Overblog Follow this blog
Administration Create my blog
September 14 2012 6 14 /09 /September /2012 17:47

John R. Houk

© September 14, 2012

 

In Libya U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens was murdered by an angry Islamic mob or perhaps an organized terrorist attack using the angry mob as cover. U.S. embassies in various other Muslim nations such as Egypt and Yemen to name a few have also been attacked by angry Muslim mobs.

 

Why?

 

http://api.ning.com/files/SWNcHQrxWYltHsfg6wIULRdixYAD6rt8wATOsJu0flBs0C6MI6eWHy4w1cbDfh3yPgEUA3hYpXehZZ8fA7dQ3GkK087XGRVH/MuhammedMohammedMuhammadactor.jpg

Picture Actor Portraying Islam

 

The media is reporting that Sam Bacile produced a fill entitled “The Innocence of Muslims”. It is now believed that Bacile (or Bassiel or Bassil) is a pseudonym for a person who might be Nakoula Basseley Nakoula (A separate report on Bacile-Nakoula from CNN). The movie was billed as an action/adventure telling the real story of Mohammed. The thing is this movie got a lot of play on the Internet in the Muslim world including an Arabic translation (the movie was filmed in English). Muslims find that the truth about Mohammed that is even written in their holy writings (Quran, Hadith, Sira, Sunna etc.) is insulting. I am guessing the insult is in the irreverent way non-Muslims disseminate the truth as written in Islamic holy writings. I have difficulty in imagining Mohammed’s story told in its entirety can be told reverently when it comes to the beheadings of Arab Jewish tribes and the taking of Jewish women as sex-slaves, concubines and/or wives. Mo instituted piracy and thieving-slave raids as a good thing because Mo heard from Allah that what benefitted Muslims and Mohammed is good when executed upon non-Muslims.

 

Mohammed’s example during life became the framework on how to treat non-Muslims when Islamic conquest branched out of the Arab Peninsula terrorizing Christians into converting to Islam to the north and west of the Arab Peninsula. Mohammed’s example was even more brutal in the conquest toward the east of the Arab Peninsula because those poor souls were regarded as polytheists rather than the People of the Book (i.e. Jews and Christians). The initial invasions of the Indian Sub-Continent was a job of convert or be exterminated of the remnant that was not enslaved for male manual labor or female sex-slavery.

 

This is a short exposé of Mohammed and the civilization he inspired that can be known as the Islamic World or Islamic Culture. Trust me – from a non-Muslim perspective there is much more you should know to understand that Islam is completely antithetical to Christianity and the Secularized Culture in the West that has evolved from Christianity. Islam has never evolved past a Middle Ages mindset.

 

In the Middle Ages professing Christians were fairly ignorant of what was written in the Holy Bible. Christians from peasantry to royalty for the most part only understood their faith from the Catholic Clergy in the West. The reason for this is that most Europeans were illiterate. Thus the Catholic Church placed a high importance on Church tradition rather than the specifics of Scripture. Tradition and Scripture do not necessarily concur with each other. Some Clergy began to view that Tradition began to stray too far from the Scriptures and began to advocate for the Church to draw closer to the Word of God rather than to stray to a Tradition that looks nothing like Scripture.

 

The Crusades were initiated out of the weariness of the Christian West being subject to slave and booty raids from Muslims ever encroaching on Christian Europe. Thus when it was reported that Muslims began to rob, prevent and/or kill Christian pilgrims journeying to the Holy Land, it became a good excuse for the Church hierarchy to rabble rouse European nobility and royalty to invade the Holy Land and wrest control away from the Muslims. From a Christian perspective the Crusades to the Holy Land was a Just War against the haters of Jesus Christ. HOWEVER, from a Scriptural perspective the Crusader armies committed ungodly and non-Christ-like actions similar to the same things the Muslims did in their conquest of Christian lands. As a supply line the Crusaders would ravage their way across Europe heading toward Constantinople (renamed Istanbul by Muslim conquerors).

 

During the era of the Crusades the city of Constantinople was the capital of what was left of the Byzantine Empire (Eastern Roman Empire that evolved into a Greek-centric culture). The Byzantines were a shell of their former glory. When the last Byzantine Emperors began to ask the West for help against the Saracen (Muslims), they did not think the Crusaders would eventually sack Constantinople on the way to the Holy Land.

 

The First Crusade began in 1096 and was responsible for setting up the near 200 years of the Latin Kingdom. The Fourth Crusade (1202 – 1261) sacked Constantinople in 1204. The Ninth and Last Crusade (1271-1272) began the demise of the Latin Kingdom in the Holy Land (1099-1187 [Fall of Acre 1291] Online book “LATIN KINGDOM OF JERUSALEM).

 

The Crusades essentially were the result of years of insult against Christianity. The murder of 3,000 Christian pilgrims (1065) making their way to the Holy Land was the last straw for a militant feudal society fairly ignorant of the actual principles laid out in the Holy Bible.

 

I am dwelling on the revisionism of academic Leftists and Muslim Apologists pertaining to the Crusades because it is the mindset that seeks justification for violence when Islam is insulted. The reality is Islam’s central tenets that Mohammed is the Last Prophet from God which Mo calls Allah with the implication that Allah is the same god of Abraham is offensive to Jews and Christians. The memorized sayings of Mohammed that were eventually recorded as the Quran calls the Holy writings of the Old and New Testament corrupted. Since Mo is plugged into Allah (I’m not sure if Mo is directly plugged into Allah or if Mo heard from Allah only through the Angel Gabriel or both), he can say the Word of God in the Old Testament (Torah and Tanakh for Jews) and the New Testament is corrupt.

 

As a Christian it would be wrong of me to speak about the Jewish belief of the Quran. I can say as a Christian the Quran is full of bologna written to cast a net upon then polytheistic Arabs to bring them under a charismatic leader and bound with the power of cultic beliefs to strengthen Mo’s and the later Companions’ hold over the Arab people. When the charismatic cultic leader died, the Companions would use the memorized sayings of Mohammed to ensure cultic control of the Arabs – the first believers of Mohammed.

