September 30th, unless they are verified to be Syrian Christians. While Christians pose absolutely no threat to America, the Syrian Muslim refugees contain a fifth column [Two more perspectives on 5th Column Muslims HERE and HERE] that hates us and wants to kill us and destroy our way of life; so essentially, they are imposing a religious test, with the endgame being a Christian holocaust.

 

In January 2016, Nadia Taha [The Freedom Fund], a 21 year old Iraqi woman, testified about her brutal rape and enslavement by Islamic State terrorists, before the United Nations Security Council in her effort to convince the international community to intervene. She recalled, "That night, he beat me up, forced me to undress, and put me in the room with six militants ... They continued to commit crimes to my body until I became unconscious."

 

Last April in St. Peter's Square, Pope Francis stated that "Our brothers and our sisters ... are persecuted, exiled, slain, beheaded, solely for being Christian ... I truly hope that the international community doesn't look the other way." Now, one year later this evil persists.

 

"If the world hates you, you know that it hate Me before it hate you. _ John 15:18 ... If they persecute Me, they will persecute you. _ John 15:20

 

With so many hundreds of thousands of Christians forced from their ancestral lands and murdered by Muslims, is it too late to save Christianity in the Middle East? Only time will tell, but time is running out.

 

Americans and people of the Free World, who care, simply have to do everything within their combined ability to save the Christians of Iraq and Syria and stop the spread of this intense and insane regional war to other regions. Whatever one's situation, send any aid at hand to relief organizations, similar to the Barnabas Fund [About and Donate], who are sheltering, feeding and even evacuating Christians to the West. Move our leaders to send more and better resources to national guard equivalents like the Peshmerga [Breitbart 3/16/16], who are fighting the Islamic State. Move world leaders to eradicate the Islamic State. And should these efforts fall far short, young Christian men and women might also consider going to these areas to help and/or fight, not as mercenaries but as Defenders of the Faith: Christmas Day 2014 was the first time in 2,000 that the bells did not ring out in the city of Mosul.

 

By Justin O Smith

________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All links are by the Editor and all text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad Christianity
write a comment
April 10 2016 1 10 /04 /April /2016 10:53

John R. Houk

© April 10, 2016

 

Robert Nilsson posted this as a comment to “Muslims Threaten an Army Vet in Minnesota”:

 

Did you see this? 
https://youtu.be/ra45nX9JmW4

 

VIDEO: 'Sharia Patrols' Harassing Citizens in London, Belgium, Sweden

 

 

Posted by LthlWepon

Published on Mar 21, 2015

 

And this was my thoughts on this video:

 

The Sharia being forced upon British citizens MUST NOT be allowed to take root in America. If those Sharia patrols emerge on American soil, then those forcing Sharia need to be arrested for breaking the Free Speech and Religious Freedom portions of the First Amendment. OTHERWISE American vigilantism will arise again in America to beat down this multicultural lunacy.

 

I don’t know about you, this irritated me enough to make it a standalone post.

 

JRH 4/10/16

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad Immigration
write a comment
April 9 2016 7 09 /04 /April /2016 15:07

 

John R. Houk

© April 9, 2016

 

VIDEO Fox9: St. Cloud Veteran Gets Threat

 

 

So you think Muslim immigrants and Muslims refugees and their sons and daughters are not a threat to indigenous Americans? Ask veteran Staff Sergeant Thomas Keane residing in St. Cloud Minnesota.

 

The largest Muslim influence in Minnesota are Somalian Muslims that seem very attracted to the Islamic terrorist organization al Shabaab which based in Somalia. It also seems the Islamic State more recently has also made incursions among the Somali-Muslims in Minnesota. In a recent WND article it was discovered that Minnesota Muslims interviewed were grateful for the lack of persecution but would much prefer Sharia Law to American Constitutional. In a nutshell that means a zero intent to assimilate to the American way of life. Thomas Kean became a victim of this Muslim attitude when he discovered a note on his car windshield telling him threatening to leave NOW! The implication was an “or else!

 

Muslims coming to America as refugees are a threat to the American way of life, our Constitutional legal system and to the heritage ingrained in American souls influenced by the Pilgrims, Puritans and Christians in general.

 

Further reading:

 

U.S. Army Veteran Says He Found This ‘Disturbing,’ Poorly-Written Note Left on His WindshieldThe Blaze; 4/8/16 10:01am

 

 

JRH 4/9/16

********************

Islamic Radicals Threaten US Army Veteran - HERE in America!!!

 

By Scott Raab, Navy Veteran

Sent: 4/7/2016 3:01 PM

Sent by Move America Forward

 

SHOCKING ISLAMIZATION OF AMERICA

**US MILITARY VET RECEIVES THREATS FROM
RADICAL MUSLIMS HERE ON HOME TURF**

 

Veteran gets threat letter Fox 9

 

The latest incident in a very disturbing trend, one of our own US Army vets living in St. Cloud, Minnesota, just Northwest of Minneapolis, received a shocking flagrant threat left on his vehicle as it sat outside his home where his family sleeps.

 

The short and cryptic message told the Army vet to "LEAVE HERE NOW" with the word NOW underlined menacingly. After the horrific recent attacks in Brussels, San Bernardino, Paris, and more, these threats seem all too real.

 

Although people may dismiss it as a mischievous youth or joke, the alarming trend of radical Islam taking hold in American Muslim communities must be taken very seriously, especially considering they targeted this Veteran at his home.

 

Here's more from the story as investigated by the local Fox News affiliate in Minneapolis:

 

Hate note left on U.S. Army veteran's windshield in Minnesota says: 'U kill R brothers'
As seen on FOX9 News

[Link discovered is 4/7/16 09:17AM CDT Update]
April 6, 2016

 

ST. CLOUD, Minn. (KMSP) - A photo of a hate note left on an army veteran's windshield in St. Cloud on Monday is now going viral on social media. The note reads, "U U.S. soldier, U kill R brothers -- U leave here NOW. "

 

Staff Sergeant Thomas Keane & Muslim Threat Letter

 

The Facebook post, that's already been shared over 10,000 times, was written by fellow veteran Jonathan Ksepka, who said he shared it to make veterans and service members "aware that these kinds of threats have been made in the area," he wrote.

