Overblog Follow this blog
Administration Create my blog
March 3 2015 3 03 /03 /March /2015 14:09

 

As much as Leftists, Mainstream Media, Establishment Republicans and even some relevant Conservatives want nothing to do with Sarah Palin, on a personal level I believe she is Presidential material. Her detractors insult her intelligence. Let me tell you something President Ronald Reagan endured the very same insults toward his intelligence. AND after never giving up on races for President, he eventually won two conservative terms as President of the United States of America. President Reagan (although Leftists hate it) has already gone down as one of the best Presidents in American history. Get over Palin’s detractors and realize this gal is a charismatic leader with a lot of electoral influence.

 

I didn’t hear much praise from Conservative circles on Palin’s CPAC 2015 speech. Thanks to Stephanie Hahn Nolan and her post to the Facebook group Sarah Palin’s EARTHQUAKE 2016 I found a summary and a Youtube video of her entire speech. The speech is highly critical of President Barack Hussein Obama’s handling of global Islamic Terrorism. She could have also included BHO’s idiocy in making an Iran deal allowing nuclear arms which definitely leads to an existential threat to Israel. (One reason Obama hated head of government Prime Minister Netanyahu giving a bicameral speech to Congress which undoubtedly exposes that Foreign Policy idiocy.)

 

Below is the NewsWire.net summary followed by the roughly 24 minute video that has Medal Honor winner Sergeant Dakota Meyer introducing Sarah Palin.

 

JRH 3/2/15

***************************

Sarah Palin Suggests How the US Should Deal With ISIS

 

By Tyler Jones

February 27, 2015

NewsWire

 

Sarah Palin said in a speech before Republican activists that there is a solution to the problem with ISIS. We just should kill them all “like Nazis.”

 

(Newswire.net -- February 27, 2015)  -- Former GOP VP nominee Sarah Palin blamed the Obama administration for the rise of ISIS in the Middle East. In an emotional speech about American war veterans, the former Alaska governor seized the opportunity to critique Obama’s administration.

 

In the speech in National Harbor, Maryland, Palin accused Obama of failing to destroy Islamic State militants and for the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq, because he pulled American troops out of the country.

 

“The rise of ISIS is the direct result of this administration's refusal to heed that warning,” Palin said. “The Middle East is a tinderbox and it's coming apart at the seams...as ISIS expands, it takes back land we just spilled blood to secure.

 

Palin blamed Obama for the casualties that died in vain in Iraq and in the Afghanistan because the situation in the Middle East is now worse than ever.

 

"Did we actually win in Iraq and Afghanistan before we waved that white flag? The jury is still out. But when evil Islamic terrorists are on the march screaming 'Allahu Akbar' from Syria to Iraq to Libya and Yemen and the streets of Paris, well it doesn't look like victory," she added.

 

Palin criticized Obama's conciliatory comments calling on him not to equate Islam with terrorism.

 

"Lecturing Christians to get off our high horse about radical Islam won’t stop the Islamists from killing Christians," Palin said. "Stop blaming the victim and wake up, Mr. President. While Christians bow their heads to pray for you, radical Islamists want to cut off your head," she said in a speech.

 

Referring to recent comments by State Department representative Marie Harf, who said that the US could not beat Islamists simply by killing them, Palin took completely opposite stand.

 

"They say we can’t kill our way out of war,” Palin said. "Really? Tell that to the Nazis. Oh wait, you can’t because they’re dead. We killed them,” she said.

 

VIDEO: Governor Sarah Palin CPAC 2015

 

 

Published by The ACU

Published on Feb 26, 2015

 

______________________

©2015 Newswire.Net, All rights reserved.

 

Newswire.net Home Info Page

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics
write a comment
March 2 2015 2 02 /03 /March /2015 18:23

 

Robert Smith sent a query that pertains to keeping illegal aliens from entering the USA. He compares his duty in the military along the South Korean side of the DMZ I presume as a guard. The query leaves me to guess what part of the U.S. Military he served because he doesn’t specify and to be honest I am not knowledgeable enough to know if the American Army or the American Marines have guard duties in the DMZ. Mr. Smith signed his email with PSG retired. I never served in the military, so I am unaware of the acronym “PSG”. Without doing much investigation my best guess comes from Wikipedia:

 

United States Army

 

In the United States Army,[10] Rifle Platoons are normally composed of 42 soldiers. They are led by a Platoon Leader (PL), usually a second lieutenant (2LT), and with a Platoon Sergeant (PSG), usually a Sergeant First Class (SFC, E-7). Rifle Platoons consist of three nine-man Rifle squads and one nine-man Weapons squad each led by a Staff Sergeant (E-6). The Platoon Headquarters includes the PL, PSG, along with the PL's Radio-Telephone Operator (RTO), Platoon Forward Observer (FO), the FO's RTO and the Platoon Medic. (PlatoonUnited States Army; Wikipedia; page was last modified on 16 February 2015, at 20:07)

 

Mr. Smith is quite appreciative of the amount of security provided by the DMZ South Korean side fence. (See Also HERE,  HERE and HERE) He is incredulous that such a secure fence can be constructed and maintained in South Korea but American voters are continuously told that the same thing cannot be accomplished along the U.S./Mexican border.

 

JRH 3/2/15

***************************

Our Un-Sealable Borders

 

By Robert Smith (PSG – ret.)

Sent: 2/26/2015 8:39 PM

 

Several Administrations have declared our southern border cannot be sealed. This however brings to mind the most secure border in the world today. The border of which I speak is the border between North and South Korea.

       

The building of the fence at the southern edge of the demilitarized zone, commonly called the DMZ, was built by our Army Corps of Engineers and South Korean allies.

       

The first tour was spent trying to stay alive. The last two consisted of running patrols in the DMZ and patrolling and guarding the fence.

        

The fence consists of two fences. The primary fence is eight feet high, the secondary fence is twelve feet high. Both fences are topped by razor wire concertina type wire. Approximately twenty five meters separate the two fences.

         

There are security observation towers placed at intervals along the fence, each tower is in visual contact with the towers on either side of them. These towers are manned 24-7 by three to five men.

         

In my second tour the finishing touches were being made on the fence and we had a few infiltrators make it through the fence and into South Korea.

         

In my third tour the fence had been completed and the only North Koreans that came through the fence were those individuals seeking asylum.

          

I am sure such a fence along our southern border would produce results much the same as we have in Korea.

          

So why is it not being built?

          

There should not be any discussion about immigration reform or any type of amnesty until our borders are secure.

           

Call your Senator and Representative let them know how you feel about this issue.

___________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

© Robert Smith

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Immigration
write a comment
March 2 2015 2 02 /03 /March /2015 12:50

 

John R. Houk

© March 2, 2015

 

The reason I chose another <<sales narrative>> in the compendium was among other things to prevent them from immediately ending the ideological discussion with their <<6-million-omg-nazi-enough-said>>- bashing stick. I know a lot of people will be disappointed when reading this, but my love for Israel is limited to its future function as a deportation-port for disloyal jews. I am aware of the sad fact that all available statistics confirm that only aprox. Three percent of eurojews oppose multiculti (but from an anti-islamist perspective), and that only approx. 0.2 percent support nordic indigenous rights. I wish it wasn’t so. The reason why so called <<counterjihadists>>, at least the great majority, seemingly <<praise>> Israel, is to avoid the above described suppression-tactic. However, there is in fact a strong anti-nordicist/ethnocentrist wing within the counter-jihad movement, represented by Fjordman and his Jewish network, the EDL-leader, the SIOE-leaders, Wilders, Farage etc., but their organisations are so heavily infiltrated by nordicists and ethnocentrists that it’s hard to say which wing are actually controlling them. (Anders Breivik - Norwegian-to-English translation)

 

The above translated to English quote defines the real difference between Europe’s Neo-Nazi/Fascist movements and the nationalistic Right Wing Counterjihadist movements. The first is nationalistic racism politically and the second is nationalistic cultural preservation that is anti-Islamic (but not maliciously violent racist) and not antisemitic.

 

The Neo-Nazis, which in 21st century, are more likely to describe themselves as advocates of a pure Nordic Supremacist race rather than German Aryan Supremacists of Hitler’s Nazis.

 

European Counterjihadists wish to prevent the immigration of counter-culture Muslims, demand assimilation acceptance standards of resident immigrants, naturalized immigrants and natural born Muslims; or the deportation of Muslims who refuse to respect Western (not necessarily Christian) laws and cultural mores.

 

The European Multiculturalist Left (and their North American Leftist cousins) group Nordic Supremacists and Counterjihadists and call them extremist Right Wing nut jobs. Counterjihadists deplore being grouped with Nordic Supremacists. AND Nordic Supremacist purists deplore Counterjihadists and the Nordicists that swing toward tolerance of Counterjihadists.

 

I sense it is a good guess that Nordic Supremacists contribute to the rising antisemitism in Europe by grouping Left Wing Jews as traitorous Eurojews. I suspect there is no love for Observant Jews either, but I could not tell from the Nordicist Norwegian essayist explaining his belief system. Rather than follow the Hitler Final Solution of annihilation he supports deporting Left Wing Jews to Israel.

 

Contrary to the Nordic Supremacists, the Counterjihadists are quite favorable toward European Jews because Leftist Jews have very much so assimilated to Western Culture and Observant Jews have zero intention of affecting Western Culture or the Rule of Law in any way negatively on the Western nation they have are citizens (probably dwelling therein for many centuries for that matter).

 

Ergo Nordic Supremacists are racists and Counterjihadists are not racists but are promoters of their nationality’s indigenous culture and Rule of Law.

 

I am cross posting the Google English translation of Bjorn Brataas’ essay to get a good snapshot of the differences between Nordic Supremacists and Counterjihadists. I just want to be clear I am in no way supportive of Nordic Supremacism. As far as I am concerned Nordicists are as counter-culture as Islamic Supremacists. BUT it is my belief Americans need to understand what is currently convulsing Europe. Islamic radicalism is bringing more and more voting citizens in Europe toward an affinity of Nordic Supremacism and Counterjihadism. The problem is the standard cross-European voter does not really distinguish between the two movements but are just darn weary of the violent turmoil erupting in their neighborhoods from violent Muslims.

