Overblog Follow this blog
Administration Create my blog
December 10 2014 4 10 /12 /December /2014 16:48

 

John R. Houk

© December 10, 3014

 

In America this is an ethical argument between Leftists and Conservatives on how to deal with illegal aliens slipping across the southern border in droves. Leftists are dedicated to the concepts involved with diverse multiculturalism. Conservatives are dedicated to the concepts of maintaining the core values and heritage that have made America an exceptional nation, the freest nation in the world and the nation which foreign nationals desire to move into seeking a better life than existed in their homeland.

 

The irony is Leftists would agree with the immigrants looking for a better life in America. The problem is diverse multiculturalism enables immigrants to subscribe to the legal and social traditions of the homeland they are escaping from. In the mind of Conservatives this is a problem because the refusal to assimilate to the American culture that extols the language and history dilutes that which America exceptional and great.

 

The largest amount of ILLEGAL immigrants to the USA today tend to be Hispanic Latin Americans. The traditions brought to Latin America come primarily from Spain which has a heritage of authoritarian elites subjugating the less fortunate as laborers that benefit those elites.

Here is an excerpt that explains Latin America’s heritage (in full disclosure if read entirely blames in part “North America” [meaning USA] and European interference):

 

 

… Latin America's problems resulted from the Spanish colonial
system that had offered native-born whites little opportunity or
responsibility in government. The tradition of autocracy and paternalism was a poor precedent for would-be democratic republics. The emphasis on executive power inspired presidents, generals, landowners, and church officials to wield authority with arrogant disregard for public opinion and representative government.

The colonial economic system, based on raw materials rather than
industry, encouraged concentration of land and other forms of wealth in a few hands. The church with its vast properties, monopoly on education and welfare agencies, and command over cultural life complicated the politics of every new nation.

In addition, the new states were cursed by problems associated with the wars of independence. Some of the most productive areas were devastated. Hatred and division remained. Many men who had fought the royalists remained armed, predisposed to a life of violence and pillage and likely to group themselves about the caudillos, who promised adventure or profit in revolutions.

 

The final problem facing the new states was that of racial disunity. In 1825 there were from 15 to 18 million people in the former Spanish empire. About 3 million of them were whites, the wealthiest and most educated population. That figure remained constant until the last third of the century, when immigration from Europe in[c]reased drastically. There were about the same number of mestizos, who scorned the Indians, but were not accepted by whites. Their numbers steadily increased, as did their ambition. During the nineteenth century at least half of the population in some states was Indian. Deprived of the small protection once offered by the Spanish crown, they either sank into peonage or lived in semi-independence under their tribal rulers. Finally, in Brazil and most of the Caribbean island, blacks were in a large majority. Conflicts of interest quickly developed between these broad racial groups, particularly between the Creoles and the mestizos. The pernicious effects of these divisive factors can be seen in the experiences of each nation.

Mexico

Despite its promising beginning in 1821, Mexico suffered a …
(Latin America: Establishment of Latin American States; By Allen Pikermen; International World History Project; 2002)

 

The heritage of the United States of America as brought over from the English monarchy are quite different. Future Americans came to the New World to specifically find a life better than existed in their homeland. Those non-English colonials that came had to do so under the authorization of the English Crown. So even those earliest immigrants to North America that came from non-English but European roots still owed their legal-economic foundations derived from English law.

 

Here is an excerpt that a quick search on my part demonstrates (I could probably find a better source but I was in a hurry):

 

 

… The ideas and practices that led to the development of the American democratic republic owe a debt to the ancient civilizations of Greece and Rome, the Protestant Reformation, and Gutenberg's printing press. But the Enlightenment of 17th-century Europe had the most immediate impact on the framers of the United States Constitution.

 

The Philosophes

 

Europeans of the 17th century no longer lived in the "darkness" of the Middle Ages. Ocean voyages had put them in touch with many world civilizations, and trade had created a prosperous middle class. The Protestant Reformation encouraged free thinkers to question the practices of the Catholic Church, and the printing press spread the new ideas relatively quickly and easily. The time was ripe for the philosophes, scholars who promoted democracy and justice through discussions of individual liberty and equality.

 

One of the first philosophes was Thomas Hobbes, an Englishman who concluded in his famous book, Leviathan, that people are incapable of ruling themselves, primarily because humans are naturally self-centered and quarrelsome and need the iron fist of a strong leader. Later philosophes, like Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Rousseau were more optimistic about democracy. Their ideas encouraged the questioning of absolute monarchs, like the Bourbon family that ruled France. Montesquieu suggested a separation of powers into branches of government not unlike the system Americans would later adopt. They found eager students who later became the founders of the American government.

 

John Locke

 

The single most important influence that shaped the founding of the United States comes from John Locke, a 17th century Englishman who redefined the nature of government. Although he agreed with Hobbes regarding the self-interested nature of humans, he was much more optimistic about their ability to use reason to avoid tyranny. … According to Locke, a ruler gains authority through the consent of the governed. The duty of that government is to protect the natural rights of the people, which Locke believed to include life, liberty, and property. If the government should fail to protect these rights, its citizens would have the right to overthrow that government. …

 

Important English Documents

 

Ironically, the English political system provided the grist for the revolt of its own American colonies. For many centuries English monarchs had allowed restrictions to be placed on their ultimate power. The Magna Carta, written in 1215, established the kernel of limited government, or the belief that the monarch's rule was not absolute. …

 

The Petition of Right (1628) extended the rights of "commoners" to have a voice in the government. The English Bill of Rights (1688) guaranteed free elections and rights for citizens accused of crime. …

 

The foundations of American government lie squarely in the 17th and 18th century European Enlightenment. The American founders were well versed in the writings of the philosophes, whose ideas influenced the shaping of the new country. Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, James Madison, and others took the brave steps of creating a government based on the Enlightenment values of liberty, equality, and a new form of justice. More than 200 years later, that government is still intact. (2. Foundations of American Government; ushistory.org – American Government; © 1995-2014 by the Independence Hall Association, a nonprofit organization in Philadelphia, PA founded in 1942. Publishing electronically as ushistory.org.; online since July 4, 1995.)

 

The largest problem I have with the excerpt above is that nearly ignores the influence of Christianity on the Founding of the USA. It is typical in this day and age to bend to Left Wing humanist interpretations of history which is more often critical of Christianity than supportive of the great faith’s influence not only in America but Western culture at large in general.

 

It is my opinion that the Left has acquired the keys that disseminate education in the USA which is not a good thing for Christians. The Christian Right the best defender of the faith in the 21st century has reacted by perhaps overemphasizing Christianity’s influence of the Founding Fathers. In turn the Left has reacted by overemphasizing the non-Christian influences amplified in the above excerpt. I like the middle ground taken by Mark David Hall, Ph.D. written in 2011. Dr. Hall explains why the far Left and the Christian Right are both wrong on a limited basis. Yes the influences of the great Philosophes were paramount to the Founding Fathers, YET every single Founding Father (even Jefferson and Madison) and the majority of the new USA’s voting enfranchised citizens attributed their social foundations to Christianity especially as they governed their individual lives by morality. Even the most deist of the Founding Fathers believed that without Christian ethics and morality, government would fall into chaos or tyranny. Read Dr. Hall’s essay entitled “Did America Have a Christian Founding?

 

Ergo it is my assertion that that the Left’s political motivation in encouraging open borders to a Latin American culture will ultimately lead to a dilution of the American culture that has made our nation exceptional and free. Immigrants must be welcomed into America but not at the cost of American culture. Immigrants must assimilate! Sure immigrants can honor their heritage by maintaining their memories on an individual basis. However, to maintain the American culture the maintenance of the American version of the English language is a paramount stepping stone for assimilation.

 

This leads me to an emerging multicultural immigration problem. That problem is the willingness of our government (largely under the tutelage of the Obama Administration) to bring foreign born Muslims to the USA. Before the Left Wing multiculturalists and Muslim apologists scream Islamophobe racist, I actually believe individuals that idiotically choose to worship an antichrist religion like Islam should be free to do so according to the First Amendment of the Constitution.

 

The thing is that Muslims that revere Allah, Islamic holy writings and the religion’s false prophet Mohammed WILL BE INTENT to refuse assimilation into American culture.

 

Islam’s Sharia Law is absolutely contradictory to the Liberty and Freedom inherent in the U.S. Constitution. Most adherents to any religion have supremacist ideals about their faith. I know I do pertaining to Christianity. HOWEVER the Islamic faith supremacists requires the blood of all humanity that refuse to submit to Islam or insults Islam (including its crazy prophet).

 

Any foreign culture that develops an ideology among individuals living in or outside the USA that rejects assimilation into American culture and our constitutional government is a threat to the USA remaining free with individual rights and liberty.

 

It’s bad enough that illegal Latin American aliens are coming to America just as much to send money back to their homelands while enjoying taxpayer supported programs, it is worse to take in legal immigrants that have no intention to assimilate but rather to overthrow the Constitution and replace it with Sharia Law.

 

Those Muslims that identify the Quran and Mohammed as perfect and that people must be in submission to Islam are individuals that have the imperative to bring down our Constitution and culture of Freedom and Liberty. If those particular Muslims tell you differently they are either intentionally lying or are unintentionally self-deceived. Allah commands Muslims to eradicate or reduce the non-believers of Islam to a cruel second class citizenship of obeying the rules of Sharia (or else!).

 

This is as evil as when the old Soviet Union cultivated American Communists to use the American system to bring down America or a few radicalized self-starting Communists acting as anarchists (cough can you say Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrnfriends to Obama) to bring down the Constitution and the American heritage.

 

These thoughts are largely inspired by some Geert Wilders information posted by the Gatestone Institute. In case you don’t know who Wilders is, he became known to me largely through a mini-documentary entitled “Fitna”. Wilders takes the title from the same Arabic word that means “a state of trouble or chaos”. “Fitna” is roughly about 16 minutes long and worth the view. The tiny documentary caused quite a stir in the Western World and in Muslim dominated nations. Wilders’ home nation of Netherlands even prosecuted him for hate speech when the documentary is actually truth speech. The Netherlands prosecution lost.

 

Lo and behold the Leftist government of the Netherlands is once again going after Geert Wilders’ free speech rights by interrogating him about a speech encouraging his Dutch constituents (he is a member of whatever the Netherlands calls a Parliament) to support legislation that limits the immigration of Moroccan Muslims who refuse assimilation into Dutch culture.

 

Under heavy pressure by the Dutch left, national government, and the North African immigrants themselves for a rallying cry where Wilders asked a campaign-stop crowd in The Hague if they wanted 'more Moroccans  or 'less Morrocans' in Holland (followed by predictably raucous cheers for the latter), the Dutch politician is fighting back and -per usual- speaking his mind...

 

With the new left-leaning government in charge, they now have the top public prosecutor attempting to build a case against Geert for 'hate speech', asking the the (sic) police to retain and question him, etc.

 

But of course, as a man of deep thought and clear logic, he says things for a reason- Wilders had no trouble explaining himself, and even issued a public statement. As is his manner, the Dutch Freedom Party leader didn't back down a millimeter... while offering an eloquent defense of his position.

 

Some highlights:

 

  • I name the problems that I see.... That is my duty. That is why I have been elected. I rely on objective facts and figures....
    Because they are the truth.

 

  • I do not intend to hurt or offend people, either

 

  • In my fight for freedom and against the Islamization of the Netherlands, I will never let anyone silence me. No matter the cost, no matter by READ THE REST (Geert Wilders in Interrogation by State Police: 'I have yet to meet the Dutchman who wants more Moroccans in the Netherlands...'; By The Reaganite Republic; 12/10/14)

 

Geert Wilders has made a statement about the interrogation according to what I have read was released while being subjected to the police questioning. I discovered through Google Wilders’ statement is all over the web but I am going with the Gatestone Institute version.

 

JRH 12/10/14

****************************

Statement of Geert Wilders during His Interrogation by the State Police

 

By Geert Wilders

December 9, 2014 at 5:00 am

Gatestone Institute

 

As a democratically elected politician I name the problems that I see.... That is my duty. That is why I have been elected. I rely on objective facts and figures.... Because they are the truth.

 

I do not intend to hurt or offend people either... Already for over 10 years, I have lost my personal freedom.

 

In my fight for freedom and against the Islamization of the Netherlands, I will never let anyone silence me. No matter the cost, no matter by whom, whatever the consequences may be.

 

To speak with the words of Martin Luther King: "I close by saying there is nothing greater in all the world than freedom. It's worth going to jail for. It's worth losing a job for. It's worth dying for."

 

The Hague, December 8, 2014.

 

Today, Dutch parliamentarian and PVV leader Geert Wilders made a statement during his interrogation by the Dutch State Police. The State Police interrogated Mr Wilders on behalf of the Dutch Public Prosecutor, who is considering to prosecute Mr Wilders because the politician had asked his voters during the election campaign whether they wanted more or fewer Moroccans in the Netherlands.