Staff Sergeant Thomas Keane served in the U.S. Army for 24 years from 1990 to 2014. He was also awarded a Purple Heart. But what made him a hero to many, is exactly what made him a target to at least one.

"I went to turn the car on, and I see the letter on my windshield," Keane told Fox 9. "It's just disturbing."

 

We can't let these kinds of threats go unanswered. Respond by showing your support for our troops who are currently in harm's way! Show how patriotic the rest of us are!
 

MAF continues to support all of our military dog teams wherever they serve as well as the 10,000 troops in Afghanistan and 5,000 or more in Iraq.

We support their missions to defeat the Taliban, Al Qaeda, ISIS, and all the terrorist groups that want to kill Americans and plot terror attacks that could happen anywhere.

ISIS has attacked our bases in Iraq recently, resulting in the recent death of a US Marine. So our troops are very much still in harm's way! They're risking their lives to serve their country and we must support them!

 

Send MAF Care Packages to our Troops

 

[There is more to the MAF Email. They are stories related to fund raising for care packages to our Patriotic men and women serving overseas.]

______________________

Muslims Threaten an Army Vet in Minnesota

John R. Houk

© April 9, 2016

____________________

Islamic Radicals Threaten US Army Veteran - HERE in America!!!

 

All Donations are Tax Deductible
Please make all checks payable to "Move America Forward"

Donations by Check Can be Sent To:


ATTN: Scott Raab
Move America Forward
8795 Folsom Blvd. Suite 103
Sacramento, CA 95826

To sign up a deployed service member to receive a care package or
to request care packages if you are a deployed service member, visit

www.moveamericaforward.org or call (916) 441-6197

 

Send Care Packages

 

ABOUT MAF – PRO-MILITARY CHARITY

 

History

 

Move America Forward was initially formed in response to concerns raised by U.S. troops that the news media was frequently presenting inaccurate coverage that often ignored the success of their missions and accomplishments in the War on Terror.

 

MAF began holding rallies to support the troops where patriots could display their flags and it quickly transformed into a year round care package program. Conducting national bus tours, sending delegations overseas, working with military servicemen and women, pro troop companies, service organizations, and many other supporters from all across the nation to benefit our troops.

 

About

 

Move America Forward (MAF) is a military charity and the nation’s largest grassroots pro-troop organization, MAF is dedicated to supporting the brave men and women of our Armed Forces and their missions to defeat terrorism.  MAF is supported by hundreds of thousands of pro-troop activists, veterans, and military families all across the nation who share in our unwavering support.

 

We work with other non-profits, military service organizations, corporate sponsors, community networks and private citizens to support our Military and demonstrate affirmatively our appreciation and admiration for their service to America.

 

It is our strong belief that American citizens must be enlisted in the effort to let our troops know that they are in our hearts and prayers and that we will defend their service and honor them here on the homefront while they protect America on the frontlines overseas.

 

LEARN MORE AND SUPPORT THE TROOPS TODAY

 

  • MAF’s Care Package Program has delivered over 315 tons of care packages to the front lines of Afghanistan and Iraq. In partnership with our supporters each Care Package comes with a wide array of popular items requested by our troops. Most importantly they include a personal message from the person who donated the care package. To find out more about other Care Package features like the READ THE REST
Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad Immigration
write a comment
April 8 2016 6 08 /04 /April /2016 14:18

 

Don Moore posted an interesting analysis focused on Donald Trump. The article is written by Mark Alexander of The Patriot Post. I actually also receive a Patriot Post subscription but I thought I’d give credit to where I read Alexander’s thoughts which Don Moore’s group on the Blind Conservative Group on IO.

 

It appears to me that Mark Alexander is not a Trump supporter; nonetheless Alexander provides a fairly decent examination that if Trump wins the GOP nomination and the Dem nominee is Hillary Clinton. Which is to say Trump loses unless these set of circumstances emerge …

 

JRH 4/8/16

**********************

2016 — The Math That Matters Most

A Trump v Clinton Matchup

 

By Mark Alexander

Sent: 4/6/2016 2:09 PM

Post Date: April 6, 2016

Original link: http://patriotpost.us/alexander/41763

Sent by Blind Conservative Group on IO

 

"Man, once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the spot of every wind. With such persons, gullability [sic] takes the helm from the hand of reason and the mind becomes a wreck." -Thomas Jefferson (1822)

 

 

The 2016 general election will determine not just our next president; it will also determine which political party controls the Senate and House.

 

While the House is securely in Republican hands, Senate control is most assuredly in play1. That's because Republicans will be defending 24 Senate

seats2 while Democrats only need defend 10. Currently, Republicans hold a narrow 54-46 majority in the Senate.

 

Consequently, this election is not just a four-year decision but a generational one, because the next president will nominate the Supreme Court justice who will fill the swing-vote vacancy created by the death of Antonin Scalia3, and perhaps three additional seats - those of Justices Ginsberg, Kennedy and Breyer. If Hillary Clinton4 holds off the challenge from Socialist Bernie Sanders5 and is then elected president on November 8, only a Republican Senate would stand between her and the progressive dream of a statist-controlled Supreme Court for the next quarter-century.

 

We elect our presidents every four years, but those presidents nominate Supreme Court justices for life.

 

This is what Ronald Reagan meant when he said, "Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction."

 

Let me be clear: If Republicans lose both the presidential election and control of the Senate, the Socialist Democratic Party6 will control the despotic Judicial Branch7 for the foreseeable future, and the tyranny of the so-called living constitution8 will reign supreme.

 

Thus, those of us who support Liberty and First Principles9 should engage in a vigorous debate about the qualifications of presidential candidates, and the consequences of who will run against Hillary Clinton this November. We should consider with great deliberation the character of our presidential candidates10.

 

For the record, that debate among those of us who advocate for Liberty by way of the ballot box, among other means, is not restrained by Ronald

Reagan's11 admonition about fratricidal attacks - his "Eleventh Commandment12."

 

In his 1990 autobiography, "An American Life," President Reagan wrote of that brother-against-brother fratricide in his first campaign for the California governorship: "The personal attacks against me during the primary became so heavy that the state Republican chairman, Gaylord Parkinson, postulated what he called the Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican. It's a rule I followed during that campaign and have ever since."