 

European Leftists really control the dispensing of the Rule of Law in Europe primarily through the auspices of the European Union (EU). And as such, Leftists are grouping both movements as Right Wing extremists to keep the voters voting for them. It is my suspicion that Muslim violence will increase in such a way that European voters will eventually vote more and more for the most eloquent nationalist that wishes to prevent Muslim violence. Let the world pray that eloquent anti-Muslim violence representative is a Counterjihadist rather than a Neo-Nazi Nordicist. Counterjihadists will be a positive for the preservation of the heritage of Greco-Roman-Judeo-Christian cultural influences. Nordicists will be as culturally disruptive as Islamic Supremacists.

 

JRH 3/2/15

*******************************

Fjordman and his Jewish network ..." Lest this letter from Breivik?

Anders Breivik Jewed the Jews

 

By Bjorn Brataas

February 22, 2015 6:27 pm

VITNET

[English by Google Translate]

[Also read Gates of Vienna version from Breivik and commentary which is excellent]

 

This letter, i.e. the availability of it - and in English - is now a year and a half old. I did not know about it until I came across it by chance.

 

It is not entirely uninteresting reading. The quote I pasted in the headline is a gold grain itself, though not exactly representative of the rest of the content of the letter.

 

I present text here when one of Witness main functions is to disseminate information that is not readily available - while we trust that the reader has their own judgment and it is up to him whether he "likes" or "dislikes," or agrees or disagree substance posted. It is this media is all about.

 

[Bjorn Brataas]

---------------

Anders Behring Breivik letter 13-09-29 to International Press

 

Explanations, clarifications and the peace proposal – NRK, TV2, Aftenposten, VG and Dagbladet (<<the big five>>), are refusing to consider.

 

The ideology known as <<Nordicism [Metapedia and Wikipedia]>> has two wings; Nordic superiority (NS) and Nordic survival (indigenous rights activism). Being a nordicist of the latter category; my primary purpose is to contribute to secure the survival and prosperity of the Nordic ethnic family (the Nordic, race). National socialists and hitlerists refer to the west-nordic people as the <<Aryan race>>. There are three European races; Nordic (physical characteristics: blonde/blue eyed/longer forehead/etc.), alpine (half nordic/half Mediterranean – f. example the French) and Mediterranean – f. example most people in Portugal, Spain, Italy, Greece etc.). <<Meds>> are approx. 20 percent Nordic and 80 percent Asiatic. The essence of nordicism isn’t to exclude or discriminate but to strive for the pure Nordic ideal. Wiki Madison Grant [White Supremacist praise of Madison] for more info. Whenever a northern-European nationalist is talking about the genocide, deconstruction or ethnic cleansing of his people, he is talking about the following (illustration box):

 

Overview: The estimated time until extinction for the Nordic ethnic family if our survival is not secured: ethnic composition-13 Nordic countries in percent. Nordic vs. non-nordic. Overview of the 13 largest Nordic countries where Nordics have status as an indigenous people and until recently made out the majority: Germany, England, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Austria, Norway, Scotland, Ireland, Wales, Finland, Iceland and Luxembourg.

 

 

 

Year

 

Nordic (1)

 

Nordic (2)

 

Tot. North.

 

Tot. Non-North.

1900

 

71

 

19

 

90

 

10

1939

 

69

 

16

 

85

 

15

1960

 

62

 

13

 

75

 

25

1990

 

47

 

8

 

55

 

45

2013

 

35

 

5

 

40

 

60

2050

 

14

 

1

 

15

 

85

2100

 

2,9

 

>0.1

 

3

 

97

Nordic (1) = purity: 60-95%
Nordic (2) = purity: <95%+

 

The estimated time until extinction for the Nordic race occurs sometime between 2050 [Blog Editor: Hence the title of Breivic’s PDF document “2083 – A European Declaration of Independence”] and 2100. Presupposes today’s non-nordic immigration of 1% per year, today’s fertility rate, and that Nordics are not granted autonomous indigenous states. The biggest threat is neither African nor Asian immigration, but in fact inter-EEC immigration from members from the Mediterranean ethnic family and from the alpine.

 

When dealing with media-psychopaths

 

And this is where it gets problematic. The <<big five>> and liberal media in general have over the last 68 years developed multiple suppression-tactics for <<handling>> nordicists and other nationalists. Propaganda, or the use of false or exaggerated information for the support of a view or case, has been used for thousands of years to suppress political opposition, and unfortunately it’s quite effective.

 

All research, illustrated by a report published in <<Scientific American Mind>>, Jan/Feb. 2013, shows that the professions; “Media (TV/Radio)” and “Journalists” top the list over the most psychopathic professions, as they are among the most notorious manipulators, liars and deceivers. When a journalist in addition is a leftist, who is tasked with making an <<objective>> characteristic of a <<right wing extremist>>, you know that the result will be everything but credible.

 

The editors of Norway’s <<big five>> are even more leftist than their colleagues in other countries, with exceptions being Sweden and Germany. Most, if not all, of the influential editors are disciples of the 68-revolutions ideals. For example the chief editor in Aftenposten; Haugsgjerd, is a former member of AKP (Workers Communist Party), which used to make <<kill-lists>> of right wing politicians, and several of Dagbladet’s editors are self-proclaimed communists. Unfortunately, Norwegian and northern-European editors are such people. The most influential editors in Norway, for example Stanghelle, Giever, Strand, several in NRK etc., are so influential that they, a small group of no more than 20 editors, literally define reality, in Norway. The editors in NRK, Aftenposten and VG are referred to as <<the Oslo mafia>> by smaller media companies, and are known for their consensus-decisions and left wing orientation. The northern-European media’s zero-tolerance stance towards nationalists the last 68 years has been our greatest problem.

 

Although the British cultural elite admitted in 2008/09 that Nordic brats are in fact indigenous to the UK, their Norwegian colleagues are still refusing to acknowledge the fact that nordic-Norwegians are indigenous to Norway. These 20 editors are simply refusing to discuss the issue, and if you try to stress the issue you will be labeled as a Nazi and held accountable for the Jewish holocaust etc., an effective suppression-tactic.

 

22/7 was an attempt to force these 20 editors, and their colleagues in the other 12 Nordic countries into dialogue with their country’s nordicist-movements (you call them Nazi-movements). The compendium was an experimental approach. I wanted to try a different approach by making it impossible for the MSM in all 13 Nordic countries to end the discussion, using the Nazi-tactic. I was obviously naive enough to think that this approach would lead to a scenario where there could be a serious discussion about the MSMs 68-year witch-hunt and about securing Nordic survival.

 

If I could say anything to the editors in NRK, TV2, Aftenposten, VG, Dagbladet, and their northern-European colleagues, it would be; can we please just skip all the false propaganda and B.S. and focus on solving these issues through dialogue. You can start by announcing a formal apology and declare that the Nordics are indeed indigenous to all 13 Nordic countries. Afterwards, you can accept the invitation to dialogue with the nordicist-movements. Let’s start discussing <<Project Yggdrasil>>. My book; <<The Nordic Federation>> describes this peace-plan through 400 pages, but, it has been blocked by Norwegian prison authorities since 11.07.13. It’s also important to note that <<Project Yggdrasil [Blog Editor: This is the name of a blog devoted to Breivik thoughts. It has been taken down by Blogger probably due to the info found in this pro-Breivik Blog]>> [Blog Editor: What’s the reference to “Yggdrasil”?  Yggdrasil is the Norse mythological Tree of Life] was developed after 22/7 [Blog Editor: 22/7 refers to the date July 7, 2011 in which Breivik is responsible for the slaughter of 77 people – mostly youthful teens] and has nothing to do with the compendium [i.e. his 1500 page manuscript linked above]. Securing the survival of our Nordic race is an issue of utmost urgency. Consider this a formal invitation to reconciliation-talks, talks which should have taken place in 1945. I would have been able to contact the nordicist-leaders in all 13 countries, if it weren’t for the letter ban. Whatever you choose, know that you, the editors, have the influence to decide whether this conflict will end. Be smart, choose dialogue instead of persecution, for the first time in 68 years.

 

The reason I chose another <<sales narrative>> in the compendium was among other things to prevent them from immediately ending the ideological discussion with their <<6-million-omg-nazi-enough-said>>- bashing stick. I know a lot of people will be disappointed when reading this, but my love for Israel is limited to its future function as a deportation-port for disloyal Jews. I am aware of the sad fact that all available statistics confirm that only approx. three percent of eurojews oppose multiculti (but from an anti-Islamist perspective), and that only approx. 0.2 percent support nordic indigenous rights. I wish it wasn’t so. The reason why so called <<counterjihadists>>, at least the great majority, seemingly <<praise>> Israel, is to avoid the above described suppression-tactic. However, there is in fact a strong anti-nordicist/ethnocentrist wing within the counter-jihad movement, represented by Fjordman and his Jewish network, the EDL-leader, the SIOE-leaders, Wilders, Farage etc., but their organisations are so heavily infiltrated by nordicists and ethnocentrists that it’s hard to say which wing are actually controlling them.

 

When dealing with media psychopaths, a good way to counter their tactics is to use double-psychology, or at least so I thought. The compendium was, among other things, of a calculated and quite cynical <<gateway-design>> (the 2+?+?=6 -approach), created to strengthen the ethnocentrist wing in the contra-jihad movement, by pinning the whole thing on the anti-ethnocentrist wing (many of the leaders are pro-multiculti social democrats or liberalists), while at the same time protecting and strengthening the ethnocentrist-factions. The idea was to manipulate the MSM and others so that they would launch a witch-hunt and send their <<media-rape-squads>> against our opponents. It worked quite well.