 

Our freedom is being threatened. Threatened by a violent totalitarian ideology – Islam – that brings with it death and devastation. Threatened by a politically correct elite that does not tolerate criticism of Islam and mass immigration, and that nurtures cultural relativism.

 

I rise up against this.

 

As a democratically elected politician I name the problems that I see. I name the dangers and disadvantages that we experience in the Netherlands as a result of cultural relativism, mass immigration and the ongoing Islamization. That is my task. That is my duty. That is why I have been elected. That is the reason why I am in politics and why I founded the Party for Freedom (PVV).

 

I am fighting for a better Netherlands.
To preserve our own culture.
Our own identity.
Our safety.
Our freedom.

 

I do not discriminate. I do not spread hatred, nor do I incite to it. I do not intend to hurt or offend people either. However, I do not mince my words when I defend our established freedoms and name the dangers to our society.

 

I dedicate my life to the fight against this evil ideology and the defense of our liberties. Every day, I pay the price for this fight. Already for over ten years, I have lost my personal freedom.

 

During the past 10 years, I have drawn attention to the Moroccan problem which we have here in the Netherlands. These include serious problems with integration, crime and welfare dependency. The majority of the jihadis travelling from the Netherlands to Syria is Moroccan. In order to see the whole context, the contents of the attachments that I deposit with you here today must be taken into consideration.

I rely on objective facts and figures. Facts that I must name. Because they are the truth. If we had had the same problem in the Netherlands with Canadians, I would have named them.

 

Those who do not understand that we have an enormous problem with Islam and with Moroccans in the Netherlands, though seeing, they do not see, and though hearing, they do not hear.

 

For the reasons above, while on campaign in The Hague, I argued that there need to be fewer Moroccans. And, at an election meeting in The Hague, I asked those present a number of questions, one of which was "Do you want more or fewer Moroccans?"

Geert Wilders during his March 2014 speech, where he asked "Do you want more or fewer Moroccans?" (Image source: nos.nl video screenshot)

 

Indeed, I want fewer Moroccans in the Netherlands for the reasons and context that I have previously expressed in this statement as well as in Parliament and for which I refer you to the documents that I now deposit.

 

I have yet to meet the Dutchman who wants more Moroccans in the Netherlands. Asking for fewer Moroccans is something totally different than if I were to want all Moroccans to leave the Netherlands or than if I were to object to every Moroccan.

 

Like me, 43% of all the Dutch and 95% of my supporters want fewer Moroccans in the Netherlands. I have said what millions of Dutchmen think.

 

I also want less Islam in the Netherlands.

 

And like me, 65% of all the Dutch and 100% of my supporters think that the Islamic culture does not belong to the Netherlands.


Since the establishment of the PVV, I have advocated fewer immigrants from Islamic countries.


Since the establishment of the PVV, I have identified the Moroccan problem and presented (democratic) solutions for it, such as:

 

  • limiting the immigration of people from Islamic countries, hence also Morocco

 

  • promoting the voluntary remigration of non-Western foreigners, hence also Moroccans

 

  • expelling criminals with dual nationality after denaturalization, hence also Moroccans. Since Moroccans living in the Netherlands are significantly overrepresented in crime statistics and often have dual citizenship, this would also lead to fewer Moroccans in the Netherlands.

 

I do not retract anything of what I have said.

 

Because I have said nothing wrong.

 

In my fight for freedom and against the Islamization of the Netherlands, I will never let anyone silence me. No matter the cost, no matter by whom, whatever the consequences may be.

 

To speak with the words of Martin Luther King: "I close by saying there is nothing greater in all the world than freedom. It's worth going to jail for. It's worth losing a job for. It's worth dying for."

 

For these above reasons, I assume that the Public Prosecutor will decide not to prosecute me.


Any other decision cannot be interpreted otherwise than politically motivated.

 

Geert Wilders

_________________________

Culture Assimilation Matters – Ask Geert

John R. Houk

© December 10, 3014

_________________________

Statement of Geert Wilders during His Interrogation by the State Police

 

Copyright © 2014 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved.

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Politics Counterjihad
write a comment
December 6 2014 7 06 /12 /December /2014 19:25

 

John R. Houk

© December 6, 2014

 

Muslim terrorists have infiltrated American Universities. These sly devils don’t openly practice Islamic terrorism on American soil (anyway, not yet). Rather via Professors and university student activists they foment the Jew-hatred and Christian-hatred inherent in the Quran. A part of this hatred is to propagandize Muslim students and idiotic Left leaning students that America is the great satan and that Israel is the little satan.

 

The propaganda comes from foreign sources pulling the strings to undermine the USA. Those foreign agents of propaganda originate from the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in Egypt and the Islamic terrorist organization Hamas.

 

The Muslim Brotherhood is dedicated to establish a global caliphate reminiscent in power of the bloody ruthless days of conquest that brought the initial cancer to spread across the world that began to metastasize in the early 600s AD (that’s right Anno Domini – year of the Lord, not CE – Common or Christian Era).

 

Hamas is a wing of the MB embedded in Gaza that agrees with the MB agenda but is dedicated to destroy Israel and kill Jews pretending to be a non-existent people called Palestinians.

 

This network of radical Muslims foment the destruction of U.S. Constitutional rights while using the very same rights to do so. The U.S. government allows this out of the self-destructive concepts of political correctness, diverse multiculturalism and the vagueness in defining the width and depth of the First Amendment rights of Free Speech and Religious Freedom.

 

The universality of Free Speech rights in the First Amendment has left the courts to try and define what the extent of Free Speech should be. For most of the U.S. history the courts erred on the side of allowing government-Congress to define the line not to be crossed in Free Speech. Erring on the side of the government defining the limits of Free Speech began during WWI with the head of the American Socialist Party convicted in breaking the Espionage Act by printing pamphlets to resist the draft into the Army.

 

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the 1919 SCOTUS decision defining the limits of Free Speech is measured by how it is or is not a Clear and Present Danger to nation (as in National Security) and the public good. In this way SCOTUS effectively amended the First Amendment to bring a narrower grasp of the extent of the First Amendment.

 

Although the Clear and Present Danger doctrine established by SCOTUS rather than the Amendment process brought new legal challenges. It turns out there is a lack of definition to the context of the meaning to a Clear and Present Danger.

 

Between 1919 and 1969 SCOTUS struggled to pin down the parameters of a Clear and Present Danger.

 

The great break came in the Court's 1969 decision in Brandenburg v. Ohio. There the Court said the government could not take action against a member of the Ku Klux Klan, who said, among other things, "We're not a revengent organization, but if our President, our Congress, our Supreme Court, continues to suppress the white, Caucasian race, it's possible that there might have to be some revengence taken." The speaker did not explicitly advocate illegal acts or illegal violence. But in its decision, the Court announced a broad principle, ruling that the right to free speech does "not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." (Bold Emphasis Mine - Is Violent Speech a Right? By Cass Sunstein; The American Prospect; 12/19/01)

 

This Brandenburg v. Ohio decision provided a little more clarity in getting a grasp on judging a Clear and Present Danger. This refined Clear and Present Danger legal doctrine runs like this according Cass Sunstein:

 

First, the speaker must promote not just any lawless action but "imminent" lawless action. Second, the imminent lawless action must be "likely" to occur. Third, the speaker must intend to produce imminent lawless action ("directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action"). (Ibid.)

 

There still is leeway in pushing the envelope on what is legal and what is illegal. An example from I read from Sunstein is Civil Disobedience. Obviously if Civil Disobedience in non-violent in its nature one would think there would be no Clear and Present Danger to the public good. But what if the peaceful Civil Disobedience advocated by speech or print are acts that might be illegal. For example a march without city permission down a street, 18-wheeler trucks are advocated to block traffic on a busy Inter-State, a city ordinance requires Preachers to turn in a copy of their sermons to city government for speech approval and the preachers refuse and so on scenarios.

 

Those acts of Civil Disobedience are illegal by at least statute. Does promoting an illegal activity constitute a Clear and Present Danger to the public good?

 

No the KKK dude managed a Free Speech victory the 1969 SCOTUS:

 

"We're not a revengent organization, but if our President, our Congress, our Supreme Court, continues to suppress the white, Caucasian race, it's possible that there might have to be some revengence taken."

 

I am fairly convinced that alluding that “revengence” could be taken if the three branches of the Federal government suppress White Supremacist ideology. A “revengence” act is an act of violence.

 

As a Christian Right political blogger I often call on readers to stand up to the government on restricting where and when Christians can practice their Religious Freedom. Am I inciting violence?

 

When I advocate Christians and Americans to stand up against Muslims in America promoting the destruction of the USA in favor of a Sharia based Caliphate, am I inciting violence?

 

When I advocate Christians to understand that Islam’s revered writings is full of Jew-hatred and Christian-hatred, am I inciting violence?

 

If I call for Americans – especially college age Americans – to protest Islamic hatred on American campuses, would I be inciting violence? After all the modern history of Islam shows that Muslims enter into crazy violence when non-Muslims have the courage to protest Muslim-hate ideology pertaining to Jews, Christians, Israel and American constitutional Liberty (because Sharia Law elements run counter to the Constitution’s Bill of Rights).

 

I ask these questions because the reading of the Quran, Hadith and Sunna enlists me to tell you that Islam is no religion of peace and spiritual fulfillment. The Quran specifically calls for the death of all people who refuse to submit to Islam. The evidence of this is the FACT that over the last 1400 years of Islamic history Muslim conquests have resulted in 270 MILLION non-Muslims (Christians, Jews, Hindus and more) killed in the name of Jihad to spread Islam around the globe. Obviously these 270 MILLION people refused to submit to Islam and lost their lives for it.

 

When hear, read about or see Muslims expressing this hate ideology on American campuses, it is this Islamic Superiority mentality of Jihad that killed 270 MILLION people.

 

VIDEO: Islam 270 Million Bodies in 1400 Years - What Every Kafir Must Know!

 

 

Published by forbidislam

Published: Nov 16, 2010

 

This vid consolidates the points in Frontpage's interview with Bill Warner "Islam: 270 Million Bodies in 1400 Years".

May every kafir wake up and smell the coffee.

Islam is aids. Whoever in bed with it will be infected and die eventually. I used to say Islam is cancer, every muslim is a cancer cell in our society. Though some cancer cells may not or never spread, but once it does, it kills you. Now I found cancer is better than islam, at least cancer is not contagious.

Since EVERY Muslim supports jihad through the even division of their zakat, the mosque offering/tax, EVERY Muslim's hands are full of innocent blood! Remember, 270 million died under the sword of Islam so that Muslims were able to enter Allah's paradise full of beautiful virgin sex slaves!

In more than 1400 years, muslims have killed much much more than 270 million people:


https://sites.google.com/site/fiavnorge/nyheter/22


http://www.news42day.com/2010/02/islam-270-million-bodies-in-1400-years-2/


http://www.masada2000.org/islam.html [Blog Editor: The Masada 2000 website (Wikipedia) has had a history of trouble to exist. This link may be dead. Webhosts tend to get complaints because of a controversial "S.H.I.T. LIST" which points toward Leftist Jews and I am guessing Muslim apologists. The website always seems to pop up again under another Webhost.]

Studies show that at least every three minutes is a Christian is tortured in the Muslim world and that in 2009 alone, more than 165,000 Christians have been killed, mainly in Muslim countries due to their Christian faith.

There are a number of organizations that report about this, but the cases are still greatly hampered by the power of the lefti's journalistic elite, that READ THE REST

 

I want so badly to condemn the ideology of the haters of Islam, but I am choosing to err on the side of Free Speech. Muslim Apologists and Leftists could very easily come after me for hate-speech for exposing the true nature of Islam or for saying Biblical Morality trumps the legalization homosexual normalizing.

 

So those morons do have a right to express their moronic ideology. HOWEVER, that means I also have the right to upbraid anything that diminishes Christianity and the Original Intent of the U.S. Constitution. Shutting me up violates my First Amendment Rights as much as forcing Radical Muslims to shut up.

 

On the other hand as a free society Institutions, organizations, business owners have the right to decide whose interests to support. So Universities that allow Muslims to express violent hatred toward Israel, Jews and Americans that want nothing to do with Sharia-hatred of Constitutional Liberty should – rather MUST – must have the freedom to shut down the hate.

 

In the case of Public Universities voters actually have the power to focus on the hate spewing from Muslims in racist overtones. Most sovereign States in America have an initiative process in which voters can legislate where state congresses fear to tread.

 

So embark on your own Civil Disobedience and protest those haters of Israel, Jews, Christians and American Constitutional Liberties!

 

JRH 12/6/14 (Hat Tip: Stop Islam Facebook Closed Group)

**************************************

VIDEO: Hamas On Campus

Video also on Facebook

 

 

Published by Hamas On Campus

Published: Sep 30, 2014

 

The Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) is Hamas on Campus. An organization dedicated to wiping Israel off the map.