 

It is obvious to any Christian that rewrote or I guess retold the OT and NT in a way that would make his fellow Arabs feel special and hope Jews and Christian would buy the revamped used car and join the party of blood lust, sex-slavery and conquest.

 

But you see the New Testament tells Christians that if anything is added or taken away from Scripture it will be an act to deceive Christians out of their Salvation provided in the death, burial and Resurrection of the One and Only Son of God that is also fully human in order to Redeem humanity from Satan’s grasp of this age.

 

1 But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who bought them, and bring on themselves swift destruction. 2 And many will follow their destructive ways, because of whom the way of truth will be blasphemed. 3 By covetousness they will exploit you with deceptive words; for a long time their judgment has not been idle, and their destruction does[a] not slumber. (II Peter 2: 1-3 NKJV)

 

18 For[a] I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add[b] to him the plagues that are written in this book; 19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away[c] his part from the Book[d] of Life, from the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

 

20 He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming quickly.”

Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus! (Rev. 22: 18-20 NKJV)

 

Islamic existence then is an offense to Christianity. Islam denies that Jesus is the Son of God. Islam denies that Jesus has the nature of being fully God and being fully human. Jesus’ Divinity made His humanity sin free unlike the rest of humanity that inherited Adam’s curse. This is the centrality of Christianity: The sin-free Jesus Christ was crucified to death as a sacrifice once and for all to Redeem humanity from Adam’s Fall from the Presence of God. Jesus is Resurrected as fully God reclaiming His Divine attributes that He gave up to live in a mortal human vessel. Jesus’ bodily Resurrection led Him to Ascend to Heaven to sit at the Right-hand of the Father ever interceding for the Believing Saints. Jesus promises to Return which will lead to the final defeat of all unbelievers that would rather believe in Satan’s deception. After Believers are certified in the Book of Life the New Earth is created. The New Heavenly Jerusalem is united with the New Earth then the New Heaven and the New Earth are united with all Redeemed humanity experientially knowing the very Will of God – no guessing, no tears, no toil and no fear of mortality nor the Second Death.  Islam denies this Christian centrality in totality.

 

Islam teaches that the Son of Promise is Ishmael rather than Isaac; hence Jacob renamed Israel and his progeny are not God’s Chosen People and Salvation then is not of the Jews. Islam teaches that Jesus is not the Son of God but only a human prophet in a prophetic line leading to Mohammed. Islam teaches that Jesus did not die on the Cross nor did He ever Resurrect in bodily form. Islam teaches eternal sexual pleasures for males that die in Jihad fighting non-Muslims (aka Infidels or kafir).

 

In essence Islam is a cultic offense to Christ and Christians!

 

Christians that understand the Word of God as found in the New Testament are taught not to take an offense when insulted for being a Christian. This is probably a key reason Americans as the most Christian-Conscious nation among nations with a Christian heritage don’t riot in the streets when Christ is offended by the ungodliness that Islam presents to the Christian faith in denying the Godhood and the Redemption of humanity in Christ Jesus the Lord.

 

If Christians were to ever comprehend just how much the religious existence of Islam is an insult to Christianity, those Christians that are more carnal natured than spiritual natured might indeed begin expressing anger toward Muslims living in America. Unlike the Muslim riots in Islamic nations in which the Quran teaches to kill those that insult Mohammed and Allah, Christians are taught in the Bible that vengeance for persecution and injustice against Christianity is the Lord’s to execute. We all know that there are those that tap into the Christian faith that might believe causing harm in the name of Jesus toward insulting non-Christians might indeed strike back on a more individual basis: e.g. Muslim store owners, Mosques, taxi drivers and so on in American society. In such cases I am squarely behind the rule of law and the First Amendment that such offenders that act out violence against Muslims (or any offending group of people: religiously, politically or [gasp] gender challenged) should be duly arrested and prosecuted for their crimes. However, not prosecuted according to Sharia Law which would lead to punishment of cruelty and inhumanity, but rather according the law of the land as backed by the U.S. Constitution.

 

I have to tell you though. I am becoming extremely wearisome of Muslims targeting Americans because they feel offended by our Free Speech Liberty. I find it more disgusting that Muslim governments are not doing more to protect American sovereign land which is what an Embassy and a Consulate IS.

 

I watched the trailer to “The Innocence of Muslims’. The acting is horrible. The dialogue is worthy of a homemade video made at someone’s house is idiotic. From an American perspective this movie would be more a parody of Mohammed’s negative side of life. From a Muslim perspective this movie would indeed be highly offensive. BUT COME ON! Attacking American Embassies in the Middle East who until the riots began had no connection or idea that such a movie was made is insanely STUPID!

 

VIDEO: Muhammad Movie Trailer

(Since the last time I viewed this video YouTube has placed a warning before viewing message. I don’t know how long YouTube will allow a video that insults Islam to stay up. Such is the hypocrisy of politically correct Free Speech.)


 

WORSE! Many of these rioting Muslims overseas are desecrating the American flag and raising the Black Flag of al Qaeda with praise for Osama bin Laden roughly on the anniversary of the Islamic terrorist attack on American soil on September 1, 2001.

 

As I was writing this I just saw Secretary State Hillary Clinton correctly condemn the “anti-Islam” movie; However Clinton finished her condemnation by saying something to the effect that “how dare someone make such a movie that insults ‘a great religion’ like Islam.”

 

I have to apologize to the Muslims that have chosen to live the peaceful tenets of Islam. I have probably already the realm of the insult for you. There is a side of Islam that I often describe as the dark side that is insidious, especially to Jews, Christians and Hindus. Quranic suras specifically led Imperialist Islam of the past to conquer, convert, dehumanize non-converters or kill non-believers of Islam for daring not to submit to Islamic Supremacism.

 

Sure Christianity had their share of atrocities in history, especially against Jews; however those atrocities were contrary to the Word of God. The atrocities of past Muslim Imperialism were in accordance to the Quran, Hadith and Sira of Islam.