 

I was never kicked out of Stormfront [Blog Editor: A racist White Supremacist website founded by Don Black – SPLC profile (I usually critical of SPLC because they lump legitimate Conservatives with actual White Supremacist) and ADL profile]. Instead, I attacked them in the compendium in order to protect them, as I knew the authorities would use the fact that I frequented the site, against them, and that an army of leftist journalists otherwise would strike hard. I tried to hint about this double-psychology, by quoting <<war is deceit>> x number of times, but I couldn’t make it more obvious, as it had to be credible to the aggressive army of 2000 media psychopaths (the MSM-rape-squad). The <<hug-your-opponents, kick-the-ones-you-love>>-tactic is one of the oldest in the book. The infiltration of the Freemasons, followed by the publication of the Freemason-pic, was in fact a deliberate and calculated attack against them.

 

Obviously, none of the above would have worked if it wasn’t credible. When I tried to publish three essays describing all of this, on 20.08.12, I was notified about the <<gag-directive>> which came into effect 08.08.12. Apparently, many people didn’t comprehend my deliberate usage of double-psychology, and this is my own fault. In any case, the Fjordman-network figured it out quite early, which explain why they have attacked me so viciously. It wasn’t my intention to cause the outing of Fjordman, with subsequently him being brutally media-raped by 200 MSM-psychopaths. But on the other hand, ethnocentrism gained momentum at the same time as I managed to prevent a significant crackdown against the European and US nordicist movement.

 

There has been an active power-struggle between the two factions within the contra-jihadist movement for years, and the reason why it’s so critically important to dominate and influence this movement is because it acts as a <<supplier of terms>> to moderate European nationalist parties with a base consisting of tens of millions of Europeans. The battle within the <<counter-jihad>>-movement is in many ways a battle for the future content of northern-European nationalism. This makes it even more ironic that many nordicists and ethnocentric nationalists, Stormfront included, still don’t know that I systematically used double-psychology in order to protect them, and in an attempt to prevent the multiculti MSM from using their <<I-win-button>>.

 

Did I serve the nordicist cause more effectively by using this tactic, rather than using rhetoric which would immediately allow them to label me as a Nazi? I believe so, but other than me should be the final judge of that.

 

When dealing with an angry mob of influential journalists and editors representing the worlds most advanced propaganda machinery, you’re fundamentally screwed no matter how you choose to maneuver. Propagandists will not waste a single second on people they do not view as threats. I could have easily avoided excessive pathologisation by keeping the message short and by clinging to the already established ideological cliff of national socialism (it’s important to remember that this was at a time when all right wing radicals were labeled as Nazis), but if they had been allowed to label me as a Nazi, the ideological considerations and discussions would be over, and my court-speeches and propaganda performance would never be broadcasted worldwide, during the trial. Furthermore, people would not be forced to seek answers in the compendium along the way. Regardless of their efforts, I felt I managed to make the best out of an almost impossible situation, despite of the fact that I made a few mistakes during the process.

 

As for my efforts to try to force the editors and ruling politicians in each of the 13 Nordic countries into dialogue with the nordicist-movements, I failed miserably, not surprisingly. It is after all a theoretical impossibility that a single soldier could manage to succeed where potent movements have failed for 68 years. But everyone should know that 22/7 happened in order to try to force a dialogue between the chief editors in the <<big five>> in all 13 Nordic countries, and the so called <<fascist movements>> in the corresponding countries.

 

I remember there was at least one journalist during the trial touching the core of this issue, as he stated; <<The only thing that could prevent the extinction of Nordics are racial hygiene-programmes on a full scale, something which is impossible in today’s multiethnic and multicultural societies. Therefore, it is pointless to enter into dialogue with “these people”. We simply can’t co-exist with them>>. First of all, we are of course fully aware of the fact that you feel you have no other choice than to suppress us, due to this reason. And you have been brutal the past 68 years. This harsh suppression and persecution has driven thousands of nationalists in northern-Europe to suicide, something which explains why these editors don’t like to admit to being responsible for these acts. However, if only more than one out of 5000 Nordic journalists could be this honest, 22/7 and approx. 500 annual nationalist and <<racist>> attacks could be avoided in the future.

 

Of course we understand that full scale racial hygiene-programmes are difficult in today’s societies. But if they had just stopped their bigotry for one second and listened to what we have to say, they would have learned that we can coexist. First of all, one of the reasons the first- and second-generation nordicist leaders have failed with entering into dialogue, is because of their <<all-or-nothing>>-strategy. From a “third-generation” point of view, considering that we lost the European civil war (WW2), the <<all-or-nothing>>-approach has been a complete failure, and continuing this path is counter-productive, irresponsible and may lead to extinction of the nordic race. Changing this to an <<all-or-something>>-approach is the only way to go. One bird in the hand is better than ten on the roof. <<Project Yggdrasil>> is a very good solution and a realistic compromise.

 

I believe I will be able to sell in PY to the vast majority of nordicist-leaders in all 13 Nordic countries, as soon as you lift the letter ban. The message I would send to the chief editors in NRK, TV2, Aftenposten, VG and Dagbladet, is; I ask that you support <<Project Yggdrasil>> in Norway, contributing to a situation where we are allowed to secure nordic-Norwegian survival in <<Norway-Yggdrasil>>, a Norwegian-nordic indigenous state located in Østfold, consisting of two percent of the Norwegian territory. It’s also a very small price to pay in order to end a 68 year old conflict. If an agreement is reached you will be free to transform 98 percent of Norway into your multiethnic and multicultural utopia, without the risk of facing the alternative. This model would succeed in northern-Europe, just as it would succeed on a purely political level – securing peace between <<islamofascists>> on one side, and liberalists/social democrats on the other, in countries such as Egypt and Pakistan.

 

I’m quite sure that project Yggdrasil in Norway, and in the other 12 Nordic countries, would solve a conflict which has been unsolved during the last 68 years. I ask that I’m allowed to present this peace plan to the leading nordicist voices in Norway; Tore Tvedt, Varg Vikernes, Erik Blucher, Nicolay Kvisler and others (no need to target them, as they are all non-militant political activists). Securing Nordic survival is the most important cause for all of us, and I believe they will be willing to abandon their <<all-or-nothing>>-approach, for the sake of a small but sovereign indigenous state.

 

If my assumption is correct, then a peace agreement can be reached within a year, if the chief editors in NRK, TV2, Aftenposten, VG and Dagbladet decide to support the plan, and the same could be a reality for the rest of northern-Europe within two years, if movements in these countries follow.

 

The forming of a parliamentary basis for the founding of this autonomous Norwegian-nordic indigenous state in south-west Østfold will only be possible with the backing of the editors in these five companies, as they define the political agenda in Norway. Not a single parliament member in Norway will ever dare to back project Yggdrasil without the blessing from the editors in these companies.

 

If these editors continue to refuse to have anything to do with me, the above mentioned individuals are all capable. They are the unofficial leaders of the Norwegian nordicist movement, through example, personal sacrifice and continued effort, whether they like it or not. When the Norwegian MSM announced that Fjordman was my role model and idol, they couldn’t be more wrong. These four individuals, on the other hand, are all worthy of trust, respect and praise, due to their past and continued efforts. Their advice and recommendations should be listened to by all Norwegian nationalists. Furthermore, the candidates they support can be trusted. I hope they soon will contribute to take responsibility by uniting the Norwegian nationalist movement by forming an equivalent entity to that of the Swedes Party. The reason I’m saying all of this is because it’s likely I’ll soon be <<out of the game>>, as I won’t be able to survive the SHS-programme for much longer.

 

Unfortunately but not surprisingly, the response from editors to the mentioned information will either be total silence or even more ridicule and pathologisation. After this letter I’ll probably have +2 conditions and +3 personality disorders, or perhaps the imaginary <<bad childhood>> will end up being worse. But before these editors reject <<Project Yggdrasil>>, and of course they will; they should ask them-selves; are you 100 percent sure that dialogue and reconciliation-attempts isn’t the way forward?

 

In any case, their limitless bigotry and denial, until now, has at least been quite amusing.

 

[These were the first 5 pages, the remaining pages haven't been published in full yet.]

 

[The following quotes were taken from document.no]

 

I have guaranteed and will continue to guarantee that I will no longer propagate violence as a political tool, or for any other reason, as my only plan has been to attempt to become a fascistic “Mandela”, or to contribute to work for Nordics rights in other ways. (Page 10)

 

The reason why I’m so intensely hated by the left, and many others, has little to do with my acts, but everything to do with the “negative” media campaigns which have been, and continue to be carried out. The word “mass murderer” or “mass killer” is used consistently by journalists.

 

These 100 individuals were sons, daughters, fathers and mothers, and their families experienced an equal tragedy to that of the 22/7-families. Both myself and Sønsteby were radical nationalists fighting against foreign enemies and against Norwegians who facilitated a foreign invasion. The only difference was that Sønsteby, uninformed regarding the Labour Party’s future plans concerning forced ethnic and cultural deconstruction (muliticulti), fought to bring the social democrats to power, while I fought against Labour. (s. 16)

 

… a conflict that will continue for decades to come. Why can’t we all get along, and stop acting like angry 12-year olds? We have wanted dialogue with you for 68 years, and you refuse to even acknowledge the existence of the Norwegian fascist movement and instead try to label us as nuts and victims of child abuse. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

 

… tormented until I am pushed to take my own life.

 

Ila is refusing me to move on with my life, despite of exemplary behavior for 27 months, without exception.

 

The 22/7-attacks are today celebrated by the far right in all European countries, either you like it or not, and I have been celebrated as a hero, martyr, role-model and as a source of inspiration by tens of thousands. One of the reasons why more people began to support the reasons for the acts, is because I carried out the trial with dignity, in many people’s eyes, and that I at the same time continuously have demanded that Europe’s political elites, including European mainstream media, must immediately stop treating Norwegian, nordic and European nationalists and fascists like animals, and instead go into dialogue with us, in order that we are granted a minimum of self-determination.

 

I have the last 27 months proved that the only thing I desire is to be a good role model to others.