 

Reagan fared well by following that rule, and after soundly defeating Jimmy Carter for the presidency in 1980, he won 49 of 50 states during his re-election campaign of 1984 - losing just Minnesota, the home state of his opponent Walter Mondale, by a mere 3,800 votes. (Oh, and he also lost the District of Columbia - an outcome that speaks for itself.)

 

Unfortunately, Republican presidential contenders since, most notably the 17 GOP candidates13 who began this primary, have taken the art of fratricidal attacks to new lows.

 

In every respect, this election cycle is like no other I have ever witnessed

- or read about - and primarily for one reason: The "establishment politicians," the professional political class, are disconnected from those of us who live outside the Washington Beltway.

 

It's no wonder that Bernie Sanders is nipping at Hillary Clinton's heels, having thumped her in seven of the last eight contests - including last night's double-digit win in Wisconsin14 - and I totally understand the popular appeal of Donald Trump15. According to the most recent (and reliable) Quinnipiac University political poll16, 57% of Americans agree that "America has lost its identity." The same percentage say that they are "falling further and further behind economically," and 53% say they want "a leader who is willing to say or do anything to solve America's problems."

 

These findings are consistent with our analysis and what we hear from our fellow grassroots Patriots17, most of whom have expressed their support for Ted Cruz or Donald Trump over the more centrist John Kasich.

 

But unlike each of these remaining three candidates who have broken their

pledges18 to support the eventual GOP nominee, I will support that nominee because I know for certain the perilous threat that "President Hillary Clinton" poses to the future of Liberty.

 

Last night's Wisconsin win for Ted Cruz notwithstanding, Mr. Trump still has a commanding delegate lead in the race to see who will likely face Hillary Clinton.

 

But there are serious questions about the election math - not of the GOP convention math19 as determined by the delegates20, but of the general election math.

 

That is the only math that matters.

 

Until recently, Donald Trump has frequently referenced his "lead in the polls." I tend not to reference most media polls because of what we define as the "Pollaganda Effect21," which is: Outcome-based opinion samples (polling instruments designed to generate a preferential outcome), which in large measure reflect prior-opinion indoctrination or cultivation by the same media conducting the poll. The incestuous results are then used to manipulate public opinion further by advancing the perception that a particular candidate or opinion on an issue enjoys majority support.

 

But that being said, there are some very distressing research polls assessing a matchup between Clinton and Trump in the general election.

 

Notably, the results of these polls have been affirmed consistently for several months now. Allow me to reference a couple of the most recent findings below, and, of course, you determine what to make of these findings.

 

On Monday, there was a report from Whit Ayres, president of the conservative polling firm North Star Opinion Research and author of "2016 and Beyond: How Republicans Can Elect a President in the New America."

 

According to Ayres's research, "A Trump nomination has as much chance of success in the general election as Trump University, or Trump Mortgage, or Trump Shuttle, or Trump Vodka, or Trump Casinos. Trump is an electoral disaster waiting to happen." He then notes the demographic trends22 that will have enormous impact in 2016: "A Republican nominee who hopes to win a majority of the popular vote in 2016 must gain either 30% of the nonwhite vote or 65% of the white vote, a level not seen since President Ronald Reagan's 49-state landslide sweep in 1984." There are more women than men voters, and "Trump's favorable to unfavorable ratings among white women are 29% to 68%. . Millennials have now passed baby boomers to become the largest generation. Trump's ratings among millennials are now 18% favorable to 80% unfavorable, with 70% strongly unfavorable." (Trump's unfavorable ratings with women are even higher in the latest Wall Street Journal/ABC News poll23.)

 

Ayres continues, "Since 1984, no victorious Republican presidential candidate has received less than 91% support from Republicans. Trump's favorable to unfavorable ratings among Republicans are 52% to 47%, with 34% strongly unfavorable. A candidate beginning a general election campaign with almost half of his party holding unfavorable views is a non-starter.

 

Contrast that with Hillary Clinton's favorable to unfavorable ratings among Democrats of 78% to 20%. A Trump nomination would put a Democrat in the White House, seriously threaten Republican majorities in Congress and leave the Republican Party in shambles."

 

For the record, Trump's GOP unfavorable ratings are on par with those24 of George W. Bush at his presidential low point.

 

Next up is the most recent research from Public Policy Polling25 on the most popular Republican in the race - Donald Trump - unless Kasich drops out.

 

According to this and similar polls, 42% of Republican voters would support Trump if the election were held now. About 33% would support Cruz and 22% Kasich. However, when asked if Kasich were to drop out, 51% of his supporters go to Cruz while only 23% support Trump. That would put Trump and Cruz in a statistical dead heat.

 

Notably, the latest Reuters rolling averages26 today put Cruz ahead of Trump nationally. These numbers have significant implications for the general election, particularly since Mr. Trump has yet to collect more than 49% of the votes in any primary.

 

 

The general election results, and the likelihood that Republicans will lose their Senate majority with Trump on the ticket, are upheld by both conservative and liberal media research, as noted both in New York Times poll summaries27 and Washington Post poll summaries28. They are also affirmed by the 30-day rolling average of polls29.

 

Perhaps most ominously, Larry Sabato, a seasoned election forecaster at the University of Virginia's Center for Politics, concludes that in a Clinton v Trump contest, Democrats will go into Election Day with a whopping 347 electoral votes in their pocket or strongly leaning30 toward Clinton. They only need 270 to win. And by way of affirmation, Clinton leads Trump by double digits in six of the most comprehensive polls taken in the last month.

 

The fact is, whether the polling source is Left, Centrist or Right, Trump takes a beating in a head-to-head general election matchup with Clinton.

 

Based on the total number of primary votes cast to date, about 5% of all eligible voters have checked ballots for Donald Trump. That means an even smaller percentage have cast primary votes for Ted Cruz and others - because until a few weeks ago, the field was still flooded with GOP candidates. But, the percentage of primary votes cast for a candidate is of less importance than the percentage of total eligible voters supporting a particular candidate.

 

All that having been said, as utterly perplexing as the current primary cycle is, it remains possible that once Trump and Clinton debate each other mano a mano (yes, the masculine applies to Hillary), Trump might pull enough blue-collar and rustbelt Demo support away from Clinton to defeat her. This will be especially true if the momentum generated by Sanders does not transfer to Clinton. (She is, after all, a historically weak, unpopular and untrustworthy candidate.)