 

This is where a Muslim Apologist invariables writes to me to say BS and other epithets I typically do not write. The favorite response is that there is no compulsion of religion in Islam. The Quranic sura is extremely deceptive. Lack of compulsion means there are choices offered to a non-Muslim which I have already touched on. The choice is Convert, become a subhuman dhimmi or die. You see, Islam does not compel your religious choice. When you freely choose between the three offers from Islam you are choosing rather than Islam compelling you.

 

The Muslim riots across the Muslim world are an example of Muslim intolerance to the civil rights of non-Muslims that the Left-Stain-Media cannot fail to show you. However, there are loads of Christians in the Muslim world that experience religious intolerance. Many Christians are menaced by Islamic Blasphemy laws in which Mohammed, Quran, Allah or Islam in general assign the accusation of insult. If a Christian shares about Redemption in Christ to a non-Muslim you have blasphemed Islam. If a Christian drinks out of a Muslim well you have blasphemed Islam. If a Muslim converts to Christianity you have blasphemed Islam. If you say in defense of your Christianity that Jesus is better than Mohammed is, you have blasphemed Islam. If you accuse Muslims of kidnapping your Christian daughter for marriage you have blasphemed Islam for interfering with Islamic conversion. If your Christian daughters are raped by a Muslim, your daughter is stoned to death for fornication or adultery. In honesty Muslim men pull the same junk on Muslim women as well. The message: if women are in a position where a rape can happen it is the woman’s fault and she must be punished. Welcome to Sharia Law.

 

I gotta tell ya.

 

Risking being told that I am an Islamophobic bigot against Muslims, I have come to the point that I am fed up with protecting the feelings of Muslims when the truth of the dark side of Islam is exposed. Muslims have no problem talking about the unscriptural dark side of Christianity’s history AND trust there is plenty of dark side in Christianity’s history. But I must reiterate that Christianity’s dark side was perpetrated by Christians doing atrocities that the Bible specifically condemns. Unlike in Islam in which theological duality can make contrary suras both true depending on the situation favorable to Islam or the concept of abrogation, Christianity has no such duality. There is right and wrong and forgiveness or unrepentance in Christianity.

 

So here’s the thing. Christians would not AND should not riot in the streets or single out Muslims with vigilante justice – it is not Scriptural. On the other hand it is time for Christians to speak up in Churches, at political precinct meetings or do something like join an ACT for America Chapter in your local area.

 

It is only when Christians are willing to promote their faith even if such promotion is insulting to Mohammed and Islam, will one not have to be embarrassed when a Leftist or Islamic Apologist tries to shut you down with the ad hominem insult of Islamophobe or bigot. Street Preachers go to the streets and proclaim the Good News of Jesus Christ. Go in extremely large groups to places like Dearborn, MI where Muslims began pelting Christians holding signs with cans, bottles and eventually stones. Even if you feel like a minority you must remember that Islam ONLY represents less than 2% of the U.S. population. America is a nation with a Christian heritage and NOT a Muslim heritage.

 

But REMEMBER! You are in America. Just because you have the First Amendment Right to speak and practice your faith peacefully, so also do the misled Muslims that are ignorant of Christ’s Salvation because of Quranic lies. It is not illegal to be a Muslim in America. Muslims have the right to be deceived by Islam as much as you have the right to enlighten a Muslim about the Salvation in Christ to a new and living life now in this age and the next life.

 

I am saying DO NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE SHOUTED DOWN from your Christian faith.

 

JRH 9/14/12

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
September 2 2012 1 02 /09 /September /2012 18:46

http://api.ning.com/files/JBeRfPa*Y6AcR8RZJMtGw62caA1BPZidAccQVX9-aoYcGiSZ0jhPNb8Z8506nPUJYsc2MbBSbN9kmfUpJdUfCLfRwDjYE481/NaziIslam.jpg

 

Ninety percent of Muslims in the world consider themselves Sunnis. Roughly the other ten percent consider themselves Shias. Both Sunnis and Shias have a concept of a Mahdi; however the description below is more akin to the Twelver Shias that dominate Iran (ancient Persia).

 

Here is a fifth installment of the Global Watch Special Report 2011.

 

JRH 9/1/12

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
August 25 2012 7 25 /08 /August /2012 13:00

http://api.ning.com/files/WGK0ehe3rFtgZo8pdmcMuK86un6inQEQN-uHN0mWzea5zJl2zhwg7JQzFM*kpkN3eHDTxIWDeY4XmZYNuAMfn17NZEdNPT1o/WhattheWestNeedstoKnowaboutIslam.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© August 25, 2012

 

Anders Breivik was recently convicted for his mass murder in Norway. There is no doubt Breivik created his delusional agenda by acting out from Counter-Jihad writers. That is a fair enough analysis. On the other hand it is an unfair conclusion to blame Counter-Jihad writers for Breivik’s mass murder.

 

Counter-Jihad writers do not expose the dark side of Islam to incite hate but rather to incite understanding and caution.

 

Why do non-Muslim Westerners need understanding and caution in relation to Islam?

 

It is Because Islamic Culture and Islamic Sharia Law is not compatible to Western Culture in concepts of Liberty and Freedom. This is especially the case with the United States of America which has Liberty and Freedom encoded in the Constitution’s First Amendment which touches on Religious Freedom, Free Speech, Free Press and the Freedom to Protest and to freely redress grievances to the government.

 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

So acceptance of Islam by Left Wing Multiculturalists is a path to destroying Western Culture as Muslim demand more and more acceptance of Islamic Supremacism inherent in their holy writings and Sharia Law.

 

Well that is my two-cents. Fjordman has some thoughts which I am cross posting from the Gates of Vienna. I am not going to include the Norwegian language version which can found at the end of the English version of Fjordman’s thoughts.

 

JRH 8/25/12

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
August 15 2012 4 15 /08 /August /2012 16:44

http://api.ning.com/files/jKKdfRBwElrgJtss4IExFtf1*zumXXYoiRseT4Y5vI2FFJEjWS-Dp*xuxdXiCc3I4cxl*sWWqB29i4*Cpf*QHVCfAaQ07UK8/SafwatHegazy.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© August 15, 2012

 

An esteemed (in Egypt) Muslim Brotherhood preacher proclaims, “We” - as in purist Radical Muslims – “will  be masters of the world.”