Find out how the The SJP was created to be Hamas on Campus and work in tandem with the Muslim Brotherhood proxy, the Muslim Students Association (MSA).

______________________________

If Muslims Can Express Free Speech Rhetoric, so Can Christians

John R. Houk

© December 6, 2014

_____________________________

About Hamas on Campus

 

HamasOnCampus.org was set up by a group of students and alumni from different campuses across the USA and Canada. We represent both Jews and non-Jews, left and right, liberal and conservative. We value freedom of speech, women’s rights and human rights. For this reason we are disturbed by the increasingly radical behaviour and rhetoric by Hamas supporting organizations on campus.

 

In particular, we are concerned by the activities of the MSA (Muslim Students Association) and SJP (Students for Justice in Palestine).  Both share anti-Israel and anti-democratic values.  We are most concerned about the SJP. It declares itself to be secular in nature but in fact, supports the values and deeds of Hamas. The SJP is financially connected to Hamas via a network of organizations including the MSA, CAIR and the AMP.

 

Please join us in exposing the SJP, also known as Hamas On Campus.

 

The HamasOnCampus.org Team

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
December 3 2014 4 03 /12 /December /2014 14:24

 

Intro to Shamim’s ‘Lecherous Men Gang Raped Two Christian Girls’

Edited by John R. Houk

December 3, 2014

 

Rape committed by Muslims against non-Muslims is an epidemic even in the West but especially in the Muslim dominated world. Muslim rape perpetrators often justify this crime against women and very young girls as a right promised in the Quran and/or Hadith.

 

This is often reported me by Pakistani-Christian activist and reporter Shamim Masih. Due to Shamim’s reporting I have become acutely aware of Pakistan’s rape epidemic more than the rest of the world. Here is an excerpt from a 2013 article on Pakistan’s rape epidemic that provides the numbers to drive home the horror that Pakistan minorities face (to name a few – Christian, Hindu and Ahmadi [Pakistan-Ahmadi perspective]):

 

Official data confirms that 17,075 women were raped over the past five years. Of these, 1,368 were instances of gang-rape.

 

In just the past two years, the statistics recorded by the National Police Bureau (NPB), show that 6,887 women were raped, while 550 were gang-raped during this period (2012-2013).

 

According to these statistics, over 3,000 women are, on average, raped every year in Pakistan. In 2013, the total reported cases of rape were 3,164. In 2012, this number was 3,173.

 

Reported cases of gang-rape in 2013 remained 257 and 293 in 2012. In 2011, police registered 3,272 cases of rape besides the reports of 264 women were allegedly gang-raped. In 2010, the numbers were 3,158 and 310 respectively.

 

 

But these numbers, which NPB collected from regional police departments, reflect only the tip of the iceberg. These are the cases the authorities actually registered. There are countless others which are not reported because police officials refuse to register First Information Reports (FIR) after taking bribes from the culprits.

 

In many other rape cases, local community leaders, families, politicians or victims deliberately try to cover up incidents of rape to avoid “social embarrassment”

 

 

“This data is based on the FIRs registered in all police stations across the country. We believe the actual number of incidents is far higher than numbers which are reported,” said a senior government official, who monitors the crime statistics.

 

“It is very difficult to get ‘real’ statistics from the provinces. They hide several incidents and show less cases than there actually are,” the official told Pique on the condition of anonymity, because he is not authorized to talk to the media.

 

“It is a common trend with our police department that they desperately avoid registering the FIR and try their best to prevent the complainants from registering one,” he said.

 

READ ENTIRETY (THE RAPE EPIDEMIC; By Mirza Khurram Shahzad; Pique Magazine; 4/1/14)

 

Below is Shamim’s report on the gang rape of teen Christian girls by Muslim males. 

 

JRH 12/3/14

***********************

Lecherous Men Gang Raped Two Christian Girls

 

By Shamim Masih

Sent: 12/2/2014 11:54 AM

 

ISLAMABAD: Sehrish 18 and Farazana 14 were forcibly raped by lecherous Muslim men in District Jaranwala a couple of days back but the police avoided registering FIR in this regard.

 

 According to the details, Sehrish and Farazana, daughters of Ilyas Masih, went to nearby fields for an outdoor toilet. While there were several very aggressive and lecherous Muslim men (Sijad, Azeem, Asif, and Akbar etc.) grabbed them and took them deeper into local woods, where two teenage virgin girls were gang raped. The men laughed and mocked the girls as they took away their innocence. Stating this, is [the] fate of poor Christian girls. The girls then had to make their own way home running scared and half naked after the terrifying ordeal.

 

When they told their parents what happened to them, their father Ilyas Masih, resident of Chack no. 651/2 immediately went to the local Police Station. Yet despite pleading for justice the local police refused to register a First Investigation Report (FIR) but [the police] tried to coerce the father to reach a compensation agreement with [the] men who had scarred his daughters for life. The father stated that the police were extremely aggressive with him in their attempts at reaching an unlawful compromise between him and the perpetrators of the vicious attack on his daughters. Then he has pursued the matter through the local courts and civil judge Kamran has ordered for a medical examination to be undertaken on the poor defenseless girls, who have been physically shaken by the event.

 

According to the latest report FIR no. 552/14 has been registered and Sijad has been arrested and [the] rest are fugitives. This is to mention here that in rural areas of the Pakistan there is no defecation and urination facility in the houses and usually poor people have to use a communal cesspit as an outdoor toilet for urination. Basharat Khokhar said that this is very common that aristocracy treat poor girls as their slaves. There are many cases that are not being reported. And the poor class is being exploited everywhere. Pakistani Christian needs to be strengthening economically, he added.

    

Even now as I write this piece the father advised me that threats are being made to him, his friends and his family. However, he will keep his resolve and will get justice for his daughters. He said that God will see them through this difficult period.

 

Be Blessed,

 

Shamim Masih

 

Diplomatic Correspondent, Foreign Policy, Diplomacy, UN, F & S, MOST, CADD & Human Rights Activist

 

Daily Khabrian – in Urdu (PakBiz.com description – in English) & Channel - 5 (A project of Khabrian Group of papers)

 

For Americans especially, I have discovered the best way to donate to Shamim Masih is via Western Union sending this LINK to a Western Union agent in Islamabad. Include Shamim’s phone - +92-300-642-4560

_____________________________

Lecherous Men Gang Raped Two Christian Girls

 

Edited by John R. Houk

Text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Shamim Masih

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad Christianity
write a comment
December 2 2014 3 02 /12 /December /2014 15:30

 

John R. Houk

© December 2, 2014

 

The Obama Administration fundamental transformation of America has embedded confusion among the populace, increased mistrust of government among the anti-Liberal populace, rampant government corruption and lies and the transformation of the American legal system into tools of a Leftist agenda unfortunately utilizing race-baiting as the instrumental tool.

 

Now believe it or not I am going to move toward the beheading of a White Woman by a Black Man, but I feel I need to drive a point home first.

 

I’m curious. If I said “Trayvon Martin,” would you recognize that name? How about if I said “Michael Brown,” do you recall that name?

 

Martin was the unarmed teen that was shot to death by George Zimmerman after the teen decided to attack Zimmerman for questioning the teen’s presence in his neighborhood. Brown is the eighteen year old Black thug that strong-armed the robbery of a carton of cigarettes from a convenience store followed closely by Ferguson Police Officer telling him to get out of the middle of the street in which Brown provocatively declined to obey the Officer. Officer Wilson then proceeded to place Brown in his squad car at which time Brown attacked Wilson grabbing for the Officer’s gun while pummeling the Officer’s face. Wilson managed to secure his weapon falling out of the squad car with Brown making a break for it. Wilson then told the young thug to stop. Instead of stopping the huge teenage thug turned to rush Officer Wilson resulting in the Officer shooting until he felt the lethal was necessary or get beaten up.

 

What did Martin and Brown have in common? They were both Black-American unarmed teens exploited by race-baiters inciting the Black-American to anger.

 

The first media reports on the Martin-Zimmerman incident was that the shooter was a racist white neighborhood watch person. Which was interesting since Zimmerman had a Hispanic-Black background (Mother: Peruvian born with Black Grandfather) and a Germanic background (Father: German ancestry and Roman Catholic even though Zimmerman can also be Jewish). The race-baiting by Left Wing Black & White Americans demonstrates hypocrisy.

 

The Brown-Wilson incident in Ferguson Missouri was largely stoked by a Left Wing media and race-baiting Leftists – both Black and White – who need social justice turmoil propaganda do win elections to perpetuate the lies propagandized to their dependent-entitled constituents. The lying myths created by race-baiters is accurately told by Bryce Buchanan which I found at the American Thinker:

 

The events in Ferguson, Missouri are the latest example of sick political theater, carefully orchestrated to shape public policy. The theatrical productions are pure fiction, but are presented as fact. They are morality plays with heroes and villains intended to create strong emotions directed at a political objective. All the elaborate productions are based on central lies. None would be possible without a complicit media to carry the script.
 

 

The fictional stories written for the Mike Brown/Darren Wilson and the Trayvon/Zimmerman morality plays followed nearly the same script. Two wonderful young black men were shot by racist white men for no reason at all. They were “executed”. They were “gunned down like dogs”. America is racist. Cops are racist. 
 

The leftist media present the fictional story with glee, repeating the lies endlessly, sometimes doctoring the evidence and always ignoring the facts. They appear oblivious to the hatred and division that they are causing. Or worse, they appear to seek violence as a ratings booster. In Ferguson, the mob knew the script. For media and mob it was, “lights, camera, action!”

 

In reality, the Brown/Wilson tragedy does not fit the narrative of a racist cop killing a gentle black man. The opposite is true.  Let’s examine some of the other narratives that were pushed by the emotional, misinformed mobs. Three common chants and protest signs were: We Want Justice, Black Lives Matter, and Stop Killing Us.

 

“We Want Justice”: It is an undeniable fact that the credo, “snitches get stitches” dominates black culture. Cooperation with the police is explicitly forbidden and those who testify about crimes are very often punished for it. There are many black murder cases where significant numbers of people witnessed the murder and none of them will talk to the police. The do not want justice.

 

“Black Lives Matter”: Where are these demonstrators when thousands of other black lives are snuffed out? It appears that “Some Black Lives Matter” -- the ones that are part of the show.

 

“Stop Killing Us”:  91% of black murder victims are killed by other African-Americans according to FBI statistics. You should stop killing you. White people and white policemen are not the problem. Thomas Sowell has some insight on the real problem here and Jason Riley here

 

READ ENTIRETY (Sick Political Theater; By Bryce Buchanan; American Thinker; 11/29/14)

 

Martin-Zimmerman and Brown-Wilson are the classic examples of a situation infecting America successfully since January 2009. God help us if the 2016 elections don’t reverse this race-baiting domination by January 2017.

 

Now that I have refreshed your memories of four people I’d be surprised if you didn’t recall some of that recent history. Let me ask you another current event question. Do you know who Colleen Hufford was?

 

I’m willing to bet you do not have a clue who she was unless you maybe watch Fox News and in that case her name as a victim wasn’t really publicized too much.
 

Hufford is the Oklahoma woman assaulted and beheaded by Alton Nolen at her job and the executioner’s former job. The Mainstream Media (MSM) notoriously dropped Hufford’s victimhood when the Obama Administration’s FBI decided to classify the murder and assaults as workplace violence. Case closed – the local authorities can deal with murderer Nolen, right?

 

WRONG! Alton Nolen was a crazy homegrown jihadi driven to a murderous craze from the Islamic ideology spewed by the Islamic Society of Greater OKC which is a member of Radical Muslim Mosque network under the aegis of Islamic Society of North America. Unfortunately there is no proof Nolen was given marching orders from these Islamic terrorist supporting entities, but at the very least it wouldn’t take a rocket scientist to determine where his brainwashing began.

 

Ryan Burnside has an article showing some new relevant information that Colleen Hufford’s beheading was DEFINITELY NOT workplace violence. Not only was Nolen practicing jihad against non-Muslims but the info shows just how horrific the attack was. Released autopsy data shows that Hufford did not kneel down like an obedient dhimmi, rather she put up a fight in which the murderous Muslim Nolen had to wear Hufford out before he beheaded from the front rather than the typical submissive kneel made popular by ISIS videos.

 

How corrupt has the FBI become under the Obama Administration that America’s premier crime fighting police agency chooses the propaganda of workplace violence rather than the truth of Muslim-hate of people refusing to submit to Islam?
 

JRH 12/2/14

************************

BREAKING: Shocking New Details Released About Woman Beheaded by Muslim in Oklahoma

 

By RYAN BURNSIDE

December 2nd, 2014

Conservative Tribune

 

New details have emerged regarding the woman who was violently beheaded by a domestic Islamic terrorist at an Oklahoma food plant in September.