 

And where can Clinton attack Trump31 without undermining her own campaign?

 

Not Wall Street connections, not personal integrity, not honesty, not wealth, not marriage infidelity, etc. Raising any of those issues with Trump will draw fire on her own record. Of course, there is that wild card: A Clinton indictment32.

 

Unfortunately, she is coated with as much non-stick Teflon as Bill Clinton33. Even under the most unfavorable circumstances for Clinton, a Trump victory would still be a long shot.

 

If Trump is the nominee, I hope he can defeat Clinton - but I don't base my reasoned, critical analysis on popular opinion or "hope," and neither should any of us.

 

Again, this is not just a four-year decision but a quarter-century decision.

 

If Hillary Clinton wins and Republicans lose control of the Senate gauntlet against her judicial nominees, batten down the hatches.

 

Ultimately, the math that matters is the poll taken on November 8th of this year. I care less about the name of the GOP candidate than I do that candidate's ability to defeat Clinton at best, or leave the GOP Senate majority intact at worst.

 

 (Finally, a request for prayer: This morning, our nation lost another great Patriot. Sandy McMillan served with SEAL Team 2 and was a fellow Navy Leaguer. He was a family man, a long-time colleague and friend. Please pray for his wife and their family. Fair winds and following seas, my friend! We will miss you.)

 

Pro Deo et Constitutione - Libertas aut Mors Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis

 

 

Links

 

1.http://patriotpost.us/articles/41037

 

2.http://patriotpost.us/posts/41134

 

3.http://patriotpost.us/articles/40676

 

4.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/37087

 

5.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/40591

 

6.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/9235

 

7.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2937

 

8.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2970

 

9.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/7324

 

10.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/41349

 

11.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/8891

 

12.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/23978

 

13.http://patriotpost.us/opinion/36849

 

14.http://patriotpost.us/posts/41753

 

15.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/40890

 

16.http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2340

 

17.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/9612

 

18.http://patriotpost.us/posts/41617

 

19.http://patriotpost.us/articles/41755

 

20.http://www.nationalreview.com/article/433519/donald-trump-nomination-political-suicide-republicans

 

21.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/3060

 

22.http://www.wsj.com/articles/whit-ayres-a-daunting-demographic-challenge-for-the-gop-in-2016-1425513162

 

23.http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/examining-trump-s-problem-female-voters-n544901

 

24.http://www.gallup.com/poll/116500/presidential-approval-ratings-george-bush.aspx

 

25.http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_32916.pdf

 

26.http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TR130/filters/LIKELY_PRIMARY15:1,PARTY_ID_:2/dates/20160101-20160405/type/day

 

27.http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/us/politics/donald-trump-general-election.html

 

28.https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/04/01/gop-wakes-up-polls-are-no-longer-trumps-friend/

 

29.http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/trump_favorableunfavorable-5493.html

 

30.http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/the-only-thing-that-matters/

 

31.http://patriotpost.us/posts/41374

 

32.http://patriotpost.us/articles/41642

 

33.http://patriotpost.us/alexander/24356

 

34.https://patriotpost.us/donation/new?ref=site_content

______________________

Copyright from The Patriot Post: © 2016The Patriot Post.

 

Blind Conservative Group Description

 

A group for blind people and others for the discussion of politics and other conservative interests.

 

Subscribe to Blind Conservative: blind-conservative+subscribe@groups.io

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment
April 6 2016 4 06 /04 /April /2016 18:01

David Daleiden

 

What happens when you are a moral person exposing baby-killers who murder legally but illegally perform a live-birth then kill the child for more viable baby body-parts to sell to researchers?

 

This is what happens: the moral person is persecuted by a Left oriented legal system protecting the baby-killing industry. Ask David Daleiden of the Center for Medical Progress.

 

Back Stories:

 

Grand Jury Indicts Daleiden for Exposing Planned Parenthood – 1/26/16

 

Houston Prosecutor Persecutes Daleiden and Merritt – 1/30/16

 

JRH 4/6/16

*************************

California Authorities Raid Home of Man Who Shot Undercover Planned Parenthood Videos

 

By DON THOMPSON

April 6, 2016 | 6:55 AM EDT

CNSNews.com

 

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — An anti-abortion activist who made undercover videos at Planned Parenthood clinics said in a social media posting that California Department of Justice agents raided his home Tuesday.

 

Agents seized all video footage from his apartment, along with his personal information, David Daleiden said in a Facebook post. Daleiden, the founder of a group called the Center for Medical Progress, said agents left behind documents that he contends implicate Planned Parenthood in illegal behavior related to the handling of fetal tissue.

 

Center for Medical Progress spokesman Peter Robbio confirmed the social media posting is authentic, but he declined further comment. He said Daleiden lives in Orange County.

 

Rachele Huennekens, a spokeswoman for state Attorney General Kamala Harris, said in an email that she can't comment on any ongoing investigation.

 

Harris said in July that she planned to review the undercover videos to see if center violated any state charity registration or reporting requirements. She said that could include whether Daleiden and a colleague impersonated representatives of a fake biomedical company or filmed the videos without Planned Parenthood's consent.

 

Harris, a Democrat, is running for the U.S. Senate. Daleiden suggested in the social media posting that the raid was politically motivated because Harris has accepted campaign contributions from Planned Parenthood.

 

Daleiden faces related charges in Texas. One of his Texas attorneys, Terry Yates, did not return telephone and email messages Tuesday.

 

Texas authorities initially began a grand jury investigation of Planned Parenthood after the undercover videos were released in August.

 

But the grand jury cleared Planned Parenthood of misusing fetal tissue and indicted Daleiden and a colleague, Sandra Merritt, in January on charges including using fake driver's licenses to get into a Houston clinic.

 

Daleiden previously said his group followed the law in making the videos. His post Tuesday called the raid an "attack on citizen journalism" and said he will "pursue all remedies to vindicate our First Amendment rights."

__________________________

Copyright 1998-2016 CNSNews.com.

CNSNews.com is a division of the Media Research Center.