 

Dr. Safwat Hegazy is the same Muslim Brotherhood guy promoting a united Arab-Muslim nation with Jerusalem as the capital city. That Hegazy political position opens a can of worms the Western Media is failing to tell you.

 

It is openly usurping Israel’s capital city which in turn means the belief that Israel will cease to exist.

 

It is also proves that Arabs do not really view Arabs that call themselves Palestinians are a nationality. The so-called Palestinians would revert back to the political station of mere Arabs prior to the British Mandate for Palestine in 1917.

 

This all means forcing Israel to give land that is of their ancient heritage will not bring peace because Muslims propagandized with the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood have NO intention of living in peace with a Jewish Israel speck in their midst.

 

So why should American voters support politicians that call for the creation of a Palestinian State at the expense of Israel’s existence keep on voting for those politicians?

 

VIDEO: SHA

 


 


 

 

JRH 8/15/12

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
August 14 2012 3 14 /08 /August /2012 20:07

http://api.ning.com/files/C17EiH1KfPaI*OcOT-j2CyFxDmA10SDGey*xUOJKRr9D41fQ3aZrsFW8tItJHgx58gv2H5ziH-Ab0kbtu5*3zq89DfJps**n/EssamFathyAbdouKatihOssamaBahloul.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© August 14, 2012

 

Islamic Center of Murfreesboro (ICM) has won its legal battle to open their Mosque that was built even though there was a cease construction order on the State level in Tennessee. ICM went over the heads of the State level courts and got a Federal Judge to allow construction so the Mosque could open in time for the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.

 

If you live outside of Tennessee you might ask: So what? What’s the big deal? The First Amendment guarantees Religious Freedom to worship as we please, right?

 

Well you see the thing is the leadership of the ICM Mosque is a bunch of Radical Muslims that support the Muslim Brotherhood agenda for a Caliphate to rule the world under Islamic Supremacist intolerance for Religious Freedom, Free Speech and a whole slew of Civil Rights that Americans otherwise take for granted.

 

This Radical Islamic Mosque seems to have the Local and State authorities in their pockets because along with the Tennessee media they were in the tank to support the Sharia loving and anti-Constitution (no matter what a Muslim says – Sharia is anti-Constitution) ICM.

 

Justin O. Smith has some thoughts on the infiltration of Radical Islam into taxpayer supported institutions particularly in education relating to the ICM experience of using the Constitution to destroy the Constitution.

 

JRH 8/14/12

*****************************

Raise Your Voice America! /or Execrate Islamic "Education"

 

By Justin O. Smith

August 13, 2012 at 2:05pm

Justin Facebook Notes

 

Willful ignorance, a lack of real analysis and discernment and perspective, and the denial of documented history has been the mainstay of 'The Tennessean', as it uses contributors from the Univ of California at San Diego and Washington & Lee School of Law who have thrown ill-informed accusations of "racism" and "fear of losing influence" to counter arguments against building the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro, Sharia finance within U.S./Tenn governments and Sharia compliant rules and guidance for U.S./Tenn schools and textbooks. By conflating "racism" and a battle to halt the entry of the totalitarian, freedom-killing and anti-Human Rights core tenets of Sharia doctrine and Islam into the U.S. legal system, they have shown that they are truly ignorant of the ideas that comprise Sharia law and the evil and the threats that this Islamic ideology represents in America, or they are fully cognizant of the consequences of their actions and have joined the Left-Muslim alliance in an effort to neutralize and/or destroy the founding ideas of our nation, based on the marriage of Equality and Freedom and Christianity!

 

Essam Fathy, head of the ICM building committee, Imam Ossama Bahloul and Saleh Sbenaty, MTSU professor and ICM spokesperson, are sometimes heard praising Our U.S. Constitution. And why wouldn't they? This Sacred Document is their tool to our own destruction, as it is being used to advance the fascism of Sharia law and Islam... beguiled by the dhimmis, advocates and appeasers of Islam, such as Mayor Earnest Burgess and Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam. Bahloul recently stated after the ICM opened, "...religious freedom is a fact existing in this nation." If not for the fact that so many within the ICM are known Muslim Brotherhood members and Hamas supporters, I would find Bahloul almost believable. But, these men are less interested in "religious freedom" than they are in seeing the validation of Islam and forcing America's majority to accept Islam's demands. Otherwise, they would not be collaborating with CAIR and Abdoulrahman Kittah to implement and enact their Islamic agenda for schools and textbooks through the Rutherford County legal counsel, Angela McCloud.

 

The ICM's own views bely their assertions of a belief in Freedom and the U.S. Constitution, and those views are remarkably close in sentiment to Aliya Izetbegovic's views. From the ICM's 2008 website: "The main focus is to insure the Masjid/mosque has a stronghold on our community and to expand beyond religious teachings...We must work hard so that the ICM has a prominent role in the development and progression of not only Murfreesboro, but Middle Tennessee."

 

Consistent with Islamic thought and motivation and aligned with Sayeed Qubt's teachings, 'The Islamic Declaration' (1970) became a driving force in the Bosnian "civil war" when author Aliya Izetbegovic won the 1990 elections. Aliya asserted that Islam was incompatible with non-Islamic systems and that peace and coexistence could never occur between the Islamic "religion" and non-Islamic social and political institutions; wherever it takes root, Aliya contended Islam must create an Islamic republic, once it is strong enough. In this state, "it is particularly important that education and the media should be in the hands of people whose Islamic moral and intellectual authority is indisputable."

 

Before the war, Bosnian Muslims were highly secular in their perspectives, but returning mujhadeen/holy warriors from Afghanistan and an insertion of foreign Islamic fundamentalists soon influenced a shift. Muslims were promoted as the dominate group, although short of a majority. Islam expanded in the schools, and new textbooks emphasized the benefits of Ottoman rule. The government encouraged the Islamic religion and gave Muslims preference in hirings and promotions, in much the same manner as Pres. Obama's administration has proceeded. More importantly, the Bosnian military became Islamicized!