 

The large majority of my supporters are, perhaps surprisingly to most, non-militant and non-violent “right-wing radicals”. It would also have ruined every chance to become what I feel obligated to try to be; a non-violent ideologue and a more active politician.

 

Violence is not, and has never been, a part of my ideology. The action was among other things a mean to bring attention to an important cause, and therefore to get a chance to bypass the wall of censorship to propagate important information, but it was not a part of my ideology.

 

It’s correct that the manifesto was a terror manual, like any other ideology’s terror-manuals. But a so called terror-manual is simply propagating means, and is never part of an ideology.

 

In other words I’m not longer a right wing extremist.… (willing to use violence), but a so called right wing radical.

 

The main reason for the fall of Labour, however, was the easily anticipated effect of double-psychology concerning the initial sympathy-phase. It was easy to see that Labour was going to make the critical mistake of misusing this opportunity, which caused significant over-exposure and subsequent antipathy. As a student of history, it was very easy to anticipate these events.

 

Even the Nazis treated Russian prisoners of war and the Jews more humanely, both in Auschwitz – Block 11, and later in Auschwitz-Birkenau. It may be true that the prisoners were forced to work until they couldn’t take it anymore, for economic gain, but they were executed in the most humane manner by zyklon-B-gas. The work able men who behaved exemplary during the stay were rarely subjected to either high- or low-intensive torture. They were all spared the suffering of long-term isolation, and were given the opportunity to be part of a community together with their own. Most of them were later, through humane executions, granted an honorable martyr’s death.

 

And if any of them wanted to end the forced labour, they could at any given time request a painless and honorable martyr’s death, by letting a guard know.

 

Apparently, all the Auschwitz-jews got off easily, as they were evidently shown a much greater degree of humanism than I have been shown by the Norwegian Ministry of Justice and the prison authorities.

 

I showed a greater degree of humanism on 22/7, than what I have been shown after. I did in fact everything in my power to ensure that the 50 AUF-leaders and the 15 regular AUF-members were granted a quick and painless death. I granted them all an honorable martyr’s death, and due to their political sacrifice they were all, and are still, celebrated as champions of the internationalist socialist movement …

 

I would never, even if I was given the opportunity to do so, torture another human being, not even my worst enemy.

 

So if you are not willing to contribute to stop the torture, then you should at least show me the level of humanity that I and the Nazis showed.

 

I cannot kill myself, because my religion does not permit me. Suicide is a cowardly and unforgivable act that must never be considered by anyone. On the other hand, that’s easy for Jesus to say. He only had to hang on the cross for three days, and not 27 months.

 

Islamofascists in the Arab world, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, are treated just as badly as the nationalists in Europe.

 

But I have never hated them, not even now.

 

You have treated me much worse that an animal for 27 months! This is a fate much worse than death, and I would have preferred, if it was possible, to be granted at least the same degree of humanity that the Auschwitz-jews were shown by the SS, instead of being subjected to abuse and treated worse than an animal for six more months.

_________________________________

Europe: Nordic Supremacism vs. Counterjihadism

John R. Houk

© March 2, 2015

______________________________

Fjordman and his Jewish network ..." Lest this letter from Breivik?

 

© 2015 witness. Editor for Vitnet.no is bear Brataas.

 

Blog Editor: Google English translation edited by John R. Houk and spellcheck. Words that I was unsure were left alone as well as the British spelling of English words. I allowed spellcheck to capitalize many words that in my estimation should have been so; however it is possible that Anders intentionally did not capitalize some words. Keep in mind this is an English translation from Norwegian text so I am going to assume Google needed an alternative spelling. Explanatory embedded links are by the Editor.

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
March 1 2015 1 01 /03 /March /2015 01:01

 

John R. Houk

© March 1, 2015

 

Well any fellow trekkies out there. Spock is really dead this time. Leonard Nimoy died Friday February 27, 2015 (See Also TMZ) at the age of 88. Perhaps Leonard found someone to pass his katra to. Dear God I love that Star Trek character. Live long and prosper.

 

VIDEO: "I have been - and always shall be - your friend."

 

 

Published by MegaStarTrekker

Uploaded on Jul 3, 2010

 

From Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan

 

 

VIDEO: Star Trek 3: The Search for Spock (2/8) Movie CLIP - Don't Call Me Tiny (1984) HD

 

 

Published by MOVIECLIPS

Uploaded on Feb 17, 2012

 

Star Trek III: The Search for Spock movie clips: http://j.mp/1uwwqVx
 

BUY THE MOVIE: http://amzn.to/AEHnJB
 

Don't miss the HOTTEST NEW TRAILERS: http://bit.ly/1u2y6pr

CLIP DESCRIPTION:


Kirk (William Shatner) and Sulu (George Takei) rescue McCoy (DeForest Kelley) from jail.

FILM DESCRIPTION:


When last we left the crew of the star ship Enterprise, they were heading home following a skirmish with the despotic Khan. The unpleasant incident had cost the life of Mr. Spock (Leonard Nimoy)--or so it seemed. Admiral Kirk (William Shatner) is informed by Spock's father Sarek (Mark Lenard) that his son is being kept alive in the thoughts of one of the crew members. It now becomes necessary to search for Spock's body, so that flesh and soul can be rejoined on Vulcan. It turns out that Spock's spirit is residing within the mind of the Vulcan's longtime shipmate, "Bones" McCoy (DeForrest Kelley). Finding the body is another matter, since the Enterprise has been consigned to the trash heap and thus is out of Kirk's jurisdiction.

CREDITS:


TM & © Paramount (1984)


Cast: William Shatner, DeForest Kelley, George Takei, Gary Faga, Douglas Alan Shanklin


Director: Leonard Nimoy


Producers: Harve Bennett, Ralph Winter


Screenwriters: Gene Roddenberry, Harve Bennett

WHO ARE WE?


The MOVIECLIPS channel is READ THE REST

 

 

JRH 3/1/15

__________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts
write a comment
February 28 2015 7 28 /02 /February /2015 13:03

 

As a blogger I am huge fan and very appreciative of the Norwegian essayist that still posts under the pseudonym Fjordman. In saying that I was very gratified to come across a tribute to Fjordman’s posts of his first essays on a tenth anniversary of the first post at his long unused blog (perhaps not online anymore – I haven’t checked). The tribute was posted on February 20, 2015 on the blog Tundra Tabloids.

 

Update: As I was Googling Fjordman for this post I ran into a Gates of Vienna post written by Fjordman himself talking about this 10th anniversary of his first blog post. I will include that post after the Tundra Tabloids cross post.

 

JRH 2/28/15

******************************

TEN YEAR ANNIVERSARY FOR FJORDMAN, FIRST BLOG POST PUBLISHED TODAY

By KGS

20/02/2015 13:30

Tundra Tabloid

 

In honor of Fjordman’s ten year anniversary, I republish the first ever blogpost under the name of Fjordman. Sadly, his first ever post could have been penned today with just a few subtle changes. It’s largely through Fjordman’s excellent essays that many of us came to know places such as Malmö, Sweden, or about Muslim rape statistics and government indifference to them and to daily plight of the citizens of the countries that they are sworn to protect.

 

We owe much to this man who has asked from us so little, who no longer is able to call his home country ‘home’ because of the demonization of his character by the Norwegian political power structure, its media, academy and politicians. Fjordman has had to pay a high political price for his justified views, which is all the more galling, seeing that the politicial (sic) iron triangle just mentioned, still insists that anti-Western Islam is not the problem, only those (like Fjordman) who dare point out how wrong that assumption is.

 

Here is his last entry.

Sunday, February 20, 2005

Muslim Rape Epidemic in Sweden and Norway – Authorities Look the Other Way

 

(Note: Updates to this post here: The Norwegian Government – Covering Up Immigrant Rapes and here: Rapes: Nothing to do with Islam?)

 

Numbers released in January 2005 indicate a sharp rise in the number of rape charges in Malmö, Sweden’s third largest city:

 

Thomas Anderberg, responsible for statistics at the Malmö Police, says there was a doubling of the number of reported rapes by ambush in 2004, following what was already a decade of steadily increasing numbers of sexual crimes. – I think that’s great news, says Anna Gustafsson, head of the Domestic Violence Unit at the Malmö Police. She suggests that the increase is due to the fact that women who otherwise wouldn’t press charges for rape now choose to contact the police.

 

In other words, Gustafsson claims that we are dealing with a “technical” increase, not a real one. However, national statistics reveal that reported rapes against children have almost doubled in Sweden during the past ten years:

 

According to Swedish Radio on Tuesday, statistics from Sweden’s National Council for Crime Prevention show that the number of reported rapes against children is on the rise. The figures have nearly doubled in the last ten years: 467 rapes against children under the age of 15 were reported in 2004 compared with 258 in 1995. Legal proceedings continue this week in a case involving a 13 year old girl from Motala who was said to have been subjected to a group rape by four men. (Note: These four men were Kurdish Muslims, who raped the girl for hours and even took photos of doing so)

 

The number of rape charges per capita in Malmö is 5 – 6 times that of Copenhagen, Denmark. Copenhagen is a larger city, but the percentage of immigrants is much lower. And it’s not just the rape statistics that reveal a scary increase in Malmö or Sweden. Virtually every kind of violent crime is on the rise. Robberies have increased with 50 % in Malmö only during the fall of 2004. Threats against witnesses in Swedish court cases have quadrupled between 2000 and 2003. During the past few decades, massive immigration has changed the face of Sweden’s major cities, as well as challenged the viability of the welfare state. In 1970 Sweden had the fourth highest GDP per capita among developed countries with income about 6% above the OECD average. By 1997 it was at fifteenth place with an average GDP per capita 14% below average. Malmö has a heavy concentration of Muslim immigrants in particular. According to some estimates, it will be a Muslim majority city in no more than 10 years. Crime is rampant in the growing ghettos:

 

Becirov runs the Islamic Center of Malmö, on the outskirts of Sweden’s third-largest city. Some immigrant neighborhoods in the city have (official) unemployment rates exceeding 50 percent. Swedish authorities have failed to lift up the area, and seem to be giving the Islamic Center of Malmö a great deal of leeway in attempting to do so. An article that appeared in 2003 noted that “a few” of the 6-to 10-year-old girls were wearing headscarves. On a visit in January 2005, fully 80 percent were covered in class–only a handful were not. In a fit of absent-mindedness, Sweden has suddenly become as heavily populated by minorities as any country in Europe. The percentage of foreign-born is roughly equivalent to the highest percentage of immigrants the United States ever had in its history (on the eve of World War I). Rosengård appears to be all-immigrant. The public schools have virtually no ethnically Swedish children. There are stories–familiar in other parts of Europe where immigrants from the Muslim world have recently settled–of students harassing Jewish teachers and defacing textbooks that treat Jewish themes. Crime is high.