 

The mission of the Media Research Center is to create a media culture in America where truth and liberty flourish. The MRC is a research and education organization operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and contributions to the MRC are tax-deductible. 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics Conspiracy Theory
write a comment
April 5 2016 3 05 /04 /April /2016 17:18

 

John R. Houk

© April 5, 2016

 

It appears that FBI Director James Comey is the first lynchpin hurdle on whether or not Hillary Clinton is indicted for using a private home server to receive and send classified information. (The second lynchpin would be Attorney General Loretta Lynch and the third lynchpin President Barack Hussein Obama.)

 

Director Comey is providing at least the appearance of a vigorous FBI investigation into Hillary with unverified reports that over a hundred FBI Agents are involved in combing server data.

 

Also apparently Director Comey seems to have earned the respect of both Dems and Republicans as a non-political civil servant serving in both the Bush Administration and the Obama Administration. Based on that journalist evaluation I have read about I thought it might be interesting to provide an excerpt from one of today’s Salon.com articles. Salon should be evaluated as a committed Leftwing Internet rag:

 

This is how the FBI destroys Hillary: The 10 questions that could end her White House dreams

These questions, if answered honestly, would most likely hand the Democratic nomination to Bernie Sanders

 

The FBI’s upcoming interview of Hillary Clinton will be a turning point in the race for Democratic nominee, especially since Clinton won’t be able to speak to James Comey and his FBI agents in the same manner her campaign has communicated with the public. Unlike loyal Hillary supporters who view the marathon Benghazi hearings to be a badge of courage and countless prior scandals to be examples of exoneration, the FBI didn’t spend one year (investigating this email controversy) to give Clinton or her top aides parking tickets. …

 

Imagine if you had 22 Top Secret emails on your computer?

 

Would you be able to claim negligence?

 

Also, the issue of negligence is a canard. Clinton and her top aides were smart enough to understand protocol. For every legal scholar saying that indictment isn’t likely (because it’s difficult to prove Clinton “knowingly” sent or received classified intelligence), there’s a former attorney general and former intelligence officials saying that indictment is justified.

 

 

I explain three possible scenarios in my latest YouTube segment regarding how the Clinton campaign would react to the reality of indictment. No doubt, certain supporters would still vote for Clinton, even with the possibility of criminal behavior.

 

 

Therefore, below are ten questions the FBI should ask Clinton and her top aides. These questions, if answered honestly, will most likely hand the Democratic nomination to Bernie Sanders. Remember, the issue of convenience or negligence won’t be enough to circumvent repercussions from owning a private server as Secretary of State. FBI director James Comey and his agents aren’t Democratic superdelegates or beholden in any way to a political machine. They’ll demand answers to tough questions and below could be some of the topics discussed in Clinton’s FBI interview.

 

1. What was the political utility in owning a private server and never using a State.gov email address?

 

 

An editorial from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel titled “Clinton’s abysmal record on open government” explains the possible political motive …

 

In addition, regardless of Clinton’s excuses, the only believable reason for the private server in her basement was to keep her emails out of the public eye by willfully avoiding freedom of information laws. No president, no secretary of state, no public official at any level is above the law. She chose to ignore it, and must face the consequences…

 

And donations to the foundation from foreign governments have raised conflict of interest questions for Clinton as secretary of state, an office with power over foreign affairs and favors second only to the president’s.

 

 

2. Were all 31,830 deleted private emails about yoga?

 

ABC News

 

…  “This review did not involve opening and reading each email. Instead, Clinton’s lawyers created a list of names and keywords related to her work and searched for those. Slightly more than half the total cache — 31,830 emails — did not contain any of the search terms, according to Clinton’s staff, so they were deemed to be ‘private, personal records.’” 

 

There was no government oversight, therefore the FBI has every right to ask why Clinton’s staff was allowed to pick and choose (through keyword searches) private emails from others that could have contained classified intelligence.

 

3. Why didn’t you know that intelligence could be retroactively classified?

 

This leads to the issue of negligence; a zero-sum proposition. Either Clinton wasn’t smart enough to know protocol, or breached protocol. Both scenarios aren’t good for a future presidency. Both scenarios won’t prevent legal repercussions, given the 22 Top Secret emails.

 

4. Why did you use a Blackberry that wasn’t approved by the NSA?

 

An article in Madison.com titled “Emails: Clinton sought secure smartphone, rebuffed by NSA” explains the issue of Clinton’s Blackberry:

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Newly released emails show a 2009 request to issue a secure government smartphone to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was denied by the National Security Agency.

 

A month later, she began using private email accounts accessed through her BlackBerry to exchange messages with her top aides.

 

 

Clinton used a Blackberry that wasn’t approved by the NSA. Along with the issue of political motive, and why she deleted tens of thousands of emails, the unsecured Blackberry use could easily lead to an indictment.

 

5. What did you say to Bryan Pagliano? 

 

Mr. Pagliano recently received immunity. He’s told the FBI, most likely, about his conversations with Hillary Clinton. Any discrepancy in stories could lead to a felony charge for Hillary Clinton or Pagliano’s immunity to be revoked. Both have every incentive to tell the truth.

 

6. Why were 22 Top Secret emails on a private server?

 

This is a simple question with no logical answer circumventing political repercussions. If Clinton and her staff are able to evade this issue, future government officials will also be able to have Top Secret intelligence on unguarded private servers.

 

7. Was any information about the Clinton Foundation mingled with State Department documents? 

 

The answer to this question could lead to hundreds of other questions.

 

8. Did President Obama or his staff express any reservations about your private server?

 

President Obama’s White House communicated with Clinton via her private server. If anyone in the White House said anything about Clinton’s server, this could lead to new controversy.

 

9. Did Bill Clinton send or receive any emails on your private network?

 

The server was located in their home, so it’s a valid question.

 

10. How was your private server guarded against hacking attempts?

 

Foreign nations and hackers already tried to compromise Clinton’s server.

 

These questions could easily give Bernie Sanders the nomination. I explain that Clinton faces possible DOJ indictment in the following appearance on CNN International. Although Bernie can win without Clinton’s indictment, the email controversy will most likely become a giant story very soon. With READ ENTIRETY (This is how the FBI destroys Hillary: The 10 questions that could end her White House dreams; By H. A. GOODMAN; Salon.com; 4/5/16 10:12 AM CDT)

 

Did I mention that Salon was a Leftist rag? AND Salon is throwing Hillary under the bus in favor of Bernie Sanders. Did you notice the author Goodman mentioned “22 Top Secret emails” – as in classified - more than a few times?