 

Just exactly what are the great contributions Islam has made to American society that its "scholars" should be given access and even any limited control over textbook contents? ... A new "terror" lexicon and innumerable plots against the U.S.? Does anyone really think it's a good idea to allow them access to our children's minds? We've already seen their Islamic schools in action at Dar al-Hijrah and the Saudi Islamic Centers in Virginia that exhibit textbooks rife with the most vile anti-Semitism and anti-American Islamic racism and propaganda.

 

In 1977, the Hamburg Symposium for the Euro-Arab Dialogue opened with a flurry of speeches expressing contempt for anyone questioning the doctrines of Islam, while exhalting (sic) the Islamic civilization as a "beacon of light." The Arab delegates exploited the opportunity for claiming once more the Islamic origins of Judaism and Christianity, for promoting Abraham as a prophet of Allah and Jesus Christ as a failed earlier version of Mohammed. And nobody had the strength of will and conviction to oppose this lie with an indignant yell, "Have you lost your mind?"

 

Why would we give any credence to Islamic imams' suggestions for our schools when their own "religion"/ideology is based on lies, and they consistently rewrite history to suit their agendas? Along with their Palestinian myth, Islamic scolars (sic) would have us believe, erroneously, that paper was invented by Muslims rather than the Chinese and that Damascus and Baghdad made Pericle's Athens and Augustus' Rome look like squalid villages. Most educated, intelligent people reconize (sic) that the study of blood circulation originated with Hippocrates, But Islamic scholars promote Ibn Sina, a Muslim, as the pioneer of this science.

 

America has already witnessed Muslim students force the removal of crucifixes from the walls of Catholic universities. How much longer before they demand that ordinary U.S. citizens cannot openly display their crosses, just as they have done in the U.K.? Along with the symbols of competing religions, Islam would like to ban the blasphemous works of Voltaire and Victor Hugo; biology too must be banned because it is "immodest" and deals with the human body and sex. And, of course, they cannot participate in gymnastics or swimming.

 

While some of our public schools and educators attempt to teach the full equality of men and women, private Islamic schools still teach the following: Women should be subservient to men, and Muslims must keep their distance from infidels. Muslims should view the democratic societies in which they live with contempt and regard them as transitory, destined to be replaced by an Islamic caliphate governed according to Sharia law. And, the reinforce the sexual morality that young Muslims learn at home, which allows polygamy for men, prescribes stoning to death female adulterers and rape victims but not the rapists, and demands the deaths of homosexuals.

 

America is infected by a plague of islamofascism in collusion with an indigenous fascism. Our presumed educators and school board officials scatter the infection even in elementary and pre-schools where showing a Nativity scene or a Santa with toys is considered an insult to Muslim children; and, exponentially more intensified in the high schools and exacerbated in the universities, the lies are perpetuated through indoctrination as history is rewritten and falsified. Islam is presented to Americans as a religion of tolerance, peace and mercy as seen in MTSU's philosophy department. Historical fact notes "the Big Lie" and tells quite a different story."

 

Far too many Americans are enduring this despotism on all levels of government, from the White House and the Dept of Justice right down to the Rutherford County Commission and School Board and the ICM Board, either from ignorance, fear or pure complacent apathy. Many do not realize that their silence or submission helps the new combined nazifascism of the Left-Muslim alliance to grow. I hope You are listening America, because I don't want to be like one of the forgotten anti-fascists who warned against Mussolini and Hitler seventy or eighty years ago. And those who ignored the warning suffered the shame and infamy of their choices!

 

How much longer will it be before our educators demand of our children that anytime they may have an occassion (sic) to write the name "Mohammed," it must be followed with "PBUH"... "peace be upon him"?!? This battle is for nothing less than the very essence of Freedom... Freedom's nature!

 

By Justin O. Smith

_________________________

 

Intro to Raise Your Voice America!/or Execrate Islamic "Education"

John R. Houk

© August 14, 2012

________________________

Raise Your Voice America!/or Execrate Islamic "Education"

 

Justin’s Facebook Page

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
August 6 2012 2 06 /08 /August /2012 19:56

http://api.ning.com/files/JxgpmmSkRcuhMQAqFALmM0XIDwiqqwq5Ui4lFpGD0*uvS7kxVFLHITvrONCpJtIT38WCgA3ZjqwpCgn2SUYa*OlvFG5O*Uy5/ShariainAmericatoon.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© August 6, 2012

 

The Rutherford Reader is a free local and weekly newspaper with circulation in the Murfreesboro, TN area as well as 43,000 online subscribers. The Reader’s money base is third party advertising for the Murfreesboro area.

 

So what, right?

 

The Reader is a local bastion against Radical Islam in its area making the newspaper a target for Radical Muslims pretending to be moderate and Multicultural Leftists. In the case of Murfreesboro, most of the large circulating Tennessee newspapers rag on the Reader (especially The Tennessean) as the local hate-speech and bigoted media.

 

The thing is there isn’t an iota of truth to the accusations. The Reader is simply having journalist contributors and perhaps the publisher report on the local Mosque which has deep pocket connections to Radical Islam. Unless you have been in a coma since September 2001 you do know America was attacked by the Radical Muslim transnational terrorist organization known as al Qaeda. The USA has been involved in the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) since 911. So whether bureaucrats in the U.S. government publicly recognize that war or not Islam in its so-called radical form has been at war ever since.

 

HENCE, after a Mosque engages with Muslim-American organizations that have ties with the Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas or whatever terrorist organization, it is noble for a local newspaper to buck Liberal Multiculturalism and report on Radical Islam and/or the speakers promoting a Radical Islamic agenda for America. AND in case you have been victimized by Muslim Apologists, that Islamic agenda is not pretty or copacetic for Constitutional America especially as related to the Bill of Rights.

 

One of the contributing journalists to the Reader is Justin O. Smith. Justin is also a defender of the Reader when Muslim Apologists and Multicultural Leftists wrongly go after the Reader rather than say a newspaper like The Tennessean which has been caught lying to support in print Radical Islam in Tennessee.