 

Early media reports depicted the gruesome encounter as one where the radical Islamist, Alton Alexander Nolen, attacked and killed Colleen Hufford from behind.

 

But according to new[s] reports, Hufford wasn’t just an innocent victim who didn’t put up a fight – she fought valiantly to save her own life. (H/T Viral.Buzz)

 

The man, who the media only said was a “recent” Muslim convert, actually had multiple social media postings on Facebook that professed his allegiance to the Islamic State.

 

But the FBI still classified the crime as “workplace violence” and not what it truly was – domestic terrorism.

 

Hufford suffered multiple defensive wounds as she fought the Islamist at every turn, doing everything she possibly could to protect her life.

 

The autopsy report clearly shows that she did not die with her back turned.

 

She had wounds across her hands, cheeks, arms and neck before she was injured enough that the Islamist was able to carry out the beheading.

 

“Evidence from the autopsy indicates Hufford put up a fight before her death. The autopsy describes multiple defensive injuries to both hands and her right arm and other injuries to Hufford’s cheek, chest and upper arm.”

 

Hufford was a hero in her own right. Though she ultimately lost the battle for her life, she gave it all she had.

 

But did Obama acknowledge her death? Not a bit. As a matter of fact, he never mentioned her name once in public.

 

Yet, Trayvon Martin could be his son, and Mike Brown’s death was a tragedy.

 

Hufford won’t get the attention she deserves. We have the utmost respect for this American woman for at least attempting to fight this Islamic monster off before he took her life for no reason.

 

The killer remains in jail, where he’ll rot for a long time to come or hopefully face the death penalty.

______________________________

Black Leftists Use Racism to Destroy American Foundations

John R. Houk

© December 2, 2014

_______________________________

BREAKING: Shocking New Details Released About Woman Beheaded by Muslim in Oklahoma

 

About Conservative Tribune from its Facebook Page

 

© 2014 Conservative Tribune. All Rights Reserved.

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad Politics
write a comment
December 1 2014 2 01 /12 /December /2014 15:48

Ezra Levant

John R. Houk

© December 1, 2014

 

If you are not already cognizant about the terms Legal Jihad and Lawfare you should study up.

 

Lawfare: The Use of the Law as a Weapon of War

 

 

Lawfare denotes "the use of the law as a weapon of war"** or, more specifically, the abuse of Western laws and judicial systems to achieve strategic military or political ends.

 

It consists of the negative manipulation of international and national human rights laws to accomplish purposes other than, or contrary to, those for which they were originally enacted.

 

Lawfare is also evident in the manipulation of domestic legal systems (by state and non-state parties) to implement laws inconsistent with general principles of liberal democracy.

 

The principles underlying lawfare are also present in glaring failures to apply human rights law and in the disproportionate and biased application of the law.

 

Modern-day lawfare has five goals:

     

1. To silence and punish free speech about issues of national security and public concern;

     

2. To delegitimize the sovereignty of democratic states;

     

3. To frustrate and hinder the ability of democracies to fight against and defeat terrorism;

     

4. To confuse laws of armed conflict with human rights law; and

     

5. To prevent the application of human rights law in situations where it is needed the most.

 

READ ENTIRETY (Lawfare: The Use of the Law as a Weapon of War; The Lawfare Project)

 

If this Lawfare Project explanation piques your interest you should check out the PDF ‘“LEGAL JIHAD”: HOW ISLAMIST LAWFARE TACTICS ARE TARGETING FREE SPEECH’ Brooke Goldstein and Aaron Eitan Meyer published in 2009.

 

Now I encouraged you to read up on Legal Jihad due to an update email from Elsa Schieder in relation to the World Truth Summit which brings in Counterjihad speakers and writers addressing the threat of Muslim jihadi terrorists to the Western World.

 

Elsa is identifying a Canadian victim of Legal Jihad in Ezra Levant. Mr. Levant was sued by the Radical Muslim Khurrum Awan for publicly calling him an Antisemite. AND the Canadian Courts actually agreed with Awan that Mr. Levant made a defamatory accusation against him. It didn’t matter to the Canadian Judge that Awan was the youth president of the Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC – See Also HERE). The CIC is a virulently Antisemitic organization that at the very least offers support for Islamic terrorists who demand the destruction of Israel and the death of Jews.

 

So this how this cross post is going to work. First I’m posting Elsa’s email then I’m following that with Ezra Levant plea for funds to appeal the Canadian dhimmi Judge that failed to connect Antisemitism with Khurrum Awan who has been in the upper levels of leadership in the Radical Islamic Jew-hating CIC.

 

JRH 12/1/14

************************

The Judgement against Ezra Levant, and Politically Correct Nuttiness

 

By Elsa Schieder

Sent: 11/29/2014 11:50 AM

Sent as World Truth Summit Update

 

Do I have any news or thoughts I'd especially like to share?  Today, with the sun glinting on the snow, the temperature outside at minus 10, the existence of a force like Islam seems impossible. But I know it's around, with an ideology against the freedoms I value. 

 

This week, on November 27, I got an email from Ezra Levant of Sun News, letting me know that he had just "lost a defamation lawsuit ... brought by Khurrum Awan, the former youth president of the Canadian Islamic Congress." Ezra called Awan an anti-Semite. On what basis? "Awan was, at one time, the youth president of the Canadian Islamic Congress, an anti-Semitic organization. At the time Awan was its youth president, the CIC was led by a notorious anti-Semite, Mohamed Elmasry. Elmasry famously went on national TV** to state that any adult in Israel is a legitimate target for terrorism. The CIC has publicly called for the legalization of anti-Semitic terrorist groups." 

 

However, all that wasn't evidence enough. Ezra has been called upon to pay 80,000 plus court costs. 

 

On what basis? "The judge ruled that it is defamatory to call the former youth president of an anti-Semitic organization, anti-Semitic." Why? Because Awan denied it in court, and said "he never knew about his organization's infamous misconduct." 

 

Ezra is appealing. Good. As for the ruling, I find it utterly appalling. Here's where you can contribute to Ezra's legal costs:

http://www.standwithezra.ca

 

I'd say we urgently need a Freedom Community!

 

 

Another thought. Sometimes it feels urgent to DO SOMETHING about Islam. After all, 125,000 Christian deaths at the hands of Muslims over the past year. Women used as sex slaves. 

 

And sometimes it feels: time to slow down, time to pace yourself. After all, they've had 1400 years. Most of us are just starting to understand what we are dealing with. 

 

First, it takes most of us (me, anyway) years to come to anything like a full understanding of political Islam with its plan to conquer the world - to dominate or slaughter those it labels kafirs, to slaughter those it labels atheists, polytheists, apostates. It takes most of us years to understand how far the tentacles of political Islam reach - into text books, government, the media.

 

And then there are the politically correct. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY. WHAT FOLLOWS IS UTTER NUTTINESS. They hold: all opinions are equal; morality is relative. Yet they denounce Israel as an apartheid state. But if all opinions are equal, then they should equally accept that Israel is not an apartheid state - but they don't. Instead they tend to foam at the mouth at the suggestion. Likewise, they shrug off that Saudi Arabia is an apartheid state - going against their own position, that all opinions are equal, and morality is relative, and we must not judge. Instead, they're harshly judgemental of Israel - going against their own supposed stance on "all cultures are equal."

 

As I said, this is all utter nuttiness. But it takes most of us a long time to figure out just how nutty it is - and longer to figure out how to get through to people who hold: All positions are equal, as long as they're whatever I believe. 

 

 

All the best to all of us who care and dare - to think and to speak. 

 

Elsa

 

PS. There are also bits of sunshine here and there, not only right outside my window. In Montreal, there have recently been 2 excellent speakers - Nitsana Darshan-Leitner (Bankrupting Islam, One Lawsuit at a Time) and Bill Warner (Why We Are Afraid and A Voice for the Voiceless).

 

Then, at 7:30 pm, Monday, Dec 1, there will be a third speaker, 

Jamie Glazov of FrontPageMag (Ruby Foos Hotel, 7655 Decarie Blvd).

 

For more info, you can email: valerieprice@sympatico.ca

 

 

PPS. By the way, why isn't the site for The Freedom Community already up and running? It will include a membership site, where members can contact each other, and interact. That takes a lot of technical work. There are also loads of other questions, quite everyday, but they still take time - like, what will be the image on top? You can see the current image here: 

http://TheFreedomCommunity.com

 

 

PPPS. Here's another question we've been dealing with: in how many languages will the site be available? That's not decided. There will be at least 3: English, French and German. If you speak another language, and want to get involved, please let us know. 

 

** Elmasry famously went on national TV:

VIDEO: Khurrum Awan & Mohamed Elmasry: Complete strangers!

 

 

Published by AlohaSnackbar01

Published: Mar 11, 2014

 

Now that the testimony phase of the Khurrum Awan/Ezra Levant libel suit is over, I thought I'd re-up this little clip of Mohamed Elmasry of the Canadian Islamic Congress from the old Michael Coren Show many years ago - Sun News Network has been using a copy from one of my old suspended Youtube accounts - here's a new copy for ya boys!
==========================
The following shamelessly stolen from

http://eyecrazy.blogspot.ca/

========================
As a reminder, Awan was the Youth President of the CIC while its founder, Elmasry, was its head. The CIC is hardly a gigantic organization. it has and had only a handful of permanent staffers, and any reasonable person could draw obvious inferences about whether or not the Youth President of that small organization would have substantial dealings with the President. Though Awan has claimed he was unaware of the antisemitic stances of the CIC, he was its Youth President shortly after Elmasry, as its head, had become nationally infamous for declaring, on television in 2004, that he believed any Israeli civilian over the age of 18 was a valid target for murder while excusing terrorist suicide bombings as "a means to an end."

There was more testimony today that was as plausible as Awan's denial that he was unaware of the antisemitic support for terrorist groups by the CIC, for which he served as a political advocacy organizer. In court today, Awan denied that he was close to Elmasry despite agreeing to introduce his former alleged mentor at a fundraising event for the latter's news magazine website, The Canadian Charger. The fundraiser occurred after Awan READ THE REST

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++

I’ve lost my lawsuit. But I’m going to appeal. Here’s why.

 

By Ezra Levant

November 28, 2014

Stand with Ezra

 

Today I lost the lawsuit against me brought by Khurrum Awan, the former youth president of the Canadian Islamic Congress.

 

You can read the full ruling here. The judge awarded Awan a whopping $80,000 plus legal costs.

 

I am reviewing the technical aspects of the ruling with my lawyer. But there is something terrifying, buried in this ruling, that I already know I simply must appeal — all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary.

 

On paragraph 166 of the decision, the judge ruled that calling Awan an anti-Semite is defamatory, and that’s one of the reasons I lost, and have to pay him so much money.

 

Judge’s decision against Ezra Levant Paragraph 166 photo

But Awan was, at one time, the youth president of the Canadian Islamic Congress, an anti-Semitic organization. At the time Awan was its youth president, the CIC was led by a notorious anti-Semite, Mohamed Elmasry. Elmasry famously went on national TV to state that any adult in Israel is a legitimate target for terrorism. The CIC has publicly called for the legalization of anti-Semitic terrorist groups.

 

And yet the judge ruled that it is defamatory to call the former youth president of an anti-Semitic organization, anti-Semitic. Because he denied it in court, and said he never knew about his organization’s infamous misconduct.

 

This should concern anyone who is worried about radical Islam, the right to criticize it, and the right to call out anti-Semitism in the public square.

 

If this judgment stands, anyone who dares to challenge members of Muslim extremist groups on the basis of their affiliation with such groups is at risk of costly lawsuits — and all the member of the anti-Semitic group needs to do is to deny that they share the beliefs of their organizations that they work hard to promote, or say they had no clue their anti-Semitic group was anti-Semitic.

 

If this ruling is allowed to stand, it will hinder anyone who campaigns against anti-Semitism — any Jewish group, any pro-Israel group, even anyone who criticizes radical Islam.

 

This ruling doesn’t just affect my rights. It’s a setback for freedom for everyone.

 

The comments in question were written on my personal blog six years ago, and so I’m footing the legal bills for this fight myself. The cost of the appeal will surely be at least $30,000 — and I’ve got to come up with that right now. If you share my belief that we cannot let this ruling stand please help me appeal this case now, by clicking here to contribute to my legal costs.

 

Yours gratefully,

 

Ezra Levant

___________________

WHAT! Legal Jihad against Ezra Levant Successful, BUT …

John R. Houk

© December 1, 2014

___________________

The Judgement against Ezra Levant, and Politically Correct Nuttiness

 

World Truth Summit - ELSA, TRUTH SLEUTH

__________________

I’ve lost my lawsuit. But I’m going to appeal. Here’s why.