 

Is it unfair and “racist” to suggest a link between the influx of Muslim immigrants and the growing number of rapes? Not if we compare with the situation in neighboring Denmark, where this trend has been evident for years:

 

Criminologist: immigrants are rape champions

 

If one leading expert is to be believed, the sharp rise in the number of rapes in this over the last 5 years is largely attributable to a group of unemployed and alienated immigrants. ‘Over the last 5-10 years there has an increasing tendency to marginalise and alienate immigrants,’ says Professor Flemming Balvig, a criminologist at Copenhagen University. ‘As a result, many second generation immigrants have reacted against this through various types of criminal activity, including rape.’

 

Muslim rape concern

 

Alarmed at last week’s police statistics, which revealed that in 68% of all rapes committed this year the perpetrator was from an ethnic minority, leading Muslim organisations have now formed an alliance to fight the ever-growing problem of young second and third-generation immigrants involved in rape cases against young Danish girls.

 

As Robert Spencer has demonstrated, rape can indeed be linked to Islamic teachings of Jihad, and even to the example of Muhammad himself, his Sunna. Above all, it is connected to Islamic notions of the role of women in society, and their behaviour in the public sphere. An Islamic Mufti in Copenhagen sparked a political outcry after publicly declaring that women who refuse to wear headscarves are “asking for rape.” Apparently, he isn’t the only Muslim in Europe to think this way:

 

The German journalist Udo Ulfkotte told in a recent interview that in Holland, you can now see examples of young, unveiled Moroccan women with a so-called “smiley”. It means that the girl gets one side of her face cut up from mouth to ear, serving as a warning to other Muslim girls who should refuse to wear the veil. In the Muslim suburb of Courneuve, France, 77 per cent of the veiled women carry veils reportedly because of fear of being harassed or molested by Islamic moral patrols.

 

Hijab, the Islamic veil, is thus not “just a piece of cloth”. It serves as a demarcation line between proper, submissive Muslim women and whores, un-Islamic women who deserve no respect and are asking for rape. The veil should more properly be viewed as the uniform of a Totalitarian movement, and a signal to attack those outside the movement. Judged in the light of the Mufti who said that women who don’t wear it are asking for rape, how on earth can the veil be said to be about “choice”? The freedom to choose not to be raped if you dress in a normal fashion in your own country? Is that what freedom is about in Europe in 2005?

 

Even though Sweden, unlike Denmark, has almost no public debate about immigration, frustration is very much present underneath the surface. 75 % of Swedes think that many people in their country “dislike” Muslims, more than in any other European nation surveyed. Even in Holland, which recently witnessed violent clashes with Muslims after the murder of Islam-critic Theo van Gogh, the rate is lower than in Sweden. But you’re not supposed to talk about such issues in Sweden. That would be “racist”:

 

Swedish laws prohibiting “hate speech” against racial minorities have been vigorously enforced. There have, for example, been a number of gang-rapes of Swedish women by Muslim immigrants. But Swedes must be careful what they say about them. On May 25, neo-Nazi Bjorn Bjorkqvist was convicted and sentenced to two months in prison for writing, “I don’t think I am alone in feeling sick when reading about how Swedish girls are raped by immigrant hordes.” [“Jag tror inte jag är ensam om att må dåligt när jag läser om hur svenska tjejer har våldtagits av invandrarhorder”]

 

All in all, we must say that there is strong circumstantial evidence indicating that the rise in rape charges in the city of Malmö could very well be real, which puts the Malmö Police assertion that this is “great news” in a rather curious light. And the problem is not just limited to Sweden. It exists in Norway, too:

 

Rape charges in the capital are spiraling upwards, 40 percent higher from 1999 to 2000 and up 13 percent so far this year. Police Inspector Gunnar Larsen of Oslo’s Vice, Robbery and Violent crime division says the statistics are surprising – the rising number of rape cases and the link to ethnic background are both clear trends. But Larsen does not want to speculate on the reasons behind the worrying developments. While 65 percent of those charged with rape are classed as coming from a non-western background, this segment makes up only 14.3 percent of Oslo’s population. Norwegian women were the victims in 80 percent of the cases, with 20 percent being women of foreign background.

 

Europe: Tolerating Intolerance

 

An incredibly revealing article that tells us all we need to know about the multiculturalist fetish in Europe and some parts of North America, not to mention the need for change within Islam. Apparently, the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet reported that 65 percent of rapes of Norwegian women were performed by “non-Western” immigrants – a category that, in Norway, consists mostly of Muslims. The article quoted a professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo (note: her name is Unni Wikan) as saying that “Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes” because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. The professor’s conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West needed to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: “Norwegian women must realize that we live in a multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.”

 

In January 2005, Norwegian media reported that 2004 saw the highest number or rape charges ever recorded in the capital city of Oslo. Strangely enough, there was now no mentioning of how immigrants were grossly overrepresented in rape cases. Why not? Unless there has been a sudden and unexplained drop in the number of immigrants raping Norwegian women between 2001 and 2004, which is unlikely, the statistics should be at least as staggering in 2005 as they were before. If they are not revealed, it can only mean that “somebody” didn’t like the numbers presented in 2001, and decided to bury them. That “somebody” must be a person at the very top level in the police, maybe even in the government. If so, that is disquieting. What is even more disquieting is that the media are equally silent about this. How come no journalists are digging into the material? And where are all the professional Feminists, in a Scandinavian nation brimming with them?

 

The conclusion one may draw from this is that the authorities in Sweden and Norway know about, or should know about, a disturbing amount of Muslim immigrant rapes of native Scandinavian women, yet choose not to make this information known to the public. Perhaps it would be just too politically incorrect to reveal the negative effects of decades of naïve immigration policies. Perhaps it would also destroy too many multicultural pipe dreams among the intellectual elites, who have built their current careers and reputations on advocating how culturally and economically enriching this new population mix would be. So in the end, the safety of young Scandinavian women is sacrificed in order to keep the glossy image of a multicultural society intact. It is a chilling demonstration of an Eurabian continent that now appears to care more about not upsetting relations with its immigrant population than about protecting its own citizens.

_______________________

Edited by John R. Houk relying largely on spellcheck. Many British influenced words were left untouched and some words left alone out of uncertainty.

+++++++++++++++++++

Ten Years On

 

By Fjordman

February 20 2015

Gates of Vienna

 

If you appreciate this essay by Fjordman, please consider making a donation to him, using the button at the bottom of this post.

 

Today, February 20 2015, is exactly ten years since the first time I published an essay under the pen name Fjordman. Time flies. I had been active on the Internet for several years before that date, but I did not have my own website. I did not imagine that I would still be writing so many years later. Yet here I am.

 

The first essay I published as Fjordman was about the very high number of rapes in Sweden, and how this may be tied to mass immigration. I no longer write about this subject as much as before, but the number of rapes in Sweden is at least as high ten years later.

 

I was among the first to discuss in English the problems caused by Muslim immigration in Malmö, Sweden’s third largest city. I was often accused of exaggerating or making things up. Meanwhile, Malmö has evolved from stabbings to car bombings. Unfortunately, many of the problems I deal with in my essays have worsened, all over the Western world.

 

My first blog post got quite a few comments and thousands of readers. That is because it was linked to by Little Green Footballs (LGF). It is hard to believe now, but when I launched my Fjordman blog in February 2005, I got a lot of help from LGF. Back then, Charles Johnson’s LGF was still a large and relevant website. It helped point readers to myself, Gates of Vienna and many other writers such as Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.

 

I recently visited LGF, which I had not done for a very long time. Charles Johnson still posts. On Google, he is now called a “political blogger, center-left provocateur.”

 

Those who have followed my writings since the beginning will recall that the period of the LGF Wars was one of the nastiest events I experienced as Fjordman (until Mr. Breivik showed up). That was when Charles Johnson decided to suddenly switch sides and attack all of his former allies in the nastiest and most dishonest manner possible.

 

In hindsight, we clearly won this conflict. Today, Mr. Johnson is completely irrelevant, whereas I, Gates of Vienna — and for that matter Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch — are still publishing and actually being read.

 

The moral? Have patience, and continue stating what you believe to be true based on factual evidence. This will not always be pleasant in the short run, but it will eventually pay off.

 

Looking back, my view is that the most positive development that has taken place over the last decade is that awareness about the Islamic threat among the general public is now much greater than it was some years ago.

 

Unfortunately, this knowledge still has not led to any significant change in policy among Western ruling elites. They continue to promote mass immigration and open borders, no matter how many terror attacks occur or how much insecurity our societies suffer from. U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama is arguably an even worse appeaser of Islamic aggression today than he used to be seven years ago. Alternatively, perhaps he is just showing his true colors, since he does not have to worry about being reelected anymore.

 

Furthermore, the darkness represented by Islamic sharia and Jihadist barbarism is spreading and deepening. That is a sad fact. One only has to look at the videos of mass beheadings produced by the self-proclaimed Islamic State (ISIS) in the Middle East to realize this. These videos are now watched with great enthusiasm by militant Muslims in cities across the Western world.

 

I did not know the film director Theo van Gogh when he was murdered by a militant Muslim in the streets of Amsterdam in 2004. More recently, however, Muslim terrorists have been targeting people whom I know and have met multiple times, also in Scandinavia. Since 2005, I have joined the rapidly growing number of people in Western Europe who can no longer have a publicly listed address or telephone number. The threat seems to be getting closer every year. It is no longer abstract.