 

Regardless of this refreshing bluster from Salon.com, I have noticed that pundits on the Left and the Right do not think Hillary will ever be indicted although not really for agreeing reasons. Most Leftist pundits toe the line that this is all a Right Wing conspiracy of the usual smoke and mirrors with no proof of a fire. Right Wing pundits tend to believe that neither Loretta Lynch nor President Barack Hussein Obama will allow Hillary to be indicted on their watch.

 

Lloyd Billingsley of FrontPageMag.com offers a scenario that doesn’t really fit the usual Left-Right talking points about Hillary Clinton. Billingsley throws the ball in Director Comey’s court and some interesting facts connected to history between Comey and Hillary in the view Hillary received some interesting passes in some questionable legal issues. Below is the article in entirety.

 

JRH 4/5/16

*******************

COMEY, CLINTONS AND CLEMENCY

 

By Lloyd Billingsley

April 5, 2016

FrontPageMag.com

 

Hillary Clinton’s email problems, going back to her time as Secretary of State, have not drawn heavy coverage from the old-line establishment media. As the investigation nears its final stages, FBI director James Comey’s past dealings with the Clintons may prove of interest.

 

Detail on those dealings emerged in American Evita: Hillary Clinton’s Path to Power, a 2004 book by Christopher Andersen, a former contributing editor to Time magazine who has written for Life, the New York Times, and Vanity Fair. None could be described as conservative but Andersen is candid about Hillary’s political past.

 

Hillary’s friends Robert Treuhaft and wife Jessica Mitford were “avowed Stalinists” who opposed the Hungarian uprising of 1956 and remained committed to the Communist cause. American Evita charts Hillary’s admiration for Marxist theoretician Carl Oglesby and Rules for Radicals author Saul Alinsky, from whom Hillary learned that “the only way to make a real difference is to acquire power.”

 

After Bill Clinton left the White House, one staffer told Andersen, the entire focus was on “getting Hillary back in.” The road led through New York, where Hillary took aim at the Senate seat vacated by Daniel Patrick Moynihan. Hillary was not from New York and had never spent more than a few days there, so she needed creative ways to attract votes.

 

New Square, a Hasidic enclave 30 miles northwest of Manhattan, had voted as a bloc in previous elections and campaign workers urged Hillary urged to stop there. In New Square, four members of the Skver sect had been convicted in 1999 of bilking government aid programs for some $30 million. During her visit, Hillary denied that any pardon was discussed.

 

The day before the election, in a letter to New Square’s main synagogue, president Bill Clinton said he looked forward to visiting the village. As Andersen noted, New Square delivered Hillary’s biggest victory margin of any community in New York state, 1,359 votes to only 10 for her opponent Rick Lazio.

 

During the final days of his presidency, Bill Clinton opted to reduce the prison terms of the New Square offenders, and after 9/11 that sparked an investigation. As Anderson notes, “Hillary received an unexpected gift in late June when, without explanation, U.S. Attorney James B. Comey closed the New Square clemency case.

 

Clinton’s pardon of fugitive Marc Rich also drew an investigation and Andersen finds it odd that the Bush administration would “help the Clinton’s out” by refusing to release documents related to the pardons. And “in accordance with his boss’s wishes, U.S Attorney James Comey gave Bill and Hillary a pass.”

 

On September 4, 2013, James Comey became director of the FBI. In that role, Comey oversees the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified material on her private email and server. Whether she gets a pass this time is uncertain, but Comey’s history with the Clintons is worth media attention. So is Hillary’s history on the subject of terrorism.

 

“At Hillary’s urging,” Andersen writes, “the President granted clemency to 16 Puerto Rican terrorists who have been sentenced to prison following a wave of bombings from 1974 to 1983 that took the lives of six Americans and wounded scores of others. Incredibly, the terrorists had not even asked for clemency.”  The worst attack was the January 24, 1975 bombing of Fraunces Tavern in Manhattan. The Puerto Rican FALN exploded a bomb during the lunch hour, “hurling body parts into the street and killing four people.”

 

The terrorists accepted President Clinton’s offer of clemency but expressed no regret for their actions. Former U.S. Attorney Joseph Di Genova went on record that “the Puerto Rican terrorists were pardoned because they were a political benefit to the president’s wife. Make no mistake about it.” As Anderson notes, FBI director Louis Freeh opposed the pardons, as did New York major Rudy Giuliani, senator Charles Schumer and former Puerto Rico governor Carlos Romero Barcelo who, says Andersen, “pleaded with the president not to release the bombers.”

 

Stories on the Clinton pardons have not been a staple of the current campaign, in which Republicans have been the targets of choice on the terrorism issue. Perhaps a bit more balance is in order. Reporters, meanwhile, will find American Evita: Hillary Clinton’s Path to Power a worthy refresher course on the Democratic frontrunner.

 

_____________________

Hillary Indictment Trouble?

John R. Houk

© April 5, 2016

___________________

COMEY, CLINTONS AND CLEMENCY

 

Lloyd Billingsley is the author of Bill of Writes: Dispatches from the Political Correctness Battlefield and Hollywood Party: Stalinist Adventures in the American Film Industry.

 

© COPYRIGHT 2016, FRONTPAGEMAG.COM

 

ABOUT

 

FRONTPAGE MAG IS A PROUD PROJECT OF THE DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER

 

The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.

 

The David Horowitz Freedom Center combats the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to destroy American values and disarm this country as it attempts to defend itself in a time of terror.  The leftist offensive is most obvious on our nation’s campuses, where the Freedom Center protects students from indoctrination and intimidation and works to give conservative students a place in the marketplace of ideas from which they are otherwise excluded.  Combining forceful analysis and bold activism, the Freedom Center provides strong insight into today’s most pressing issue on its family of websites and in the activist campaigns it wages on campus, in the news media, and in national politics throughout the year.

 

David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club, the Individual Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic Freedom.