 

ABOUT Stand with Ezra

 

Send a Cheque

 

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
November 29 2014 7 29 /11 /November /2014 14:11

 

 

Intro to ‘OsamaArshad vs. Dajjal’

John R. Houk
© November 29, 2014
 
In examining some the comment from my blog NCCR I discovered some interchange of dialogue between a Counterjihad writer and a Muslim apologist. The interchange resulted from a cross post ascribed to the pseudonym writer known as Dajjal and the Muslim calling himself OsamaArshad. This Osama dude who so bravely defends Islam while erroneously claiming Muslim assertions that the real Holy Book – the Bible, points to old Mo. When Dajjal shuts him down, Osama calls Dajjal a dreamer propagating deception. AND then this member of the religion of peace challenges Dajjal to a battle to settle is right or wrong. For me that implies a threat of violence. Also interestingly, OsamaArshad does not provide a link as to his identity and that is okay because I set up my comments to hear from dissenters of my posts and cross posts. BUT some of Osama’s comments are linked: http://deleted/.
 
Yeah, if you click that link my browser takes me to a page that says “This webpage is not available”. Underneath that unsurprising message is this message if you click “details”:
 
The server at deleted can't be found, because the DNS lookup failed. DNS is the network service that translates a website's name to its Internet address. This error is most often caused by having no connection to the Internet or a misconfigured network. It can also be caused by an unresponsive DNS server or a firewall preventing Google Chrome from accessing the network.
 
Did you mean http://deleted.com/?
 
Guess what? “Deleted.com” is an actual webpage. BUT I am certain the Muslim so full of integrity – OsamaArshad - did not intend for web-users to go to that page. Here is the top advertising description of that page:
 
Deleted.com is your premier resource for information relating to recovering your lost data, whether it be on your harddrive or on backup media such as CDs. Have you lost important data? Do not worry, there are many invaluable tools available online that are very effective in data recovery and all the quality ones can be found here. We feature product reviews, hints and tips on recovery. Enjoy your stay on deleted.com!
 
Now I can’t tell you if Osama purposefully linked his name to “http://deleted/” or not; however I think it is safe to discern that either Osama had his website, blog or avatar page deleted (probably by WordPress) OR the brave member of the mujjahadeen of Islam fabricated the link for us gullible non-Muslims.
 
The dialogue between OsamaArshad and Dajjal begins with a relatively short sentence from Osama informing Dajjal that the Islamic sources are authentic implying they are beyond reproach. Then the dialogue is off and running.
 
I am going to begin with Osama’s less than truthful assertion about Islam followed by Dajjal’s response followed again with the back and forth. If you wish to read all the comments for the April 12, 2014 post entitled “Let’s Anger CAIR and Offend Muslims by Exposing Them,” simply click the link. Osama and Dajjal’s comments are dated November 25 and since I was a bit annoyed with Osama I interjected some most likely unflattering short rejections of Osama’s assertions. I am not posting my assertions. The comments are cross posted in the order presented by WordPress.
 
The title I am giving them this dialogue is purely from yours truly. I hope it captures the spirit of the dialogue.
 
JRH 11/29/14
*****************************
OsamaArshad vs. Dajjal: Is Islam Evil or Good?
From OsamaArshad & Dajjal
© November 29, 2014
 
 
How gives you right to run propaganda about our religion. Do you even have any prove for what you have published above………

These are all the specimen of your hipocracy…….

You right that Islam was forcefully introduced and spread, Did Muhammad PBUH drew a single drop of blood at the event of Fateh Makha [Blog Editor: Conquest of Mecca – Wikipedia  The Religion of PeaceAnswering Islam].
 
 
By the blessing of Almighty God, my great grandfather had the wisdom to depart from England & Canada and come to Michigan where he and his descendants could enjoy the protection of the Bill of Rights. The first amendment in that document establishes the write of free speech.
 
In a democratic form of government, open and unfettered discussion of public issues is required to maintain liberty.
 
We need and we have the right to expose the evil design, content, intentions and effects of Islam along with National Socialism, Fascism & Communism. And so, by God, we will blessed well continue to do, like this:
 
 

 
 
 
If your consider Islam a lie and it’s peace false then why are the Israeli invading and slaughtering the Muslims of Gaza. O my bad I think it’s Dajjal how said that slaughter those how are not of your opinion. If you think that you are so true -

Bet you don’t have the guts to do that don’t you?

Actual you ppl don’t even know that who you even are... You are the puppets of dajjal……..!!
 
 
Israel was invaded and occupied by slaves of Satan in 638. The Ottoman Empire lost the Levant after fighting on the wrong side in WWI. The Balfour Declaration resulted from a Jew helping England to synthesize nitrates which helped them win the war.
 
Gaza, Judea & Samaria were seized illegally by Jordan and Egypt in ’48. Israel won them back in ’67 when the Muslims tried and failed again to exterminate Israel.
 
Muslims attack, Jews retaliate. Israel should obliterate.
 
Slaughtering those “not of your opinion” defines Islam. In your arrogance and insanity you project your own evil onto your intended victims. The Islamic law of the Hanafi madhab, codified in the second volume of Hedaya, on page 216, is explicit. “Infidelity is an evil which must be removed from the world by Islam or death.” Kindly kiss my ass.
 
 

 
 
 
You ppl are just sitting over there to make a bad impression of Muslims all around the world………….
 
 
The vast majority of Muslims are descended from the early victims, first of deception; the world’s most vicious con game, second & more numerous, from conquest. Their ancestors were either tricked, converted at sword point or converted to get out from under grievous levy of Jizya.
 
The true believers, described in Surah Al-Anfal 1…5, Surah At-Taubah 9.111 & Surah Al-Hujuraat 49.15, are the worst of living creatures; willingly enslaved to Satan and ought rightly to be obliterated.
 
We write to warn our fellow Kaffirs of the existential threat to life, liberty & prosperity posed by Islam.
 
 
You forming your own Hadith does not give any authenticity to it .all the Hadith by prophet Muhammad PBUH are preserved carefully and with great authenticity.
 
 
Seventh century written Arabic was in its infancy, lacking vowels and diacritical marks, it had only consonants, thus it was no more than a memory aid with seven variant readings. Nothing in Islam is reliable or verifiable. The whole ball of turd is hearsay.
 
In my original posts, I cite sources and provide links to those available on the web. Like this:
 
 
 
 
Here’s smthng about dajjal…..
 
Dajjal who is the opposite of the saver Messiah is described as anti-messiah by the Jews. And Dajjal is believed to be killed by the breath of the Messiah.
 
In the Old Testament, Dajjal of the end of time is also mentioned. The evil force of Dajjal who destroys everything, prepares a dreadful plan, but is defeated in the end is mentioned in the book of Ezekiel. (2) Dajjal concept which also takes place in Zechariah and Joel shows itself in Daniel more clearly. Daniel sees him in person with naked eye and pictures a portrait of him. (3) This Dajjal is known as a big sovereign, commander of strong armies, who defeated three kings, and who destroyed temples.
 
Dajjal is especially mentioned in Christianity, too. According to St. Paul, it is one of the religious fundamentals of Christianity to believe in the coming of the Messiah in the end of time.
 
In the New Testament it is told that Dajjal will appear before the second coming of Messiah and will be killed by the breath of Hazrat Eesa (Jesus/Messiah). (4)
 
Dajjal is mentioned as Meshiha Daggala in the Matthew Bible. Meshiha Daggala is clearly mentioned in the Syrian translation of the New Testament. (5)
 
We see in a verse of the Matthew Bible, this is told about the false Messiah:
 
Students of Jesus asked what will be the sign for the end of the world. Jesus replied them: Do not let anyone turn you, because many will come in my name saying I am the Messiah and will lead many astray. And many false prophets will lead many astray, and many others will lose his love because mischief will rise. Only those who withstand until the end will reach salvation. (6)
 
In another verse, those false messiahs are described as to be able to show big omens and wonders. (7)
 
In the first letter of the John Bible, Dajjal is mentioned as antichrist as the opposite of Jesus. (8)

As it is seen, in those verses Dajjal is mentioned as a community rather than a person. However, most of the Catholic theologians agree that it will be a person. (9)
 
 
Messiah Ad-Dajjal is the anti-Muhammad, not the Anti-Christ. In Islamic eschatology, Isa, your pale imitation of Jesus, returns to kill the remnant of Jews & Christians and rule the world by the Koran. Jesus Christ is not a genocidal warlord. He came not to destroy men’s live but to save them. Moe said to the men of Mekkah: “I bring you slaughter.”
 
 
 
 
According to Hindus…….
 
One Hindu research professor, in his stunning book, claims that
description of avatar found in the holy books of Hindu religion is in
fact that of the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.
[Blog Editor: Islamic-Dictionary.com]). A little while ago, in India a fact revealing book has been published, which has been the topic of discussions all over the country. Amazingly, the author of this book is a fair-minded famous professor, who happens to be a Hindu. His name is Pundit Vedaprakash Upadhai and the name of his fact-revealing book is “Kalki Avtar”. The author is a Hindu Brahmin by caste of Bengali origin.

He is a research scholar, a seeker of the truth and a well-known pundit in Allahabad University. After years of research work, he published this book and other eight pundits have endorsed and certified his points of argument as authentic.

According to Hindu belief and their holy books, the description of the guide and the leader, named Kalki Avatar, fits that of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.) of Arabia. Therefore, the Hindus of the whole world should look into this new information not wait any longer for the arrival of Kalki Avatar (the spirit) as he already arrived 1400 years ago. The author produces following sound evidences from the Vedas and other holy books of Hindu religion in support of his claim:

1. In Purana (a holy book of Hindus) it is stated that Kalki Avatar would be the last messenger of god in this world for the guidance of the whole world and all human beings. (According to Islam, prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.) is also considered the last messenger of god in this world who was sent to guide all human beings).

 
2. According to a Hindu religion prediction, the birth of Kalki Avatar, would take place in an isle which again according to Hindu religion is Arab region.

 
3. In books of Hindus, the names of the father and the mother of Kalki Avatar are given as Vishnubhagat and Sumaani respectively. If we examine the meanings of these names we shall come to a very interesting conclusion: take Vishnubhagat, Vishnu (meaning God) + Bhagat (meaning slave) = slave of god Allah (god) + abd (slave in Arabic) = slave of god (Abdullah in Arabic name of Muhammed’s father) Sumaani = peace or calmness Amenah (Arabic) = peace or calmness (name of mother of prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.)

 
4. In religious books of Hindus, it is mentioned that the staple food of Kalki Avatar would be dates and olives and he would be the most honest and truthful person in the region. Without any doubt the prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.) is acclaimed to possess these qualities.

 
5. It is stated in Vedas (holy book of Hindu religion) that the birth of Kalki Avatar would take place in an honorable clan. This perfectly fits the Quraysh where the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.) belonged to.

 
6. God would teach Kalki Avatar through his messenger (angel) in a cave. Allah taught Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.), through is messenger angel Jibraeel (Gabriel) in a cave known as Gaar-e-Hiraa (a cave in Mount Hiraa).

 
7. God would avail Kalki Avatar with a very speedy horse to ride and travel the whole world and the seven skies, indication of Buraaq (horse) and Me’raaj (the night when prophet traveled the seven skies).

 
8. God would also avail Kalki Avatar with divine help. This was particularly proved in the battle of Uhud.

 
9. Another dazzling account given about Kalki Avatar was that he would be born on the 12th of a month. Whereas the prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) was born on the 12th of the Rabiul Awwal (Islamic calendar).

 
10. Kalki Avatar would be an excellent horse rider and a swordsman. The author here draws the attention of Hindus that the real days of horses and swords have gone and the present time is of guns and missiles. In fact, the divine book, Holy Qur’an contains qualities and signs attributed to Kalki Avatar reflecting on the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.).

 
These facts are verified and supported by the eight eminent pundits. What the author and the eight other eminent pundits say is that the Hindus who are still anxiously awaiting the arrival of Kalki Avatar are simply subjecting themselves to a never ending pain. Because such a great messenger has come and departed from this world fourteen centuries ago.
 
 
Allah Almighty says in Holy Quran
 
“… Those who follow the Messenger, the Immaculate One, whom they find mentioned in the Torah and the Gospel which are with them.” Al-Quran 7:158)
 
No doubt there are many prophecies regarding the advent of the Holy Prophet Muhammad in the Bible, but in the above quoted Quranic verse, the Torah and the Gospels are especially mentioned; because Moses and Jesus were prominent figures among all Israelite prophets.

Muslims look upon the source of Bible as holy and divine and its medium as truthful men. And here is a verse of Al-Quran which confirms this statement:
 
” Say ye: We believe in Allah and what has been revealed to us, and what was revealed to Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac, and Jacob, and his children, and what was given to Moses and Jesus, and what was given to all other prophets from their Lord. We make no difference between any of them; and to Him we submit ourselves.” (Al Quran 2:137)
 
Of course, Muslims regard the Christian Scriptures as interpolated, but interpolation still implies retention of some original truths.