 

On Facebook I found such a defense from Justin and I am cross posting it below.

 

JRH 8/6/12

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
August 1 2012 4 01 /08 /August /2012 10:47

I post on a few social blogs as well as my primary blog SlantRight 2.0. At my blog at the TCU I posted “Bell Exposes the Liars Supporting Murfreesboro Radical Islam.” A comment there deserves to be shared en masse.

 

The written comment is followed by an extremely humorous video from 2008. The comment reads “I suggest that Murfreesboro start buying up property and do what our friend in Katy, Texas did.”

 

Followed by the video:

 

pig race mosque pt 2

 


 


 

JRH 8/1/12 (Hat Tip: Shayn Roby)

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
July 22 2012 1 22 /07 /July /2012 19:02

 

http://api.ning.com/files/--Z44IZLRd1fWySiBc6gIBC-f7P0D8gvF0SwT-wMIqJq4NfeTd5BTJav0HA6y3YEj91iDvWeqUKYTO0vCSGmJgEgH8a5qgAh/HillaryClintonSalehaS.MahmoodAbedin.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© July 22, 2012

 

The Leftist Mainstream Media (MSM) - sometimes recognized as the lamestream media – in collusion with Muslim apologists have attacked Rep. Michele Bachmann and four other Congressmen have been attacked as bigoted Islamophobes for demanding an investigation to Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in the U.S. government.

 

Although I don’t have an irrational fear of Muslims as connoted by the epithet of Islamophobe, I like to think I wear the Islamophobe badge proudly. Islamophobia could better be defined as a rational caution relating to the agenda of Radical Islam to force an international Caliphate on the world that if they are sane will have nothing to do with the anti-Liberty principles inherent within Sharia Law.

 

As such Radical Islamic proponents view that there are two enemies to be destroyed; i.e. the little Satan Israel and the great Satan America.

 

Now that Egyptian voters have elected a Muslim Brotherhood (MB) candidate to be President of Egypt, the MB is now or should be recognized as a transnational organization that government National Security interests should be focusing on. Somewhat in the same way (hopefully) there is a National Security watch on Iran.

 

The MB is big on the concept that the USA is the big Satan that must be destroyed by infiltrating America to create the environment that will allow Islam to overcome the U.S. Constitution. You Need to READ:

 

§  The Muslim Brotherhood "Project"

 

§  The Muslim Brotherhood "Project" (Continued) – “The Project” Translated

 

§  MB General Strategic Goal for the Group In North America (The English Translation after the original Arabic)

 

So when U.S. Congressmen recognize there are individuals with ties to the MB or an MB affiliate in the U.S. government and desire an investigation then that is NOT bigotry! Rather an investigation is awareness that something is afoot that endangers the U.S. Constitution of which every government employee up to and including the Office of President of the United States is sworn to uphold. If there are people in government that have sworn to uphold the Constitution OR at the very least work in a government Office sworn to uphold the Constitution yet desire the Constitution’s demise, then those people need to be excised from government responsibility at the very least. If there is an “at most” a criminal investigation must occur to discover if our nation has been harmed internally.

 

I am glad that the Center for Security Policy (CSP) has put together an exposé of Huma Abedin’s mother Saleha S. Mahmood Abedin. Huma Abedin is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s close aide. That means she has access to Classified materials that her MB mother might be interested in acquiring. That would not be good for America. Below is the CSP email sent to highlight a free PDF document entitled “Ties that Bind? THE VIEWS AND AGENDA OF HUMA ABEDIN’ S IS LAMI S T MOTHER”.  

 

JRH 7/22/12 (The CSP email can be read at SlantRight 2.0 below this point)

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
July 20 2012 6 20 /07 /July /2012 23:59

http://api.ning.com/files/FrwZt*9W4pcipMJ8WPpl-IvHSn7OUeC-4KxjKcyrJlo8SdkI7KqcKh7MlPegcnNBrSe1lL5m-1WOciAJ6rlooBEHG987X7uk/RadicalIslamandKafir.jpg

 

John R. Houk

© July 21, 2012

 

WND has undoubtedly paid attention to a little known Radical Islamic group known as United Muslim Nations International since the group threatened WND with an or else if the Internet magazine did not cease from criticizing Islam.

 

On July 7, 2012 WND released an article entitled, “Muslims: Wipe Christianity from Face of Earth.” The article caused quite a stir among expose Islam bloggers big dog and little dog. The thing is WND did not post the link to the UMN Intl. 23 page document. In fact Pamela Geller’s post on the WND article linked to Michael Rubin and Robert Spencer saying to the effect the 23 page document was typical Radical Islamic material; however the links at Atlas Shrugs pointing Rubin and Spencer are now dead links. Now I don’t know if the links were posted incorrectly or if the Rubin and Spencer sources links were removed or changed. I would not have thought anything about it except a Google+ friend found the PDF 23 page document she believes that WND is referring to. She did not find a specific reference of any outright call to wipe Christianity off the face of the Earth. She asked for my thoughts and sent me a link she had found.

 

I went to the PDF document and downloaded it in case it disappeared from the Internet. I have now just finished reading it fairly close manner.

 

I have to concur with Linda that the PDF document does not specify the genocide of Christians from planet Earth.

 

However, the PDF document is clearly written in the purist style of Radical Islam and once you get past the flowery theology of what a good Muslim is, the document indeed push Muslim readers to follow the example of Mohammed and the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs in its brutal conquest and conversion of NON-Muslims to Islam. Of the author does not write of the brutality of conquest but of the glory of Islam and how good old Allah was their protector and guide for the Islamic Golden Age.

 

There are definite references to NON-Muslims and Muslims described as hypocrites (i.e. Moderate Muslims) are kafir (unbelievers). The kafir are not to be trusted or treated nicely, indeed they must be punished and killed if they withstand the author’s perceived New World Order of a new Islamic Caliphate.

 

So there is an insinuation to wipe Christians off the face of the Earth but in all honesty not just Christians. Any kafir is worthy of death in resisting Islam and Islamic Sharia Law.