 

FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political commentary has 1.5 million visitors and over 870,000 unique visitors a month (65 million hits) and is linked to over 2000 other websites.  The magazine’s coverage of and commentary about events has been greatly augmented over the last two years by the presence of four Shillman Fellows in Journalism underwritten by board member Dr. Robert Shillman. FrontPage has recently added a blog called “The Point,” run by Shillman Fellow Daniel Greenfield, which has tripled web traffic.

 

DiscoverTheNetworks.com, launched in 2005, is the largest publicly accessible database defining the chief groups and individuals of the Left and their organizational interlocks.  It is a full service encyclopedia of the left providing an intellectual diagram of its institutional power in American culture and politics. DTN has had more than 8 million visitors so far this year and is a key resource for students, scholars and members of the media.

 

Since 2003, the Center has promoted an Academic Bill of Rights to support students’ academic freedom, and free the American university from political indoctrination and renew its commitment to true intellectual diversity. This campaign has had a permanent impact on American higher education.

 

In 2007, the Center undertook an READ THE REST

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics Crime Conspiracy Theory
write a comment
April 4 2016 2 04 /04 /April /2016 14:42

Shamim Masih

 

Shamim Masih considers himself a patriotic Pakistani. It often filters his eyes that the Pakistani government will someday protect the rights of all Pakistanis. That is “all” is in not just the Sunni Islamic majority but also religious minorities of which Shamim is a Christian. Many Christians in Pakistan look back and revere Pakistan’s founder - Mohammad Ali Jinnah – secularist minded Muslim who felt a Hindu dominated India would not be a fair place for Muslims to live in.

 

It is my sense that Shamim is realizing that an Islam dominated Pakistan will always be a raw deal for Pakistani Christians.

 

JRH 4/4/16

*********************

Live Your Life – Let Others Live Too

 

By Shamim Masih

Sent: 4/3/2016 3:46 PM

 

ISLAMABAD: With all respect to Muslims …... Multiculturalism is failure. And that was the reason for Pakistan. There is no point when Muslims migrating to Western Nations and imposing them to accept them or otherwise call them as racists. Do Christians migrate to Muslims nations? Do they accept Christians at all? Simply, no ... But the fact is that Muslims do not let other religious minorities to live in their countries and to practice their religion freely. I am by birth Pakistani, not an immigrant; even before the partition [India/Pakistan partition 1947] my forefathers used to live in the same area called Punjab province. Somehow, in early 2000 we shifted to the Twin city (Islamabad/Rawalpindi) and settled living in rented houses, very obviously owned by Muslims.

 

[The best way to SUPPORT Shamim’s Christian advocacy in Pakistan is via Western Union sending money with this LINK to a Western Union agent in Islamabad. Shamim’s email is shamimpakistan@gmail.com, Include Shamim’s phone - +92-300-642-4560]

 

Pakistan has become a Sunni Muslims dominated country and this sick mind-set has changed the concept of the creation of the country. Founder of the country, Mohammad Ali Jinnah struggled for a country where all people can live peacefully. He clearly announced that every person is free to live his life. On 12 March, 1949, the second constituent assembly of Pakistan passed the Objective Resolution which was proposed by the first Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan, proclaimed that the future constitution of Pakistan would not be modeled entirely on a European pattern, but on ideology and democratic faith of Islam. The legislative election in 1954 saw the Awami League coming to power and its leader Huseyn Suhrawardy becoming country’s first Bengali Prime Minister. Promulgation of constitution in 1956 leads Pakistan declaring itself Islamic Republic (official name) with the adoption of parliamentary democratic system of government.

 

Since then Islam phobia prevailed in the country and Mullahs are busy in spreading hate against other religions. Thousands of people have been either killed or sent to prisons saving Islam. Muslims believed that Islam is the only sacred religion and they are busy in saving it by killing others. Clerics are busy in giving fatwas and thus creating Mumtaz Qadris. [Blog Editor: Should be of interest – “Pakistan’s Islamic Religious Right Mobilizes Anew to Defend Blasphemy Laws and Try to Get Asia Bibi Hanged”]

 

Good Friday is a Christians’ ritual and its common practice that Christians gather for mass and worship God. Honestly speaking I am not too religious and do not attend church on a regular basis and on these types of occasions I usually worship at my home as I feel every man has his personal affiliation with his creator. There is more than one reason to it, as I am sick of so called pastors (religious businessmen) (will write on it later). So we, family members gathered for Good Friday service and started worshiping in our house. While the service was on someone knocked at the door, I went out to see and found the landlord there. He said that it’s not church and you are not allowed to say our prayer at home, if you want to [not] keep it [your home], continue [praying], better to leave the house. I explained to him that we did not invite others but [our] family members and [we are simply] praying on our religious event. But he was not satisfied and ordered us to leave the house. It’s not the first time, in June last year, when we gathered for my mother’s death anniversary, he disturbed our gathering.

 

Is this country made for Muslims only? Do we have no right to live our lives? Will justice be done? Is this a safe place for our children? I know that government issuing statements that minorities are given equal rights and some minority parliamentarians are doing the same. Some so-called patriotic [Pakistanis] claim try to show their loyalty by criticizing others. But my question is; where does a common Christian person stands? A major portion of Pakistani Christians are living below the poverty line and the same segment faces problems in everyday life.

    

Pakistan is a Muslim dominated country and Muslims have changed the societal culture by building mosques and madrassas on every corner but Christians are not allowed to build [Churches or pray in own homes]. In the capital, Islamabad only, there are hundreds mosques and madrassas are constructed illegally. The Founder of the nation, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, created this country and [proclaimed] given rights [for all religions]. But his successors have changed his ideology. These hardline clerics are defaming the face of Pakistan not we Christians…... 

 

Be Blessed,

 

Shamim Masih

 

Journalist, Blogger and Human Rights Activist
http://oiwerk.blogspot.com/

 

The best way to SUPPORT Shamim’s Christian advocacy in Pakistan is via Western Union sending money with this LINK to a Western Union agent in Islamabad. Shamim’s email is shamimpakistan@gmail.com, Include Shamim’s phone - +92-300-642-4560

_________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor. All links are by the Editor.

 

© Shamim Masih

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Christianity Counterjihad
write a comment
April 3 2016 1 03 /04 /April /2016 13:39

Yesterday I posted a video that exposes that Muslim refugees are flooding into Europe without appreciation of their non-Muslim hosts violating the laws of the land with rapes, theft and murder and more. Today I’m posting a good follow-up with a great submission by Justin Smith that has the message that if the same kind of Muslims going to Europe come to America expect Islamic terrorism in one form or another.