The principle that the Holy Prophet Muhammad testifies to the truth of all previous revelations, furnishes a strong foundation for harmony between the various religions of the world, as well as for the unity of the human race. The fact that all of the foregoing prophets testify to the truth of Prophet Muhammad constitutes a yet stronger testimony to the truth of Islam and the Unity of religions.
 
Moses prophesied about Hadhrat Muhammad.
 
In Deuteronomy 18:17-19, Moses prophesied:
 
“And the Lord said unto me. They have well spoken that which they have spoken, I will raise them up a prophet from among their brethren like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him.”

The foretold prophet in this prophecy was not Jesus Christ, nor any other Israelite prophet, because none of them ever claimed to be the prophet promised here. We read in the Gospel of John (1:19-21) that in the time of Jesus, the Jews were expecting the advent of three prophets. Firstly Elias, secondly Christ, thirdly a prophet of such universal fame that in his case no other specification was thought necessary. “The Prophet” was enough to convey what was meant. Jesus claimed to be the Christ and he regarded John the Baptist as Elias (Matthew 11:14, 17:10-13). Further, he prophesied about his second advent in the last days when true faith would disappear from the earth (Luke 18:8).
 
 
Your quote of 7.158 is bogus. Here is a link to the real thing, word by word Arabic/English. http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=7&verse=158.
 
Kauthar is not named in the Bible, he is mentioned only generically as a false prophet. That unrepentent sinner was unworthy of the title of respect he bestowed upon himself. Henceforth in my responses to you I will refer to him as Moe.
 
Moe is not the comforter mentioned by Jesus. The comforter is the Holy Spirit; Moe was unholy flesh. 15If you love Me, you will keep My commandments. 16I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever; 17that is the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see Him or know Him, but you know Him because He abides with you and will be in you .… http://biblehub.com/john/14-16.htm
 
The Prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy could not be an Arab, he must be a Jew to be one of their brethren: Jesus Christ!
 
 
You ppl say and I quote “PLEASE WAKE UP” brother it’s actually you who has fallen asleep and wondered off in to your dreams of deception.
 
 
So Mr. “WHO EVER YOU ARE” why don’t you come and battle this argument…….
____________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Text or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.
Most of OsamaArshad’s text was unedited to preserve his tone however there was some spell changes I could not resist to accomplish.
 
© OsamaArshad and Dajjal
Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
November 24 2014 2 24 /11 /November /2014 17:42

 

Dajjal explores the concept that Mohammed was demonized or demonic. Since it is my firm belief that Islam is a specifically an antichrist religion I concur that there was some kind of demon activity in Mo’s life. Dajjal provides the facts.

 

JRH 11/24’14

******************************

Islam Is Demonic

 

Dajjal

Nov 2, 2014 at 8:36 PM

 

[Dajjal Editor: Originally posted to FB, now updated with typos and spelling fixed, plus another quote from Ishaq. Please reblog this.  Snooper’s blog - Freedom Ain’t Free and Take our Country: Islam: Divine or Demonic?]

 

You will not frequently find an assertion so well proven from Islam's canonical texts. Taken together, the quotes used in this post expose the true identity of Allah and character of his Profit.
 

Unlike my usual rants, this post is entirely free of profanity and obscenity. 

This post exhibits evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that:

 

  • Muhammad, aka. Moe had a devil

 

  • Moe was demon possessed

 

  • Allah is Satan.

   

The evidence is found in the canonical texts of Islam: Qur'an, hadith & Sira which are quoted and linked so that you can verify the quotes and examine their context. [Emphasis added for clarity.]
  

When Moe had his hallucination in the cave at Hira, he feared for his probity and sanity. There is some interesting information in Abu 'Abd Allah Muhammad Ibn Sa'd Ibn Mani' al-Zuhri al-Basrí KITAB AL-TABAQAT AL-KABIR.

Moe reported strange perceptions and feared he was becoming a sooth-sayer.

 

Moe: Insane

 

Volume 1, Parts 1.45.4
http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.45.4

 

'Affan Ibn Muslim informed us: Hammad Ibn Salamah informed us on the authority of Hisham Ibn 'Urwah, he on the authority of 'Urwah: Verily, the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, said:


0 Khadijah, I see light and hear sounds and I fear I shall be a sooth-sayer. She said:


Verily, Allah will not do it with you, 0 son of `Abd Allah. Verily, you speak the truth, return things entrusted to you and fulfil (obligations of) relationship.


He feared that he was losing his sanity.

 

Volume 1, Parts 1.45.5
http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.45.5

Yahya 1bn Abbad and `Affan Ibn Muslim informed us; they said: Hammad Ibn Salamah informed us; he said: Ammar Ibn Abi `Ammar informed us; (variation) Yahya Ibn `Abbád (only) said: Hammad Ibn Salamah said: I think (he narrated) on the authority of Ibn `Abbas:


Verily, the Prophet, may Allah bless him, said: O Khadijah I hear sounds and see light and I fear I am mad. She said: 0 son of `Abd Allah! Allah will not do it with you. Then she approached Waraqah Ibn Nawfal and related (the incident) to him. He said: If he is true, then he is nomos as in the case of Moses. If I am alive, when he is commissioned (to prophethood) I shall support him, help him and believe in him.

 

Moe Was Suicidal

   

When the revelations were interrupted for a time, Moe became suicidal, intending to throw himself from a peak.

 

Volume 1, Parts 1.46.3
http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.46.3


Muhammad Ibn `Umar informed us; he said: Ibrahim [P. 131] lbn Muhammad lbn Abi Musa related to me on the authority of Dawud Ibn al-Husayn, he on the authority of Ibn Ghatfan Ibn Tarif, he on the authority of Ibn 'Abbas:


Verily, after the first revelation to the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, that came at Hira, it (the coming of revelations) remained suspended for a few days; since he did not see Gabriel, he was much grieved; he went to Thabir and at another time to Hïra with the intention of throwing himself down. When the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, was intending to do this from one of these mountains he heard a sound coming from the heaven. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, paused for a moment because of the thunderous sound, then he raised his head and lo! it was Gabriel seated in a chair between the earth and the sky. He was saying: 0 Muhammad! Thou art surely the Apostle of Allah, and I am Gabriel. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, returned, and Allah had cooled his eye and strengthened his heart; then revelations followed one after the other.

 

Is Jibrael An Angel?

   

 Concerning Jibrael, how many wings do angels have?

 

35:1. All the praises and thanks be to Allâh, the (only) Originator [or the (only) Creator] of the heavens and the earth, Who made the angels messengers with wings, - two or three or four. He increases in creation what He wills. Verily, Allâh is Able to do all things. http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/35/1/default.htm

 

Consider for a moment the consequence of an odd number of wings: imbalance. Controlled, stable flight would be difficult. How many wings does Jibrael have?

 

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 455:
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/bukhari/004.054.455.html

 

Narrated Abu Ishaq-Ash-Shaibani:

I asked Zir bin Hubaish regarding the Statement of Allah: "And was at a distance Of but two bow-lengths Or (even) nearer; So did (Allah) convey The Inspiration to His slave (Gabriel) and then he (Gabriel) Conveyed (that to Muhammad). (53.9-10) On that, Zir said, "Ibn Mas'ud informed us that the Prophet had seen Gabriel having 600 wings."

 

Was Jibrael Real?

   

Angels have 2, 3 or 4 wings, but Jibrael had 600. Is Jibil really a divine angel?  Was Jibrael objective or subjective, did others see him or was Moe the only one?

 

Sahih Muslim Book 031, Number 5997:
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/031.5997.html
'A'isha, the wife of Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him), reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: 'A'isha, here is Gabriel offering you greetings. She said: 1 made a reply: Let there be peace and blessings of Allah upon him, and added: He sees what I do not see.

 

Revelations

   

How did Moe receive his revelations?  In dreams, a voice or a bell.  A dream could be spontaneous or divinely or demoniacally inspired. Hearing a disembodied voice or an invisible friend could be auditory hallucination. What of the bell?

 

Hell's Bell

   

Prior to the invention of Morse Code, the bell could not communicate complex information.  The bell is mentioned in hadith as Satan's musical instrument, accompanied by a devil and repellent to angels.  How then is it possible that Jibrael, averse to bells, communicated Allah's revelations through the musical instrument of Satan?  The revelations must be demonic, not divine.

 

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 1, Number 2:
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/bukhari/001.001.002.html


Narrated 'Aisha:

(the mother of the faithful believers) Al-Harith bin Hisham asked Allah's Apostle "O Allah's Apostle! How is the Divine Inspiration revealed to you?" Allah's Apostle replied, "Sometimes it is (revealed) like the ringing of a bell, this form of Inspiration is the hardest of all and then this state passes ' off after I have grasped what is inspired. Sometimes the Angel comes in the form of a man and talks to me and I grasp whatever he says." 'Aisha added: Verily I saw the Prophet being inspired Divinely on a very cold day and noticed the Sweat dropping from his forehead (as the Inspiration was over).

 

Sahihy Muslim Book 024, Number 5277:
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/024.5277.html


Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Angels do not accompany the travellers who have with them a dog and a bell.

 

 

Sahih Muslim Book 024, Number 5279:
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/024.5279.html

 

Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The bell is the musical instrument of the Satan.

 

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 34, Number 4218:
Narrated Umar ibn al-Khattab:

Ibn az-Zubayr told that a woman client of theirs took az-Zubayr's daughter to Umar ibn al-Khattab wearing bells on her legs. Umar cut them off and said that he had heard the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) say: There is a devil along with each bell.

 

Denial

   

Moe's critics among the disbelievers said that he was a mad poet or sorcerer. Allah mentions them in the Qur'an.  Why did Allah see a need to raise the issue in his revelation?

 

http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/10/2/default.htm
10:2. Is it wonder for mankind that We have sent Our Inspiration to a man from among themselves (i.e. Prophet Muhammad ) (saying): "Warn mankind (of the coming torment in Hell), and give good news to those who believe (in the Oneness of Allâh and in His Prophet Muhammad ) that they shall have with their Lord the rewards of their good deeds?" (But) the disbelievers say: "This is indeed an evident sorcerer (i.e. Prophet Muhammad and the Qur'ân)!

 

http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/21/112/default.htm
21:112. He (Muhammad) said: “My Lord! Judge You in truth! Our Lord is the Most Beneficent, Whose Help is to be sought against that which you attribute (unto Allâh that He has offspring, and unto Muhammad that he is a sorcerer, and unto the Qur'ân that it is poetry, etc.)!"

 

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/069-qmt.php#069.040

 

69:40. That this is verily the word of an honoured Messenger [i.e. Jibrael (Gabriel) or Muhammad which he has brought from Allâh].

 

69:41. It is not the word of a poet, little is that you believe!

 

69:42. Nor is it the word of a soothsayer (or a foreteller), little is that you remember!

 

69:43. This is the Revelation sent down from the Lord of the 'Alamin (mankind, jinns and all that exists).

 

69:44. And if he (Muhammad) had forged a false saying concerning Us (Allâh),

 

69:45. We surely should have seized him by his right hand (or with power and might),

 

69:46. And then certainly should have cut off his life artery (Aorta),

 

69:47. And none of you could withhold Us from (punishing) him.

 

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/081-qmt.php#081.022


81:22. And (O people) your companion (Muhammad is not a madman;

81:23. And indeed he (Muhammad  saw him [Jibrael (Gabriel)] in the clear horizon (towards the east).

81:24. And he (Muhammad withholds not a knowledge of the unseen.

81:25. And it (the Qur'ân) is not the word of the outcast Shaitân (Satan).

 

Possessed

   

Was Moe demon possessed? Is there any evidence in the Qur'an or hadith?  Moe's aunt had a clue.  His foster mother, Halima thought he was.

 

Your Lord = Your Satan!

 

http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/bukhari/006.060.475.html
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 475:

Narrated Jundub bin Sufyan:

Once Allah's Apostle became sick and could not offer his night prayer (Tahajjud) for two or three nights. Then a lady (the wife of Abu Lahab) came and said, "O Muhammad! I think that your Satan has forsaken you, for I have not seen him with you for two or three nights!" On that Allah revealed:

'By the fore-noon, and by the night when it darkens, your Lord (O Muhammad) has neither forsaken you, nor hated you.' (93.1-3)
http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/093-qmt.php#093.001

 

Halima's fear

 

Source: Ishaq: "The Life of Muhammad", pg. 72. Click image for context. 

Aisha's devil made her jealous of Moe but Moe was safe from his devil.

 

http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/039.6759.html

 

Sahih Muslim Book 039, Number 6759:

 

A'isha the wife of Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him), reported that one day Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) came out of her (apartment) during the night and she felt jealous. Then he came and he saw me (in what agitated state of mind) I was. He said: A'isha, what has happened to you? Do you feel jealous? Thereupon she said: How can it he (that a woman like me) should not feel jealous in regard to a husband like you. Thereupon Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: It was your devil who had come to you, and she said: Allah's Messenger, is there along with me a devil? He said: Yes. I said: Is devil attached to everyone? He said: Yes. I (Aisha) again said: Allah's Messenger, is it with you also? He said: Yes, but my Lord has helped me against him and as such I am absolutely safe from his mischief.