 

There are a lot of references that Muslims must treat Mohammed as the perfect example of how a Muslim should live and how a Muslim should treat NON-Muslims. Let’s look at this perfect man.

 

 

Muhammad was born around 570 AD to a widowed mother who died just six years later.  He grew up poor and orphaned on the margins of society, which was controlled by tribal chiefs and trading merchants.  He worked for his uncle, Abu Talib, as a camel herder.  Although his uncle had some standing in the community, Muhammad himself did not rise above his lowly station until he was 25, when he met and married a wealthy widow, Khadija, who was 15 years older.

 

His wife's trading business not only nurtured Muhammad's natural talents of persuasion, but it also gave the successful salesman an opportunity to travel and acquire knowledge that was not as accessible to the local population.  He would later use this to his advantage by incorporating the stories that he had come across into his "revelations" from Allah, particularly the tales from the earlier religions, Judaism and Christianity. 

 

Having attained a comfortable lifestyle and the idle time that wealth affords, Muhammad would wander off occasionally for periods of meditation and contemplation.  It is quite likely that he was experiencing the symptoms of a midlife crisis, including a desire for personal accomplishment and meaning.

 

One day, at the age of 40, he told his wife that he had been visited by the angel Gabriel in a dream.  Thus began a series of "revelations" which lasted almost until his death 23 years later.  The Qur’an is a collection of words that Muhammad attributed to Allah.  The Hadith is a collection of narrations of the life and deeds of Muhammad.  The Sira is his recorded biography.  The Sunnah is said to be Muhammad's way of life, on which Islamic law (Sharia) is based.

 

With his wife’s influence and support, Muhammad proclaimed himself a prophet in same "lineage" as that of Abraham and Jesus, and began trying to convert those around him to his new religion.  He narrated the Quran to those who believed him, telling them that it was the word of Allah (heard only by himself, of course).

 

 

Relations with the Meccans turned particularly sour after an episode known as "the Satanic Verses" in which Muhammad agreed to recognize the local gods in addition to Allah.  This delighted the Meccans, who generously extended their welcome.  But Muhammad soon changed his mind after his own people began to lose faith in him.  He claimed that Satan had spoken through him, and he rescinded recognition of the Meccan gods (Tabari 1192, Quran 22:5253:19-26). 

 

 

To deal with this unpleasant truth, sympathetic narratives of the early Meccan years usually exaggerate the struggle of the Muslims with claims that they were "under constant torture."  They may also include apocryphal accounts that are unsupported by earliest and most reliable historians (see MYTH: Persecution of Muslims at Mecca - Many Deaths).

 

Modern storytellers and filmmakers (such as those behind 1976's The Message) have even been known to invent fictional victims of Meccan murder, either to dramatize their own tale or to provide justification for the "revenge killings" that followed.  But, in fact, the only Muslim whose life was truly in danger was that of Muhammad - after 13 years of being allowed to mock the local religion.  (See also MYTH: Muhammad was Tortured at Mecca).

 

 

It was at Medina that Islam evolved from a relatively peaceful religion borrowed from others and into a military force that was intended to govern all aspects of society.  During these last ten years of Muhammad's life, infidels were evicted or enslaved, converted upon point of death and even rounded up and slaughtered depending on expediency.

 

To fund his quest for control, Muhammad first directed his followers to raid Meccan caravans in the holy months, when the victims would least expect it.  This was despite the fact that the Meccans were not bothering him in Medina (see MYTH: Muhammad and his Muslims were Persecuted by the Meccans at Medina).

 

Muhammad provided his people with convenient revelations "from Allah" which allowed them to murder innocent drivers and steal their property (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 426).  The people around him gradually developed a lust for things that could be taken in battle, including material comforts and captured women and children.  (See also MYTH: Muhammad Raided Caravans to Retrieve Stolen Property).

 

Often the people captured in battle would be brought before the self-proclaimed prophet, where they would plead for their lives, arguing, for example, that they would never have treated the Muslims that way.  The traditions are quite clear in portraying Muhammad as largely unmoved by their pleas, and ordering their deaths anyway, often by horrible means.  In one case, he orders a man slain, telling him that “Hell” will take care of the poor fellow’s orphaned daughter (Ishaq 459).  (See also MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed Captives)

 

The raids on caravans preceded the first major battle involving a Muslim army, the Battle of Badr.  This was the spot where the Meccans had sent their own army to protect their caravans from Muslim raiders.  Although, Muslims today like to claim that they only attack others in self-defense, this was clearly not the case in Muhammad's time.  In fact, he had to compel his reluctant warriors with promises of paradise and assurances that their religion was more important than the lives of others.  (See also MYTH: The Battle of Badr was Defensive).

 

 

First, to try and gain their favor, Muhammad briefly preached that Christians and Jews could attain salvation through their own faith.  In fact, he changed his followers' direction for prayer from Mecca to Jerusalem, which prompted the Jews' tolerance of him while he worked surreptitiously for the power to evict them.  These earlier concessions and teachings were later revoked by Muhammad, since the Jews ultimately refused his religion.  The rare early verses of tolerance in the Quran are abrogated by later verses such as 9:29.

 

 

While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out and said, "Let us go to the Jews" We went out till we reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle."  Bukhari 53:392

 

The Jews of Mecca were the first in a very long line of unfortunate people to be offered the opportunity to convert to Islam under obvious duress.  Forcible conversion is very much a Muslim tradition started by Muhammad (see MYTH: Muhammad Rejected Conversions to Islam made under Duress)

 

Since they chose to hold on to their religion (and their property) Muhammad looked for reasons to go to war against the Jews at Medina.  According to some Muslims, the first tribe, the Qaynuqa, were driven from their homes and land on the pretext that one of their own had harassed a Muslim woman.  Although the offender was killed prior to this by a Muslim, the Muslim was also killed by Jews in retaliation for the first murder.

 

After laying siege to the entire community and defeating the tribe, Muhammad wanted to put every male member to death, but was talked out of it by an associate - something that Allah later "rebuked" him for.  The Qaynuqa were forced into exile and the Muslims took their possessions and property, making it their own.  Muhammad personally reserved a fifth of the ill-gotten gain for himself (a rule that he was sure to include in the Quran).