 

I have experienced many ups and downs over the past decade. Needless to say, being dragged into the events caused by the deranged mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik in 2011 easily constitutes the low point of my adult life so far. I was forced to evacuate my home and go into forced exile from Norway due to the extremely negative and largely baseless media exposure I received because of this case and Breivik’s so-called manifesto. The weeks after the deadly July 22 attacks is the only time that I have ever seriously considered giving up writing. After a while, I decided to continue. Yes, I lost the protection of a pen name. However, many people write under their real names, even if they face harassment for it. I see no reason to do less than they do.

 

The most positive thing that has happened to me in the past decade has to be all of the wonderful people I have met. This may sound like a terrible cliché, but I really have been blessed to meet many courageous, funny, smart and wonderful individuals while doing this work. They are one of my main sources of inspirations to keep on going. I am eternally grateful for their company.

 

DONATE TO FJORDMAN by going to end of essay at Gates of Vienna

For a complete archive of Fjordman’s writings, see the multi-index listing in the Fjordman Files.

___________________________________

History of the Counterjihad

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
February 27 2015 6 27 /02 /February /2015 18:45

 

All other speculation is Conspiracy Theory

John R. Houk

© February 27, 2015

 

Below is an exchange between myself (John Houk) and Robert Cold. I suspect there are many things that I and Robert agree upon; however in my humble opinion Robert relies too much on Conspiracy Theory as authenticated Conspiracy Fact. After setting the stage with the exchange between us I will proceed to demonstrate why I believe Robert’s assertion are unproven Conspiracy Theories with little concrete evidence in fact. Everything else is pure speculation.

 

John Houk Manuel Bush had many things I disagreed with, being a terrorist is not one of them. Robert, although it is a bit suspicious that Osama was dumped into the ocean, but I have heard enough SEALS to believe the freaking terrorist who will be credited for starting WWIII in the future that I am convinced it was NOT a body-double - That's just moronic conspiracy theory.

February 25 at 11:06am . (2/25/15)

 


Robert Cold Hey John Houk ......you don't still believe that the navy dumped Osama into sea do you? It came out long ago that, even that was a lie. Where have you been? Even crewmen on board the ship have blown the whistle on that one. You really need to do investigative journalism if you are going to be in journalism. There are enough re-writers already. Too many in fact.

Yesterday at 3:09am · (2/26/15)

 

Robert here are the facts about bin Laden’s burial at sea:

 

Every source that claims he was not buried at sea have no proof except for the Obama Administration’s refusal to show photos or video. No proof means it’s speculation rather than an exposé!

 

On the other hand there are credible reasons for not showing photos and videos. All the reasons have to do with the politics of appeasement and Obama’s policies of stroking the Muslim mind so to avoid offenses – like that is working.

 

The only Conspiracy Theory that came close to a smoking gun was the notorious WikiLeaks hacking … err … I mean intercepted some emails from STRAFOR vice-president Fred Burton communicating this:

 

‘… believes the body was “bound for Dover, [Delaware] on [a] CIA plane” and then “onward to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Bethesda [Maryland],”an email says.’ (Leaked: Bin Laden not buried at sea, body moved on CIA plane to US; RT.com [meaning Russia Today as in Putin propaganda machine]; 3/6/12 09:29 – updated 3/6/12 14:28)

 

RT.com further reports that the WikiLeaks stolen email quotes Burton as saying:

 

"If body dumped at sea, which I doubt, the touch is very Adolph Eichman like. The Tribe did the same thing with the Nazi's ashes," Burton commented in another email. Eichman was one of the masterminds of the Holocaust by Nazi Germany. He was captured by Mossad agents in Argentina and, tried in Israel, found guilty and executed in 1962. His body was cremated and his ashes were scattered at sea over the Mediterranean.

 

"Eichmann was seen alive for many months on trial before being sentenced to death and executed. No one wanted a monument to him so they cremated him. But i dont know anyone who claimed he wasnt eicjhman [sic]. No comparison with suddenly burying him at sea without any chance to view him which i doubt happened [sic],"Stratfor CEO George Friedman replied.

 

"The US Govt needs to make body pics available like the MX's do, with OBL's pants pulled down, to shout down the lunatics like Alex Jones and Glenn Beck," Burton says in another message.

 

In another missive Burton says Osama’s body “is a crime scene and I don’t see the FBI nor DOJ letting that happen.”

 

WikiLeaks began publishing Stratfor emails in late February. The archive was obtained by the hacker group Anonymous, which successfully attacked one of the firm’s servers. More than 5 million emails were apparently stolen. [RT.com uses italic to indicate the email from Burton and STRATFOR CEO George Friedman.] (Ibid.)

 

Let’s talk about facts Robert. The RT.com story came out in 2011. STRATFOR debunks Putin propaganda with this info:

 

In February 2013, Fox News (1) reported that the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have obtained emails that were part of 2.7 million emails they downloaded from Stratfor Global Intelligence (a geopolitical intelligence firm providing strategic analysis and forecasting). (2)

 

The emails were then posted on WikiLeaks, but Stratfor claimed the hackers may have forged and altered many of the emails.

 

The official company response was that Anonymous were thieves and the company would not be victimized a second time by defending or explaining to the public about their stolen property of confidential emails.

 

The report also mentioned that members of the offshoot hacking group LulzSec were arrested by the FBI around the same time that the emails were leaked.

 

 

When the AFIP was closed in September 2011, it was moved to the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) in Washington, DC. According to the US National Library of Medicine, the AFIP was located at 6900 Georgia Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20306 as part of the Walter Reed complex. (7)

 

By the time Osama Bin Laden was killed, the AFIP was in the process of shutting down the Georgia Avenue location and moving across campus to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. It’s very unlikely if the body was being transported back to the US instead of being buried at sea that it would have been taken to the AFIP.

 

It’s pointed out on various online forums that Burton’s later emails state that he was mistaken and that Bin Laden had been buried at sea. It’s evident that these emails were simply one person’s speculations about what might have happened or what was going to happen. Yet, they became a centerpiece of a conspiracy theory about the disposal of the terrorist’s body.

 

The facts were distorted by the speculation of someone perceived as an authority and were taken as inside knowledge. This untruth was repeated over and over as a truth and soon became a commonly held belief. (Why Some Believe Bin Laden Was Not Dumped At Sea; By SallyPainter; Top Secret Writers; 12/9/14 10:00)

 

Now here is the political reason bin Laden was buried at sea rather than made public. When the SEALS gunned the old Islamic terrorist down, they were not finished taking out vengeance on the murdering creep’s corpse. Several SEALs took turns emptying their magazine into the already dead body. Essentially this made bin Laden unrecognizable. If photos were released I suspect most Americans would say, “I want a turn.” BUT Obama is a Leftist concerned about reelection in 2012 and concerned about the poor feelings of global Muslims that a dead Muslim got what he deserved. Here’s some Breitbart excerpts from 2014 (again way after Conspiracy Theories emerged):

 

Special operators involved in the mission to take out Osama bin Laden say the reason photos of his body weren’t released is because they would have shown a body riddled with bullet holes.

 

Carried in a report published by the Daily Mail, “the report from a website well known within the intelligence and armed services community claims that the sheer number of times Osama bin Laden was shot is the reason why the government never released photos.”

 

The “Special Operations Forces Situation Report” describes how “operator after operator took turns dumping magazines-worth of ammunition into bin Laden’s body.”

 

The report has raised questions about whether excessive force was shown to the man so singularly identified with the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and Shanksville, PA. 

 

SEAL Team Six member Mark Bissonnette wrote about taking down bin Laden in No Easy Day. In the book, he described firing extra rounds into bin Laden’s body because the terror leader was “still twitching and convulsing” after the first shots. (REPORT: OSAMA BIN LADEN 'SHOT MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED TIMES'; By AWR HAWKINS; Breitbart.com – National Security; 3/14/14)

 

Even a Chechen newswire extremely friendly to Islam believes bin Laden was killed by SEALs but has a different reason for bin Laden’s kill photos not ever being shown. This sentiment is the current closest thing that gives a reason bin Laden wasn’t dumped in the sea (entire article):

 

When Obama announced the assassination by his thugs of Sheikh Osama bin Laden (may Allah have mercy on him), and then different versions of what happened began to appear in western media, people familiar with methods of democratic propaganda and disinformation immediately expressed their doubts about the trustworthiness of all these stories.

 

Too obvious was an American desire to present Sheikh Osama bin Laden in a negative light, to insult and humiliate his memory and say things just the opposite of what his character and background had been.

 

The American refusal to provide at least photos or video of the body of bin Laden and a dubious story of a burial in the sea, according to the canons of Islam, further strengthened the suspicion that the Americans were simply lying.

 

What did not help, either, were obviously staged scandals and leaks of "classified information" about a storm of the house of Osama bin Laden and his assassination, which were periodically distributed in the form of interviews, books and TV shows.

 

The last leak of disinformation were recent statements of an alleged former bodyguard of the Emir of al-Qaida, A certain Abdul Fattah said that bin Laden supposedly blew himself up with a martyr bomber's belt with which he never parted. That is why the Americans did not show his body, he claims.

 

However, the story is false and intended to hide the truth about bin Laden's martyrdom.

 

So what did really happen in the Pakistani city of Abbottabad in the night of May 2, 2011?

 

The question is answered by the wife of Sheikh Osama bin Laden, a native of Yemen, Amal al-Sada, who was with her ​​husband at the time of the storming of the house where he accepted martyrdom. (After the publication of this news, it was deleted by the administration of TwiMail, but the text is also posted on YouTube and has not been removed so far).

 

Amal al-Sada told the real story of the Sheikh's martyrdom, and revealed the secret of the disappearance of his body.

 

Here is her story:

 

- "When the attack started and soldiers began to descend from helicopters, the brothers, who were in the house at the time, entered into battle with them. The clash was heavy and intense.