   

Moe had a devil who only gave him good commands!

 

http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/039.6757.html
Sahih Muslim Book 039, Number 6757

:

Abdullah b. Mas'ud reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: There is none amongst you with whom is not an attache from amongst the jinn (devil). They (the Companions) said: Allah's Messenger, with you too? Thereupon he said: Yes, but Allah helps me against him and so I am safe from his hand and he does not command me but for good.

 

To whom did Moe pray, and what did he pray for?  Moe preyed upon weaker people, as at Badr, where he supposed that Allah would give him the Meccan caravan as a prey. Read about it in "The Life of Muhammad" on page 289.
http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n167/mode/1up

Moe prayed for the conquest of the wealthiest fort at Khaybar for the provision of his destitute companions. Ishaq reveals it on page 512.
http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n280/mode/1up

Full comprehension of the Ishaq quote which follows requires having Surah Al-Anfal 8.67 fresh in mind. Moe wanted "the good of this world" meaning extortion & plunder.

 

http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/8/67/default.htm
8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.


When we open "The Life of Muhammad" to page 510 beginning with the last paragraph, continuing through the first paragraph on 511, we learn that before every ghazwat, Moe prayed to the "Lord of the devils" for the worldly goods of the town and its people to be delivered into his hands.

 

'0 God, Lord of the heavens and what they o'ershadow
And Lord of the lands and what they make to grow
And Lord of the devils and what into error they throw
And Lord of the winds and what they winnow,
we ask Thee for the good of this town and the good of its people and the
good of what is in it, and we take refuge in Thee from its evil end the evil
of Its people and the evil that is in it. Forward m the name of Allah' He
used to say that of every town he entered.
http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n279/mode/1up

 

Allah: Lord of the Devils

   

Who is lord of the devils but Satan?  That is who Moe directed his salat to and he prayed for plunder and protection from possible counter attack. 

Can you connect the dots? Moe had a devil who only gave him good commands and he prayed to the lord of the devils.   He received revelations through Satan's musical instrument, which repels angels and is accompanied by a devil.  On mention of Moe's devil deserting him, Allah revealed a new verse denying it. Allah has another clue for you.

 

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/022-qmt.php#022.052
22:52. Never did We send a Messenger or a Prophet before you, but; when he did recite the revelation or narrated or spoke, Shaitân (Satan) threw (some falsehood) in it. But Allâh abolishes that which Shaitân (Satan) throws in. Then Allâh establishes His Revelations. And Allâh is All-Knower, All-Wise:

22:53. That He (Allâh) may make what is thrown in by Shaitân (Satan) a trial for those in whose hearts is a disease (of hypocrisy and disbelief) and whose hearts are hardened. And certainly, the Zalimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers, etc.) are in an opposition far-off (from the truth against Allâh's Messenger and the believers).

 

Do you see the contradiction between those two verses?  Allah lets Satan introduce falsehood but Allah abolishes it... as a trial for the hypocrites and disbelievers.  What did Satan throw in? What did Allah abolish?  How was any disbeliever to know about it after Allah abrogated it??

 

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/053-qmt.php#053.019
53:19. Have you then considered Al-Lât, and Al-'Uzza (two idols of the pagan Arabs)

53:20. And Manât (another idol of the pagan Arabs), the other third?

53:21. Is it for you the males and for Him the females?

53:22. That indeed is a division most unfair!

53:23. They are but names which you have named, you and your fathers, for which Allâh has sent down no authority. They follow but a guess and that which they themselves desire, whereas there has surely come to them the Guidance from their Lord!

53:24. Or shall man have what he wishes?

53:25. But to Allâh belongs the last (Hereafter) and the first (the world).

 

Satanic Verses

   

Why did Allah need to abolish intercession by his daughters???  The Satanic Verses begin on page 165 of Ishaq.
http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n105/mode/1up
For the quote and commentary of Al-Tabari, Vol. 6, pp. 107-112, go to Wikiislam.
http://wikiislam.net/wiki/The_History_of_al-Tabari#Volume_VI:_Muhammad_at_Mecca

 

Ibn Sa'd, Tabari and Muir follow Ishaq. It is easier to select text from Ibn Sa'd, so I quote from "Kitab al Tabaqat al Kabir".

http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.51.1
Volume 1, Parts 1.51.1

 

Muhammad Ibn `Umar informed us; he said: Yunus Ibn Muhammad Ibn Fudalah al-Zafari related to me on the authority of his father; (second chain) he (Ibn Sa'd) said: Kathir Ibn Zayd related to me on the authority of al-Muttalib Ibn 'Abd Allah Ibn Hantab; they said:


The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, had seen his people departing from him. He was one day sitting alone when he expressed a desire: I wish, Allah had not revealed to me anything distasteful to them. Then the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, approached them (Quraysh) and got close to them, and they also came near to him. One day he was sitting in their assembly near the Ka`bah, and he recited: "By the Star when it setteth", (Qur'an, 53:1) till he reached, "Have ye thought upon Al-Uzza and Manat, the third, the other". (Qur'an, 53:19-20) Satan made him repeat these two phrases: These idols are high and their intercession is expected. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, repeated them, and he went on reciting the whole surah and then fell in prostration, and the people also fell in prostration with him. Al-Walid Ibn al-Mughirah, who was an old man and could not prostrate, took a handful of dust to his forehead and prostrated on it. It is said: Abu Uhayhah Sa'id Ibn al-'As, being an old man, took dust and prostrated on it. Some people say: It was al-Walid who took the dust; others say: It was Abu Uhayhah; while others say: Both did it. They were pleased with what the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, had uttered. They said: We know that Allah gives life and causes] death. He creates and gives us provisions, but our deities will intercede with Him, and in what you have assigned to them, we are with you. These words pricked the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him. He was sitting in his house and when it was evening, Gabriel, may peace be on him, came to him and revised the surah. Then Gabriel said: Did I bring these two phrases. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, said: I ascribed to Allah, what He had not said.


Then Allah revealed to him: "And they indeed strove hard to beguile thee (Muhammad) away from that wherewith We have inspired thee, that thou shouldst invent other than it against Us; and then would they have accepted thee as a friend. And if We had not made thee wholly firm thou mightest almost have inclined unto them a little.
 

Then had We made thee taste a double (punishment) of living and a double (punishment) of dying then hadst thou found no helper against Us. (Al-Qur'an, 17:73-75. This narration is not acceptable, because none of the first narrators is a Companion. For a detailed discussion see Shibli, Sirat al-Nabi, 1st edition, p. 176)

 

Moe was desperate for recruits. He wished that Allah had not revealed anything displeasing to the pagans of Mecca, so he allowed Satan to interject some verses of his own which the Meccans approved. Yeah, right.
 

Review 8.67 quoted above; what does Allah want as the price of Moe's admission to his celestial bordello? "Great slaughter".  Who seeks the genocide of the human race, God or Satan?  Who runs a carnal house, God or Satan? Allahu Shaytan!!!
 

If you doubt that Jannah is a carnal house, read Surah An-Naba’! See also Surah Al-Baqarah


http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/078-qmt.php#078.031


http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/2/25/default.htm

If any doubt remains, go to Book 41 of Tirmidhi for the details of Paradise.
http://ia600509.us.archive.org/22/items/JamiaTirmidhiSunanAl-tirmidhi/16768046-Jami-a-Tirmidhi-Sunan-alTirmidhi.pdf#page=1242

 

Wives from the Fire

   

Wait a minute! Muslims only get 2 Houris in Jannah, what of the 70?  Who but Satan would take Jews and Christians out of the fire for Muslims to screw eternally???  If you go to Hell, some blessed Muslim will screw your widow for eternity.  This is a weak hadith, but the fact that a scholar included it in his sunan speaks volumes about Allah's character.

 

Sunan Ibn Majah 5.423
http://www.archive.org/download/SunanIbnMajah5Vol.Set/Sunan-Ibn-Majah-Volume-5-English.pdf#page=423
4337. It was narrated from Abu
Umhah that the Messenger of
Allah said: "There is no one
whom Allah will admit to
Paradise but Allah will marry him
to seventy-two wives, two from
houris and seventy from his inheritance
from the people of Hell,
all of whom will have desirable front passages
and he will have a male member that
never becomes flaccid (i.e., soft and limp)."' (Da'if)
Hisham bin Khalid said: "From
his inheritance from the people of,
Hell" means: "Men who enter
Hell, and the people of Paradise
will inherit their wives, just as the, -
wife of Pharaoh will be inherited."

 

Rescue from Hell

   

What could be more demonic than giving your widow to a Muslim as a sex slave?  Exchanging you for a damned Muslim; you burn in his place. This is a sahih hadith: its authentic.  Allah will take Muslims from the fire and replace them with Jews and Christians.   Allahu Shaytan!!!!

 

http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/037.6665.html
Sahih MuslimBook 037, Number 6665: 

Abu Musa' reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: When it will be the Day of Resurrection Allah would deliver to every Muslim a Jew or a Christian and say: That is your rescue from Hell-Fire.

 

________________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Dajjal has assured me that all the spelling was been tweaked; nonetheless a simple spellcheck demonstrated a few simple grammatical typos. I allowed spellcheck to correct these. Other than this nothing has been changed from the original especially in Dajjal’s Arabic spellings or quotations.

 

© Dajjal
 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
November 22 2014 7 22 /11 /November /2014 16:15

 

Qaiser Ayub is a Pakistani Christian. From what I have been able to decipher is he is an educated man which seems to be relatively rare among the Christian minority of Pakistan.  According to Shamim Masih he has a MA in Computer Science. Apparently back in 2011 on a blog he operated he is accused of writing or depicting the false prophet Mohammed in unflattering terms. In case you have been hiding under a rock that is illegal in Pakistan and the entire Muslim world for that matter. In Pakistan Christians are accused of some kind of illegal blasphemy acts all the time and most often they are falsely accused as a matter of spite by Sunni Muslims.

 

In the case of Qaiser Ayub who was actually a Pakistan college professor, I have to wonder what the reason was for sticking around Pakistan since 2011 with a blasphemy infraction hanging over his head. At any rate the blasphemy charge caught up with him a few days ago and was arrested in Lahore. Shamim Masih writes that that Sohail Johnson – the Chairman of the Christian organization SLMP is in Qaiser’s corner. In trying to find some background on the incident I also discovered that Sardar Mushtaq Gill – the National Director of the Christian organization Legal Evangelical Association Development (LEAD) is in Qaiser’s corner.

 

Pakistani Christian and civil rights organizations too often compete for foreign funding. I pray Qaiser’s case is one in which both the SLMP and the LEAD are working together to combat the blasphemy charge against Qaiser Ayub.

 

JRH 11/22/14

*******************************

Qaiser Ayub, Held Over Blasphemy Allegation Sent to Jail

 

By Shamim Masih

Sent: 11/20/2014 9:00 PM

 

ISLAMABAD: After a week of the burning of Christian couple to death in Kot Radha Kishan, Punjab police have arrested Qaiser Ayub, 40 a blogger, from Lahore over an alleged act of blasphemy. According to the sources, a Christian man, holding a Master’s degree in computer sciences, used a website to make blasphemous remarks. [He was booked under the Pakistan Blasphemy Law.] Sources told that a Christian man was alleged [to use] derogatory language against the Holy Prophet in his blogs.

 

Mohammad Saeed, complained and filed an application in [the] city Police Station against the accused and [the] case was registered First Investigation Report (FIR) no. 105/11 under section 295-C in PS. Talagan, Dist. Chakwal. The accused went into hiding after the registration of the FIR against him for a couple of years. On 14 November, 2014, Chakwal police arrested him from Lahore and presented him in the court on 15 November in Talagang. According to the police the FIR was registered on June 9, 2011 and the man was arrested after three and half years.

 

According to police officials, Qaiser is alleged of drawing sketches against Islam on his blogs.

  

According to Sohail Johnson, chairman Sharing Life Ministry Pakistan (SLMP), the family of Qaiser Ayub, his wife Amina Bibi and three children are in safe custody. SLMP will be taking care of his family and his case as well. The organization is arranging legal assistance for his case.

 

Sources confirmed Jabbar Hussian – SP Rawalpindi range is appointed to investigate the case. Qaiser Ayub is shifted to jail for his judicial investigation. [Again] sources confirmed the Police is trying to hide the secret of the case investigation and requested the media people to keep it in a low profile.