 

 

The Jews of the Banu Qurayza tasted Muhammad's wrath after their leader half-heartedly sided with the Meccan army during a siege of Medina (the Battle of the Trench).  By then, Muhammad had evicted the other Jews and declared that all land at Medina belonged to him, so the original constitution of the town was no longer in effect.  It is important to note that the Qurayza did not attack the Muslims, even after switching loyalties (contrary to another popular myth).

 

Although the Qurayza surrendered peacefully to the Muslims, Muhammad determined to have every man of the tribe executed, along with every boy that had reached the initial stages of puberty (between the ages of 12 and 14).  He ordered a ditch dug outside of the town and had the victims brought to him in several groups.  Each person would be forced to kneel, and their head would be cut off and then dumped along with the body into the trench.

 

Between 700 and 900 men and boys were slaughtered by the Muslims after their surrender. (Bold Emphasis Mine)

 

The surviving children of the men became slaves of the Muslims, and their widows became sex slaves.  This included the Jewish girl, Rayhana, who became one of Muhammad's personal concubines the very night that her husband was killed.  The prophet of Islam apparently "enjoyed her pleasures" (ie. raped her) even as the very execution of her people was taking place.

 

 

At one point following a battle, Muhammad provided instructions on how women should be raped after capture, telling his men not to worry about coitus interruptus, since "Allah has written whom he is going to create."  (See also MYTH: Muhammad Never Approved of Rape)

 

Following the battle against the Hunain, late in his life, Muhammad's men were reluctant to rape the captured women in front of their husbands (who were apparently still alive to witness the abomination), but Allah came to the rescue with a handy "revelation" that allowed the debauchery.  (This is the origin of Sura 4:24 according to Abu Dawud 2150).

 

 

Not content with waiting for Allah to act on his behalf, Muhammad had personal critics executed, including poets.  One of these was a mother of five children, who was stabbed to death by Muhammad's envoy after a suckling infant was removed from her breast (see MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed Women).  Other innocent people were killed merely because they were of a different religion, sometimes including children (see MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed Children).

 

 

An elderly woman named Umm Qirfa once ran afoul of Muhammad merely by fighting back when her tribe was targeted by Muslim raiders.  Muhammad's adopted son tied the woman's legs separately to two camels, then set the camels off in opposite directions, tearing the woman's body in two.  He also killed her two sons - presumably in gruesome fashion - and made her daughter into a sex slave.  (See also MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed the Elderly).

 

… (The Life of Muhammad: An Inconvenient Truth; TheReligionofPeace.com; Read Entirety)

 

I apologize for the time spent on Mohammed’s real biography. In some fair play for Muslims that have been indoctrinated on the goodness of Mohammed, there are plenty of Quran, Hadith and Sira that do indeed show a good Mohammed. The good Mohammed is what is preached to Muslims at their Mosques. Just as there is plenty of bad news in the Bible of people considered good men in the Old and New Testament it exists for humanity to know that as people we are not perfect. The Christian Bible points to Jesus the Christ as both fully man and fully God. Christ’s humanity was needful for humanity to be Redeemed from Satan’s grasp. Thus Christ in the New Testament is often referred as the Last Adam because as a man he born perfect because  His Father is God. Mohammed on the other hand example of a typical man that may have indeed started out with a good agenda; however as Mohammed increased in power, power definitely corrupted.

 

This is the document [That can be read below this point at SlantRight 2.0] that WND claims a Muslim Cleric is to have said all Christian must be killed. Portions I placed in Bold Italics followed by “Mine” are sections to take notice as misleading, deceptive or downright violent.

 

JRH 7/21/12 (Hat Tip: Linda Strawn)

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment
July 17 2012 3 17 /07 /July /2012 12:18

Rep. Andre Carson a Democrat from Indiana and one of two Muslims currently in Congress at an ICNA conference gave a speech claiming American Public Schools should model curriculum after Muslim Madrassas.

 

Dems and Leftists rail against Christianity having an influence in American schools yet this Muslim calls for an Islamic model to take over Public American Education – what is that? Carson has a reputation as a Black Muslim racist with roots back to racist Louis Farrakhan the leader of the Nation of Islam (NOI).

 

ACT for America has sent an email that asks to be forwarded to friends which includes two videos of Brigitte Gabriel talking about the Carson-Madrassas idiocy and the other that includes Rep. Louie Gohmert a Republican from Texas placing into the Congressional record ACT’s open letter opposition to the relatively new FBI counterterrorism training materials that ridiculously tries to guard the feelings of Muslims that may be suspected of Islamic terrorism.

 

JRH 7/17/12

*****************************

ACT! for America in the news

 

Sent by ACT for America

Sent: 7/17/2012 10:28 AM

 

Last week, Brigitte Gabriel appeared on Hannity to discuss Rep. Andre Carson’s outrageous assertion that our public schools should be modeled after Islamic madrassas.

Also last week, Rep. Louie Gohmert spoke eloquently about protecting freedom as he introduced into the Congressional Record the ACT! for America open letter to Congress opposing revisions to FBI counterterrorism training materials.

Both short video clips are available for viewing below. Please forward this email to others you think might be interested, and encourage them to sign up for our email alerts at www.ACTforAmerica.org.

 

VIDEO: Brigitte Gabriel on Modeling US Schools After Madrassas, White House & Muslim Brotherhood

 


 


 

 

VIDEO: Rep. Gohmert Introduces ACT! for America's Letter on FBI Counter-Terrorism Training Materials

 


 


 

____________________________

ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

Repost 0
Published by ubiquitous8thoughts - in Counterjihad
write a comment

Overview

  • : ubiquitous8thoughts
  • ubiquitous8thoughts
  • : This is a Christian Right blog. This means there is religious freedom, free speech, Constitutional Original Intent, Pro-Israel, Anti-Islamist and a dose of Biblical Morality (Pro-Life & anti-homosexual agenda) content in this blog.
  • Contact

Search

Links