 

American soldiers and the Pakistani army soldiers were those who attacked our house. They acted together.

 

There were so many of them. They quickly spread all over the yard and the house. A fierce battle followed.

 

At the time of the assault, Osama was in his room. He immediately took a gun and ran to the window. In the first few minutes of the shooting, a bullet hit him in his face, and he immediately accepted martyrdom, Insha'Allah.

 

And it was the grace of Allah for the Sheikh.

 

The Americans, after a while, entered the room and found Sheikh Osama martyred.

 

They took the body, carried him out of the house and loaded into a helicopter which belonged to American marines.

 

When the helicopter took off, while it was in the air, there was a very loud explosion. Probably the helicopter was shot down. It caught fire and exploded in the air. Parts of the helicopter fell to the ground. Everyone in the helicopter was killed, and their bodies were torn to pieces. The same happened to the Sheikh's body.

 

The Americans wanted to show the martyred Sheikh Osama around the world to demonstrate their victory, but Allah destroyed their plans.

 

Allah took away from them even the body of Osama bin Laden. They were left with nothing, so the Americans had to come up with a story about his burial in the sea. Allah protected Sheikh in life and protected him from his enemies after his death.

 

May Allah grant him martyrdom and Gardens of Firdaus in higher degrees of Paradise!"

 

***

 

In addition to this story, recall that some time after the events in Abbottabad, in August of 2011, the Americans leaked, through Fox TV, that in Afghanistan, the Mujahideen of the Islamic Emirate had shot down a helicopter which belonged to "Team 6" of the American navy who participated in the storm of the house of Emir of al-Qaeda. 22 "SEALS" thugs were killed. Obama expressed his condolences to the families and friends of the marines.

 

It is possible that this leak was an attempt to cover the losses of Americans killed in the helicopter with the body of Osama bin Laden and the marines in Abbottabad on the night of May 2, 2011. (Americans lied. Sheik Osama bin Laden's wife tells truth about his martyrdom; By Department of Monitoring; KavcazCenter.com: 6/15/13 01:09) 

 

Frankly I don’t place a lot of stock in Muslim propaganda than I do with Putin propaganda; however one thing is for sure, bin Laden was killed May 2, 2011, shortly after 1:00 am PKT by SEAL Team 6. The only dispute here is was he buried at sea or get blown up in a crashing helicopter.

 

Mr. Robert Cold, these are the facts.

 

JRH 2/27/15

_______________________________

Spellcheck editing ran by the Editor. In some cases the “ignore” button was pressed.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden_death_conspiracy_theories

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Conspiracy Theory Counterjihad
write a comment
February 26 2015 5 26 /02 /February /2015 14:32

 

John R. Houk

© February 26, 2015

 

Every once in a while I get comments from posts many years in the past that are usually spam marketing promotions. I usually delete the spam comments when my notifications alert me they have arrived. However on 2/15/15 I received a comment from a person identifying himself as tarek smith (probably a pseudonym) to the March 10, 2011 post entitled “What Might Happen to Libya’s Weapons Cache?” on my NCCR blog.

 

In looking back at the 2011 post I realized that the thoughts were a precursor to the eventual Benghazi slaughter of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, State Information Officer Sean Smith, and Navy Seals Glen Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods.

 

As the title suggests the relatively short post based on a STRATFOR analysis involved wondering what happened to Muammar Gaddafi’s weapons cache after the various Libyan rebel militias managed enough unity to defeat and execute old the Muslim dictator/supporter of anti-Israel/anti-American terrorism. Keep in mind this is before the Benghazigate suspicions that Obama was illegally sending that weapons cache to Syrian rebels fighting Bashar Assad. If that is indeed what happened to the weapons cache it is likely that much of those weapons fell into the hands of al Qaeda supported Jabhat al-Nusra (JN – 12/2014 PDF) or ISIS terrorists as well (See Also HERE).

 

Tareq’s comment is translated by Google Translate from Arabic text. Go to the NCCR comment with the date-link below to view that Arabic text. Google Translate’s translation is in rather broken English. If one has a better translation feel free to post it in the comment section. Some of the words Google couldn’t figure out are in transliterated English text.

 

 The reason the comment piqued my interest, after I took the time to try to decipher it, is that Tarek seems to be calling on all good Muslim bros to unite against the Radical Islamists inserting politics as much as the Islamic religion. Or if my guess is incorrect Tarek may be calling the government the West seems to be supporting a treasonous entity and to support the Islamists.

 

From the links I looked at below, it seems the West is supporting the government located in Tobruk while the more radical Islamic militias are supporting a government established in Tripoli.

 

If you have read my past posts you probably realize I am what Leftists and Muslim apologists would label an Islamophobe. The reason for that is I am just down right against anything Islamic. Islam is Islam rather it is radical or the so-called moderate. Both so-called camps view the Quran as absolute truth and place a lot of stock in the Hadith and Sira which are not quite as absolute as a the Quran but many Muslims to one degree or the other find quite authoritative.

 

Due to this Muslim love for their Islamic revered writings (NOT holy to me) Islam is an evil religion vis-à-vis Christianity or Judaism for that matter. The Quran specifically denigrates the Divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ, rejects the Crucifixion, rejects the essential Resurrection that Christians believe can restore humanity to God Almighty and reject Christian mainstay orthodoxy such as the Trinity – Father, Son and Holy Spirit are ONE God expressed in three persons. The Quran twists and fabricates the Holy Scripture of the Old Testament (Jewish Tanakh and thus the first five books of Moses Christians call the Pentateuch and Jews call the Torah) AND the New Testament. This Quran twisting and fabricating eliminates Islam as part of the Abrahamic religions (as far as I’m concerned) and only leaves Judeo-Christianity. If that makes me an Islamophobe I embrace the term. I just don’t embrace the literal meaning of the term which would go something like an unnatural fear of Islam. I don’t have an unnatural fear, rather I have a theological loathing of Islam. Even as much as I loathe Islam I work very hard to take a ‘What Would Jesus Do?’ (WWJD) mentality toward that theopolitical ideology. Most of the time I am successful with WWJD but admittedly there are moments that the loathing steps over the line. God have mercy on me.

 

JRH 2/26/15

***************************

tareq smith Comment

February 20, 2015 at 11:16 AM

 

Links that may help you decipher the broken English of Google Translation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appeal to Libya rebels honorable particularly followers of the National Conference and the Islamists all year in Libya.

 

Dear brothers in Libya - rebels nationalists and Islamists in Libya united, united, united for the sake of Libya before it is too late. The enemies of Libya on the doors and start laying the fingers of the Arab betrayal of eastern Libya and customers from inside Libya and guest resort also is not clean is Daafairse- if Daash [Blog Editor: or Daesh – pejorative name for ISIS, ISIL, IS (Islamic State)] Libya accepted work Under the leadership of the rebels in Libya.

 

Welcome if they refused the leadership of Libya rebels and the legitimate Libyan Amthelh b Libyan National Congress [Blog Editor: Apparently Libya currently has rival governments] must get rid of them quickly before Etjzrua and Imitdoa in Libya. Where these Islamic[s] their appearance can accept sometimes between the good people of the principle of Islam is one, has always been recognized help to his brother Muslim but matter [of] fact is mixing between politics and religion, and the entry of the wicked intelligence Alognih guise of religion through the intercalation of religion and an introduction to some of the good people seducer [Blog Editor: Perhaps “seducing”] them and pushed them to the forefront of polishing the scene and behind them the bad guys managing general framework and funding from suspicious sources of intelligence - foreign with traitors customers in the Libyan interior. [These] taking advantage of the good people, the truth is decent title for this; Right is intended to Batal. So who wants to help the rebels brothers in Libya Islamists and Qumien-- seek for the good of Libya and the future of the people. Alliba- must accept the Libyan administration hundred b percent people of Mecca know Bashaabha? Those who refuse to work under the leadership of the Libyan National Congress in the interest of Libya urgent and necessary to Shooting outside Libya violently because [of] the enemy and holds a foreign agenda pose the greatest threat to the existence of Libya and its people unabated or Takhir. [0kl – Blog Editor: I have no good guess for “0kl”] anything away from the leadership conference seeks to work outside the system under the National Libyan leadership, the leadership of General National Congress, which emerged from the largest segment of the Libyan people.

 

Otherwise should be classified as an enemy of Libya and its people, whatever the gloss image and logo is, an enemy of Libya must Dhardhm outside the border and rehabilitation of Taban seducer of their people Alliba0erjoa guidance and reconciled to Msthakaha.

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
February 25 2015 4 25 /02 /February /2015 14:04

Dr. Jim Garrow

Here’s a good Conspiracy Theory I wish some corroboration would emerge to confirm. Dr. Jim Garrow (Here’s a good bio but disquieting photo – And HERE) claims he was a covert CIA agent and has knowledge that Obama ordered the stealth assassination of Andrew Breitbart and author Tom Clancy. The Tea Party Crusaders posted a story on this accusation by Dr. Garrow on February 22, 2015 but after doing some checking I discovered the Garrow accusation has been going on since at least 2013. I found the 2013 date on a skeptical Free Republic post. If you look at some of the headline titles from the Examiner.com Dr. Garrow does have the appearance of a way-way-out-there-in-left-field kind of guy. On the other hand Dr. Garrow was the runner-up to President Barack Hussein Obama in the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009. Dr. Garrow’s nomination is related to his book “THE PINK PAGODA: ONE MAN'S QUEST TO END GENDERCIDE IN CHINA” (Book Review – The Canadian). In relation to that book here is a 2011 book interview:

 

VIDEO: The Pink Pagoda: The Extraordinary Work of Dr. James Garrow

 

 

Published by ATLAHWorldwide

Published: Dec 15, 2011

 

Hon. James David Manning, PhD interviews Dr. Jim Garrow on his new book "The Pink Pagoda." Recorded on 13 December 2011. Go to http://atlah.org for more information.