 

JRH 4/3/16

***********************

Victory at All Costs

Collect the Dead

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 4/2/2016 1:57 PM

 

"I'm sick of preening celebrities who tell me to 'PrayForTheWorld' and celebrate diversity while indiscriminate floods of Muslim refugees across Europe and America corrode the pillars of peace and freedom." -- Michelle Malkin, March 23rd, 2016

 

Four murdered Americans among the thirty-five victims in Brussels and seventy-one murdered Christians in Lahore, mostly women and children, blown apart over the Easter Weekend, are representative of the true face of Islam and the severe existential security threat Islam and Muslims pose to America, and Americans would be deluding themselves by thinking otherwise. This is a threat that will only be made worse through the delay of common sense action and the immediate halt of Muslim immigration into our country.

 

Americans cannot place any hopes on the elusive "peaceful" and "moderate" Muslims. While 70% of the followers of traditional Islam have been deemed "moderate" by Leftist politicians and intelligentsia, far too often, the reality has shown us otherwise, and once described "moderates" are found in the ranks of "radicals", usually after another bloody terrorist attack and too late to do anything but collect the wounded, maimed and dead.

 

If, as stated by a few U.S. Senators, it is an insult to Muslims to advocate tracking Muslim refugees already here and to halt Muslim immigration for any period of time, then I suggest that Muslims stop murdering Americans. And for those who tell us to view the Muslim graves at Arlington, I tell them, that for each headstone, there are a hundred more Muslims who would happily betray America and see Her destroyed.

 

Ali Mohammed, top aide to Osama Bin Laden, immigrated to the U.S. in the 1980s from Egypt. He became a U.S. Army sergeant and an instructor at the JFK Special Operations Warfare School at Ft. Bragg. Then Mohammed went on to smuggle suspected terrorists into the U.S. through Vancouver, Canada. And, in his greatest betrayal of this generous America which offered him so much, Mohammed trained El Sayyid Nosair and Mahmud Abuhalima, who took part in the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing.

 

Brussels bombers Ibrahim and Khalid Bakraoui's plot to force a nuclear scientist to make a dirty nuclear bomb, brings to mind the New Jersey Al Qaeda member Sharif Mobley, currently serving time on terrorism charges. Mobley worked in several nuclear plants in Salem County, NJ and he had passed multiple federal background checks through 2008.

 

Muslims are the only people committing global wholesale murder in the name of Islam. They are the only people who openly proclaim their desire to kill Jews and Westerners, and Muslims are the only people vowing to conquer the world: These facts are not irrelevant to America's immigration policy.

 

If every single Muslim grievance against the West and America were addressed and assuaged today, tomorrow a hundred more would be posited by the leaders of Islam, simply because we exist and are not Muslim. Anyone saying "we cannot afford to alienate" Muslims act as though it's America's fault that Muslim's attack us. Offend the Muslim world or not, Islam will always manufacture one more reason to attack America.

 

Over the last four decades, Shamim Siddiqqi [An author of a treatise to Islamize West], leader of the Islamic Circle of North America, has advocated subverting our republic by linking Islamist front groups to racial politics. During the 2015 joint conference of the Muslim American Society, an overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the ICNA, Khalilah Sabra, MAS leader, openly called for "revolution", as she discussed Muslim support for Black Lives Matter. Drawing parallels between the U.S. and the Middle East and events leading to the Muslim Brotherhood-led Arab Spring revolutions, Sabra suggested, "We are the community that staged a revolution across the world; if we can do that, why can't we have that revolution in America?"

 

Any Muslim calling for the reform of Islam, in the Western sense of the meaning of the word "reform", is considered a heretic. However, an infinitesimal number of liberal thinking secular Muslims, such as Irshad Manji, Dr. Zuhdi Jasser and Asra Nomani, are attempting to counter the integral violent doctrines of Islam and reform Islam. But any successes will be next to impossible to achieve, due to Islamic texts and the competing theological hierarchies of Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. And compounding the difficulty of their task, Saudi Arabia and Egypt are still exporting the virulent Wahhabi brand of Islam to 2000 mosques across America: No one can reasonably expect Islam to achieve reformation in this lifetime or the next.

 

Perhaps millions of Muslims are already living peacefully with the rest of the world, the non-Muslims, the Christians, the infidels, as the Progressives and Muslim apologists would have us believe, but on the whole, I have yet to see it anywhere -- not even in Jordan where King Abdullah has called for "reform" and yet still allows the persecution of Jordan's Christian minority to persist. And in the meantime, their "religion of peace" is awash in the blood of Americans, Europeans, Yazidis and Christians and their fellow Muslims.

 

Where is the historical evidence of a mainstream "moderate" Islam or even Islam "the religion of peace" after Islam's first ten years?

 

Isn't it reasonable for Americans to decide who is allowed into our country? Isn't it logical to determine that banning the immigration of Muslim "refugees" will prevent many terrorists from entering America too?

 

Americans have had enough of placing memorial flowers on the graves of their loved ones, who were murdered by Muslims seeking to impose Islam in the name of Allah, and as Progressives and Obama lecture the rest of America on retaining our "American values" it becomes obvious their "values" are a perversion of everything "American". Our American values are based on Western and Judeo-Christian principles, not Middle Eastern values or oppressive teachings of the Koran, whether Muslims like it or not; and resisting a government utopian policy of open borders and coexistence that allows hundreds of thousands of Muslims to enter America and commit mass murder is not a "hate-crime." It is our duty to prevent the murder of innocent civilians in America and to defend America and not let Her perish: Here and abroad --- We Must Fight or Die.

 

By Justin O. Smith

__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor. All links are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad Immigration
write a comment

Overview

  • : ubiquitous8thoughts
  • ubiquitous8thoughts
  • : This is a Christian Right blog. This means there is religious freedom, free speech, Constitutional Original Intent, Pro-Israel, Anti-Islamist and a dose of Biblical Morality (Pro-Life & anti-homosexual agenda) content in this blog.
  • Contact

Search

Links