 

Be Blessed,

Shamim Masih

 

Diplomatic Correspondent, Foreign Policy, Diplomacy, UN, F & S, MOST, CADD & Human Rights Activist

 

Daily Khabrian – in Urdu (PakBiz.com description – in English) & Channel - 5 (A project of Khabrian Group of papers)

 

For Americans especially, I have discovered the best way to donate to Shamim Masih is via Western Union sending this LINK to a Western Union agent in Islamabad. Include Shamim’s phone - +92-300-642-4560

__________________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Shamim Masih

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Christianity Counterjihad
write a comment
November 21 2014 6 21 /11 /November /2014 10:27

Robert Wakefield shared the below Youtube education moment on Islam as a comment to the Stop islamization of America Facebook Group sharing of my blog post “Fire is Still Burning” written by Shamim Masih. Since Shamim was reporting on crazy Pakistani Muslims burning a Christian husband and wife to death under false accusation of blasphemy promoted by a local Mullah from the Mosque loudspeakers, this video pertaining to Islam should be an eye opener.

 

 

JRH 11/21/14

*****************************

VIDEO: Three things you (probably) don't know about Islam

 

 

Published by mattluvsrush1

Published: Sep 4, 2010

 

Three Things You Should Know About Islam by http://www.youtube.com/TheWhiteR0ses

Three surprising things you probably didn't know about Islam and the Quran. This subject may affect you in the near future, so take the chance to inform yourself now - before it does.

 

##

 

Parts of the text have been strongly inspired by the website


• http://www.citizenwarrior.com

• Qu'ran online: http://quran.com/9/29

 

• Abrogations: http://muhammadanism.com/Quran/abrogation_koran.pdf
 

• Sharia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM4ODj... – Broken Link
 

• Taqiyya: http://en.wikipedia.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya

 

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Qur...

 

[Blog Editor: The Religion of Peace link above is broken, but I have found two links that mattlubrush1 might be referring to:

 

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/024-hell-and-hate.htm

 

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm]

 

##

 

Islam (Arabic: الإسلام‎ al-'islām, pronounced [ʔislæːm] is the monotheistic religion articulated by the Qur'an, a text considered by its adherents to be the verbatim word of the one, incomparable God (Arabic: الله‎, Allāh), and by the Prophet of Islam Muhammad's teachings and normative example (in Arabic called the Sunnah, demonstrated in collections of Hadith). Islam literally means "submission (to God)." Muslim, the word for an adherent of Islam, is the active participle of the same verb of which Islām is the infinitive.

Muslims regard their religion as the completed and universal version of a primordial, monotheistic faith revealed at many times and places before, including, notably, to the prophets Abraham, Moses and Jesus. Islamic tradition holds that previous messages and revelations have been changed and distorted over time. Religious practices include the Five Pillars of Islam, which are five obligatory acts of worship. Islamic law (Arabic: شريعة Šarīʿah) touches on virtually every aspect of life and society, encompassing everything from banking and warfare to welfare and the environment.

The majority of Muslims belong to one of two denominations, the Sunni and the Shi'a. Islam is the predominant religion in the Middle East, North Africa, and large parts of Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Sizable communities are also found in China and Russia, and parts of the Caribbean. About 13% of Muslims live in Indonesia, the largest Muslim country, 31% in the Indian Subcontinent, and 20% in Arab countries. Converts and immigrant communities are found in almost every part of the world. With approximately 1.57 billion Muslims comprising about 23% of the world's population, Islam is the second-largest religion in the world and arguably the fastest growing religion in the world.

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam

 

_________________________________

Blog Editor: The Youtube Channel mattluvrush1 has a fascinating about page which I will enjoy to share here:

 

They say stupid s**t... I just hold the mirror!

 

On this channel we discuss:

 

-Politics

 

-Religion

 

-Comedy

 

Anyone who has come here or to my videos to troll, will have their comments removed, unless they're just too funny and I feel like making fun of you! I will not hesitate to block someone who consistently demonstrates a lack of social skills. I do it not only for myself, but also for those wishing to discuss issues in an adult manner.

 

I don't mind intelligent opposing opinions. I encourage you to share yours with me. I am always open to learning something new! I enjoy the thrill of a good debate, but who doesn't? That's why we're all here!

 

If I made a video about you...

 

I apologize that you feel no one should disagree with your position(s). You are certainly entitled to your opinion, I would appreciate the same courtesy. Please understand that I had good reasons for making the video. There must be some glaring flaw in your ideology, or I wouldn't have bothered. If you watch the entire video, and do a little research, you'll see why I made the video. I don't have a big head or anything, but I know what I got.

 

If you're just another free thinking intellectual you're welcome here anytime, so long as you play fair! Intellectual honesty, and integrity will win you a lot of points with me. Even if we don't agree, I'll respect your position, providing it is not bigoted.

 

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
November 20 2014 5 20 /11 /November /2014 14:41

 

I am a member of the Facebook Group Stop Islam. Another member there found a Bret Harte article at the Facebook Group Australophobia. Just to be clear I am an American and not Australian; nonetheless there is a growing controversy in the Land Down Under that could creep its way into the USA. That Controversy is centered on legally forcing food packing or distribution companies to pay a fee to a certified Muslim who then gives the “halal” stamp of approval that notifies Muslims that the food is certified A-OK to consume according to Sharia. IN ESSENCE this would force various Aussie companies to pay the jizya tax for Muslim certification in which the fees would trickle into some Muslim theopolitical agenda (whether that be Mosque building, Muslim charity [Can you say terrorist funding?] and so on).

 

Australia’s controversy today will probably be America’s controversy tomorrow. I mean Radical Muslims are preaching in the National Cathedral in Washington DC.

 

My first inkling was to cross post this directly from Stop Islam; however it became apparent to me that the Facebook postings were without Mr. Harte’s links he included in his original post. So thanks to the old Google search engine I found a version at an Aussie location called Morning Mail dated 11/13/14. I included the original links from there. Take note that the Stop Islam version also has some of the Morning Mail comments at the end of the post. Those comments are currently longer than the Stop Islam version. I am not providing the comment links from the original. Also note the English grammar of the Aussies is similar to the British hence there are some spelling deviations from the grammar rules found in America.

 

JRH 11/20/14

***************************

Jizya Opposition to halal is irrational, is it?
Exclusive
Bret Harte

Paula Wells shared Australophobia's post.

November 15 at 11:42pm

Stop Islam Closed Facebook Group

 

The craven halal-paying companies are striking back. Australians who oppose halal are prejudiced, ignorant, misinformed, extremists and inspired by hate, they say.


The Dairy Farmers Association talks of “irrational bullying campaigns” and urges members to go ahead and pay the halal levy.


So does South Australia’s Investment and Trade Minister, Martin Hamilton-Smith. He urged local exporters to “keep working” with the multi-million-dollar Middle Eastern market. “I encourage South Australian exporters to put enterprise and job opportunities ahead of the extreme views of a minority… prejudice has no place in Australia.”


And as for the cloth-head halal supporter, Darren Chester MP of the Nationals, he is more than a supporter of it, he is an apologist for it. In his own words, “The decision by a food company to meet halal requirements is a voluntary decision.” What? All these Australian companies suddenly voluntarily agreed to pay a religious tax? Chester is either pig-ignorant or is deliberately misinforming those who write to him.


So are Australians prejudiced, ignorant, misinformed, hate-inspired extremists?


Let’s start with the Jizya.


Muhammad very clearly established that people of other religions have to pay a tax – the jizya – to Muslims as a reminder of their inferior status.


It is specifically laid down in the Muslim Holy Book: “Fight those who believe not in Allah… until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” Qur’an (9:29)


This is not some out-of-date old notion from the 8th century. The jizya is commanded by Allah himself. It is an obligation on all Muslims. But it is an obligation which actually coins money for them and as such one which has been enthusiastically endorsed by them.


The extortion has been followed through the centuries and was a part of the brutal Ottoman rule over Christians, Jews and others. The Serbs of Europe often had to hand over their children to satisfy the collector of the jizya. The children were converted to Islam and trained in jihad as warriors (Janissaries [Link]). This was the Devşirme [Link and Link] system.


In India, well into the 17th century, Muslim jizya collectors would even take the wives and children of impoverished Hindus and sell them into slavery for the jizya requirement.


This is why Islamic purists such as Hamas and the Taliban wish to reinstate the jizya.


The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt have it as part of their current policy that Christians must pay a jizya and an Egyptian cleric on al-Hafaz TV said in 2013 that America that Muslims should demand more money as jizya from the Americans so that, in his words, “we can leave them alone.”


The notorious British Muslim preacher, Anjem Choudary, points out that “the normal situation is for [Muslims] to take money from the kuffar” (kuffars are non-muslims and is a term of contempt.) This cookie, by the way has been associated with around 20% of all convicted terrorism cases in the UK over the past 10 years, says he wants a passport to join ISIS, according to The Times.


The first thing ISIS does right now is impose jizya. The rounding up of women and selling them in the markets is one way how they collect the jizya. It is sanctioned by the ISIS Mullahs. Hamas has the same idea.


So the obligation is current, and it is no grand leap to see the halal levy as one way the jizya is paid. Under a masquerade of the thinnest kind a certifier decides that no pig fat was used anywhere in the production. They even certify water!


Muslims make no bones about it. Halal certification is a gold mine. They use this very phrase – a gold mine – in the Indonesian Jakarta Post. [Click on this link for a detailed look at Muslim enforcement of halal]


Now, it really does not matter how the money collected is disbursed – the very fact that it is collected at all is Australian’s acceptance of an inferior status to Muslims. This is why it is collected – to make Australians feel subdued At present, in Australia, it supposedly goes to charity.


Let’s assume it does.


What charity?


What are the objects of Muslim charity? Well, laid down as top of the list of charitable objects is building mosques. It is called Waqf.


Is that clear enough?


The money that Australian companies pays to Muslims as halal certification is used for the building of mosques.


And on the list of charitable objects is the support of jihad warriors.


Nowhere on the list is any non-Muslim objective, not one cent goes to the Royal Blind Society or the RSPCA or Vinnies [St. Vincent de Paul Society]. It is raised from Australian citizens to go to Muslim-only causes.


And in spite of all the poppycock talked about inspection by government authorities – there is none.


No Australian with an ounce of pride would pay the halal extortion.


But many Australian companies have no sense of national pride or honour; they are gutless appeasers of Islam following a buck. Literally they sell Australia’s soul for their profit.


And so too, do the ‘economic rationalists’ in Canberra.


* “During a roundtable discussion on U.S. and foreign aid to Egypt, an Islamic cleric, clearly of the Salafi bent—he had their trademark mustache-less-beard—insisted that the U.S. must be treated contemptuously, like a downtrodden dhimmi, or conquered infidel; that Egypt must make the U.S. conform to its own demands; and that, then, all the money the U.S. offers to Egypt in foreign aid can be taken as rightfully earned jizya.”


Source
Share this:


Email


{8 comments… add one}


Likeatreat


One thing I do know is that we are not the minority. If we were, what we say would be gospel, that is how this country works now.


REPLY LINK


Albert


Ordinary real Australians are being sold out to Islam by ignorant politicians and arrogant un-Australian companies all in the name of a buck. Even though the Islamics themselves say of the ‘Zakat’ (tax):


6. “Fi sabi `Lillah. Those who are fighting in the Cause of Allah, e.g., the Mujahideen.”
 

(Support terrorism?)


7. “Ibn as’Sabil. The wayfarer; Muslim travelers who need assistance while on a journey.”
 

(Pay fares of those going to join ISIS in Iraq?)


Those running these companies aren’t able to programme their one brain cell to recognise that aiding and abetting Islamic terrorise is treason and apparently the government doesn’t want to know about it either.


This national disgrace is about more than just building jihadist training centres (Mosques). It is about supporting Sharia with plans to introduce it into Australia as soon as they have the numbers here to pull it off.


In the words of an leading Mullah, “At a meeting of the Islamic Global Halal Congress held in Pakistan, the former Grand Mufti of Bosnia, Mustafa Ceric called upon all Muslims to, “Conquer the world through the Halal movement, as Halal means pure and hygienic and the non-Muslim world will have no choice but to accept it.” He went on to say, “The Halal certification movement has the strength to lead Muslims to rule the global economy, as food and other services are the basic need of every human being”.


Wake up Australia and boycott halal products. Go to www.halalchoices.com.au and become informed about the realities of this Islamic extortion racket that you are paying for.

________________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Texts or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

About Morning Mail’s author Bret Harte:

 

Morning Mail does not want your real name or personal details as pen-names are the standard. Content character, not personal character. For a pen-name pick a quality, dead, non-Australian author. Jack London, Lord Byron, Bret Harte, Mary Shelley, Charlotte Bronte or let MM pick one. This provides a consistent look, and gives a spurious air of intellectualism to Morning Mail. (Contributor’s Page; Morning Mail; 10/24/13)

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment

Overview

  • : ubiquitous8thoughts
  • ubiquitous8thoughts
  • : This is a Christian Right blog. This means there is religious freedom, free speech, Constitutional Original Intent, Pro-Israel, Anti-Islamist and a dose of Biblical Morality (Pro-Life & anti-homosexual agenda) content in this blog.
  • Contact

Search

Links