 

At any rate Dr. Garrow is vilified by the Left and still is appreciated by Christian leaders and far as Conservatives go, I suspect the appreciation or lack thereof is related to the believability scale on Conspiracy Theory.

 

Without further ado here is the Tea Party Crusaders article doing what I do enjoy – vilifying the Liar-in-Chief.

 

JRH 2/25/15 (Hat Tip: Lilliane Parker)

*****************************

INCREDIBLE: Ex-CIA Agent Claims Obama Had Breitbart and Clancy Killed

 

By crusader

February 22nd, 2015 at 12:22 AM

Tea Party Crusaders

 

Doctor Jim Garrow, philanthropist and worker for one of the largest non-profit organizations on the planet to save female children from slaughter in China.

 

He has been featured on several media outlets throughout the world. Last Sunday, as a guest of Now the End Begins internet radio program however, he dropped a bombshell on the world. Dr. Garrow claims that up to a week ago he was covert CIA. To top it off on the program, he states he knows that President Obama ordered the hits that killed Tom Clancy and Andrew Breitbart!

 

According to Garrow …

 

Andrew Breitbart died under mysterious circumstances. The autopsy said that he died with no prescription drugs in his system and only a .04 blood alcohol content not days after taping an interview with the now also deceased “alleged” gay lover of President Barack H. Obama. So why if he died of natural causes did the FBI go after his widow for potential homicide?

 

Well according to Dr. Jim Garrow, Andrew Breitbart was not dead of natural causes. According to the interview, he was killed directly by the Obama Administration. Andrew Breitbart was known for his controversy against the administration and the news media. Several people believed he was killed including some of the main founders of www.breitbart.com in his memory.

 

Then there was Tom Clancy. Tom Clancy died last week at the age of 66. Although they say “natural causes”, the actual list of cause of death on his autopsy, cause of death unknown.

 

Tom Clancy once said:

 

I hang my hat on getting as many things right as I can. I’ve made up stuff that’s turned out to be real — that’s the spooky part.”-Tom Clancy to the New York Times


It is no secret when he wrote The Hunt for the Red October that he was met at the door by Pentagon officials and FBI agents demanding to know where he got top-secret documents.

 

Dr. Garrow states that after the incident, the CIA “spoon fed” him classified information and scenarios to write his novels in a manner that was entertaining but contained that ever needed element of truth. Dr. Garrow says that is why he was killed because he was getting to close to a secret they don’t want the world to know. In fact Dr. Garrow attributes the statement quoted above as “a little too late”.

 

Dr. Garrow states President Obama had Tom Clancy killed as well and noted that it takes 5 days for plant toxins and most poisons to break down and leave no traces in the human body. Amazingly enough, or coincidentally, the doctors did not perform an autopsy on Tom Clancy’s body for 5 days.

 

Finally he revealed a revelation so shocking to the radio program that can be best described in their own words:

 

Lastly, he revealed that Obama’s administration was made up of Marxist Muslims who all take their orders from Senior Adviser to the President, Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett.

 

Dr. Garrow said that it is well known to intelligence agencies all over the world that Obama is a foreign plant who was placed on the path to the presidency by ultra-rich Saudi nationals. This is why, Garrow said, that all of Obama’s education records have been permanently sealed.

____________________________

© 2015 Tea Party Crusaders

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Conspiracy Theory
write a comment
February 25 2015 4 25 /02 /February /2015 09:29

 

In the post “Islam’s Allah is NOT the same as Christianity’s GOD Almighty” I affirmed that which the title proclaims. Denis Saldanha left this comment on G+ comments:

 

Why Christianity, it is compatible with none.”

 

emma jones took Denis’ comment as a criticism of Christianity. I am actually not sure if it was a criticism. If one looks at this question enough one might either negative or positive connotations. If Denis’s query was in a negative sense, then emma’s answer is awesome. Indeed, emma’s comment criticism is insightful enough for a stand-alone post. You can read an edited version below.

 

 

JRH 2/24/15

******************************

This is what Islam Allows as Faith

[Arbitrary Editor’s title]

 

By emma jones

2/23/15 11:50 AM

 

Islam is the only religion with a holy book that allows:


--Murdering those who won't convert


--Having sex with 1 year old children


--Allowing people to lie if it furthers Islam


--Having sex with a dead body (Moe ham head did this with his dead aunt)


--Taking the lives and property of anyone who disagrees with Islam


--Cutting off limbs of people for crimes


--Beheading, burning people alive, rape


--Having sex with animals as long as you kill them and don't eat them


--Predicts a paradise in the after-life with 72 virgins for sex, young boys for sex, and rivers of wine ...... which would know as a Roman orgy in the real world


--Endorses slavery



ISLAM cannot agree with any other religion.  If a muslim leaves islam he must be killed.  So shut up if you haven't read the Hadith, Koran, etc. Are you talking out of your ass?

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
February 24 2015 3 24 /02 /February /2015 07:00

The winning legal team outside the Manhattan courtroom: Nitzana Darshan-Leitner (C) and Kent Yalowitz (2L). (Photo: Facebook)

 

Amazing! A Federal Court in Manhattan actually did the right thing and found the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) libel for inciting terrorism (See Also HERE) during the 2nd Intifada (Full Scope) conducted against Israel. Maybe Obama will surprise me and praise the Court’s decision.

 

JRH 2/24/15

***********************

US Court Finds Palestinian Authority Guilty of Terrorism; Damages May Exceed $655 Million

 

By: United with Israel Staff

February 24, 2015

United With Israel

 

The Palestinian Authority was found guilty of inciting terror attacks that led to the deaths of US citizens in Israel during the Second Intifada. A landmark victory for Israel!

 

Kent Yalowitz, lead prosecuting attorney of a landmark trial against Palestinian terror, proudly declared that “the Palestinian Authority and the PLO have been found liable by an American jury for six heinous terrorist attacks that killed and injured hundreds of civilians.”

 

The Israel Law Center, an Israel-based legal rights organization (known as Shurat Hadin in Hebrew), represented 11 families that took the Palestinian Authority to court for inciting, planning and carrying out six terror attacks that killed American citizens in Israel during the Second Intifada (2000-2004).

 

Following the landmark decision by a US court, Shurat Hadin’s director, Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, and attorney Kent Yalowitz were elated with the jury’s verdict.

Darshan-Leitner declared on Facebook: “BREAKING: Palestinian Authority & Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) FOUND GUILTY ON EVERY COUNT!”

 

“We are truly grateful that an American court has heard the evidence against the Palestinian Authority and the PLO and determined that suicide terrorism was indeed their official policy during the Second Intifada,” Darshan-Leitner stated.

 

“The defendants have already been boasting that they will appeal the decision and we will never collect on the judgment. We will not allow them to make a mockery of the US court process, however, and we continue to pursue them until it is paid in full.”

 

“If the PA and PLO have the funds to pay the families of the suicide bombers each month, then they have the money to pay these victims of Palestinian terrorism.”

 

Yalowitz explained: “If you have a policy that says [that] if you commit a terrorist act, you keep your job,” get a promotion and get paid while you’re in jail, “that says something about who you are and what you believe in,” the Jerusalem Post reports.

 

He hoped that “after years of difficult and emotional effort, we secured for the families today a small measure of justice.”

 

A large sum of $218.5 million in damages was awarded to the victims. According to applicable anti-terrorism laws, this amount will likely be tripled to a whopping sum of over $655 million.

 

Darshan-Leitner said “This historic verdict against the defendants will not bring back these families’ loved ones nor heal the physical and psychological wounds inflicted upon them but it truly is an important measure of justice and closure for them after their long years of tragic suffering and pain.”

 

This landmark verdict will likely have a major impact on the Palestinian Authority’s effort to prosecute Israel for alleged war crimes in the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Israeli government has already indicated that it intends to use the same court to charge the Palestinian Authority with terrorism and crimes against humanity.

 

Upon hearing the verdict, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said: “The US federal court decision determines the responsibility of the Palestinian Authority for the murderous terrorist attacks of the previous decade. Instead of drawing the requisite lesson, the Palestinian Authority is advancing steps that endanger regional stability such as the hypocritical application to the International Criminal Court even as it is allied with the Hamas terrorist organization. We expect the responsible elements in the international community to continue to punish those who support terrorism just as the US federal court has done and to back the countries that are fighting terrorism. Today as well we remember the families that lost their loved ones; our heart is with them and there is no justice that can console them.”

 

Sign the Petition to Stop Funding the Palestinian Authority

 

The Palestinian Authority openly supports and encourages terror attacks against the citizens of Israel. Terrorist groups answer this call with a bloodthirsty enthusiasm. If there was any doubt before, it has been completely eliminated this past month, as we have witnessed the most horrific terror attacks against Israelis with full support from the PA.

 

It is an outrage that the United States continues to fund the PA. They are funding terror - plain and simple. Join us in demanding that the US stops funding Palestinian terror

 

CLICK HERE TO SIGN THE PETITION TO STOP FUNDING THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY.

 

__________________________________

© United with Israel 2015

 

About United with Israel

 

United with Israel is a global, grassroots movement comprised of individuals who are deeply committed to the success and prosperity of Israel. Our primary mission is to build a massive network of pro-Israel activists and foster global unity with the People, Country and Land of Israel. In short, we seek to fight and win the battle of public opinion for Israel. We maximize the incredible power of social media to spread the truth about Israel to the entire world.

 

From incessant rocket attacks to threats of annihilation and fears of nuclear attack, Israel is alone in a big world of unfriendly nations. And for the first time, Israel is under intense pressure to divide Jerusalem, the eternal capital of Israel. This is a defining moment for the nation of Israel.

 

Now more than ever, Israel needs READ THE REST

 

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Israel
write a comment

Overview

  • : ubiquitous8thoughts
  • ubiquitous8thoughts
  • : This is a Christian Right blog. This means there is religious freedom, free speech, Constitutional Original Intent, Pro-Israel, Anti-Islamist and a dose of Biblical Morality (Pro-Life & anti-homosexual agenda) content in this blog.
  • Contact

Search

Links